Syrian Foreign Ministry says Israeli actions are part of its policy of assisting rebels fighting the Assad regime.
The Syrian government acknowledged on Monday that Israel struck targets inside its territory overnight.

In its first official statement, the Syrian Foreign Ministry claimed four were killed and nine injured in Israeli strikes.

In what it termed a "flagrant violation" of its sovereignty, the Foreign Ministry stated that "Israel's new aggression comes within the context of direct and consistent support it provides terrorists in the area, following the Syrian regime's successful battle against them."

The Israel Air Force struck nine military targets, among them command centers, in response to Sunday's cross-border missile shooting, which killed an Israeli teenager and wounded his father and two other civilians in the Golan Heights.

On Monday morning a United States federal appeals court released the secret Obama administration memo that provided legal justification for the 2011 drone strike in Yemen that killed U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaki, an alleged al Qaeda leader.

Reuters explains the rationale, as put forth by the document:

The memo, prepared by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, says that because the U.S. government considered al Awlaki to be an "operational leader" of an "enemy force," it would be legal for the CIA to attack him with a drone "as part of the United States' ongoing non-international armed conflict with al Qaeda," even though he was a U.S. citizen.

The memo also says the killing of al Awlaki by U.S. military forces would be legal under an authorization for the use of U.S. military force approved by Congress following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington, D.C.

While capturing al Awlaki would have been preferable, the memo states that "we also understand that an operation by either agency to capture al-Aulaqi in Yemen would be infeasible at this time."

View the full document below, with the drone memo starting on page 67:

The US has been quite busy this century trying to undo itself as a world power. This was slow going in the beginning - after all, mighty empires don't tend to fail overnight - but after a decade of assiduous effort the pace has started picking up speed. Like most collapses, the fiascos the US has been creating proceed slowly at first, then all at once.

Take the 2008 "war" in former Soviet Georgia. The Pentagon spent years trying to form Georgia into an anti-Russian, US-dominated puppet. Then, during the Olympic games in Beijing, the US-educated president of Georgia decided to please his masters by initiating artillery bombardment of civilians in a disputed enclave in Georgia inhabited by Russian citizens. In response, the Russians rolled into Georgia, mopped it up, annexed the disputed territory (plus another one) and left. Western media dutifully whitewashed Georgian war crimes and did their best to paint Russia as the aggressor. But his masters were not pleased, and its US-educated president was left to twist in the wind as a political corpse.

A similar fiasco started unfolding in Ukraine in the spring of 2014. You see, the US foreign policy and military establishments are quite compulsive in their unceasing efforts to undermine Russia. The 1%ers who own the US government also have a personal vendetta gainst Putin. They can't forgive him for what he did to Russia's oligarchs who did so much to undermine Russia under Yeltsin: he de-fanged and de-clawed them, banning them from politics and depriving them of political influence. During the Winter Olympics in Sochi, the democratically elected president of Ukraine was overthrown in a coup supported by a false flag operation in which mercenary snipers killed scores of civilians and policemen. In his place the US installed a hand-picked junta that included some neo-Nazi elements. This fiasco is still unfolding; I will return to it in a moment.

It's the fog of diplomacy.

For years, Iran has been an archenemy of the United States. Now, with alliances blurred in the Mideast, the two countries are talking about how to stop an offensive in Iraq by al-Qaida-inspired insurgents. How is it that adversaries that haven't trusted each other for 35 years could cooperate on Iraq today?

They are strange bedfellows, to say the least.

In the Syrian civil war, the U.S. backs the opposition. Iran supports Syrian President Bashar Assad.

The U.S. for three decades has considered Iran a "state sponsor of terrorism." The U.S. says Iran bankrolls anti-Israel terrorist groups and other extremists intent on destabilizing the Middle East. The U.S. has threatened Iran with military action if Iran approaches the capacity to develop nuclear weapons. But despite all the differences, the U.S. and Iran are more engaged diplomatically at this moment than in years.

After a breakthrough interim agreement last year, the U.S., Iran and other nations are hoping to wrap up a deal within the next month that would curb Iran's nuclear program. Progress on nuclear talks is leading American officials to explore whether Iran can be a useful partner on interests long viewed as shared, such as fighting Sunni extremism and ensuring stability of Iraq. Iran, like the Iraqi government, is Shiite. The insurgent group leading the assault in Iraq, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, is Sunni.

But there is worry that Iran is trying to leverage its helpfulness on Iraq into better terms in the nuclear negotiations.

The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), an Al-Qaeda-inspired Sunni militant group, is mocking Michelle Obama and so-called hashtag diplomacy on social media. The jihadists' Tweets are also bragging about the capture of Iraqi military vehicles.

On June 10, less than a thousand of ISIS militants in soft-shelled pickup trucks occupied the northern Iraqi city of Mosul with a population of 1.8 million people. The city fell with no apparent resistance as scores of Iraqi troops fled dropping their uniforms and leaving precious US-made hardware behind. The militants celebrated getting US-made Humvees and tanks - some of which have since headed to Syria to be used against the government forces - and even allegedly captured at least one Black Hawk helicopter.

#Syria: video of various clips of ISIS fighting in Deir az-Zor, incl. taking a tank from Jabhat al-Nusra: https://t.co/bD8MaBmo2I

- Aymenn J Al-Tamimi (@ajaltamimi) June 15, 2014

#Syria: Omar ash-Shishani of ISIS posing with an Iraqi army Hummer: pic.twitter.com/DLUZ6MQUJq

- Aymenn J Al-Tamimi (@ajaltamimi) June 15, 2014

The US military equipment captured by ISIS is worth millions of dollars, the New York Post reported.

Yep, a whole truckload of #Iraq army Hummers captured by ISIS and on their way to #Syria: pic.twitter.com/BLqcbhnL52

- Aymenn J Al-Tamimi (@ajaltamimi) June 13, 2014

"We're aware of reports of some equipment - namely Humvees - and the pictures that have been posted online," Pentagon spokesman Cmdr. Bill Speaks said in an email to Fox News. "We are certainly concerned about these reports and are consulting with the Iraqi government to obtain solid confirmation on what assets may have fallen into ISIL's hands."

#Iraq: Jamaat Ansar al-Islam with a captured Iraqi army tank: pic.twitter.com/84FFGnXTXk

- Aymenn J Al-Tamimi (@ajaltamimi) June 13, 2014

The photoshopped image of Michelle Obama with the #bringbackourhumvee hashtag is a take-off of her #bringbackourgirls Tweet aimed at the kidnapping of 276 Nigerian schoolgirls by militant group Boko Haram in that country.

#Humvees_AsPurchased_WithYourTaxDollars Islamists Mock Michelle with: #BringBackOurHumveehttp://t.co/44HN98RCQn ... pic.twitter.com/4oTmxc2N8N

- Tom T. (@VRWCTexan) June 18, 2014

It's not the first time the Obama tweet has been hijacked. In May, a viral anti-drone meme campaign took off with photoshopped pictures of the US first lady holding signs such as "My husband has killed more young girls than Boko Haram ever could" and "#Stop drone murder."

#BringBackOurHumvee we miss them, it would be a shame to #drone them. #Iraq#ISISpic.twitter.com/xhTlX5ChUm

- Caz Nova (@caz_nova) June 19, 2014

Americans are hitting back against ISIS on Twitter, however.

#BringBackOurHumvee or #BringBackOurHumvees before we have to send in the 72 Virgin Dating Service ... pic.twitter.com/UnDmgxOR8W

- LOLDems (@LOLDems2012) June 18, 2014

Nine Syrian military targets have been hit by Israeli jets and guided missiles, the IDF says, claiming it was a decisive response to a series of cross-border shootings to protect the citizens of Israel.

The strikes on targets in Golan Heights were carried out shortly after midnight, Haaretz reports citing an IDF official, who called it a direct response to Sunday's deadly incident when an anti-tank projectile fired from Syrian territory struck near the border fence on the Israeli occupied Golan Heights.

"The shooting [on Sunday] was a very serious act of provocation, and a continuation of a series of attacks carried out over the past several months against IDF forces throughout the border region, and in this area specifically," the statement reads.

Israeli forces have raided a building in Ramallah where the offices of several media outlets, including RT's Arabic channel, are located.

The IDF raided the Palmedia company building in the West Bank city overnight on Friday. The troops broke down the doors of several offices, destroyed some of the equipment and confiscated records, RT's correspondent Yafa Staiti reported.

"Due to the actions of the military there is no Internet connection in the office. We've lost the archive of video footage and other materials. Office furniture and computers have been damaged," she said.

Israel's military command explained that the night raid did not specifically target RT, but the lessor of the office, which is suspected of cooperating with Hamas.

Mauritanians handed acting President Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz a fresh mandate by a large margin, the country's election commission said late Sunday. Abdel Aziz, who first came to power in a 2008 coup, was re-elected with nearly 82 percent of the vote, the commission said in announcing its provisional results. His nearest rival, Biram Ould Dah Ould Abeid, won nearly 9 percent of the vote, while two other contenders, Boidiel Ould Houmeid and Ibrahim Moctar Sarr, both received about 4.5 percent.

The turnout was just over 56 per cent, the commission said, adding that the polls had been an opportunity to help "democratic practices take root in our country."

The north-west African Islamic republic has a total population of 3.8 million people.

The National Forum for Democracy and Unity, a group of Mauritania's main opposition parties, boycotted the election, accusing Abdel Aziz of trying to rig the vote, reports DPA.

The Polish Foreign Minister believes his country's alliance with the US is worth nothing and compared his government's stance to giving oral sex and receiving nothing in return, a Polish magazine said, citing a leaked recording of a private conversation.

Excerpts from the alleged exchange between FM Radoslaw Sikorski and Jacek Rostowski, an MP and former finance minister, were published Sunday by Wprost, which promised a full transcript and audio files later on Monday or Tuesday. The same magazine triggered a political storm in Poland this month by releasing a recording of a conversation between the head of Poland's central bank and the interior minister, implying a link between the two violating the bank's independence.

According to Wprost, Sikorski is skeptical about the reliance of Poland, one of the staunchest allies of Washington in Eastern Europe, on American protection.

"The Polish-American alliance is not worth anything. It's even damaging, because it creates a false sense of security in Poland," Sikorski allegedly said.

"Complete bullshit," the tape purportedly records Sikorski as saying. "We will get a conflict with both Russians and Germans, and we're going to think that everything is great, because we gave the Americans a blowjob. Suckers. Total suckers."

For the last decade, Argentina has been fighting a legal battle against the so-called "holdout" creditors led by American hedge funds that are pushing the country into a new default. Recently, American courts have started helping the "vulture funds" in their quest to make the South American country pay in full for its old bonds.

The subject of the legal battle is the payment for the bonds that have been issued before the Argentine sovereign default in 2001. While most of the bondholders participated in two bond-swaps, basically allowing the country to restructure its debt and extend the maturity of its bonds, some bonds ended up in the hands of so-called "vulture funds". Such funds are specialized in extracting value from "troubled" bonds. While some vultures feed on the carcases of animals, the "financial vultures" try to use the courts for making issuers pay in full for the bonds acquired by the "vulture funds" at steep discounts.