Welcome to Sott.net
Mon, 08 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Magnify

Friends in high places? Appeals court rules against releasing draft Whitewater indictments against Clinton

Hillary Clinton
© Getty Images
The nation's second-most powerful court sided with the government Friday in its decision not to release draft indictments prepared against Hillary Clinton during the Whitewater scandal of the mid-1990s.

A unanimous three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said the conservative group Judicial Watch failed to show "exception interests" that would warrant disclosure of the documents.

The watchdog group filed a Freedom of Information Act Request with the National Archives and Records Administration in 2015 for two draft indictments that reportedly arose from the Office of Independent Counsel investigation into the Clinton's real estate investments in Arkansas and contributions made to the real estate entity Whitewater Development Corporation.

Comment: So Teflon Clinton dodges another bullet. Guess it's important to avoid "having the public reminded of her... transgressions" given she finds any hint of an investigation "personally offensive". See also:


Light Sabers

Ukraine: Russia's representative to OSCE says Kiev sabotages Minsk agreements

Ukraine
© Sputnik. Ukrainian Presidential Press Service
Officials of Ukraine are increasingly talking about the inconsistency of the Minsk agreements, but Kiev's desire to violate these agreements can not be indulged, the permanent representative of Russia to the OSCE, Alexander Lukashevich, stated.
"We can not let ourselves become accustomed to the fact that Kiev is sabotaging the implementation of the Minsk Package of Measures on the ground and is trying to distort its essence. Another thing is worse. Now it is that the Ukrainian officials make more statements saying that Minsk agreements have been buried, that they do not meet the interests of the Kiev authorities," the Russian diplomat said during a regular meeting of the OSCE Permanent Council on Thursday.
He explained that, in particular, the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine Arsen Avakov had made such a statement during the National Expert Forum in Kiev, and it was also duplicated in an article by the edition of the Figaro.
"This is a rather serious issue: if he, as a person involved in compliance with the agreements, has not been authorized to make such statements, we should expect disavowal by the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry," Lukashevich said.

Comment: More on Kiev backing out of the Minsk Accords:

The Minsk Accord's zombie sanctions: Ukraine admits agreement is dead, but sanctions tied to them live on


No Entry

Hungarian PM Orban vows to stop Soros from interfering with elections

Orban Soros
© Reuters / Global Look Press
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban (L), George Soros, Chairman of Soros Fund Management LLC (R).
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has vowed to use all the means at his disposal to counter the influence of George Soros, warning that the American billionaire is planning to interfere in next year's elections in the country.

In an interview with Kossuth radio on Friday, Orban again accused Soros of attempting to undermine Hungarian institutions and society through his network of NGOs and pro-immigration stance, and revealed that the Hungarian intelligence services had compiled a report on Soros' activities.


"We want a different future, and... it was my duty to enlist all possible tools of the state, including intelligence, the secret services, legal and public debate," Orban told listeners. "Therefore, we ordered an intelligence report on the composition, workings and Hungarian and European influence of this Soros machinery... Hungary's very existence is at stake."

Orban and Soros have long been at odds over the issue of asylum seekers and refugees entering Europe. Orban considers mass immigration, particularly from Muslim countries, as an existential threat to Europe. Soros, meanwhile, has consistently advocated on behalf of refugees, immigrants and asylum seekers. Citing his intelligence report, Orban accused Soros of using his NGOs as a front for supporting opposition groups, which in turn criticize the government's stance on immigration.

Orban, whose ruling right-wing Fidesz party is currently leading in the polls, then went on to say that Soros is planning to use his network to interfere in parliamentary elections due to take place in April.

Comment: See also:


Dollar Gold

Another one bites the dust: Navy censures retired admiral for taking gifts from 'Fat Leonard'

Capt. Kenneth Norton
© SHAWN J. STEWART/U.S. NAVY
Then Capt. Kenneth Norton, left, is the fourth admiral in the "Fat Leonard" corruption case to receive a letter of censure, or a formal rebuke from the U.S. Navy. Norton retired as a rear admiral in 2014.
The Navy announced Wednesday that it has censured a retired admiral for personal misbehavior and accepting illicit gifts in the "Fat Leonard" corruption case.

Kenneth Norton, who retired in December 2014, is the fourth admiral in the case to receive a letter of censure, or a formal rebuke. In a statement, the Navy said a review determined that Norton had "demonstrated exceedingly poor judgment and leadership" and had "brought ill-repute and disgrace upon the U.S. Navy."

The Navy said Norton improperly accepted gifts from Glenn Defense Marine Asia, a Singapore-based contracting firm headed by Leonard Glenn Francis, known within maritime circles as "Fat Leonard" because of his 6-foot 3-inch, 350-pound frame. Francis has pleaded guilty in a long-running corruption investigation to bribing scores of Navy personnel and overcharging the Navy by more than $35 million to resupply U.S. vessels in Asia.

Comment: See also:


Jet3

Russia and Egypt sign deal for military use of airbases and airspace

A Russian Sukhoi Su-34 fighter-bomber takes off. Image: Alex Beltyukov/Wikimedia/CC BY-SA 3.0
© Alex Beltyukov/Wikimedia/CC BY-SA 3.0
A Russian Sukhoi Su-34 fighter-bomber takes off.
Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev signed a directive on November 28 approving a draft agreement between Russia and Egypt on the mutual use of airspace and airfields in both countries, laying the groundwork for a final deal to be negotiated and signed.

Medvedev's decree directed the Russian defense ministry, with the assistance of the ministry of foreign affairs, to hold negotiations with Egypt on the deal and to sign the final agreement. Any changes made to the draft agreement must not be of a "fundamental nature."

Russia's minister of defense Sergey Shoygu was in Cairo on Wednesday and discussed Russian-Egyptian military technical cooperation with his Egyptian counterpart. President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi said Egypt was interested in enhancing relations with Russia at all levels, and in the military domain in particular.


Gear

Having appealed to the ICC, Palestinians are now victims of an unjust US law

palestine-wall boy
© Eyal Dor-Ofer
A Palestinian boy overlooks the wall separating his home from the rest of the village
Imagine that you are a victim of a violent crime or theft but are forbidden from reporting it because Congress has passed a law that not only prohibits you from reporting the crime, but threatens punishment if you dare to do it. This is the situation in which the Palestinians find themselves today.

The Palestinians have been told that the US government is on the verge of decertifying their right to maintain an office in Washington because they had the audacity to complain to the International Criminal Court (ICC) about Israel's land theft and settlement activity in the occupied territories.

The story behind this nightmarish situation began in 1987 when Congress passed a law prohibiting the Palestine Liberation Organization from operating an office in the United States. This legislation which was pushed by AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobby, was designed to ensure that the Palestinians would have no presence or voice in either Washington or at the United Nations. It was an effort to put into law a secret commitment Secretary of State Henry Kissinger had made to the Israelis a decade earlier that the US would not recognize or dialogue with the PLO. The Israelis had insisted on this "no-talk" policy for the simple reason described by Israeli Labor Party leader Yitzhak Rabin: "Whoever agrees to talk to the PLO means he accepts in principle the creation of a Palestinian state between Israel and Jordan, and this we can never accept".

Comment: See as well:


Propaganda

'Liberated' Libya and the silence of the humanitarian hawks

Tripoli, Libya
© Hani Amara / Reuters
A man walks past a damaged building, Tripoli, Libya, May 28, 2017.
The reports that black Africans are being sold at slave markets in 'liberated' Libya for as little as $400 is a terrible indictment of the so-called 'humanitarian intervention' carried out by NATO to topple the government of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011.


In March 2011 virtue-signaling Western 'liberal' hipsters teamed up with hardcore neocon warmongers to demand action to 'save' the Libyan people from the 'despotic' leader who had ruled the country since the late 1960s. "Something has to be done!" they cried in unison.

Something was done. Libya was transformed by NATO from the country with the highest Human Development Index in the whole of Africa in 2009 into a lawless hell-hole, with rival governments, warlords and terror groups fighting for control of the country.


Sherlock

Paid to go away: Benghazi panel settled wrongful firing suit with $150,000

Rep. Trey Gowdy
© Alex Brandon/AP
Rep. Trey Gowdy
As chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) used $150,000 in taxpayer dollars to settle with a former aide who alleged he was fired in part because he was not willing to focus his investigative work on Hillary Clinton.

The Post confirmed the confidential settlement reached between Gowdy and the Benghazi panel and Bradley Podliska after it appeared in a list of settlements released Friday by the congressional Office of Compliance. Gowdy is now the chairman of the House Oversight Committee.

In a list provided to the House Committee on Administration, the OOC disclosed it oversaw one $150,000 settlement involving a claim of veteran status discrimination and retaliation in the last five years. Podliska, in addition to claiming he was fired for his refusal to focus on Clinton, alleged retaliation by his supervisors because he took leave to fulfill his obligations as an Air Force reservist. His December 2016 settlement, which covered the veterans status and retaliation claims, was reported by The Washington Post at the time without the settlement amount.

Comment: Linked in the above piece is background on the case, which shows Podliska's claims that he was fired "for his refusal to focus on Clinton" is fishy, to say the least.

GOP staffer fired from the House panel investigating Benghazi attacks
By Tom Hamburger and Carol D. Leonnig October 10, 2015
A Republican staffer from the House Select Committee on Benghazi has been fired after he says he developed concerns about the politicized nature of the panel's investigation.

The criticism from an experienced Republican intelligence investigator comes amid growing Democratic Party complaints that the special committee was on a mission to undermine former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton and her bid for the presidency.

A spokesman for the committee denied the allegations from the former staffer, Bradley Podliska, a major in the Air Force Reserve who issued a statement through his attorneys Saturday afternoon.

"My non-partisan investigative work conflicted with the interests of the Republican leadership, who focused their investigation primarily on Secretary Clinton and her aides," Podliska said, especially after reports surfaced in March that Clinton has used a private e-mail server. "The families of the Americans who died in the Benghazi attacks deserve to find out the truth about Benghazi, but to do that a thorough, non-partisan investigation must be conducted of all agencies and officials involved in Benghazi," the statement said.

In a news release Saturday, the committee called Podliska's claims "transparently false," stating that he "was terminated for cause." The written statement, attributed to a committee spokesman, did not mention Podliska by name but said the former employee had shown poor judgment.

"The employee actually was terminated, in part, because he himself manifested improper partiality and animus in his investigative work'' against the Obama administration, including Clinton, the statement said.

The new developments come at a difficult time for committee Republicans, who plan to question Clinton on Oct. 22 despite growing requests to shut down the inquiry.

The ranking Democrat on the Benghazi panel, Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (Md.), said Saturday evening that Podliska's allegations provide more proof of serious bias by the committee's majority.

"Republicans have been abusing millions of taxpayer dollars for the illegitimate purpose of damaging Hillary Clinton's bid for president," Cummings said, pointing out that the latest complaints come from "one of Chairman [Trey] Gowdy's own handpicked investigators."

The ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Adam B. Schiff (Calif.), called for an end to the committee on Saturday.

"Only by ending this expensive and politicized investigation can we begin to undo the damage already done through this unprecedented use of Congress's power for nakedly political purposes."

Gowdy (R-S.C.) has defended the panel's work, insisting that he has found important new documents to be released this week involving e-mails from Clinton's longtime adviser, Sidney Blumenthal, who offered intelligence advice on Libya.

Podliska's attorneys, Peter Romer-Friedman and Joe Napiltonia, said they expect to file a lawsuit for wrongful termination soon that will make the case that Podliska was fired in part because he participated in required National Guard exercises. Napiltonia said his client was terminated after notifying the committee of his active-duty military obligations. Retaliation for an employee taking military leave would violate federal law protecting the rights of uniformed military personnel, the lawyers said.

They say that Republican committee staff members questioned Podliska's military obligations along with their client's preference for a nonpartisan inquiry into the events in Libya.

Podliska, currently stationed in Germany, could not be reached for comment. His criticism was first reported Saturday afternoon by the New York Times.

Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Clinton's campaign, called the former employee's claims "explosive allegations" that "may provide the most definitive proof to date that this taxpayer-funded investigation has been a partisan sham from the start."

In rejecting Podliska's claims earlier, the committee said Podliska had received "repeated counseling for performance and lack of judgment." The statement said he had shown an eagerness to push claims against the Obama administration after joining the panel in the fall of 2014.

"One reason for which the employee was terminated was his repeated efforts, of his own volition, to develop and direct Committee resources to a PowerPoint 'hit piece' on members of the Obama Administration - including Secretary Clinton," the committee's statement said. "Thus, directly contrary to his brand new assertion."

Further, the statement said that "the former employee has violated this confidentiality requirement in a public way" and that he never previously made claims of bias.

Napiltonia said the committee's allegations of Podliska's poor job performance are "completely false."

"I would note that Mr. Podliska was never reprimanded prior to his giving notice that he was going on military leave in March," Napiltonia said Saturday after reviewing the committee's statement. Podliska spent more than a decade as an intelligence analyst with a defense agency. "He is a proud conservative Republican," said Napiltonia, one who always hoped the committee would investigate all agencies and individuals involved in the Benghazi tragedy.

From the outset, Republican members of the House have rebuffed complaints about bias on the Benghazi panel, insisting that the committee was examining the violence in Libya that led to the death of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans on Sept. 11, 2012. Increasingly, Democrats expressed doubt about the committee's work and the intentions of Gowdy.

The controversy deepened Tuesday when House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) made comments that appeared to reinforce criticism that the committee's primary target was Clinton. The GOP majority leader, who at the time was a candidate to succeed John A. Boehner (Ohio) as speaker, suggested in a Fox News interview that the committee had succeeded because Clinton's poll numbers had plummeted.



Sheriff

Evidentially Russia is the world's most effective peace-keeper

Vladislav Surkov

(L) Vladislav Surkov
The Russian draft resolution of the UN Security Council on sending the Organization's contingent to ensure the safety of OSCE observers in the Donbass should not be discussed, but accepted. Such a point of view was expressed by Russian presidential aide Vladislav Surkov.
"Russia's position on the final pacification of the Donbass is very clearly expressed in our draft resolution for the UN Security Council: what can be discussed here? It jas to be adopted," he said.
According to him, "Russia has come up with a realistic and realizable peace initiative."
"Anyone who does not support this initiative does not want peace," Surkov said, "if someone does not need peace in Ukraine, they must be forthright and do not offer different chimerical counterprojects as a distraction"

"Our country is the most effective peacekeeper. This is obvious, it was Russia that stopped a full-scale civil war in Ukraine," the presidential aide said in response to a question about how he plans to convince his negotiating partners in his own right.



Cut

Why Saudi Prince Alaweed bin Talal's 'friends' have abandoned him

Großinvestor Prinz Al Walid bin Talal
© AFP
Prince Alwaleed bin Talal
  • Investing celebrity Prince Alwaleed bin Talal has now been detained and reportedly tortured for more than three weeks.
  • The political and financial world has remained mostly silent or at least relatively calm about it.
  • Here are the uncomfortable political and financial reasons his so-called friends appear to have abandoned him.
One of the world's richest men and most sought-after investors has been under arrest and even reportedly tortured for more than three weeks.

That man is billionaire Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal. He owns major stakes in Twitter and Citigroup. He was a key shareholder in 21st Century FOX. His television interviews, including on CNBC, are promoted with "must-watch" status. He's routinely called the "Warren Buffett of Saudi Arabia."

But since November 5, bin Talal has been detained in a room at the Ritz Carlton in Riyadh. The hotel has become a de facto prison for more than 200 of his fellow princes and Saudi officials as new Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman conducts a sweeping and stunning purge of his real and potential political opponents.

To make matters worse, several credible reports have surfaced that bin Talal and the others are being tortured. One report says he's been hung upside down and beaten. Those stories gained a level of credence earlier this week when another prince, Miteb bin Abdullah, paid a reported $1 billion for his freedom.

Comment: Like all the rest of the Saudi royals, Alwaleed bin Talal had no friends. It was his money and influence that had 'friends'. But as a detainee, what influence does he have now? What ability to move money around? Such is the 'spirit of loyalty and friendship' of the global elites.

See also:

Saudi insider: 'American mercenaries are torturing' arrested Saudi elite - Prince Alwaleed was hung upside down 'just to send a message'