Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 15 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Fire

Iran unveils two missiles named after military officials killed by US forces

iran missile
Tensions continue to spike between U.S. and Iran as U.S. pushes for U.N. slap-back sanctions.

Iranian state TV announced Thursday that the nation has unveiled two new missiles, one named after a top Iranian military official killed by a U.S. drone strikes this year.

Iran celebrated their National Defense Industry Day by revealing a new 870 mile range missile, the "Martyr Hajj Qassem," which was named for Gen. Qassem Soleimani. The other, a naval cruise missile with a 620 mile range was named the "Martyr Abu Mahdi," after Iraqi militia leader Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, who had close ties with Iran.

Muhandis was killed in the same January drone strike that killed Soleimani.

Info

Russian doctors say Alexei Navalny wasn't poisoned, refuse transfer

alexei navalny
© AP Photo/Pavel Golovkin, File
In this file photo taken on Saturday, July 20, 2019, Russian opposition activist Alexei Navalny gestures while speaking to a crowd during a political protest in Moscow, Russia. Russian doctors treating opposition politician Alexei Navalny say they haven't found any indication that the Kremlin critic was poisoned. Deputy chief doctor Anatoly Kalinichenko at Omsk hospital says that as of today, no traces of poison were found in Navalny’s body. Navalny spokeswoman Kira Yarmysh posted a video on Twitter of Kalinichenko speaking.
Russian doctors treating opposition leader Alexei Navalny don't believe he was poisoned and refused to transfer him to a German hospital on Friday.

Navalny, a 44-year-old politician who is one of President Vladimir Putin's fiercest critics, was admitted to an intensive care unit in a coma at a hospital in the Siberian city of Omsk on Thursday, following what his supporters are calling a suspected poisoning that they believe was engineered by the Kremlin.

But Russian doctors treating opposition politician Alexei Navalny say they haven't found any indication that the Kremlin critic was poisoned.

Comment: See also:


Eye 1

Kremlin, WikiLeaks, hackers, trolls, you name it: US spies' OBSESSION with RT comes full circle in Senate report

Russiagate protests
© REUTERS/Lindsey Wasson
A 'Russiagate' protests in Seattle, Washington, December 17, 2019.
Reading the final Senate Intelligence Committee report on 'Russian meddling' in US elections, it's obvious they believe RT is the Christmas tree at its center, with WikiLeaks, troll bots, third parties etc. merely the ornaments.

The US establishment's obsession with RT dates all the way back to March 2011, when then-secretary of state Hillary Clinton complained about the US "losing... the information war." The infamous Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on 'Russian meddling' from January 2017 devoted more than a quarter of its total volume to RT - seven out of 25 pages, to be precise.

It was so obvious, even reporters with intimate inside knowledge of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) were skeptical.


Attention

Must-watch Documentary: 'Pl@ndemic 2: Indoctornation' - UPDATE: Ben Swann Interviews Producer Mikki Willis

plandemic documentary
This is the follow-up full-length documentary to the short film interview of Dr Judy Mikovits that went viral in May.

Watch and share this online while you can, but beware that it will almost certainly be throttled, black-listed and censored into 'non-existence'. Within hours of the film's launch, the creators' website has already been taken down. As explained in the film itself, the Internet is now almost totally theirs to control and manipulate.


Comment: Update: their website is back online as of 12 noon CET, 20 August 2020.


Download hard copies and organize viewings with friends & families. Spread it via human-to-human contact, thus maintaining digital distancing from 'the Beast' and limiting the means for its agents to interfere with the message.


Download: Pl@ndemic Indoctornation (194 MB)


Comment: It's also available (for now) here and here.

Plandemic part 1 is still available here.

UPDATE 20 Aug 2020

ISE Media has uploaded a 15-minute interview by Ben Swann of producer Mikki Willis, focusing on Bill Gates' covert mass sterilization campaigns in India and Africa:


UPDATE 23 Aug 2020

The Pl@ndemic Series website also includes this interview by Willis of Dr Judy Mikovits, who responds to the sh*tstorm of lies and abuse she was hit with after Pl@ndemic 1 was released in May:





Bad Guys

President of Mali resigns and dissolves parliament after armed coup

Ibrahim Boubacar Keita Mali president
© Luc Gnago/Reuters
Ibrahim Boubacar Keita
International community fears potentially destabilising effect on entire region

Mali's president has resigned and dissolved parliament after mutinying soldiers detained him at gunpoint on Tuesday.

In a televised address, Ibrahim Boubacar Keita said his resignation, three years before his final term was due to end, was effective immediately.

"I wish no blood to be shed to keep me in power," he said, "I have decided to step down from office."

The mutinous soldiers behind the military coup, who identified themselves as the National Committee for the Salvation of the People, promised on Wednesday morning to organise new elections after their takeover.

Comment: The coup plotters were trained by the US military (but they seem to here be acting independently of US State Department instructions).

The coup has garnered a certain amount of public support but it is hard to tell if it is truly grassroots or tactical destabilization in an area where France and other countries still have colonial interests:
The general public, as well as an opposition coalition, have been calling for Keita to resign and appear to be welcoming the detentions, as crowds of people could be seen celebrating the news on the streets of Bamako and showing their support for the military. The opposition coalition also backed the mutineers, saying that the developments were not a coup d'état but "a popular insurrection."

The dramatic developments in the West African nation follow massive anti-government protests demanding Keita's resignation over a grinding economic crisis, perceived government corruption and an inability to successfully combat armed jihadist groups in the country's north.

The detention of a president, who enjoyed support from France - Mali's former colonial power - and its western allies has set off alarm bells for both the UN and the African Union.
The rebels have stated they are not seeking power:
The military said they staged Tuesday's coup to prevent the Western African nation from "sinking into chaos," and invited social and political movements to take part in creating the conditions for new elections.

"We are not keen on power, but we are keen on the stability of the country, which will allow us to organize general elections to allow Mali to equip itself with strong institutions within the reasonable time limit," a spokesman for the military group calling itself the National Committee for the Salvation of the People said in a TV address aired by the state broadcaster.
France, citing its UN mandate, did not feel the need to consider the shift in political power in its former colony:
The French armed forces will pursue military operations against Islamic fighters in France's former colony Mali, despite the ousting of the president two days ago by a coup, Paris has said.

Concerns are growing that the coup could disrupt a military campaign against the jihadists, who are linked to Al-Qaeda and Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS), which are operating in northern and central Mali and in West Africa's wider Sahel region.

"The Barkhane operation, asked for by the Mali population and authorized by the UN Security Council, continues," France's Minister of the Armed Forces Florence Parly tweeted on Thursday.

France has had around 5,000 troops in five West African countries since 2014, as part of Operation Barkhane. Supported by regional armies, they patrol the Sahel region, including Mali, where Paris intervened in 2013 against an Islamist uprising. The military deployment reportedly receives logistical support from the US Africa Command and intelligence from the US drone base in Agadez, Niger.
Mali has been roiled by factional fighting, including US-proxy ISIS, since at least 2013: Two small excerpts from William Engdahl's 2013 indepth analysis The War in Mali and AFRICOM's Agenda: Target China
Mali itself, like much of Africa is rich in raw materials. It has large reserves of gold, uranium and most recently, though western oil companies try to hide it, of oil, lots of oil. The French preferred to ignore Mali's vast resources, keeping it a poor subsistence agriculture country. Under the deposed democratically-elected President Amadou Toumani Toure, for the first time the government initiated a systematic mapping of the vast wealth under its soil. According to Mamadou Igor Diarra, previous mining minister, Malian soil contains copper, uranium, phosphate, bauxite, gems and in particular, a large percentage of gold in addition to oil and gas. Thus, Mali is one of the countries in the world with the most raw materials. With its gold mining, the country is already one of the leading exploiters directly behind South Africa and Ghana. [6] Two thirds of France's electricity is from nuclear power and sources of new uranium are essential. Presently, France draws significant uranium imports from neighboring Niger.

******
pan sahal AFRICOM terrorist
© GlobalResearch.ca
...compared with USAFRICOM Pan-Sahal Initiative map of 'terror threat' in the Sahara today.
[...] Washington clearly had this energy-rich and resource-rich area in mind when it drew the areas of Africa that need to be "cleansed" of alleged terrorist cells and gangs. At least now AFRICOM had "a plan" for its new African strategy. The French Institute of Foreign Relations (Institut français des relations internationals, IFRI) openly discussed this tie between the terrorists and energy-rich areas in a March 2011 report. [27]



Brain

Biden 'is just lost,' says Obama's White House doctor

Dr. Ronny Jackson
© AP/Manuel Balce Ceneta
Dr. Ronny Jackson
The chief White House doctor to former President Barack Obama is worried about the mental health and stamina of former Vice President Joe Biden, suggesting that "something is not right" with the Democratic presidential nominee.

"The best way I can describe him every time I see him is that he's just lost," said Dr. Ronny Jackson, the former White House physician to Obama and President Trump. "I won't make any particular diagnosis about dementia. ... But what I will say is that something is not right," added the retired Navy rear admiral who recently won a House GOP primary in Texas.

And it is getting so bad that he is "not comfortable" with Biden being commander in chief. "I'm not," he said of the top Democrat, set to be nominated by the Democratic Party for president on Thursday.

Jackson's comments are in an upcoming book from Donald Trump Jr., Liberal Privilege: Joe Biden and the Democrats' Defense of the Indefensible,.....

In the book, the president's son and top campaign supporter addressed current issues and included interviews with key current affairs figures, such as Jackson, who began working in the White House Medical Unit under former President George W. Bush and served as "physician to the president" during the Obama and Trump administrations.

He stressed to Trump Jr. that he hasn't reviewed Biden's records but said that he witnessed the changes to Obama's vice president in person and over time.


Question

How is the US election going to be any more legitimate than the 'rigged' Belarus vote?

Mail sorter
© AP/Lynne Sladky
Mail sorter
Belarusians have taken to the streets to protest what many claim was a rigged election. Yet the US election - with its hyper-partisan media, nonsense polls, and both parties determined to contest a loss - makes Minsk's look legit.

The US is one of many countries to condemn Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko over his supposedly rigged reelection and his government's brutal crackdown on the protests that followed. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo promised to "deliver freedom" to Minsk, and even Hollywood star Chuck Norris made a bizarre video threatening to make the president "cry."

But if the Belarusian election was corrupt and illegitimate, what does that make the US' own electoral contest, which looms less than three months in the future? Many American political tactics that have become routine would elicit cries of outrage from the West if another country's politicians used them.

From the closing of polling places in poor and minority neighborhoods to gerrymandering to superPACs and dark money, US "democracy" is profoundly un-democratic - and getting worse. The amount of money spent on American elections alone would be denounced as corruption, even outright bribery, if it happened anywhere else, but US races routinely break spending records with little fanfare. The 2016 contest cost $6.8 billion, a sum that exceeds the GDPs of Guyana or the Maldives.

Comment: Inadequacies and deficiencies are each candidate's argument against the other and this election promises to hit rock bottom. So who is worth electing? The one who does this the best or the one who does it the worst?


Snakes in Suits

Obama At DNC: 'Donald Trump hasn't grown into the job because he can't'

Obama
© Quartz/KJN
Former president Barack Obama
Former President Barack Obama criticized President Donald Trump during his Wednesday address at the Democratic National Convention, saying Trump has "no interest" in living up to the expectations of American citizens.

Obama came as the penultimate address of the DNC's third night, just before Democratic California Sen. Kamala Harris. Obama argued Trump has failed to lead the U.S. amid the coronavirus, has threatened the right to vote ahead of the November election, and has failed to live up to the decency of the office of president.

"Donald Trump hasn't grown into the job because he can't," Obama said. "This administration has shown it will tear our democracy down if that's what it takes to win, so we've got to get busy."

Comment: Trump has redefined the job on his own terms. Tear downs for any construct are necessary if they are outdated, misused, or corrupted - regardless of style. In the least, Trump has shaken up complacency and in doing so, has exposed the underbelly of political status quo. There's something to be said for that...
Twitter responds with fawning reactions from supporters, who dubbed the talk "spell-binding," "expertly delivered" and "truly presidential."

Some observers noted that Obama's speech departed from his typical "uplifting promises of hope and change," however, instead focusing on "negativity" and "complaints."

Bitter Hillary gives Americans a warning: Trump and foreign adversaries could again steal the election...
Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton again sounded alarms about election-meddling "foreign adversaries" in her speech to the Democratic convention, while urging voters to take revenge for her bitter 2016 loss to Donald Trump.



Mainstream media showed its bias in the coverage of the convention - describing how Obama "torches Trump like American democracy depends on it". Grab your sick bag...:
Politico's Ryan Lizza was digging out the thesaurus to lavish Obama with superlatives.








Rubin, supposedly the Post's "conservative" blogger, declared that the entire convention was on par with a "superb mini-series," and worthy of an Emmy award.


The Republican Party's own convention kicks off on Monday, but even if the chattering classes have any tears left after this week's affair, it's extremely unlikely that they'll treat the GOP to the same level of sycophantic adulation.

It's also unlikely that viewers felt quite the same way. Biden does lead Trump in most polls, but ratings for the virtual convention are already coming in substantially below those of previous years.



Heart - Black

Dems talk about treaties with Russia to spite Trump, but nothing will change without genuine goodwill, and they have none

PutinBiden
© Reuters/Alexander Nalruskin
Russian President Vladimir Putin • Former US VP Joe Biden
US Democrats have rained abuse on Russia for the entire Trump presidency. Now they claim they want to restore and preserve the treaties he ditched. It's politically expedient, but not a sign of any real change towards Russia.

President Trump's confusing message on the subject of Russia has predictably gotten him into trouble. The Democrats, having spent the better part of the last four years accusing Trump of working for the Kremlin, may now be poised to present themselves to the public as the party best able to secure a stable, working relationship with Russia.

Trump has only himself to blame for his predicament. Back in 2016, he had promised improved relations with Russia. He failed to deliver on that, boasting instead that as president he has been "tougher on Russia" than anyone else. Yet, in an echo of 2016, he continues to insist that, at some point in the future, he will secure some unspecified wonderful deal with Russia.

"There's a very good chance we'll make a new agreement or do something to put that agreement back together," Trump declared upon announcing withdrawal from the Open Skies Treaty. "I think what's going to happen is we're going to pull out and they're going to come back and want to make a deal."

Trump has cultivated cordial personal relations with President Putin while pursuing policies adverse to Russia's national interests. Trump imposed sanctions on Russia, expelled Russian diplomats and closed diplomatic compounds, sent lethal weapons to Ukraine, launched missiles against Russian ally Syria and seized the country's oil fields. He also withdrew from the Intermediate Nuclear-Forces and Open Skies treaties.


Comment: Was Trump pursuing policies adverse to US national interests? That should be the question.


Comment: We are given the news at face value, often skewed to serve a purpose. We are not privy to what goes on behind the scenes or what qualifies an action. It is up to us to learn and discern. Treaties are meant to be a deterrence to action. Threat will always be an option.


Question

Lebanon's future: Pearl on the new Silk Road or zone of Dark Age chaos?

Beirut protest
© Reuters/Alkis Konstantinidis
Protesters against government corruption fill Beirut's streets
Many voices have been quick to enter the chorus of commentators hypothesizing the manifold possible causes of the devastating explosions which occurred on the afternoon of August 4 in Beirut which has led to mass anarchy and the surprising resignation of the government on August 11th.

While I have no great novel contribution to offer in that growing array of hypotheses (which are slowly turning into noise), I would like to share an insight which addresses a too-often-overlooked aspect of the role of Lebanon in the Great Game. Before proceeding, it is useful to hold in the mind several points of certainty:
1) The official narrative of a chance mishap of Turkish fireworks instigating the detonation of the 2700 tons of ammonium nitrate which had been sitting at the Port of Beirut for six years is entirely unbelievable.

2) This event should not considered in any way separated from the anomalously large pattern of explosions and arson which have spread across the Arab and African worlds in recent weeks.

3) This pattern of chaos must itself be seen in the context of the clash between two systems: The collapsing NATO unipolar alliance on the one side and the New Silk Road-led multipolar alliance on the other.