Biden has the support of 53 percent of registered voters in the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll released early Sunday, compared to Trump's 39 percent.

Biden's lead increased 8 percentage points from a poll before last week's debate, NBC News noted, adding that the former vice president's current advantage over Trump is his largest of the 2020 campaign.

Almost half of respondents - 49 percent - told pollsters that Biden did a better job in the debate, which was marked by repeated interruptions and personal insults. Roughly one-quarter - 24 percent - said Trump did better.

Approximately three in four registered voters - 73 percent - said the debate would have no effect on their vote.

Trump's job approval rating also fell 2 percentage points in the new survey to 43 percent.

Fifty-eight percent of respondents said Biden has the better temperament to be president, compared to 26 percent who selected Trump.

Biden also holds an edge over the president on topics including race relations, health care and the coronavirus.

Trump is still the choice of more respondents on the economy, although his support slipped 3 points in the new poll.

Respondents were also split on Trump's nominee to succeed the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. Thirty-five percent support Amy Coney Barrett's nomination, 33 percent oppose it and 30 percent say they need more information.

The poll of 800 registered voters was conducted between Sept. 30 and Oct. 1, before Trump's positive coronavirus test was announced. It has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.

Even though President Trump did most of the talking, debate watchers tend to see Democrat Joe Biden as the winner, although a sizable number remain undecided.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 84% of Likely U.S. Voters watched at least part of the first presidential debate between Trump and Biden. Of these voters, 44% say Biden won versus 36% who claim Trump is the winner. But 20% are not sure.(To see survey question wording, click here.)

Thirteen percent (13%) of the debate watchers said the debate changed their mind about whom they're going to vote for.

Republicans (91%) are more likely to have watched the debate than Democrats (84%) and voters not affiliated with either major party (78%).

Sixty-three percent (63%) of GOP watchers think Trump won. Seventy-two percent (72%) of Democrat watchers disagree and see Biden as the winner. Among unaffiliated voters, 39% say Biden won, 32% Trump, but 29% are not sure.

Republicans (19%) are more likely than Democrats (12%) and unaffiliateds (7%) to say the debate changed their mind.

The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted September 30-October 1, 2020 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Following Trump's announcement of a U.S. Supreme Court nominee just weeks before Election Day, Biden has jumped out to an eight-point lead in Rasmussen Reports' weekly White House Watch survey. The survey released Wednesday does not include reaction to the first Trump-Biden debate.

Eight vs. 14 points. Quite the difference between Rassmussen and NBC/WSJ

The older the voter, the more likely they are to believe Biden won the debate. But roughly 20% of voters of all ages are undecided.

Those under 40 are far more likely than their elders to say the debate changed their mind about whom they're going to vote for.

Blacks (72%) were less likely to watch the debate than whites (84%) and other minority voters (92%). Debate watchers in all three groups give Biden the win. Blacks are the most convinced he won, but they are also the most likely to be undecided.

Twenty percent (20%) of other minority voters say the debate changed their mind about whom they're going to vote for, compared to 11% of both whites and blacks.

• Trump and the Gordian Knot, year three
• Why Navalny was handed over to Germany
• Germany offered to build $1.2 billion LNG terminals to stop US' sanctions on Nord Stream 2

'We can't wait for another 30 years'

In an interview with Al Jazeera, published on Saturday, Aliyev said that the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) group on Nagorno-Karabakh, co-chaired by the US, France and Russia, "has been working for 28 years to mediate a solution, but to no avail."

We are not in a position to listen to statements like 'Stop it, we will work [with you], we will negotiate, we will help.' We have heard this many times. We do not have time to wait for another 30 years. The conflict must be resolved now.

The decades-long dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh - a large Armenian-populated enclave within Azerbaijan - turned violent on September 27, when Armenia and Azerbaijan blamed each other for aggression long the border. Heavy fighting continued throughout the week, with deaths reported among Armenian and Azerbaijani forces, as well as civilian casualties. Several buildings, including a hospital, were damaged during shelling of the disputed region's capital on Friday.

On Thursday, the leaders of Russia, France and the US issued a joint statement, urging for an immediate end to the violence and for both sides to resume talks. Aliyev's office reported that President Macron of France had made a phone call to the Azerbaijani leader on Friday, again urging for a ceasefire and negotiations.

Aliyev, however, told Al Jazeera that talks would be "meaningless" unless Armenia agreed to "the return of the occupied territories to Azerbaijan." The region proclaimed itself independent amid a bloody war in the early 1990s against the backdrop of the breakup of the Soviet Union, and has remained closely allied with Armenia.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, meanwhile, told Canadian newspaper The Globe and Mail that "a ceasefire can be established only if Turkey is removed from the South Caucasus," referring to Ankara's strong support for its historical ally Azerbaijan. He also said that "terrorists" from the Middle East are fighting in Nagorno-Karabakh "under Turkey's sponsorship."

Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said on Friday that "if the situation is not resolved" and Azerbaijan does ask for assistance, Ankara "would not hesitate" to provide it.

President Macron previously said that France has "credible" information that Syrian militants arrived in Nagorno-Karabakh through Turkey. Russia's Foreign Ministry also warned that the deployment of militants from Syria and Libya creates "long-term threats to the security of all countries in the region."

The comments come one day after the Armenian Foreign Ministry said it welcomed a joint call the previous day from the Minsk Group for an immediate cessation of hostilities between forces fighting over Nagorno-Karabakh.

There are concerns that this week's flare-up in violence around the disputed territory could grow into a full-blown war between the archfoes and draw in regional powers Russia and NATO-member Turkey.

Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu on October 3 rejected "superficial" demands for a cease-fire. Such demands "will not be useful this time," Cavusoglu said, according to state-run Anadolu news agency.

Cavusoglu said a day earlier at a news conference in Rome with his Italian counterpart that a cease-fire would be conditional on Armenia's withdrawal.

"As the Azerbaijani president has said, Armenia must withdraw from these territories in order for Azerbaijan to declare a cease-fire," Cavusoglu said. "This is an absolute legitimate call."

Armenia on October 2 accused Azerbaijani forces of striking Nagorno-Karabakh's capital, Stepanakert. RFE/RL's Armenian Service reported that four people were injured but no one was killed.

Shoot-Down Claims

Armenia also claimed it had shot down three Azerbaijani aircraft on October 3. Azerbaijan's Defense Ministry denied the claim, saying "not a single combat aircraft of the Azerbaijani Air Force was shot down."

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian said in an address on October 3 that the scale of the attack was unprecedented.

"We are experiencing, perhaps, the most decisive moment in our millennial history," Pashinian said, adding: "Today, more than ever, we are determined to defend our identity, our homeland, our right."

Pashinian said he spoke by phone on October 2 with commanders and other officers who are on the front line. He said about 150 high-ranking Turkish military personnel "are at the command posts of various levels of the armed forces of Azerbaijan and are in charge of military operations."

Nagorno-Karabakh is internationally recognized as Azerbaijani territory, but it and a handful of adjoining regions are controlled by ethnic Armenian separatists with close ties to Yerevan.

The Kremlin said Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke by telephone with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian on October 2 and "insisted on the need to immediately stop the hostilities and resume political-diplomatic efforts" to settle the dispute in line with the Minsk Group appeal.

Both men "agreed to continue contacts in various formats," it said.

• Judicial Watch says Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting docs to be released very soon - UPDATE
• Judicial Watch files FOIA lawsuit for FBI records on 'Trump Dossier'
• Judicial Watch sues DOJ for emails found on Anthony Weiner's laptop
• Killary's secret stash: Judicial Watch releases new batch of Huma Abedin emails not turned over to State Dept.
• Judicial Watch: Docs reveal FBI covered up 'chart' of Killary's potential violations of law
• HRC resists court order to produce 'after action memorandum' that resulted in email deletion; JW files motion to compel
• Implausible deniability: DOJ tells court it was unable to give Fusion GPS docs to Judicial Watch because of 'glitch'
• Judicial Watch obtains Carter Page FISA court documents via FOIA
• Voter fraud? Judicial Watch finds 11 California counties have more registered than eligible voters
• US/Soros-funded Colombian group blasts Judicial Watch's exposé on ties to violent Marxist guerrillas

• Austrian President says he sees no link between Navalny's case, Nord Stream 2 project
• "No evidence": EU Parliament using Navalny's alleged poisoning to stop Nord Stream project - German MEP
• German 'Novichok poisoning' claims over Navalny will prompt familiar circus of sanctions & Russia demonisation. But who benefits?
• Germany warns US against imposing sanctions on Nord Stream 2, says no country has right to 'dictate' its energy policy