In December of 2017, the New York Times told us that it was interactions involving former Trump foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos that sparked their investigation - which is in direct contradiction to statements made by former CIA Director John Brennan, who claims that it was he who did so by relaying British intelligence to the FBI.
"I was aware," Brennan said in May, "of intelligence and information about contacts between Russian officials and U.S. persons that raised concerns in my mind about whether or not those individuals were cooperating with the Russians, either in a witting or unwitting fashion, and it served as the basis for the FBI investigation to determine whether such collusion-cooperation occurred."The "finding" was based on DNS logs - and spread by Hillary Clinton herself.
The fact that there are conflicting narratives as to how the FBI's investigation started proves that launching an investigation which could derail the Trump campaign was priority #1 - while coming up with a specific reason to justify it was secondary. All they were certain of (or at least pretended to be certain of) was that Trump colluded with the Russians.














Comment: Yet another aspect to untangle and put straight in the record. Not only did the Russiagaters create a complicated, multi-layered and overarching false scenario, they banked on phony testimony and 'save oneself' tendencies to further confuse and conflict the search for the truth.
More from The Daily Caller 10/11/2018: