Welcome to Sott.net
Tue, 26 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Arrow Up

Iran's high-risk deterrence policy: Trading tankers, withdrawal steps from the JCPOA - Magnier

Johnson/Rouhani
© Tehran Times
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani • UK PM Boris Johnson
The UK acknowledged its first defeat by Iran when it released the Iranian super tanker Grace 1 captured by 30 Royal Navy commandos in the first week of July in response to a US request, as the Spanish Foreign Minister Josep Borrell revealed. In response, Iran will release the British-flagged tanker Stena Impero, captured by the "Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps" (IRGC) Special Forces before Saturday mid-day. This tit-for-tat response by Iran showed its determined deterrence policy towards the west: Iran is ready to accept any consequences, including a possible war if necessary.

Moreover, Iran is prepared for another partial withdrawal from the nuclear deal three weeks from today as a counter reaction to the insufficient response of western signatory countries and their failure to effectively oppose the illegal actions of US President Donald Trump. The US unilaterally decided to revoke the deal, persuaded by Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu - even though its Chief of Staff acknowledged the nuclear deal was working. The bras-de-fer between Iran and the west is transforming the Middle East into a powder keg, ready to blow-up after the next challenging decision.

Comment: Israel's 'might' and bravado is predicated upon the power and decisions of the US. That it has a strong grasp of how to achieve a confluence of aim and power, through manipulation and subterfuge to move its big brother to action and do its bidding, is evident in the confident rhetoric coming out of Tel Aviv. Will, as Magnier suggests, the US 2020 elections put temporary brakes on fulfilling Israel's aggressive pursuit to eliminate Iran or will blinders and triggers (real or false) set the unthinkable into motion? Iran promises to not sit idly by.


Boat

UK's Royal Navy to 'go big' as it joins US-led maritime coalition against Iran

HMS Duncan
© AP/Ben Sutton
HMS Duncan, Typer 45 Destroyer
The United Kingdom has agreed to join a US-led maritime mission to patrol the Persian Gulf region in the wake of a series of "attacks" on oil tankers there that was unfoundedly blamed on Iran.

The British Navy has already dispatched three warships, HMS Montrose and HMS Kent, Type-23 submarine-hunters, and HMS Duncan, a Type-45 air-defence destroyer, to the Gulf as it has officially signed up for the US-proposed Operation Sentinel against a purported Iranian threat.

Incidentally, HMS Kent left Portsmouth earlier this week together with another Type-45 air-defence destroyer, HMS Defender, which is set to start a mission in the Asia-Pacific region, but can potentially cover a wide area, including the Indian Ocean, meaning that it would be within an easy reach of the Gulf if needed.

The UK government said in a statement on 5 August:
"Following constructive discussions at an international conference in Bahrain last week [31 July], the UK has agreed to join an international mission [that] will see the Royal Navy working alongside the US Navy to assure the security of merchant vessels in the Strait of Hormuz."
London's decision to send another warship to the Gulf marked a clear shift from its original plans to set up a European-led naval mission there to escort British-flagged oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, even though its key allies, Germany and France, have expressed readiness to pitch in. They have, however, been reluctant to support the US initiative out of concerns that they might be dragged into a confrontation with Iran.

Comment: Keep in mind that the 'need' for these warship escorts was a set-up - a page out of the Israeli handbook on creating blamable action (on Iran) to foster desired reaction (by US). Britain needs US trade deals to support its economy, given its looming break with the EU, so anything the US (Israel) wants it will likely get.


X

Pacific states discuss kicking out 'neo-colonial' Australia from the bloc

Pacific Islands Forum members
© AFP/Adam Taylor
Australia's PM Scott Morrison (5th Rt) posing with members of Pacific Islands Forum on island of Tuvalu.
Australia announced a new policy in 2017 called "Pacific step-up" that is aimed at boosting the country's ties with the small island nations in the region, a move reportedly intended to serve as a countermeasure to China's growing influence in the Pacific.

The latest Pacific Islands Forum that recently took place in Tuvalu has resulted in major backlash against one of its participants, Australia, over the country's stance on climate change. Some of the Pacific island states alleged that Canberra doesn't fully realise the challenges that the region faces. Tuvaluan Prime Minister Enele Sopoaga said in an interview with Radio New Zealand:
"The spirit of the Pacific way is not understood by these guys, I don't think they understand anything about (it). And if that's the case, what is the point of these guys remaining in the Pacific Island Leaders' Forum?"
The dispute arose when the countries were negotiating a joint communique with Australia. While supporting the overall goal of stopping climate change, Canberra sought to include less harsh wording in the final document. Australia's efforts found little support among other members of the Pacific Islands Forum, with Tuvaluan Prime Minister Sopoaga comparing the situation with the colonial era, when colonial powers dictated what the Pacific countries could either discuss or do.

"And I see now after so many years of us coming away to set up the Pacific Island Leaders Forum, we are still seeing reflections and manifestations of this neo-colonialist approach to what the leaders are talking about", Sopoaga said.

The meeting was a major disappointment for Fiji's Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama, who called the move by his Australian counterpart Scott Morrison "very insulting". Bainimarama remarked following the bloc's meeting:
"Yesterday was probably one of the most frustrating days I have ever had. I thought Morrison was a good friend of mine; apparently not. [...] at one stage, because he was apparently [backed] into a corner by the leaders, [Morrison] came up with how much money Australia have been giving to the Pacific."
However, New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern claims that there was no "push back" from Australia regarding the forum's communique, but rather a lack of endorsement from several of the small island nations.

The dispute over pledges to end the use of coal as a source of energy and commitments to cap the temperature rise at 1.5 degrees in the Pacific Islands Forum's communique comes as Austria is implementing its "Pacific step-up" policy, which reportedly seeks to limit China's influence over Pacific states by means of Canberra engaging with them more on climate issues.

In the wake of the conflict, China's special envoy to the region, Wang Xuefeng, stated that Beijing could come up with its own "step-up" policy, recognising the needs of the Pacific states, which Canberra had failed to.

Snakes in Suits

Hypocrite Macron has the gall to lecture Putin on protests despite his violent crackdown on Yellow Vests

putin and macron
© Reuters / Sputnik / Alexey Druzhinin
Emmanuel Macron took the opportunity to tell Russia's Vladimir Putin that a "true democracy" should treat protesters with respect. In France, anti-Macron protesters have been met with police batons for the past 40 weekends.

The two leaders met ahead of the G7 summit, which Russia will not be part of, to talk about issues both bilateral and international. Amid the mostly-amicable exchange, the French president scaled the moral high ground to admonish Putin for his treatment of protesters at home.

"We called this summer for freedom of protest, freedom of speech, freedom of opinion and the freedom to run in elections, which should be fully respected in Russia like for any member of the Council of Europe," Macron said at a joint press briefing at his summer residence on the French Mediterranean coast ahead of 3.5-hour-long talks with Putin.


Comment: The French media reporting on this is highly instructive. Here's a sample from France24:
"We know that such situations don't just happen in Russia. I am a guest here and it's uncomfortable for me to talk about this," said Putin when pressed by reporters.

But he then reeled off a list of casualty tolls and said that according to "our count", 11 people were killed in the French protests and 2,500 injured.

Several people lost their lives in traffic accidents linked to the protests. Putin did not give a source for the figures.


Notice how France24, which is French state media, casts doubt on the veracity of Putin's figures, despite it being 100% factual that he is correct.


But Macron was quick to respond, noting Putin's "concern" over the violence and insisting it was important to notice the difference between the two countries.


Ah, good, someone in the West is finally going to explain why there is no equivalence...


The French president said it was important in a democracy to respect principles such as "freedom of expression and opinion" and "the freedom to demonstrate and participate" freely in elections.


Ok...


"That was why France spoke out this summer... about the situation in Moscow," he said.

"In France, those who demonstrate are able freely to take part in elections. The yellow vests were free to participate in the European elections and will go to the local elections," he said, expressing hope that they would freely express themselves "in order to reduce conflict".


Right, same as Russian citizens in Russia.


"We are a country in which people can express themselves freely, demonstrate freely, express their views freely, but what we cannot accept is them causing damage and disturbing the public order."


Uhuh. Par for the course.


In Russia, local polls are seen as a rare opportunity for dissenting voices to participate in political life as anti-Kremlin parties have been squeezed out of parliament over Putin's two decades in power.
Wait, what? The reason why protests in France are good but protests in Russia are bad is because there are no anti-Kremlin political parties?

WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN??

By that logic, because France has no anti-Elysée political parties, it is also 'un-free'.

Western leaders are idiots. Cunning, perhaps, but so stupid at the same time.

In any event, they're right, but for the wrong reason. There is no equivalence between both sets of protests because one is a popular rebellion against the entire elite, while the other is a localized issue about candidate lists for the election of Moscow's mayor. One was violently crushed, while the other is relatively unencumbered. One is actually significant for both France and the EU, while the other is actually a non-story.


Bulb

Putin and Macron discuss possibility of holding Ukraine summit

putin and macron
French President Emmanuel Macron is hosting his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, for talks expected to focus on efforts to advance negotiations to curb the conflict between Ukrainian forces and Moscow-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine.

Macron, who held talks with Putin at the Palace of Versailles near Paris in 2017, this time welcomed him at his summer retreat at Bregancon Fort, near the village of Bormes-les-Mimosas.

At the start of the meeting, Macron said he hoped his talks with Putin will lead to a four-way summit on the crisis in Ukraine over the coming weeks, instating that there was a "real opportunity" for peace.

The Russian president voiced support for the Normandy format for negotiations aimed at putting an end to the Ukrainian conflict and involving France, Germany, Ukraine, and Russia.

Bulb

Google is censoring political content? *Gasp!* Who knew?

google law court
© Getty Images / Anadolu Agency
The latest leaks about Google's clandestine political censorship are fascinating — but they're not going to knock anyone's socks off for shock factor. Who, at this stage, does not know what Google is up to?

Former Google employee Zachary Vorhies told Project Veritas that he spent a year collecting documents that prove Google uses a politically biased "fringe ranking" system and maintains a "blacklist" of undesirable websites.

Surprise, surprise! Our Silicon Valley overlords have "deboosted and deranked" websites that fall foul of its own agenda.

Coverage of Vorhies' leaks has been minimal, with the exception of right wing websites, many of which found themselves banished to the "blacklist." Liberal media has mostly ignored the leaks. This is primarily because Project Veritas is led by arch-conservative James O'Keefe and they are naturally loathe to cover any information he brings to light, regardless of how legitimate it might be.

The group has uncovered some enlightening information in the past; most embarrassingly, it caught a CNN reporter admitting that the Russiagate story, which consumed American media for the better part of three years, was "mostly bullsh*t" but that it had been "incredible" for ratings.

Bomb

Afghan president vows to eliminate Islamic State havens after wedding attack kills 63

afghanistan wedding bomb

The shoes of victims in the Kabul wedding hall, damaged after the blast.
Afghan President Ashraf Ghani has vowed to "eliminate" all safe havens of the extremist Islamic State (IS) group after at least 63 people, including children, were killed in a Kabul bombing at a wedding hall late on August 17 claimed by a local IS affiliate.

Close to 200 others were wounded.

Ghani's statement came as Afghanistan on August 19 celebrates the 100th anniversary of independence from the British.

"We will take revenge for every civilian drop of blood," Ghani declared. "Our struggle will continue against [IS], we will take revenge and will root them out." He urged the international community to join those efforts.

However, several blasts struck restaurants and public squares on August 19 in the eastern Afghan city of Jalalabad, wounding at least 34 people, officials said.

No group claimed responsibility for the 10 explosions but both IS and Taliban militants operate in the region.

Binoculars

Syrian Army advances, takes Khan-Sheikhun, launches airstrike on Turkish convoy

syria border crossing
© REUTERS / Khalil Ashawi
Turkish soldiers stand on a watchtower at the Atmeh crossing on the Syrian-Turkish border.
Syrian forces entered the town of Khan-Sheikhun in Syria's Idlib Province on Sunday, amid heavy fighting with Jabhat al-Nusra terrorists and their allies, targeting their positions and inflicting heavy losses on militants, the SANA news agency reported.

According to the report, the Syrian army targeted al-Nusra fortifications in the direction of Kafridon and al-Sabbaghiya, in the suburbs of Khan-Sheikhun, killing many of the terrorists, while other gunmen fled the area.

Earlier this week, the Syrian military liberated two villages in the south of Idlib Province after clashing with terrorists.

A brigadier general of the Syrian Armed Forces said that liberation followed violent clashes between the military and the terrorists from the Jabhat Nusra group, during which several fighters were killed and military equipment was seized.

Comment: The Syrians say they have established control over the entire city and are encircling the hills around the city in order to eliminate the snipers there:
A Syrian military source said earlier that the Syrian Army had blocked the supply lines of the Jabhat al-Nusra*terrorist group's militants after establishing control over the Damascus-Aleppo highway.

Earlier in the day, the Syrian Foreign Ministry said that Turkish armoured vehicles had entered the Syrian city of Saraqib in Idlib and were currently moving to Khan Sheikhoun, which is under the control of militants.


​The Syrian Armed Forces earlier took control of a checkpoint on the north-western border of Khan Sheikhoun, according to reports.
"Turkish armoured vehicles with munitions have violated the Syrian border and have entered the city of Saraqib, they are moving in the direction of Khan Sheikhoun...", according to the Syrian Foreign Ministry.

According to the Turkish Defense Ministry, the Syrian forces launched an airstrike on the convoy, killing 3 civilians and injuring 12:
"Our convoy was targeted by an airstrike during a transfer to Turkey's ninth observatory point in Idlib. Three civilians were killed, and 12 more were injured. We condemn firmly this attack, contradicting agreements, cooperation and dialogue with Russia", the Defence Ministry said in a statement, as quoted by Anadolu news agency.
The taking of Khan-Sheikhun almost completes the encirclement of al-Nusra in the southern terrorist-held region of Idlib:
khan-sheikhun
© syria.liveuamap.com
The situation in Idlib just prior to the taking of Khan-Sheikhun.
Moon of Alabama provides some clarity on the situation:
This morning Turkey sent (vid) a 29 truck convoy with five tanks, two infantry fighting vehicles, ammunition and additional personal toward the observation post in Morek, south of Khan Shaykhun.

Before the convoy passed through Maarat al-Numan, 20 kilometers north of Khan Shaykhun, the Russian airforce bombed its path (vid). The leader of Faylq al-Sham, a 'Syrian rebel' group controlled by the Turkish intelligence service, was escorting the Turkish army convoy in a technical. He was killed. No Turkish soldiers were harmed. The convoy stopped and will have to return to Turkey. The tanks and the ammunition will not reach the jihadis in Khan Shaykhun.



Rocket

Report: Chinese missiles could cripple US Asia-Pacific forces as Washington loses military primacy

destroyer
© Sputnik / Igor Zarembo
The 104-page report also urged the US and its Pacific allies, namely Australia and Japan, to overhaul their military investment plans as well as spending and relationships in the region.

China has enough cutting-edge ballistic missile technology to destroy the United States' Western Pacific Navy fleets and military bases in a matter of "hours", a report from the University of Sydney said on Monday.

The US no longer "enjoys military primacy" in the Indo-Pacific and has an "uncertain" capacity to keep a "favourable balance of power", the report from the University's United States Studies Centre said.

Beijing could quickly topple US forces "particularly around Taiwan, the Japanese archipelago or maritime Southeast Asia" before Washington could respond, authors Ashley Townshend, Matilda Steward and Brendan Thomas-Noone warned.

Comment: And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why 'pro-democracy' riots have been taking place in HK for the last couple of months.

If you can't beat your enemy this way, come at him that way...


Russian Flag

Russian lawmakers create 'anti-foreign meddling' commission, will send results to PACE, OSCE

russia coat of arms
© Sputnik / Natalia Seliverstova
Russian coat of arms on the facade of the parliament building in Moscow.
Lawmakers in Moscow are gearing up to examine reports of foreign meddling and deliver the findings to the parliamentary assemblies of the Council of Europe and the OSCE, as well as to the 'offending' countries.

On Monday, the council of the State Duma, the lower house of the nation's parliament, created a 12-person commission tasked with investigating foreign meddling in Russia's domestic affairs.

Comment: