
© Rick Friedman/Corbis News, Eddie Moore, Albuquerque Journal/KJN
Literary scholars have an adage about the interpretation of texts. They point out that
the really important things in a text are often what is not said, more so than what is said. To really understand a story, you have to read between the lines. What should be in the story, but was left out? What was the motive for the omissions? This often reveals deep purposes and themes that are obscured in the explicit words on the page. It's analogous to Sherlock Holmes's dog that didn't bark.
Silence is often the real meaning in a story.
The scientific scandal involving pedophile Jeffery Epstein is horrifying, but
it's vital that we understand the real meaning of the collaboration between Epstein and the science elites. The most important meaning in that partnership between Epstein and leading Darwinists and computer scientists
isn't in the depravity of the man and his elite scientific friends.
The most important meaning is in the silence in the scientific community in the midst of this atrocity. It is, I believe,
a revelation about our scientific culture and particularly about
the trust we should place in a "science consensus" that should shake us to our bones. It is what didn't happen in the Epstein story, even more than what did happen, that reveals the most.

© Twitter
Jeffrey Epstein with scientists Steven Pinker and Lawrence Krauss, Epstein's Island
Comment: See also: