Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 27 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Star of David

Pat Buchanan: Where Trump's and Bibi's Interests Clash

trump i netanyahu
On Monday, President Donald Trump designated the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization, the first time the United States has designated part of another nation's government as such a threat.

Iran's Supreme National Security Council responded by declaring U.S. Central Command a terrorist group.

With 5,000 U.S. troops in Iraq and 2,000 in Syria, often in proximity to Iranian units, this inches America closer to war.

Why did we do it? What benefit did the U.S. derive?

Eye 1

The blatant lies & dirty deals surrounding Assange's arrest

Assange
© Jack Taylor/Getty Images
Julian Assange gestures to the media from a police vehicle on his arrival at Westminster Magistrates' Court on April 11, 2019 in London.
The US has been planning to have Julian Assange handed over for a longtime, that much is obvious. Mike Pence, the Vice President, was visiting Ecuador last year, notionally to discuss the Venezuela situation, and trade. But it was fairly obvious at the time, and even more so now, that they were discussing the details of Assange being handed over to UK authorities, and eventually extradited to the US.

"Trade", indeed.

In terms of quid pro quo, the situation is clear-cut - In February, Ecuador got a $4.2 BILLION loan approved by the International Monetary Fund (amongst other pay-outs). Reuters reported on February 19th of this year:

Chess

Kim Jong Un extends hand to Trump after initiating a 'military shake-up'

Kim-Trump summit
© Leah Millis/Reuters
Amidst the ongoing nuclear negotiation standoff with the United States, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has initiated a large-scale military shakeup, bolstering his general officers corps with a wave of promotions.

The move is said to mark the upcoming birthday of his grandfather and North Korea founder Kim Il Sung, according to state media, but more significantly Kim used the occasion to extend another hand to Washington, signaling he's not given up after the disappointing failed February talks with Trump in Hanoi, which rapidly broke down.

Kim said on Saturday during a speech on state television he would be willing to hold a third summit with Trump, and said Washington has until the end of the year to make a nuclear deal happen.

Clipboard

Still on the table: Top Trump advisors and Latin American officials discuss US military attack in Venezuela at private DC meeting

maduro venezuela army


(The complete list of attendees for the private CSIS event on US military options against Venezuela appears at the bottom of this article.)


The Washington, DC-based think tank the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) hosted a private roundtable on April 10 called "Assessing the Use of Military Force in Venezuela." A list of attendees was provided to The Grayzone and two participants confirmed the meeting took place. They refused to offer any further detail, however.

Among the roughly 40 figures invited to the off-the-record event to discuss potential US military action against Caracas were some of the most influential advisors on President Donald Trump's Venezuela policy. They included current and former State Department, National Intelligence Council, and National Security Council officials, along with Admiral Kurt Tidd, who was until recently the commander of US SOUTHCOM.

Senior officials from the Colombian and Brazilian embassies like Colombian General Juan Pablo Amaya, as well as top DC representatives from Venezuelan coup leader Juan Guaido's shadow government, also participated in the meeting.

Comment: See also:


Eye 1

Assange and the death of Journalism: You have the right to always remain silent

Assange
© AFP/Alex McNaughton/Sputnik
A file photo of WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange on the balcony of the Ecuador Embassy in London.
The arrest of Julian Assange was an act of revenge by the US government that strikes at the heart of journalism

By The date - April 11, 2019 - will live in infamy in the annals of Western "values" and "freedom of expression." The image is stark. A handcuffed journalist and publisher dragged out by force from the inside of an embassy, clutching a Gore Vidal book on the History of the US National Security State.

The mechanism is brutal. WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange was arrested because the United States demanded this from the Tory British government, which for its part meekly claimed it did not pressure Ecuador to revoke Assange's asylum.

The US magically erases Ecuador's financial troubles, ordering the IMF to release a providential $4.2-billion loan. Immediately after, Ecuadorian diplomats "invite" the London Metropolitan Police to come inside their embassy to arrest their long-term guest.

Comment: See also:


Arrow Up

My friend Julian Assange - Alicia Castro former ambassador for Argentina

Assange Alicia Castro

Julian Assange, his cat "James", and Ambassador Alicia Castro
Editor's Note: @ProfessorsBlogg tweeted 14/4 a translation of "Mi Amigo Julian Assange", authored by Ms Alicia Castro, formerly Argentina's ambassador in the UK and Venezuela. The text in Spanish appeared the same day in Página 12, Argentina. Text translated by Prof. Marcello Ferrada de Noli, April 14, 2019.
In 2012, the year I arrived in London as ambassador, Julian Assange obtained the diplomatic asylum of Ecuador and settled in the embassy on Hans Crescent Street. That day the embassy was surrounded by cars of the British police and some agents struggled to enter. My first reflection was to send some trays with meat pasties -"empanadas"- and sweet pastries to alleviate the doings of ambassador Ana Alban. During the following days, together we organized a meeting of Latin American ambassadors, to follow from the legation of Ecuador the session of the OAS [the Organization of American States] where the asylum of Assange was discussed. We sat, for the first time, around that dark table, in an austere room. Suddenly, and discreetly, as we all were waiting, Julian Assange burst in. He was already a legend. I expressed to him how much, we the Latin Americans, had to thank for his revelations about the diplomatic cables that showed the deep and perverse degree of interference by the United States government in our affairs. I myself had as proof the cable that the ambassador of the United States in Argentina, Lino Gutierrez, wrote about my appointment as ambassador in Venezuela, where specific details of my actions are described, which I did not even remember.

Comment: See also:


Propaganda

UK media and MPs: The latest Assange deception

Assange
© Unknown/KJN
In my last blog post, I warned that the media and political class would continue with their long-running deceptions about Julian Assange now that he has been dragged from the Ecuadorean embassy. They have wasted no time in proving me right.

The first thrust in their campaign of deceit was set out on the Guardian's front page today.

There should have been wall-to-wall outrage from public figures in the UK at the United States creating a new crime of "doing journalism" and a new means of arrest for those committing this "crime" overseas, what I have termed "media rendition".

Remember that all of the information contained in the US charge sheet against Assange - the supposed grounds for his extradition - were known to the previous Obama administration as far back as 2010. But Barack Obama never dared approve the current charges against Assange because legally there was no way to stop them being turned against "respectable" journalists, like those at the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Guardian.


Comment: Considering what was to follow media-wise during the 2016 election and when Trump assumed the office, it stands to reason Obama didn't want to upset the MSM applecart. The DNC and individual colluders needed the MSM to be the solid and abiding disinformation source they more than adequately have proven to be.


This was the same Obama administration that had the worst record ever for prosecuting whistleblowers. Obama was no friend to investigative journalism but he understood that it would be unwise to so overtly subvert the notion of a free western press.

Comment: Recommended by Jonathan Cook: Video (viewer discretion): 'Collateral Murder - Wikileaks - Iraq

See also:


Dollars

Mnuchin: US is seeking $10B trade finance fund for Venezuela, regime change string attached

Guaido
© EPA-EFE/MIGUEL GUTIERREZ
Pretender Juan Guaido
The United States is working with a group of countries to build a $10 billion fund to help Venezuela rebuild trade once a new government is in place, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said Saturday.

The United States has joined dozens of other countries in recognizing Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido as interim president but embattled President Nicolas Maduro remains in power.

Mnuchin said that, during the spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, officials had discussed how to aid in the Caribbean country's recovery. But those institutions must sit on the sidelines until there is clear international recognition of a government in Caracas and a way to put funds into use in the country which has seen its economy collapse, while people are fleeing because they cannot get basic food and medicines.

"Every single time I've had one of these meetings I can't believe how much worse it gets on the ground for the people of Venezuela. This is a humanitarian crisis," Mnuchin said.

Comment: Financing by the IMF and World Bank has, on record, spelled financial doom for those countries too desperate to seek other means of support. Greece is one prime example. In the case of Venezuela, the US and friends have exacerbated an already precarious financial situation as a driving factor for regime change. The humanitarian crisis is the leverage. The real price is sovereignty.

See also:


Russian Flag

Haftar in Moscow, meets with Russian Ministry of Defense officials

Haftar
© RFE/RL
Commander LNA, Khalifa Haftar
The Commander-in-Chief of the Libyan National Army Khalifa Haftar was in Moscow on the afternoon of Thursday the 11th of April, for an unofficial visit to the capital Moscow to meet with a number of high-level officials in Russia's Ministry of Defense, a military source in the LNA says.

FRN has confirmed the visit of Khalifa Haftar to Russia, which came about a week after his army launched a large-scale operation in the Western Libya as well as in Tripoli that has been long dominated by the armed groups loyal to the west's recognized GNA unity government, or Government of National Accord which has achieved neither unity nor governance in the failed state formally still known as Libya.

According to a statement by the LNA spokesman Ahmed Al-Mismari, an advance is aimed to purge the country's West from terrorists and different armed militias operating there.

The LNA started a military campaign on Friday, April 5 after the Libyan Marshal addressed to all the troops involved in an operation, stressing "the need to pursue "the march of struggle" targeting "oppressors" who "provoke havoc in the capital". "It's time to peacefully enter Tripoli," Haftar also added, guaranteed that all people are safe, except for those who resort to armed confrontation with the army.

Comment: See also:


Attention

US government indictment of Assange poses grave threats to press freedom

Assange
© Jack Taylor/Getty Images
Julian Assange gestures to the media from a police vehicle on his arrival at Westminster Magistrates' Court on April 11, 2019 in London.
The Indictment of Julian Assange unsealed today by the Trump Justice Department poses grave threats to press freedoms, not only in the U.S. but around the world. The charging document and accompanying extradition request from the U.S. government, used by the U.K. police to arrest Assange once Ecuador officially withdrew its asylum protection, seeks to criminalize numerous activities at the core of investigative journalism.

So much of what has been reported today about this indictment has been false. Two facts in particular have been utterly distorted by the DOJ and then misreported by numerous media organizations.

The first crucial fact about the indictment is that its key allegation - that Assange did not merely receive classified documents from Chelsea Manning but tried to help her crack a password in order to cover her tracks - is not new. It was long known by the Obama DOJ and was explicitly part of Manning's trial, yet the Obama DOJ - not exactly renowned for being stalwart guardians of press freedoms - concluded that it could not and should not prosecute Assange because indicting him would pose serious threats to press freedom. In sum, today's indictment contains no new evidence or facts about Assange's actions; all of it has been known for years.

The other key fact being widely misreported is that the indictment accuses Assange of trying to help Manning obtain access to document databases to which she had no valid access: i.e., hacking rather than journalism. But the indictment alleges no such thing. Rather, it simply accuses Assange of trying to help Manning log into the Defense Department's computers using a different username so that she could maintain her anonymity while downloading documents in the public interest and then furnish them to WikiLeaks to publish.

In other words, the indictment seeks to criminalize what journalists are not only permitted but ethically required to do: take steps to help their sources maintain their anonymity.