Puppet Masters
Opinion polls in the United States and the United Kingdom have found that a majority of the public in both countries has a remarkably consistent belief that only about 10,000 Iraqis were killed as a result of the U.S.-British invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Estimates of deaths in Iraq actually range from 150,000 to 1.2 million. Part of the reason for the seriously misguided public perception may come from a serious belief in guided weapons, according to what the government tells people about "precision" bombing. But one must ask how so many people can be killed if these weapons are so "precise," for instance in one of "the most precise air campaigns in military history," as a Pentagon spokesman characterized the total destruction last year of Raqqa in Syria.
The dreadful paradox of "precision weapons" is that the more the media and the public are wrongly persuaded of the near-magical qualities of these weapons, the easier it is for U.S. military and civilian leaders to justify using them to destroy entire villages, towns and cities in country after country: Fallujah, Ramadi and Mosul in Iraq; Sangin and Musa Qala in Afghanistan; Sirte in Libya; Kobane and Raqqa in Syria.
This war was initiated as a 'proxy' war to be fought by their Gulf underlings, but defeats and setbacks have increasingly led Western countries to have more direct involvement. Already deeply implicated from the start - not only through the arming and training of Saudi and Emirati militaries, but also by playing a leading role with Western officers embedded in the targeting rooms, not to mention the high-level "Yemen quartet" for war planning - Western forces now appear to be openly involved in the latest escalation.
Le Figaro recently revealed that French secret service personnel are deployed on the ground in Yemen, whilst US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo explicitly green-lighted the operation on the port, something the US has - until now - held back from doing.
Comment: Interesting parallel and timing of Israel's and Saudi Arabia's illegal annexations and subsequent barriers to rightful indigenous peoples threatening their respective land grabs. Not surprising these two like-minded, black-hearted regimes are still in cahoots and doubling down on their interests by eliminating respective opposing populations.
C.J. Polychroniou: Noam, I want to start by asking for your reading of what took place at the Singapore summit, and the way this event was covered in the US media.
Noam Chomsky: It's reminiscent of Sherlock Holmes and the dog that didn't bark. What was important was what didn't happen. Unlike his predecessors, Trump did not undermine the prospects for moving forward. Specifically, he did not disrupt the process initiated by the two Koreas in their historic April 27 [Panmunjom] Declaration, in which they "affirmed the principle of determining the destiny of the Korean nation on their own accord" (repeat: on their own accord), and for the first time presented a detailed program as to how to proceed. It is to Trump's credit that he did not undermine these efforts, and in fact made a move toward facilitating them by cancelling the US-South Korean war games, which, as he correctly said, are "very provocative." We would certainly not tolerate anything of the sort on our borders - or anywhere on the planet - even if they were not run by a superpower which not long before had utterly devastated our country with the flimsiest of pretexts after the war was effectively over, glorying in the major war crimes it had committed, like bombing major dams, after there was nothing else to bomb.
Beyond the achievement of letting matters proceed, which was not slight, no "diplomatic skills" were involved in Trump's triumph. The coverage has been quite instructive, in part because of the efforts of the Democrats to outflank Trump from the right. Beyond that, the coverage across the spectrum illustrates quite well two distinct kinds of deceit: lying and not telling relevant truths. Each merits comment.
Comment: Quite an answer to one question.
Defense Secretary James Mattis' trip is scheduled for June 26-28 and comes as part of his Asian tour spanning across China, South Korea and Japan, the Pentagon said in a press release. This will be the first time a US defense chief is visiting China since 2014.
Mattis, nicknamed 'Mad Dog' during his military career, has launched a number of verbal attacks on China recently. This time, he chose a less combative tone while speaking of his upcoming discussions in Beijing.
"I want to go in right now without basically poisoning the well at this point. I'm going there to have a conversation," Mattis told reporters en route to a stop in Alaska, AP reports. "I do not want to immediately go in with a certain preset expectation of what they are going to say. I want to go in and do a lot of listening."There is little known about Mattis' agenda, but a senior US official told AP that he will focus on improving military-to-military dialogue and will avoid opening talks with "the irritants." Instead the Pentagon chief will lay out America's position on the Chinese military buildup in the South China Sea.
Comment: None of us really own any parts of the Earth, do we? Aren't we all its guests, behaving rather badly? This meeting is unlikely to produce any solutions or agreements, more like a size-up of positions and assessment of vulnerabilities.
The People's Bank of China has announced first steps towards easing monetary policy, pledging to boost demand for the national currency. The regulator said it would cut the amount of cash reserves for some banks by 0.5 basis points and unleash some 700 billion yuan ($108 billion) of liquidity to accelerate the pace of debt-for-equity swaps and support smaller companies.
The measure, which takes effect July 5, is expected to weaken the national currency and consequently make Chinese goods taxed by the US cheaper. Tariffs announced by President Trump earlier this month will come into force on the same date.
Chinese policymakers have been pushing for debt-for-equity swaps since late 2016 to ease pressure on corporations struggling with their debts.
Why it matters: Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and UN Ambassador Nikki Haley said in their announcement yesterday that one of the reasons for the U.S. withdrawal was the council's bias against Israel. Yesterday, Prime Minister Netanyahu welcomed the U.S. announcement and called the decision "a courageous decision against the hypocrisy and the lies of the so-called UN Human Rights Council."
Despite Netanyahu's remarks, senior Israeli foreign ministry officials tell me the timing of the U.S. withdrawal is problematic because it comes a few months before current UN human rights commissioner Prince Zaid Bin Raad ends his term. The said they hoped the U.S. would at least stay in the council until after the new commissioner's appointment, in order to ensure the person appointed for the job is more balanced.
The Israeli officials say there are at least two big anti-Israeli initiatives which will be much harder to block or deal with now that the U.S. has left the council:
- The publication of the database or "blacklist" of Israeli and international companies which operate in the Jewish settlements in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. A few months ago, U.S. pressure led the U.N. human rights commissioner to postpone the publication of the list.
- The formation of a commission of inquiry on the violent clashes on the border between Israel and Gaza. The council has decided to form the inquiry, but Israeli officials tell me they are concerned that without the U.S. it will be close to impossible to influence the commission's composition, mandate and conclusions.

France's President Emmanuel Macron welcomed Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez to the Élysée Palace on June 23.
"We can not have countries that benefit hugely from EU solidarity and claim national self-interest when it comes to the issue of migrants," he said at a press conference in Paris alongside Spain's new Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez.
"I am in favour of sanctions being imposed in the event of no cooperation," he said.
On the eve of a mini-summit about the divisive migration issue, the two leaders also declared support for the creation of closed reception centres where migrants would be held while their asylum claims are considered.
Comment: As the following tweet shows, the EU is teetering on the edge and punishing countries which have voted against uncontrolled mass migration may just bring about its demise even faster:
- Migrant controversy has Merkel's govt falling apart
- Any new migrant crisis could finish Europe
- Growing number of European countries now strongly refusing to accept the unchecked influx of migrants - and their reasons why
- Dysfunctional Macron and Merkel's plan to put burden of dealing with asylum seekers on countries where they first registered could split Europe
- Soros looks to gain from investments with European 'forced migration'
- Macron calls for "full force" EU integration and "yield nothing" to national sovereignty
- Behind the Headlines: Mass immigration: Wall 'em out of Fortress Europe and the Trump State?
- The Truth Perspective: Weapons of Mass Migration: Interview with Michael Springmann on Europe's Migrant Crisis
The report was first disclosed rather quietly late on a Friday evening three weeks ago in the Wall Street Journal, and subsequent reports indicated more and more details in terms of both the intent and the stage of planning conducted for these meetings. Hopes are rising that this meeting will lead to a normalization of relations between the US and Russia.
Over the past two weeks, the press has tried to destroy this narrative.
First, the "crisis" of immigrants on the border in connection with the application of the existing policy that separates children of illegal aliens from their parents if their parents were imprisoned for a crime.

Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan leaves the voting booth at a polling station in Istanbul, Turkey on June 24, 2018.
With over 97.2 percent of votes counted, the head of Turkey's High Electoral Board (YSK) says Erdogan has secured more than 50 percent of the votes needed for the victory.
In the parliamentary election, his AK Party is also in first place with over 45 percent. The pro-Kurdish People's Democratic Party (HDP) will also enter the parliament after passing the 10 percent threshold, according the board's head, Sadi Guven. Turnout was at 87 percent for both polls, preliminary data shows.
Speaking at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) retreat in Martha's Vineyard on Friday, Warner, an ardent proponent of the Russiagate narrative, implied that the lingering Mueller probe will finally bring out something worthy of attention in the coming weeks.
"If you think you've seen wild stuff so far, buckle up. It's going to be a wild couple of months," he told the crowd of around 100 people, according to Politico.













Comment: As long as 'the myth' stays alive, countries will be buying bombs and the lucrative market for the MIC will remain in business, no matter the headcount - fudged or not.