Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 27 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Sherlock

Crossfire Hurricane in a teacup? IG report exposes gaping chasm between Russiagate inquiry and reality

crossfire hurricane
© Reuters / Jim Bourg
The long-awaited report on the origins of Russiagate shows the intelligence community played fast and loose with the truth to build its case against candidate Donald Trump and inflate the specter of Russian election interference.

The report by the Department of Justice's Inspector General (DOJ IG) "makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a US presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken," Attorney General William Barr said in a statement following the report's publication on Monday. Despite the clear efforts by a handful of malicious FBI officials to mislead the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court, he continued, the "evidence produced by the investigation was consistently exculpatory."

While praising IG Michael Horowitz's work, Barr made it clear he disagrees with its essential conclusion - that all the prerequisites were properly met in order to launch July 2016's counterintelligence inquiry into purported Russian election meddling, dubbed "Crossfire Hurricane."

Bullseye

WADA's Russia doping ban is a 'war of politics' that 'robs clean athletes of glory'

Russian figure skating team
© Reuters / Shamil Zhumatov
The gold medal-winning Russian figure skating team celebrates on the podium during the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics
Russia's ban from global sports is a punishment rife with politics, analysts told RT. Worse still, political decisions can punish clean athletes, who will be denied the honor of competing for their country.

The World Anti-Doping Agency handed down the ban on Monday, after Russia was alleged to have manipulated data in a Moscow anti-doping laboratory. WADA voted to suspend Russia from all major sporting events for four years in response, meaning the Russian flag will not fly at the next two Olympic Games as well as the FIFA World Cup in Qatar, should Russia qualify.

Clean athletes, however, will be able to compete, albeit under a neutral flag and with no national anthem.

In the runup to the ban, US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) head Travis Tygart had called for even harsher penalties, including a blanket ban on all athletes, even those found to be clean.

Blackbox

Pepe Escobar: What really happened in Iran protests?

iran gas protest
© AFP
A scorched gas station set ablaze by protesters during a demonstration against a rise in gasoline prices in Eslamshahr, near the Iranian capital of Tehran.
On November 15, a wave of protests engulfed over 100 Iranian cities as the government resorted to an extremely unpopular measure: a fuel tax hike of as much as 300%, without a semblance of a PR campaign to explain the reasons.

Iranians, after all, have reflexively condemned subsidy removals for years now - especially related to cheap gasoline. If you are unemployed or underemployed in Iran, especially in big cities and towns, Plan A is always to pursue a second career as a taxi driver.

Protests started as overwhelmingly peaceful. But in some cases, especially in Tehran, Shiraz, Sirjan and Shahriar, a suburb of Tehran, they quickly degenerated into weaponized riots - complete with vandalizing public property, attacks on the police and torching of at least 700 bank outlets. Much like the confrontations in Hong Kong since June.

President Rouhani, aware of the social backlash, tactfully insisted that unarmed and innocent civilians arrested during the protests should be released. There are no conclusive figures, but Iranian diplomats admit, off the record, that as many as 7,000 people may have been arrested. Tehran's judiciary system denies it.

According to Iran's Interior Minister Abdolreza Rahmani Fazli, as many as 200,000 people took part in the protests nationwide. According to the Intelligence Ministry, 79 people were arrested in connection with the riots only in Khuzestan province - including three teams, supported by "a Persian Gulf state," which supposedly coordinated attacks on government centers and security/police forces.

The Intelligence Ministry said it had arrested eight "CIA operatives," accused of being instrumental in inciting the riots.

Георгиевская ленточка

Key takeaway from Ukraine peace talks in Paris is that Zelensky's best friend is Putin

putin
© AFP / Alexey NIKOLSKY / SPUTNIK
The Paris talks on Ukraine have enabled Putin and Zelensky to meet for the first time. But they have agreed only to kick the can down the road, to agree to disagree, while seeking progress on issues other than the war in Donbass.

It would be difficult to exaggerate the weakness of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's position. He is a political novice facing perhaps the most experienced and formidable statesman in the world. Although an intelligent man, the former TV comedian says he likes to do things quickly.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, by contrast, is known for his extreme attention to detail and for his propensity to play a very long game.

Putin is not in a rush. Zelensky is, because time is not on Ukraine's side. The country has avoided default by a whisker only by negotiating a new IMF loan to pay off the old one taken out five years ago and due for repayment this year.

Red Flag

Putin: If Kiev gets control of rebel-held border with Russia, a Srebrenica-type massacre may follow

ukraine soldiers
© REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov
Moscow is concerned that if Kiev troops take control of the border between Russia and eastern Ukraine without ironclad guarantees to anti-government militias, a massacre not unlike the one in ex-Yugoslav Srebrenica may occur.

Speaking of Kiev's demands on Tuesday, Putin said there needs to be absolute certainty that people in eastern Ukraine would be safe once control of the border changes hands, considering that there is not even an amnesty in place.

"We agreed [on the roadmap] in 2015. They have an amnesty law, some decisions have been taken, but nothing has been put into force," Putin told the presidential human rights council. Without guarantees, "I can imagine what would happen next. There will be a Srebrenica."

The warning from the Russian president comes a day after his first-ever meeting with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky in Paris.

Mr. Potato

Don't expect much from Nadler's Monday impeachment 'trial'

Jerrold Nadler
© REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) arrives at a House Judiciary Committee hearing titled "Oversight of the Report by Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III," at which witness former White House Counsel Donald McGahn was subpoened to testify at on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 21, 2019.
Before House Democrats move forward with articles of impeachment against President Trump - which may come later in the week, they're going to hold a 'trial' on Monday in which the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees will present evidence to support their case, according to CNN.

On Saturday night, the House Judiciary Committee released a 52-page report, an update to previous Judiciary Committee reports issued in 1974 and 1998 during the Nixon and Clinton impeachments. While it does not accuse Trump of committing any impeachable offenses, it it lays out what Congressional Democrats consider constitutional grounds for impeachment.

Comment: Adam Schiff was too much of a coward to show up to defend his own report:
[T]he man who has driven the impeachment inquiry for several months — primarily behind closed doors, in the Special Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol — did not show up in person.

Ranking Member Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) was present, as were counsel for both the majority and minority on the Intelligence Committee.

Collins observed: "Mr. Nunes is here! His staff is here! The leading headline is there: 'Schiff Report' — but where's Mr. Schiff?"

He noted that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had testified about his report before the committee, earlier in the year, and that Independent Counsel Ken Starr presented his report in the 1998 impeachment inquiry into President Bill Clinton.

Schiff is under increasing scrutiny — not only for his staff's early contact with the so-called "whistleblower," but also because his committee's reports included phone records of Nunes's calls, along with calls involving the president's lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and reporter John Solomon, among others.



Pirates

Democrats play havoc with history, absurdly citing King Louis XVI in effort to impeach Trump

House Judiciary Committee
© REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/Pool
House Judiciary Committee holds evidenciary hearing on Trump impeachment inquiry on Capitol Hill in Washington
House Democrats laid out their case for impeachment in a report that takes great liberties with US as well as European history. The end result comes off as a lame attempt to hide a lack of evidence behind pomp and verbosity.

Imagine my confusion when I sat down with a hard copy of the 'Constitutional Grounds for Presidential Impeachment' - the Democrats' legal case for impeachment against Trump - and randomly flipped open to page 32, which began with not only a blast from the past, but from an altogether different country: "Many officials were impeached for non-criminal wrongs against the British system of government," the line began, before naming "the Duke of Buckingham (1626), the Earl of Strafford (1640), the Lord Mayor of London (1642), the Earl of Orford and... Governor General Warren Hastings (1787)."

In case the reader missed the true essence of that quote, allow me to repeat it: "Many officials were impeached for non-criminal wrongs..." In other words, it appears that the Democrats are attempting to build an impeachment case against Donald Trump on the premise that it's perfectly legitimate to oust a sitting President who has committed no real crime. That radical idea weaves its slippery way throughout the text.

Bullseye

Europe faces refugee crisis because of its support for terrorists in Syria - Assad

Assad
© AFP 2019 / Handout/SANA
Europe has to deal with the issue of refugees because of its prior support of terrorists in Syria, Syrian President Bashar Assad said in an exclusive interview with Italian Rai24 TV channel, broadcast by Syrian channels on Monday.

"We have to start with a simple question: who created this problem? Why do you have refugees in Europe? It's a simple question: because of terrorism that's being supported by Europe - and of course the United States and Turkey and others - but Europe was the main player in creating chaos in Syria. So, what goes around comes around", Assad said as quoted by SANA news agency.


Since the beginning of the Syrian civil war, millions of people have become displaced or fled to Europe, creating an ongoing migration crisis.

The Syrian president blamed the European Union as the main culprit.

Comment: The establishment benefits from the mass migration crisis in a multitude of ways: See also: And check out SOTT radio's: The Truth Perspective: Weapons of Mass Migration: Interview with Michael Springmann on Europe's Migrant Crisis


Sherlock

Terrorist murdered in Berlin was among organizers of Moscow subway blast - Putin

Putin zelensky

Russian President Vladimir Putin (right) arrives for peace talks in Paris on December 9 with the leaders of France, Germany, and Ukraine.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has said the ethnic Chechen Georgian national killed in Berlin this summer was behind a Moscow subway blast.

Speaking at a news conference in Paris on December 9 following peace talks with the leaders of Ukraine, France, and Germany, Putin described Zelimkhan Khangoshvili as "a hardened and murderous fighter" wanted in Russia.

Putin said Khangoshvili "killed 98 people in one of his acts" and that he was also "one of the organizers of a Moscow metro blast." He gave no further details. Moscow's subway has experienced several deadly explosions over the past 20 years.

Khangoshvili, 40, who had previously fought alongside separatists in Russia's Chechnya region, was shot twice in the head in Kleiner Tiergarten park on August 23.

Comment: More from RT:
Asked about it after the 'Normandy Four' meeting in Paris on Monday, Putin said that to call the man a "Georgian" is not quite right, as he is not an ethnic Georgian and had in fact fought for the Chechen militants in the Caucasus.

"He was a militant, a very rough and bloodstained man," Putin told reporters, noting that he was wanted for an attack that killed 98 people, and was one of the masterminds of the 2004 Moscow metro bombings.

Putin's remarks align with the reporting of US government outlet RFE/RL, which said that Khangoshvili had led a "few dozen fighters" in Chechnya and fought alongside Shamil Basayev - the notorious terrorist leader responsible for the 2002 hostage taking in Moscow's Dubrovka Theater, the 2004 Beslan school massacre, as well as a series of suicide bombings across Russia.

The Russian president said his government will cooperate with the German police as they investigate the killing. He noted, however, that Russia had asked Germany "more than once" to arrest and extradite the "bandit and murderer" Khangoshvili, as he was wanted for terrorism, but the German authorities refused.

"It would be good to cooperate in other circumstances, not just in time of tragedy," Putin said.
See also:


Magnify

It's time for Ukraine to let the Donbass go

Donbass
© Anatoli Boiko/Getty Images
Ukrainian servicemen of the Donbass volunteer battalion take part in operations in a village in the Lysychansk district of the Luhansk region on Jan. 28, 2015.
As the Dec. 9 meeting of the Normandy group tasked with resolving the war in Ukraine's Donbass approaches, Ukrainians would do well to consider that Russia's occupation of the territory has actually been a godsend for their country.

The Donbass has consistently supported Ukraine's most retrograde, anti-reformist, anti-European, pro-Russian, and pro-Soviet political forces. It was the Donbass that made Viktor Yanukovych, whose political career was dedicated to bringing Ukraine back into Russia's orbit, president in 2010. It was out of the Donbass that came his corrupt Party of Regions. And it was the Donbass that opposed popular pro-democracy uprisings in 2004 and 2014.

Russian President Vladimir Putin's occupation of the eastern Donbass in the summer of 2014 effectively disenfranchised its voters. That was bad for the voters, but it enabled pro-democratic forces in unoccupied Ukraine to win the presidency and control of the country's parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, in 2014. Most of the reforms that have been adopted in the past five years — along with Ukraine's steady march toward Europe — would have been impossible had the Donbass remained a part of Ukraine.


Comment: Reforms? In the last 5 years of Ukraine's 'march to Europe' has made life a living hell for most Ukrainians.


Comment: Above seems insight into the sick mind of Western strategists. However, one thing is clear, the Donbass would be best off if allowed to separated itself from an increasingly destabilized Ukraine; it's what the people want, after all.

Dmitry Orlov interviewed by the Saker provides some real insight into the history of the region and Putin's strategy:
The Saker: What about the Donbas republics? How would you compare the situation in Novorussia with what is taking place in the Ukraine?

Dmitry Orlov: The term "Novorossiya" (New Russia) goes back several centuries, to the time Catherine the Great expanded the Russian Empire to include Crimea and other southern possessions. What Lenin reassigned to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic were Russian lands, Donetsk and Lugansk regions among them.

There are several other Ukrainian regions that are almost entirely Russian-Kharkov and Odessa specifically-but Donetsk and Lugansk are not Ukrainian in the least. This is why, after the government overthrow of 2014, when it became clear that the intentions of the Ukrainian nationalists who seized power in Kiev were to oppress the Russian part of the population, these two regions decided to strike out on their own. The Ukrainian nationalists reacted by launching a civil war, which started exactly five years ago, and which they have lost. To save face, they have declared their defeat the result of a "Russian invasion" but have been unable to present any evidence of it. Had the Russians invaded, the result would have been a replay of Russia's action in Georgia in August of 2008, which lasted about a week.

The Ukrainians are continuing to lob missiles into the territories of Donetsk and Lugansk, causing sporadic civilian casualties. Once in a while they stage minor skirmishes, suffer casualties and pull back. But mostly their "Anti-Terrorist Operation," which is what they are calling this civil war, has turned into a propaganda initiative, with the mythical "Russian invaders" invoked at every turn to explain their otherwise inexplicable string of defeats.

After some amount of effort by NATO instructors to train the Ukrainians, the instructors gave up. The Ukrainians simply laughed in their faces because it was clear to them that the instructors did not know how to fight at all. It was then decided that the "road map" for Ukraine's inclusion in NATO should be set aside because the Ukrainians are just too crazy for sedate and sedentary NATO. The trainers were then replaced with CIA types who simply collected intelligence on how to fight a high-intensity ground war without air support-something that no NATO force would ever consider doing. Under such conditions NATO forces would automatically retreat or, failing that, surrender.

Meanwhile, the two eastern regions, which are highly developed economically and have a lot of industry, have been integrating ever more closely into the Russian economy. Their universities and institutes are now fully accredited within the Russian system of higher education, their currency is the ruble, and although in terms of international recognition they remain part of the Ukraine, it is very important to note that the Ukraine does not treat them as such.

The Ukrainian government does not treat the citizens of Donetsk and Lugansk as its citizens: it does not pay their pensions, it does not recognize their right to vote and it does not provide them with passports. It lays claim to the territory of Donetsk and Lugansk but not to the people who reside there. Now, genocide and ethnic cleansing are generally frowned upon by the international community, but an exception is being made in this case because of Russophobia: the Russian people living in Donetsk and Lugansk have been labeled as "pro-Russian" and are therefore legitimate targets.

Russia has been resisting calls to grant official recognition to these two People's Republics or to provide overt military support (weapons and volunteers do filter through from the Russian side without any hindrance, although the flow of volunteers has been slowing down of late). From a purely cynical perspective, this little war is useful for Russia. If in the future the Ukraine fails completely and fractures into pieces, as appears likely, and if some of these pieces (which might theoretically include not just Donetsk and Lugansk regions but also Kharkov, Odessa and Dnepropetrovsk) clamor to join Russia, then Russia would face a serious problem.

You see, over the past 30 years most Ukrainians have been content to sit around drinking beer and watching television as their country got looted. They saw no problem with going out to demonstrate and protest provided they were paid to do it. They voted the way they were paid to vote. They didn't take an issue with Ukrainian industry shutting down as long as they could work abroad and send money back. They aren't enraged or even embarrassed by the fact that their country is pretty much run from the US embassy in Kiev. About the only ones with any passion among them are the Nazis who march around with torches and sport Nazi insignia. In short, these aren't the sort of people that any self-respecting country would want to have anything to do with, never mind absorb them into its population en masse, because the effect would be to demoralize its entire population.

But the people of Donetsk and Lugansk are not like that at all. These coal miners, factory workers and cab drivers have been spending days and nights in the trenches for years now, holding back one of Europe's larger militaries, and fighting for every square meter of their soil. If the Ukraine is ever to be reborn as something that Russia would find acceptable, it is these people who can provide the starter culture. They have to win, and they have to win without any help from the Russian military, which can squash the Ukrainian military like a bug, but what would be the point of doing that? Thus, Russia provides humanitarian aid, business opportunities, some weapons and some volunteers, and bides its time, because creating a viable new Ukraine out of a defunct one is a process that will take considerable time.
See also: