Puppet Masters
"The presence of America and England in this region means insecurity," Alireza Tangsiri cautioned on Sunday, according to Iranian media. He also suggested that Iran could form a coalition with neighboring states to guarantee security in the Gulf.
Tangsiri's remarks coincide with Gibraltar's decision to release 'Grace 1,' an Iranian oil tanker that was boarded and seized by British Royal Marines there last month. Washington has ordered that the vessel -now renamed to 'Adrian Darya'- be recaptured once it leaves Gibraltar, accusing the ship of transporting oil to Syria to support the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
Ghafoor further said that the Pakistani armed forces are fully prepared to repulse any form of Indian aggression. "Kashmir dispute is a fight to be fought for long," he said. Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi termed Rajnath Singh's statement on "No First Use" nuclear policy as a "damning reminder of India's unbridled thirst for violence".
RT America's Sara Montes de Oca spoke with Williamson after traveling to the telecommunication giant's headquarters in Shenzhen, China.
The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week that governments in Uganda and Zambia had allegedly enlisted Huawei's help to spy on dissenting voices, including tapping into opposition politicians' conversations, cracking encrypted communications, and conducting surveillance.
Comment: It's clear from Huawei's continuing growth on the world stage that US attempts to smear the company just aren't working:
- Say hello to the Russia-China operating system
- How's that blockade working Trump? Not a single European country has banned Huawei
- Engdahl: Is Canada's Huawei arrest an attempt to sabotage Trump-Xi talks?
- Why Washington wants to ban Huawei: US wants to spy and China won't cooperate

Ships from nine NATO countries sail during BALTOPS 2019 exercise in the Baltic Sea, June 2019
Though the Adriatic Sea is a "NATO lake" and the alliance's expansion in the Baltics and the Black Sea has brought it to Russia's doorstep, the navies acquired along the way are pretty much useless, argued Thomas-Durell Young, a lecturer at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California.
Young's article, titled 'NATO's selective naval blindness' and published in the most recent issue of the Naval War College Review, makes the case that the situation is "both serious and desperate," and that the navies of Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Slovenia, Albania and Montenegro all suffer from not just old ships but "legacy concepts" when it comes to sea power.
Comment: That's a lot of countries the lecturer is hoping to use in NATO's demented aggression towards Russia.
Comment: See also:
- Prime Minister Rama: NATO to Build 1st Air Base in Western Balkans in Albania
- US F-16 cost "unjustified" - Bulgarian defense minister
- Romania claims it intercepted Russian tank delivery to Serbia, "total lie" says Russia's MoD
- Slovakia becomes latest country to shun UN migration pact
U.S. military officials in Iraq will now seek out Iraqi approval before launching any air operations, a move made a day after that nation's prime minister announced a ban of unauthorized flights, including those involving coalition forces fighting ISIS.
Comment: Israel is taking increasingly desperate measures to get the US-Iran war going.
On Aug 6, Hong Kong media reported two meetings between a US political counselor and separatist leaders. Julie Eadeh, who works at the US Consulate General in Hong Kong, was caught on camera meeting with opposition figures Martin Lee and Anson Chan.
When I say "accidentally," what I mean is that he likely didn't know he was being secretly recorded and that his remarks would be made public.
He also admitted the Times' staff is loaded with left-wingers "who cheer us when we take on Donald Trump, but they jeer at us when we take on Joe Biden."
Yeah, there's a real shocker.
Greg Bean likens the revolutionary work of Julian Assange to that of Johannes Gutenberg who invented the printing press. Government reaction, 580 years later, is similarly savage.
Five hundred and eighty years ago, Johannes Gutenberg introduced the printing press to the world. That single act created a free press which gave birth to the concept of freedom of speech. The two are inextricably linked; printing is a form of speech.
Gutenberg's invention started the Printing Revolution, a milestone of the 2nd millennium that initiated the modern period of human history including the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Age of Enlightenment, and the Scientific Revolution, and began the knowledge-based economy that spread learning to the masses.
Such mass communication permanently altered the structure of society. Removing control of information from the hands of the powerful and delivering it into the hands of the disempowered.
Comment: For more on the referenced Mark Davis article above, see also:
The 'set up' of Julian Assange and why The Guardian and New York Times should be in jail
But not content with that, [in phase three] the propaganda was extended to China's economic development, its international trade, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, its Silk and Belt Road Initiative, its development bank, and other facilities and trade initiatives, through which China is accused of trying to control the world; an accusation made by the very nation that threatens economic embargo or worse, nuclear annihilation, to anyone, friend or foe, who resists its attempt to control the world.
The fourth phase is the US attempt to degrade the Chinese economy with punitive "tariffs," essentially an embargo on Chinese goods. That the objective is not better trade deals but to bring China to its knees is the fact that the negative effect of these tariffs on American consumers, farmers and manufacturers is considered secondary to the principal objective.
"We built our newsroom to cover one story, and we did it truly well," Baquet said. "Now we have to regroup, and shift resources and emphasis to take on a different story." Baquet made the remarks at an employee town hall Monday. A recording was leaked to Slate, which published a transcript Thursday.
In the beginning of the Trump administration, the Times geared up to cover the Russia affair, Baquet explained:
"Chapter 1 of the story of Donald Trump, not only for our newsroom but, frankly, for our readers, was: Did Donald Trump have untoward relationships with the Russians, and was there obstruction of justice? That was a really hard story, by the way, let's not forget that. We set ourselves up to cover that story. I'm going to say it. We won two Pulitzer Prizes covering that story. And I think we covered that story better than anybody else."But then came the Mueller report, with special counsel Robert Mueller failing to establish that the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with Russia to fix the 2016 election.
Comment: Excerpt from Slate 15/8/2019: NYT staff fed up with Dean Baquet's explanations:
Baquet was asked about historical use of the word racist. He cited the demonstrations by segregationists in 1957, which were classified as racist, unlike Trump.The full transcript can be found here.
Baquet's reasoning seems contradictory when reading [the transcript of the meeting], and it seemed to be in the room as well. Spread through the transcript are long, long questions by staffers asking Baquet to explain his reasoning, like this one:
Staffer: "Yeah, I want to follow up and disentangle a couple of things that I've often seen conflated in these meetings. You have questions like 'should we call Donald Trump a racist' and these broader discussions of our coverage getting flattened with the reason that I think we're here today, which is really narrowly the question of how we present the work that we do and the headlines that end up on our work. Because this is sort of the thing that a lot of us who are, in some capacity, public representatives of the Times feel ourselves called to answer for. Because there are these patterns of getting headlines wrong in a very specific way that recur repeatedly and in a way that makes me think that it's a process issue. And to me, the question of whether you put a phrase like "racial fires" in a headline is not actually about whether we think it's OK to call Donald Trump racist. It's whether we think it's OK to use euphemisms instead of direct, clear speech in a headline.
"And the issue with last week's headline was not really about Trump per se. It was really more broadly about what kind of credulousness we want to reflect in terms of an administration — any administration. Or about other cases where we're sort of shying away from the real content of the story to put a milder spin on it in the headline, which is sometimes actively misleading. ... it's not always clear whether we're taking on board the criticism that I think is very valid of a lot of these headlines. It is a real storyline about the Times out there now, that we are kind of repeatedly making mistakes that other people aren't making so much."
Baquet responds to that series of questions with, "I'm going to be really honest. I actually don't think we make a whole lot more mistakes." ...
Philip Corbett: ... "In other words, that the mistakes you're seeing are when we're going, shall we say, too easy on Donald Trump. There certainly have been headlines where I feel like that has been a failing. But I will say, honestly, there have been headlines that many of us have been concerned about or asked to have changed or have had discussion about where I felt the problem was the opposite. Where we were showing what could be read as bias against Trump, and were perhaps going too far in the opposite direction. "
See also: New York Times admits 'we built our newsroom' around #Russiagate and other lies














Comment: For insight into the situation in Kashmir, see: