Gulf States will be pursing their lips as they consider now their own vulnerabilities and question their reliance on that US umbrella. Even the Pentagon might be questioning, 'what then - is the point to CentCom' in light of what has happened? And above all, Israel will be experiencing a very chill wind sending shivers up the spine: Israelis cannot but be a tad struck in awe at the attack's precise targeting and technical efficacy. Quite impressive - especially given that Saudi spent $65 billion on weaponry last year, to no good avail.
Facing this humiliation, the US Administration has been 'blowing smoke': tossing around red-herrings about the origin and launch of the UAVs and cruise missiles. 'It can't be AnsarAllah (the Houthis), because such an operation was sophisticated beyond their capabilities'. Apart from the obvious Orientalism to this assertion (for, if Hizbullah can manufacture smart drones and smart cruise missiles, why shouldn't the Houthis be able so to do?), do the exact, individual contributions towards the strike on Abqaiq really matter? What is most telling is that the US - with all its massive resources in the Gulf - cannot provide the evidence from whence came these UAVs to Abqaiq.
Comment: Or, for reasons of propaganda against Iran - chooses not to disclose who really did it:
The many questions we should be asking surrounding the US push to war with Iran
Actually, the ambiguity about the strike modus operandi represents just another layer to the sophistication of the attack.
















Comment: The UK (and the US for that matter) pump up the demonizing propaganda against Russia precisely so that these Western countries may justify their own aggression and bloated expenditures on their respective "security" industries.
See also: