Puppet Masters
As recently as this weekend, Reuters reported that in order to further isolate Iran from the global financial community, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin said that the U.S. Treasury was in negotiations with the Belgian-based financial messaging service SWIFT which intermediates the bulk of the world's cross-border dollar-denominated transactions, on disconnecting Iran from the network. Washington has been pressuring SWIFT to cut Iran from the system as it did in 2012 before the nuclear deal.
The latest reversal comes as a result of 'ongoing talks between top U.S. officials and European allies "who have been pressuring the Trump administration to take a softer line on Tehran" ahead of the Nov. 4 implementation of new sanctions on Iran.
Suiciding A Slew Of Strategic Partnerships
It almost looks at this point like the West wants Russia to replace its strategic role in Saudi Arabia, at least judging by the self-inflicted damage that they've done to their own interests over the past couple of weeks since Jamal Khashoggi's killing in his country's Istanbul consulate. The circumstances surrounding it are unclear, but it's looking ever more likely that a hostile "deep state" faction was behind his murder just like the author surmised in his earlier piece titled "Khashoggi Mystery: Rogue Killers Or Rogue Royals?", though that still can't be known for certain. Even so, it's interesting to observe how many Western countries and companies decided to pull out of the Kingdom's upcoming Future Investors Initiative, which is regarded as the so-called "Davos in the Desert".
While all parties in the so-called quadrilateral talks have been given equal billing, Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron's role will be to salvage the best deal for Europe from the accord that was struck without them by Putin and Recep Tayyip Erdogan last month.
In 2018, sitting at the table headed by the Russian and Turkish presidents seems like pragmatism, as Europe outspokenly quakes in fear of a new wave of refugees in the aftermath of the inevitable government assault on Idlib, the last substantial rebel stronghold in Syria.
But did such a scenario seem plausible after the Syrian conflict broke out in 2011, and the West demanded nothing but Bashar Assad's removal, in the summer of 2015 when the Syrian president's forces reached a point of depletion, or November the same year, when Turkish forces shot down a Russian Su-24, setting off a 9-month diplomatic rift between the countries?
Comment: Vladimir Putin always seems to be able to 'work with what he's got' in a positive-guiding manner. Achieving resolution and a way forward for Syria is paramount, but until then it's worth noting the historic magnitude of the moment: the Anglo-Americans are not involved in a major meeting about the Middle East mess, which they themselves created.
Speaking at the Warsaw Security Forum on Wednesday, Retired Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges said that the United States will have to shift its military to the Pacific "to deal with the Chinese threat" - requiring Europe to take a more active role in its own defenses.
"The United States needs a very strong European pillar. I think in 15 years - it's not inevitable - but it is a very strong likelihood that we will be at war with China," Hodges warned.
Funding and training for European security will still remain a top priority for Washington, Hodges emphasized, adding that the US will also have to prepare for "the eventuality that in 10 or 15 years we're going to be having to fight in the Pacific."
Comment: The retired General is probably right on one thing, without dragging Europe into the fray, the US it wouldn't stand a chance. But then, would Europe really be willing to martyr itself for the delusion of American exceptionalism?
- Putin, Xi & Abe: Greater Eurasia Coming Together in Russian Far East
- Pepe Escobar: The Caspian sails towards Eurasian integration
- Italian port of Trieste aiming to be China's primary entry into Europe
- Pepe Escobar: Currency chaos, gold, oil, cryptocurrencies and dumping the dollar
- US mad that China dominates rare-earth metals market, accuses it of 'hurting national security'
In recent days reports have surfaced about bombs getting sent through the mail to very pointed leaders of what some call the "(Democrat) Resistance" to President Donald Trump. Devices are so far reported as having been sent to the following people:
- George Soros
- Former President Bill and Hillary Clinton
- Robert DeNiro
- CNN offices
- Maxine Waters
- Debbie Wasserman Schultz
- Eric Holder
- John Brennan
- Andrew Cuomo
- Former President Barack Obama
- Former Vice President Joe Biden
Comment: Desperate times, desperate measures -- and the level of Leftist desperation in the US is at an all-time high. See also:
- October surprise: Mail bombs target Soros, Clintons, Obama, CNN, Wasserman Schultz, Holder (UPDATES)
- NYC's 9/11 top cop Bernard Kerik walks off CNN when mail bomb story becomes politicized
The retail tycoon Philip Green has been named in parliament as the businessman accused over sexual harassment and bullying allegations that the Daily Telegraph was barred from reporting by an injunction.
Green, the owner of Topshop, was named by Labour peer Peter Hain, who said he was using parliamentary privilege in the public interest.

Bomb squad technician outside the office of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz in Sunrise, Florida.
A pipe bomb was delivered to the CNN headquarters in New York City on Wednesday morning. It was addressed to former CIA chief John Brennan - who is actually a MSNBC pundit - and had the return address of Rep. Wasserman Schultz. The envelope had insufficient postage, and misspelled Brennan's name and Florida.
There are many things to learn from the gruesome murder other than the justified outrage at the event itself. It opens a window on the truly horrible world of the extremely powerful and wealthy.
The first thing to say is that the current Saudi explanation, that this was an intended interrogation and abduction gone wrong, though untrue, does have one thing going for it. It is their regular practice. The Saudis have for years been abducting dissidents abroad and returning them to the Kingdom to be secretly killed. The BBC World Service often contains little pockets of decent journalism not reflected in its main news outlets, and here from August 2017 is a little noticed piece on the abduction and "disappearance" of three other senior Saudis between 2015-17. Interestingly, while the piece was updated this month, it was not to include the obvious link to the Khashoggi case.
Comment: Does Erdogan have the full and unfettered story? Seems unlikely we have come to the entire truth of it or ever will.
See also:
- Erdogan's speech brings forth questions whether Turkey has 'soldout' Khashoggi
- Trump: Saudi's handling of Khashoggi murder was 'a total fiasco'
It is believed to be Rouhani's first public comment on Khashoggi's grim fate and the official did not mince his words. He called out US leader Donald Trump, asking what is more important: a multi billion dollar arms deal with Riyadh, or human rights, which the US repeatedly pledges to defend.
"Today, the people all over the world are confused. Should they believe your claims about human rights or your announcement that you avoid to comment on the issue for 450 billion dollars."
Speaking during a panel at the Future Investment Initiative (FII), Saudi Arabia's international investment forum, the crown prince called the case "painful". Mohammed bin Salman, also called MBS, has been accused by many people of ordering the killing of Khashoggi, his self-exiled critic.
"The incident that happened is very painful, for all Saudis... The incident is not justifiable," MBS said.
Comment: See also:
- The Khashoggi murder exposes Trump admin's dependency on Saudis
- Will Khashoggi's death be the break with Saudi Arabia we've been waiting for?
- 21 Saudis to lose US visas over Khashoggi murder, Pompeo says SA still important ally
- Erdogan's speech brings forth questions whether Turkey has 'sold out' Khashoggi
- Trump: Saudi's handling of Khashoggi murder was 'a total fiasco'














Comment: There does seem to be an undercurrent strategy afoot and big change-ups ahead. The West is embroiled in a dynamics crisis, forced to think for the first time in decades. Thus the 'rush' to Russia is underway - a powerful new haven.