Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 03 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Vader

Middle East confusion? Can we sort it out?

US wolf
© www.4thmedia.org
The scars and swipes forever.
Are you confused by the Middle East? Here are some things you should know. (But you'll probably still be confused.)

The US, France, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, and the Gulf monarchies have all in the recent past supported al Qaeda and/or the Islamic State (ISIS) with arms, money, and/or manpower. The first example of this was in 1979 when the United States began covert operations in Afghanistan, six months before the Russians arrived, promoting Islamic fundamentalism across the southern tier of the Soviet Union against "godless communism". All the al-Qaeda/Taliban shit then followed.

In addition to Afghanistan, the United States has provided support to Islamic militants in Bosnia, Kosovo, Libya, the Caucasus, and Syria. The United States overthrew the secular governments of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya and is trying to do the same with Syria, thus giving great impetus to the rise of ISIS. Said Barack Obama in March of this year: "ISIS is a direct outgrowth of al-Qaeda in Iraq that grew out of our invasion. Which is an example of unintended consequences. Which is why we should generally aim before we shoot."

More than a million refugees from these wars of Washington are currently over-running Europe and North Africa. God Bless American exceptionalism.

The Iraqi, Syrian and Turkish Kurds have all fought against ISIS, but Turkey - close US ally and member of NATO - has fought against each of them.

Russia, Iran, Iraq, and Lebanese factions have each supported the Syrian government in various ways in Damascus's struggle against ISIS and other terrorist groups, including the (much celebrated but seldom seen) "moderate" ones. For this all four countries have been sharply criticized by Washington.

The United States has bombed ISIS in Syria, but has used the same occasions to damage Syria's infrastructure and oil-producing capacity. Russia has bombed ISIS in Syria, but has used the same occasions to attack Syria's other enemies.

The mainstream media almost never mentions the proposed Qatar natural-gas pipelines - whose path to Europe Syria has stood in the way of for years - as a reason for much of the hostility toward Syria. The pipelines could dethrone Russia as Europe's dominant source of energy.

In Libya, during the beginning of the 2011 civil war, anti-Gaddafi rebels, many of whom were al-Qaeda affiliated militias, were protected by NATO in "no-fly zones".

US policy in Syriain the years leading up to the 2011 uprising against Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, which began the whole current mess, was designed to promote sectarianism, which in turn led to civil war with the goal of regime change. US Secretary of State John Kerry declared on October 22 that in resolving Syria's civil war the country "should not be broken up, that it must remain secular, and that Syrians should choose their future leader." (All of which actually describes Syria under Assad.) Then Kerry said: "One thing stands in the way of being able to rapidly move to implement that, and it's a person called Assad, Bashar Assad."


Comment: Don't think, Mr. Kerry. You are not terribly good at it.


Comment: Props for attempting to enlighten on the diabolical policies and heinous actions of the US. There is no sane explanation to address the depth and despicableness to which the US has plummeted. The wolf within the mask is bent on consuming all in its path.


Blackbox

NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg rules out new combat operation in Afghanistan

Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg
© AP Photo/ Virginia Mayo
Afghanistan has recently seen a resurgence in violence after the Taliban captured large areas of land in the north. The United States, Germany and Britain volunteered to stay in the country past the initial pullout date.

Speaking at a press conference in Spain, Secretary General Stoltenberg said that he welcomed the will of NATO allies and partners to continue their presence, but stressed that "We will not go into a new combat operation."

"We ended the combat operation at the end of last year, but what we have decided is to continue the Resolute Support Mission... and the question is how we do that, with what kind of troops and for how long," he went on to say.

Comment: Looks like NATO is in disarray with no clear plan at all for the Middle East, especially Afghanistan.


Snakes in Suits

Need more war: NATO General calls to resume military operation in Afghanistan

NATO base in Kabul, Afghanistan
© AP Photo/ Rahmat Gul
German NATO General Hans-Lothar Domröse said that NATO should again launch a military operation in Afghanistan and conduct airstrikes against radical Taliban Islamists in the country, DWN wrote. Currently, NATO units can only advise the Afghans on issues regarding reconstruction and training for Afghan forces.

But Domröse insists that NATO should also provide military support for its 'Afghan brothers'.

Comment: With no clear plan in place by NATO for any of the countries in the Middle East, resuming military operations in Afghanistan will not accomplish anything except more death and destruction.


Bulb

Majority of EU leaders see Assad as instrumental in reaching peaceful resolution in Syria

assad
© Reuters
EU members disagree among each other when it comes to the presidency of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, an anonymous diplomatic source from Greece told RIA Novosti.

The new members of the EU from Eastern Europe, as well as France and Britain are against the al-Assad government in Syria; meanwhile the majority of EU members believe his participation is vital for finding a peaceful solution to the Syrian crisis, the Greek source informed.
"Al-Assad is the legitimate president of Syria. How can you look for political solutions without him?" — the source told RIA Novosti.
Al-Assad is a key political actor when negotiating with the Syrian government. Who else is the EU supposed to negotiate with, the Greek source asked.

One could call it a sign of progress that the members of the EU agreed that al-Assad could stay in power for a few years during a transitional period until various Syrian factions try to come up with another government.

Comment: That EU leaders are even having a discussion of whether or not Assad should or should not be involved in solving the problems of the country he leads is patently absurd, particularly since he has a higher approval rating than any one of them!


Sherlock

UK believes "explosive device" brought down Russian plane; government suspends flights from Sinai airport

Image
© Maxim Grigoryev / RIA Novosti
The British government says that it believes the Russian passenger jet that crashed over Egypt's Sinai on Saturday might have been brought down by an "explosive device."

All flights from Egypt's Sharm el-Sheikh resort to the UK have been delayed as a precautionary measure, the joint statement from the Prime Minister's Office, the Department for Transport and Foreign & Commonwealth Office said.

This will allow time for a team of UK aviation experts to assess the security situation in the resort from where the Russian-operated Airbus 321 departed Saturday.

"While the investigation is still ongoing we cannot say categorically why the Russian jet crashed. But as more information has come to light we have become concerned that the plane may well have been brought down by an explosive device," the statement read.

The security assessment is expected to be completed by Wednesday night.

Comment: There may well have been an explosion that contributed to the crash, but the question is whether the explosion was from a 'natural' or man-made event. In recent days, Western politicians have begun to spread the narrative that a bomb was responsible, which is understandable given that such power brokers are undoubtedly interested in preventing any speculation about a 'natural' cause of the crash. Why?

The relationship between the authorities of a country and the fate of the country and its people vis a vis celestial events - destructive events from the sky - is as old as human societies. The PTB today know this and that is why they want to keep a lid on any speculation about or evidence of the reality of "cosmic catastrophes".

Our 'leaders' would rather the masses think that they are modifying weather with HAARP or chemtrails - which leaves them in control - than for people to know that what is happening is completely beyond the control of the established authorities. Because, of course, when people see that the cosmos is acting against them, they always blame the authorities!

In ancient times, under such circumstances, the priest king who was clearly not 'ritually pure' would have been sacrificed and a new king put in his place in an effort to appease the gods. Constantine's imposition of Christianity was an act of exactly this sort: there were comets, famines, plague and he was just pushing every button he could think of to try to get things to settle down.

In the case of the crash of the Russian plane over the Sinai, the available evidence is strongly suggestive of one of these 'cosmic events'.


Radar

Trouble in paradise: Maldives declares state of emergency after suspected assassination attempt on the president

Image
© HO/AFP/Getty Images
The president of the Maldives, Abdulla Yameen.
The president of the Maldives has declared a state of emergency, citing a threat to citizens' safety and national security.


Comment: The threat seems more directed to the president, not the citizens, as you will read below.


Abdulla Yameen's decree, which came into effect at midday local time (0700 GMT), suspends all basic rights and gives the security forces sweeping powers to arrest suspects before a major anti-government rally planned later this week.

The main opposition Maldivian Democratic party (MDP), whose leader Mohamed Nasheed is in jail following his conviction earlier this year under anti-terror laws, has organized the protest.

Whistle

USDA silencing scientists on pesticide research

Image
© USDA
Jonathan Lundgren, an entomologist with the USDA’s Agriculture Research Service, filed a whistleblower complaint Wednesday alleging the federal agency suppressed his research on a popular class of pesticides.
A senior scientist at the U.S. Department of Agriculture filed a whistleblower complaint on Wednesday accusing the federal agency of suppressing research findings that could call into question the use of a popular pesticide class that is a revenue powerhouse for the agrichemical industry.

Jonathan Lundgren, a senior research entomologist with the USDA's Agriculture Research Service who has spent 11 years with the agency based in Brookings, S.D., said that retaliation and harassment from inside USDA started in April 2014, following media interviews he gave in March of that year regarding some of his research conclusions.

Comment: Another example of the Government witch hunt to eliminate critics:
Government scientists who believe in exposing the truth are being targeted.

Ten scientists at the US Dept. of Agriculture are on such a target list, because their research findings would harm big-corporate agriculture.

PEER (Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility), a non-profit group, knows who these scientists are, but they aren't talking. Not yet. They're trying to gain protection for the researchers.

Here is a March 26 release from PEER, "USDA Urged to Shield Its Scientists From Harassment":
"Scientists within the U.S. Department of Agriculture are subjected to management pressure and retaliation for research threatening agribusiness interests..."

"PEER has received reports concerning USDA scientists ordered to retract studies, water down findings, remove their name from authorship and endure long indefinite delays in approving publication of papers that may be controversial. Moreover, [USDA] scientists who are targeted by [big-Ag] industry complaints find themselves subjected to disruptive investigations, disapprovals of formerly routine requests, disciplinary actions over petty matters and intimidation from [USDA] supervisors focused on pleasing 'stakeholders'."
The "stakeholders," of course, would include huge biotech companies.



Light Sabers

US sent warship into disputed South China Sea to sabotage Beijing-Tokyo-Seoul talks

Image
© Youtube/Youtupe Mania
In a significant trilateral summit over the weekend, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang met South Korean President Park Geun-hye and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. It's a welcome development for Asian fraternity. But for Washington's regional hegemonic ambitions, based on divide-and-rule, it must be seen as a retrograde event.

Notably, on the agenda in Seoul was the continuation of "dialogue for regional cooperation in the spheres of economic and social development." That China, South Korea and Japan have engaged in such dialogue has to be seen as a significant step toward normalization of relations given the long history of enmity and disputes between the three regional powerhouses.

It's noticeable that just a few days before the renewal of the trilateral summit, US destroyer USS Lassen sailed into the 12 nautical miles of China-controlled islands in the South China Sea. The timing of the two events is intimately related. The question is: Did the US send its guided-missile destroyer USS Lassen into a hotly disputed region precisely for the purpose of stirring up troubled waters between China and its neighbors?

It seems more than a coincidence that Washington dispatched its warship only days before China joins South Korea and Japan - both US allies - in this landmark regional summit.

Stormtrooper

Trying to save face: US changes tone, wants to cooperate with Russia on Syria crisis

Image
© Brendan Smialowski / Reuters
In an interview with the Russian-based interstate MIR TV channel, US Secretary of State John Kerry claimed the US seeks multidimensional cooperation with Russia, including both economic development and resolution of ongoing crises in Syria and Ukraine.

Kerry emphasized the important role Russia is playing in resolving the Syrian conflict and stressed the necessity of cooperation with a "major power with very capable air forces" in the interview.

"Of course, we are coordinating and will coordinate with Russia," he said referring to the situation in Syria.

The US secretary of state also admitted that the US "would like to be able to do more with Russia" in Syria, but said that it could be possible only if "Russia really makes a decision... to help settle the political part of the war."

At the same time, Kerry stressed that the Assad regime still remains a problem for the US and its allies, as "Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, other countries and the opposition will not stop fighting Assad."

Comment: Sure seems like the US sees that they've been outmaneuvered by Putin and are now back-pedaling from their original stance to save face since they realize they will never achieve their original goal. Putin has again sent the US back to the drawing board.


Bomb

Sinai Province jihadist claim 'suicide bombing' killing at least 6 Egyptian policemen, 10 wounded

Egyptian police
© Mohamed Abd El Ghany / Reuters
A suicide bomber rammed his vehicle into a police club in northern Sinai, killing at least six Egyptian policemen and injuring 10 others. An ISIS affiliate has claimed the attack, which comes days after a Russian passenger plane crashed in the region.

In a statement Wednesday, the jihadist group Sinai Province claimed responsibility for the attack in the city of El Arish, describing it as a suicide bombing against the "apostate" police force in retaliation for the arrests of Bedouin women in the region, according to AFP. The group has killed hundreds of Egyptian soldiers and police since the Egyptian army overthrew the Islamist president, Mohamed Mursi, in 2013, following mass protests against his rule.

Comment: Is Egypt having troubles containing and eliminating Islamic State jihadists? Maybe this is part of the reason for Sisi's visit to Britain, to see how the West will help before Egypt turns their eyes to Russia.