Puppet Masters
Coincidence or otherwise, the world feels like a much more dangerous place since Joe Biden formally entered the White House on January 20. Now that the 'Make America Great Again' bumper sticker has been removed from the US juggernaut, early indicators point to a global joyride riddled with dangerous standoffs and even full-blown hostilities that could spark the mother of all conflagrations. One of the most dangerous stops along this highway to possible oblivion is playing out right now on Russia's doorstep.
For the average consumer of Western media junk food, the simmering standoff between Ukraine and Russia has been reduced to snack-size bites, popularly sold to unsuspecting consumers as 'Russian aggression'. Toss away the greasy bag, however, and the more discerning shopper will discover that Moscow has in fact steadfastly supported the conditions for peace in Donbass, where a civil war has been raging for seven years between pro-Russian forces and Kiev. Meanwhile, it is Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky who has abandoned the Minsk Protocol, the 2014 peace treaty, while signing a decree on March 24 that practically places Ukraine on a war footing with Russia.
And those aren't the only inconvenient truths the Western media would rather its audience not know about.
US helping Saudis in war on Yemen while also claiming to be 'revitalizing diplomacy to end conflict'
"The United States is continuing to work together with our Saudi partners to help the Kingdom defend itself from external threats, while at the same time revitalizing diplomacy to end the Yemen conflict," McNulty said on Tuesday.
McNulty emphasized that cross-border attacks against Saudi Arabia by Houthis in Yemen contravene international law and undermine all efforts to promote peace and stability in the region.
Boris Johnson has warned that the reduction in coronavirus infections, hospitalisations and deaths "has not been achieved" by the rollout of COVID vaccines.
The prime minister, speaking the day after the latest easing of lockdown restrictions, instead said it was the national shutdown that had been "overwhelmingly important" in driving down COVID rates.
Comment: Lockdowns have been in effect for nearly a year and apparently it's only now that they're working? Is there a more likely explanation? One might be that the coronavirus, and the flu, are seasonal and both will be in decline at this time of year in the UK.
Nearly 40 million vaccine doses have now been given across the UK, with those aged between 45 to 49 now able to book their jab appointments.
Comment: Lockdowns have no only had detrimental psycho-physiological effects on people, resulting in weaker immune systems, but by limiting contact with others they've potentially made next year's flu season worse: British Covid modellers predict 'severe flu next winter because lockdowns prevented usual herd immunity'

Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu salutes as he visits the main submarine base of the Northern Fleet to inspect the construction site of facilities for Borei and Borei-A class submarines in Gadzhievo, Murmansk region, Russia.
After paying a visit to the soldiers, Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu told journalists that the personnel met the standards required for the situation. "The troops have shown full readiness and ability to fulfill the tasks of ensuring the country's military security," he said. "Currently, these associations and formations are engaged in drills and exercises."
Shoigu said that the redeployments had taken place "in response to the military activity of the alliance that threatens Russia." The move comes amid escalating tension with the US-led NATO bloc and after bloody fighting in eastern Ukraine between Kiev's forces and two breakaway republics.
After a week of fruitful discussions between the parties to the Joint Comprehensive Program of Action - the JCPOA, better known as the Iranian nuclear agreement - and the United States (who, since May 2018, was no longer a party, and as such sat in as an observer), it looked as if the US and Iran had agreed to a mutually accepted outcome: the lifting of all nuclear-related sanctions imposed by the US in exchange for Iran returning to full compliance with its obligations under the terms of the JCPOA. The devil was in the details, however. And by week's end there was no agreed-upon formula regarding the sequence of events concerning the actions needed to be taken by both parties to fulfil their respective requirements. There was not even a timeframe.
Comment: At least one Israeli military figure was appalled at the sabotage operation:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should not have had the authority to approve the sabotage attack against Iran's Natanz nuclear facility, former Israeli Defence Force Head of Military Intelligence Amos Yadlin has said.Iran's retaliation may have already commenced:
"Sensitive operational actions with political and security implications involving potential escalation must be approved by the government. The cabinet can authorise the security cabinet to decide, and the security cabinet can authorise the prime minister and the defence minister. These processes did not happen, and the decisions were made while excluding all the decision-making bodies. Knesset oversight has not existed for a long time," Yadlin wrote in a multi-part Twitter thread on Tuesday.
According to the retired military officer, the Natanz attack served to carelessly stoke tensions with the Islamic Republic, without coordinating with Tel Aviv's American allies, and without actually improving Israel's national security situation.
"Over the years that I have participated in discussions...on the approval of Israeli actions in an enemy country, we have been faced with three main considerations: the expected achievement, the enemy's response and the potential for escalation, as well as implications for Israel's relations with its vital ally," Yadlin explained.
"48 hours after the explosion at Natanz, it has become clear that the attack did not result in the end of Iran's nuclear programme," the former official continued, adding that in the wake of media reporting on Israeli involvement in the sabotage, including "irresponsible leaks" from inside Israel, Tel Aviv should brace for Iranian retaliation. He added, however, that this response would be "measured," out of a desire on Tehran's part to avoid further escalation.
Of greater concern, Yadlin said, is that the Islamic Republic can now be expected to "take defiant measures" in the nuclear field, expanding enrichment with advanced centrifuges and reducing international supervision of its nuclear programme. "In the context of the negotiations, it is likely that Iran will harden its positions or even strengthen the hand of the Revolutionary Guards who have called on Iran not to return to the 2015 nuclear deal."
The officer also warned that even if Israel informed the US ahead of time about its plans to sabotage Natanz, the timing was "not conducive to building trust" with the Biden administration, trust which he said is "essential to coordinating positions and safeguarding Israel's interests."
Netanyahu, Yadlin alleged, probably does not have an up-to-date strategy for conducting its Iran sabotage campaign in the Biden era, "and without a doubt, in the shadow of the political crisis [facing Israel], the essential discussions have not taken place."
"Even taking a cautious view, it is doubtful whether we are not witnessing a political timing that influences the initiation of a security crisis with the goal of making it easier for Netanyahu to form another government. These are not the considerations that should inform such fateful decisions," the officer concluded.
"The Israeli ship was targeted at the Emirati port of Fujairah," the agency tweeted, adding that the number of the Israeli ship that was targeted is 9690559, it is called Hyperion, and it belongs to the Israeli PCC company which transports cars.
Israel has blamed the attack on Iran, Israeli Channel 12 reported, citing unnamed officials.
No casualties have been reported following the incident, the channel added. The attack was likely carried out with a missile or a drone, the Jerusalem Post reported, adding that the ship only suffered light damage.
The Hyperion is linked to the Israeli Ray Shipping company, which owned a vessel hit by an alleged Iranian attack on 28 February. An Israeli-owned ship was targeted in the Gulf of Oman while en route to Dubai - Prime Minister Netanyahu blamed the explosion on Iran, while Tehran rejected the accusations as "groundless."
Tuesday's attack comes amid spiralling tensions between Iran and Israel following the sabotage attack at the Natanz nuclear facility on Sunday, which disrupted the site's power grid. Tehran called the incident an "act of nuclear terrorism", while some Israeli and US media suggested that it was the results of a "classified Israeli operation."
An Ankara court has ordered the release of ten retired Turkish admirals who were detained earlier this month for signing a declaration in defense of the Montreux convention, NTV reports.
The ten admirals are being released on a signature bond, NTV said on Tuesday.
Comment: See also:
- Russian-Ukrainian war: Tragedy for people, chance for elites
- Ukraine claims Russia ignoring call for crunch talks to avert all-out war in Donbass, but Moscow says it never received an invite
- Full-scale Ukrainian war would threaten Russian security, Kremlin pledges action to prevent 'humanitarian catastrophe - US war ships set sail for Black Sea
Now, when all the global media are closely following the situation in the eastern regions of Ukraine, the international community is wondering whether Donbass will become the point of the next military conflict, and what its scale will be. The main question is "Cui Prodest"?
The answer is unambiguous: the administration of Ukrainian President is a real stakeholder in the armed conflict in eastern Ukraine. In the current Ukrainian reality, there are plenty of circumstances that determine the pattern of conduct of Volodimir Zelensky.
Comment: Conflict ahead? The idea that war covers all sins and eradicates fundamental problems is a self-serving fallacy at the expense of a designated opponent.
In the United States, ignorance about and disinterest in the world at large influences the judgment of the Opposition just as it shapes the policies of those in power. The prevailing assumption among the tiny minority of public critics of US foreign policy is that the United States calls all the shots, that the positions on any given international issue taken by our European allies, for example, are dictated from Washington or, if developed on their own, serve the single purpose of gaining favor with Washington and bolstering the "special relationship" held by London or Paris or Berlin.
If only things were that simple. In this essay I argue why they are not. Nor have they been that simple for many years now. As I look over my writings going back a decade that I published in a succession of "non-conformist" books, I was calling out the home grown nature of Neoconservatism in Europe which arose in parallel with but independent from the movement in States that gave us the horrors of the Iraqi invasion and the viciously anti-Russian policies culminating in the Maidan in Ukraine, with the change of geopolitical course in Kiev as wished by the US, namely inimical to Russia.
In a statement published on Tuesday, American officials confirmed that the two leaders had spoken about "a number of regional and global issues." As part of the talks, Biden was said to have "voiced concerns over the sudden Russia military build-up" on the Crimean Peninsula and along the border with Ukraine, calling upon Moscow "to de-escalate tensions."
The exchange comes amid widespread fears that fighting in the Donbass region between Kiev's forces and fighters from Moscow-backed self-declared republics could spill over into a full-blown conflict. The new standoff follows a large-scale mobilisation of troops and materiel by Kiev, which prompted Russia to beef up its own military presence near its Western frontier.
Some in the West have asserted that Moscow may be planning to invade Ukraine, but such claims have been met with dismissal by Russian officials. Meanwhile, in a move widely interpreted as a show of support for Ukraine, Washington has reportedly dispatched two warships to the Black Sea.
Voters in Ecuador and Peru cast ballots under strict public health measures because of the coronavirus pandemic, which has recently strengthened in both countries, prompting the return of lockdowns and heightening concerns over their already battered economies. Peruvians also were electing a new Congress.
The Electoral Council in Ecuador had not declared an official winner in the contest to replace President Lenín Moreno next month, but results released by the agency showed former banker Guillermo Lasso with about 53% of votes and leftist Andrés Arauz at 47%, with just over 90% of votes counted. Arauz had led the first round of voting with more than 30% on Feb. 7, while Lasso edged into the final by finishing about a half a percentage point ahead of environmentalist and Indigenous candidate Yaku Pérez.
Comment: Voters elected the change candidate over more of the same stagnation exhibited throughout the last decade:
Outgoing president, Lenin Moreno, didn't run this time. His popularity dropped to single digits amid criticism that his benefits-slashing neoliberal policies and underwhelming response to the pandemic took a heavy toll on the poor.
Lasso, a career banker, promised to offset the economic damage done under Moreno by doing a better job in attracting foreign investment and creating jobs in a more open economy, as well as heavily investing in agriculture.
Whether he can do this remains to be seen. In 1999, he had a short stint as 'Super Minister' of the Economy under the government of Jorge Jamil Mahuad. That time was marked by significant economic turmoil and forced Ecuador to adopt the US dollar as its national currency, gaining stability in exchange for weakening the central bank's ability to conduct monetary policy.
Arauz offered a return to the times of his former boss, President Correa, whose decade in power brought forth a number of successful social programs to reduce poverty and otherwise help the poor.
Arauz's plan to alleviate the Covid-19 economic slowdown was to distribute $1,000 checks to a million poor families. He also wanted to overhaul a $6.5 billion loan that the Moreno government took from the International Monetary Fund. Lasso pledged not to disavow the financial agreement.
Lasso's surprise win came amid a massive protest campaign by the third-place candidate, Yaku Perez. A self-styled indigenous eco-activist and socialist, he was nevertheless highly critical of Correa and his preferred candidate. After the narrow defeat in the first round, he claimed that his spot in the run-off election was stolen from him through voter fraud. He called on supporters to protest this by spoiling ballots, and was apparently quite successful in his campaign.
According to the National Electoral Council data, 1.7 million ballots were nullified. The country has a mandatory universal voting system and roughly 13 million registered voters, of which 10 million fulfilled their civic duty on Sunday.
Critics call Perez a spoiler candidate, propped up to torpedo Arauz's candidacy by splitting the vote of the left. Notably, he endorsed Lasso for president in 2017, when the banker was running against Moreno, the incumbent leader of Ecuador. Moreno himself was a Correa-backed candidate at the time and was expected to govern as a leftist, but made a U-turn after taking power.















Comment: It seems the Saudis have had to resort to diplomacy after failing to achieve more sinister objectives in their war on the country: