Welcome to Sott.net
Mon, 08 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Bullseye

Russia, Turkey and Arab League slam US decision to 'legalize' Israeli settlements in West Bank, say it damages peace process - Updates

Israeli settlement of Ramat Givat Zeev
© Reuters / Ammar Awad
Moscow slams US decision to ‘legalize’ Israeli settlements in West Bank, says it puts spanner in the works for peace process
A general view shows construction of the Israeli settlement of Ramat Givat Zeev in the occupied-West Bank November 19, 2019
The US decision to recognize Israeli settlements in the West Bank as legal will aggravate the situation in the region, Russian Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday.

"We consider Washington's decision as another step aimed at scrapping the international legal base of the Middle East settlement," Moscow stated, adding the US move will only further undermine the "already tense situation in Palestinian-Israeli relations."

Russia's position remains unchanged, viewing Israeli settlement construction on the West Bank has no legal force and exists at odds with international law. It erodes the path to peaceful solution on a basis of the two-state concept, the ministry argued.

Russian diplomats urged all parties to refrain from steps that could provoke a new escalation.


Comment: Turkey had sharp words for the US decision as well:
Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu has blasted Washington over its decision to reverse the US's previous position on the illegal nature of Israeli settlements in West Bank.
"No country is above international law. Fait accompli style declarations shall have no validity with respect to international law," Cavusoglu wrote on his official Twitter account, referring to Secretary Pompeo's statement.
[...]

Turkish-Israeli relations have been poor for years, ever since the 2010 Israeli commando raid on a Turkish aid ship heading to Gaza, with Prime Minister Netanyahu and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan regularly engaging in a back and forth war of words, accusing one another of corrupt behaviour, of "occupying" stolen territories, and branding one another as a "dictator" or "Nazi." Earlier this year, President Erdogan declared that "whoever is on the side of Israel, let everyone know that we are against them."
And the Arab League made made a similarly strong condemnation of the decision:
The Arab League strongly condemns US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's Monday announcement, in which he said that Jewish settlements established by Israel in the West Bank were no longer inconsistent with international law, the organization's head, Ahmed Aboul Gheit, said on Tuesday.
Aboul Gheit condemned in the strongest terms the statement, issued by US Secretary of State [Mike Pompeo], that his country no longer viewed the Israeli settlements in the West Bank to be contrary to international law and considered it as a very negative development," the head said in a statement.
He added that international law was formulated by the global community, "but not by a single state."

Comment: The US decision to recognize Israeli settlements has, predictably, emboldened the Israeli settlers to repeat their call for an all-out annexation of West Bank:
The effective endorsement of Jewish settlements in the West Bank by the United States on Monday became the latest in a string of explicitly pro-Israel moves by the Trump administration.

Mike Pompeo's bombshell announcement on Jewish settlements has invigorated settler leaders in Israel, who are now calling on their government to annex Palestinian territory.

Oded Revivi, a lawyer in charge of the settlement of Efrat and spokesman for the Yesha umbrella group, has urged Tel Aviv to extend its sovereignty onto the lands.
"Settlement is not a crime and it is not an obstacle to peace," he said, as quoted by The Times of Israel, adding that US envoy to Israel David Friedman had lobbied for the move.
Yisrael Gantz, chair of the Binyamin Regional Council, which governs 46 Israeli settlements in the West Bank, described the announcement as a "major step toward [Israeli] sovereignty [in the West Bank]."
He similarly called on the government to annex "Judea and Samaria", as the West Bank is officially designated in Israel.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a dramatic statement on Monday that the United States would no longer abide by a 1978 State Department legal opinion that Jewish settlements in the West Bank violate international law.

The United Nations, in a number of resolutions, has called those settlements illegal, pointing out that they were set up within territories which were occupied during a war. As much as 138 of the 193 UN member states have recognised Palestinian statehood, including the overwhelming majority of nations in Asia, Latin America, Africa and Eastern Europe. Palestinians, meanwhile, want the West Bank to comprise their future state, and argue that the sprawling Jewish settlements would effectively kill off this plan.

Despite objections from the UN, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long pushed for the establishment of more settlements in those territories, citing historic ties with the West Bank and security reasons, and campaigned on a pledge to annex parts of the West Bank. He said on Monday that the US move "rights a historical wrong" but didn't reaffirm his annexation promise.

The Trump administration has openly cast doubt on the viability of the two-state solution, which had been the core of American policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for the past several decades, and has made a number of pro-Israel police decisions during the past two years. In a show of support for the Netanyahu government, Trump moved the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, thus recognising it as the capital of Israel, and declared the disputed Golan Heights as part of the Jewish State.

The new American policy has raised more questions about the success of Trump's plan for peace between Israel and Palestinians, which includes a series of economic and political measures, but excludes a two-state solution.



Pocket Knife

Boris Johnson pledges 'tough' new measures to fight knife crime in UK

Knife cuchillo
© Pixabay.com
Boris Johnson has promised a "tough new approach" to fighting knife crime and serious violence if he wins the election.

The prime minister has pledged to "come down hard on the scourge of knife crime" if the Tories return to Downing Street after 12 December.

Under the new plans:
  • The party is promising to speed up the handling of knife possession cases, claiming that anyone caught unlawfully with a knife will be immediately arrested, charged within 24 hours and in court within a week - three times faster than the current average;
  • Police will be "empowered" to target known knife carriers with what the Tories say will be a "new" court order, which will make it easier for officers to stop and search those known to have carried weapons in the past;
  • A £35m boost will be given to violence reduction units - multi-agency teams made up of the police, social services and other agencies - in order to "champion preventative work and stop violence from happening in the first place".

Magnify

US vs Wikileaks: Espionage and the First Amendment

Young Julian Assange
© Wikipedia
Julian Assange c. 2006
If the United States seeks to put on trial WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, what are the implications for freedom of speech, for protection of government secrets and for news organizations on the Internet?

Msnbc.com has convened a panel of legal specialists to explore questions raised by a prosecution.

As one of the panelists put it, "The WikiLeaks events tee up the question of defining 'media' in the new, Internet era like no previous case."

The Justice Department has said it is exploring possible charges against WikiLeaks and Assange in the release of diplomatic messages. Attorney General Eric Holder said charges may be brought under a World War I-era law, the Espionage Act of 1917 (text here), or other laws.

Comment: The extradition is not yet assured. Though late in the race, a group of Australian politicians have announced that they will advocate for Assange's return to Australia. How this will play out in the attempted extradition is yet to be seen. Assange is amassing support from around the world with many organizing events and rallies to raise awareness of his cause and support for his release sending a loud and clear message that the public will not tolerate Julian Assange and Wikileaks being silenced. The Australian Senate for Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee claimed in October, 2019, that Assange has refused Australian Consular services and has withdrawn consent for information to be shared with the Australian High Commissioner in the UK despite repeatedly being offered assistance. If true, this may indicate that Assange is wary of Australian assistance given that they are US allies and that they may support a charge of Espionage or at least not attempt to interfere with the extradition or the judicial process. The above prediction of Paul Rosenzweig, former Homeland Security official that "Some of Assange's supporting hacktivists are identified, arrested, extradited, tried and ultimately convicted: 70-80 percent" it seems almost certain that Julian Assange is courageously holding out to protect others. This will only increase the respect of his supporters and those that do not agree with any form of suppression of journalistic reporting.


Newspaper

UK government accused of covering up war crimes in Iraq

british army
The UK is very keen at reminding certain countries - Syria, Russia, China - of their human rights abuses and yet, when it comes to looking closer to home, this current government quite frankly prefers not to, and in some cases deliberately try to obfuscate the truth.

Leaked documents have revealed that not only was the UK army involved in war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan in the 2000s, but Conservative ministers succeeded in covering it up. Military detectives unveiled alleged 'daily' abuse dating back as far as 2003 by the Black Watch regiment in Basra as well as more recent crimes such as a 2012 raid on a compound in Helmund Province where three 'unarmed' children and a young man were shot dead.

Comment: See also: And check out SOTT radio's: Behind the Headlines: Perfidious Albion: If Russia is a Rogue State, What is the UK?


Marijuana

Biden defends position of not wanting to legalize marijuana because it may be a 'gateway drug'

Joe Biden
© epa
Former VP and presidential candidate, Joe Biden
Former Vice President Joe Biden defended his reasoning to not legalize marijuana on a federal level if elected president, saying there is not "enough evidence" as to "whether or not it is a gateway drug."

Speaking at a town hall in Las Vegas on Saturday, the 2020 Democratic presidential candidate said whether the U.S. should legalize cannabis on a federal level is still up for debate as far as he is concerned.

"The truth of the matter is, there's not nearly been enough evidence that has been acquired as to whether or not it is a gateway drug," Biden said, according to Business Insider. "It's a debate, and I want a lot more before I legalize it nationally. I want to make sure we know a lot more about the science behind it."

Star of David

Pompeo: U.S. policy U-turn now considers Israeli settlements as consistent with international law

Pompeo/Omar
© Annelies Verbeek/KJN
Omar Arif Bisharat in front of the rubble of his home • US Sec of State Mike Pompeo
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has announced a U-turn in policy toward Israeli settlements in the West Bank, declaring Washington no longer sees them as inconsistent with international law.

Pompeo said the US will no longer adhere to the 1978 State Department legal opinion on the settlements, and insisted that it would not lead to the US' isolation from the rest of the global community on the issue.

The US' top diplomat said the Trump administration will leave the status of the West Bank to Israelis and Palestinians to negotiate.

Pompeo said the decision came as a result of a "legal review" and was not intended to send any message, though the move is likely to anger the Palestinian side and human rights groups who have condemned the settlements and say they undermine peace efforts.

Comment: Update: RT, 18/11/2019: Outrage erupts over 'legalization' of still-illegal Israeli settlements in West Bank
Vermont Senator and Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders slammed Trump for "isolating the United States and undermining diplomacy by pandering to his extremist base" in a tweet.

EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini renewed calls for Israel to "end all settlement activity, in line with its obligations as an occupying power," following the announcement. An EU court ruled last week that all goods originating in Israeli settlements must be labeled as such.

Jordan's Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi warned the move would have "dangerous consequences" on the possibility of peace in the Middle East.

Others pointed out that aiding and abetting a breach of international law made the US complicit in Israel's crimes.


"Trump can't wipe away with this announcement decades of established international law that Israeli settlements are a war crime," Human Rights Watch's Kenneth Roth tweeted, adding "Trump doesn't read, but we do," and pointing to Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Some commenters wondered at who the move was supposed to appeal to, since "US Jews massively reject Trump." A few mused whether this might be the straw that breaks the camel's back regarding a backlash against Israel.

Others merely snarked at the mushy headlines US media used to cover the announcement.
Of course, not everybody was upset - Israeli settler leaders stepped up calls for annexing the West Bank.



Arrow Up

Schiff confirmed John Solomon's reporting on Ukraine, despite media attacks to the contrary

ASchiff
© Unknown
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff
"I have to thank Adam Schiff, the House Intelligence Committee chairman and impeachment maestro. Really, I am grateful."

While the jury is still out on high crimes and misdemeanors, Schiff has managed to produce during the first few weeks of his impeachment hearings a robust body of evidence and testimony that supports all three of the main tenets of my Ukraine columns.

In fact, his witnesses have done more than anyone to affirm the accuracy of my columns and to debunk the false narrative by a dishonest media and their friends inside the federal bureaucracy that my reporting was somehow false conspiracy theories.

Comment: More from Breitbart 18/11/2019: Two witnesses with exculpatory evidence left out of hearings
The House Intelligence Committee's witness list for this week's public hearings in the "impeachment inquiry" omits two witnesses whose closed-door sessions last month provided exculpatory evidence for President Donald Trump. Neither of the two witnesses were on Republicans' proposed list; they were called by Democrats behind closed doors.

One witness, Catherine Croft, the special adviser at the National Security Council (NSC) for Ukraine negotiations, offered at least two pieces of evidence that tend to help Trump's argument that he did nothing wrong.

First, Croft testified that the hold on aid to Ukraine this past summer was not the first. In fact, the White House had held up military aid in late 2017 — partly because of concern about antagonizing Russia, but also because of general concerns about corruption. Croft testified, Trump had rebuked then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in front of his delegation:
Screen shot #1
© Screen Shot 2019-11-18-at-11.04.16-AM
Second, Croft testified that the Obama administration had been aware of concerns about Hunter Biden and Burisma:
Screen shot #2
© Screen-Shot, 2019-11-18-at-11.07.51-AM
She also testified that Vice President Biden was "very engaged in Ukraine policy" at the time his son had been appointed.
Screen shot #3
© Screen-Shot-2019-11-18-at-11.10.37-AM
Croft's predecessor, Christopher Anderson also confirmed that there were concerns within the Obama administration about Hunter Biden serving on the board of Burisma:
Screen-Shot #4
© Screen Shot 2019-11-18-at-11.18.56-AM
Another witness, Under Secretary of State for Diplomatic Affairs David Hale, is scheduled to testify this week even though his transcript has not been released.



X

Assange rape case dropped! Sweden forsakes probe that led him to seek asylum in UK's Ecuadorian embassy

Assange
© Reuters/Henry Nicholls
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is seen in a police van, after he was arrested by British police, in London, Britain April 11, 2019.
Swedish prosecutors will not pursue their rape investigation of WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange any further, they announced, having successfully fulfilled their role in the years-long scheme to put Assange behind bars.

Investigators determined the evidence was simply not strong enough to support an indictment, Deputy Chief Prosecutor Eva-Marie Persson told a press conference on Tuesday. Interviewing Julian Assange regarding the case would not change this assessment, she said. "The reason for this decision is that the evidence has weakened considerably due to the long period of time that has elapsed since the events in question."

The Prosecution Authority noted that, while the victim was considered credible, oral testimony regarding the case had "weakened" and that corroborating evidence was not strong enough to pursue the case.


Calendar

N. Korea: Concessions first, meeting later, Kim will not 'gift' another summit to Trump

KimTrump
© Global Look Press/Joyce N. Boghosian
North Korean Leader Kim Jong-un and US President Donald Trump, Hanoi 2/27/2019.
Pyongyang has made it clear that it will not agree to another high-level meeting between Chairman Kim Jong-un and the US President Donald Trump unless Washington changes its "hostile" policies towards the Asian nation.

Talks between North Korea and the US on Pyongyang's nuclear program, kicked off by a Trump-Kim summit in Singapore in June 2018, have failed to produce any meaningful results and improve bilateral relations between the two nations, North's Foreign Ministry adviser Kim Kye Gwan said.

The negotiating process ended up in a deadlock even though two leaders had a meeting in February, exchanged letters and met at the border between two Koreas in June.

"The US only seeks to earn time, pretending it has made progress in settling the issue of the Korean Peninsula," the official said, according to the state KCNA news agency. He went on to say that Pyongyang gained literally nothing from these talks, and would thus stop doing political favors to Trump until it gets something in exchange.

Comment: Bait and switch has limited effectiveness. Kim knows this. Does Trump?


Whistle

Steve Bannon pushed for alleged whistleblower to be removed from NSC

SteveBannon
© Reuters/Moritz Hager
Steve Bannon
Steve Bannon said in an interview that when he was at the White House in 2017, he was involved in an effort to remove an intelligence officer suspected of being the Trump whistleblower from the National Security Council due to concerns about leaks.

Bannon, who served as White House strategist through August 2017, said in an interview with VICE published Friday:
"When I was in the White House there was a number of people in the National Security Council — the named individual eventually got let go, I believe because people were suspicious, not me, but other people around him were suspicious about his leaking, and that's why he was let go."
The whistleblower, who is reported to be a CIA analyst, filed a complaint on Aug. 12 accusing President Donald Trump of abusing his office in his dealings with Ukraine.