• Israel's Lapid informs President Rivlin he has formed a government ousting Netanyahu
• Israeli opposition figures reach deal aimed at ousting Netanyahu

• Israel invokes 'fight for survival' response as it descends into racist state
• Israel's Lapid informs President Rivlin he has formed a government ousting Netanyahu
• Israel, the 'only democracy in the Middle East' rejects bill to 'maintain equal rights amongst all its citizens'

The email from Dr. Peter Daszak, President of the EcoHealth Alliance, a group that has extensive ties to the Wuhan lab gain of function research, sent the email to Fauci on April 18, 2020, roughly six weeks after the outbreak had taken hold.

The email states:

"As the Pl of the ROl grant publicly targeted by Fox News reporters at the Presidential press briefing last night, I just wanted to say a personal thank you on behalf of our staff and collaborators, for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

From my perspective, your comments are brave, and coming from your trusted voice, will help dispel the myths being spun around the virus' origins. Once this pandemic's over I look forward thanking you in person and let you know how important your comments are to us all."

Fauci responded to the email the day after, writing

"Peter:

Many thanks for your kind note.

Best Regards,

Tony"

Daszak, who also works for the World Health Organisation, is on record admitting that he was involved with manipulating coronaviruses. Here is a video of him talking in DECEMBER 2019 about how 'good' the viruses are for messing around with in a lab:

The emails with Fauci show that Daszak had already dismissed the lab leak notion nearly a year before that 'investigation' began, and despite other researchers saying it looked potentially engineered.

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this is that Daszak was one of the lead "investigators" on the WHO panel tasked with looking into the origins of the pandemic.

Is it any surprise that this guy, whose organization has shoveled at least $600,000 to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the past few years to play around with coronaviruses inside the lab, determined within 3 hours of visiting the lab in February 2021 that there was 'nothing to see here?

Daszak, like Fauci, has also since denied that there was any gain of function research being conducted at the Wuhan lab and that it wasn't being funded by EcoHealth Alliance or via the NIH with US tax dollars.

These are blatant lies, as there is mountains of evidence that confirms this was exactly the case.

Why would they deny it when it can be so easily proven the research was being conducted?

Another interesting factoid about Daszak is that he was employed as an 'expert fact checker' by Facebook when it was monitoring and removing 'misinformation' about the origins COVID on its platform.

If all of that doesn't scream coverup then what does?

Dated February 1st, one panicked e-mail to NIAID deputy director Hugh Auchincloss stated:

"Hugh,

It is essential that we speak this AM. Keep your cell phone on. I have a conference call at 7:45 am with Azar. It likely will be over by 8:45 am. Read this paper as well as the e-mail that I will forward to you now. You have tasks today that must be done.

Thanks,

Tony."

The academic paper attached to the e-mail is titled: A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence.

It discussed how researchers in the United States and China were manipulating viruses to understand better how they might attach themselves to humans.

The abstract states:

Using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system, we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicate that group 2b viruses encoding the SHC014 spike in a wild-type backbone can efficiently use multiple orthologs of the SARS receptor human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2), replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells and achieve in vitro titers equivalent to epidemic strains of SARS-CoV.

Per the National Institute for Health, "Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to (and/or, perhaps, actually does) increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens. Such research, when conducted by responsible scientists, usually aims to improve understanding of disease causing agents, their interaction with human hosts, and/or their potential to cause pandemics. The ultimate objective of such research is to better inform public health and preparedness efforts and/or development of medical countermeasures. Despite these important potential benefits, GOF research (GOFR) can pose risks regarding biosecurity and biosafety."

Just one day later, Fauci receives correspondence claiming that Tedros (of the World Health Organization) and Bernhard [Schwartländer, his cabinet chief] had gone into "conclave." This was presumably to decided on pandemic declarations or travel restrictions. They opted against such things, at the time, while President Trump was attempting to shut the U.S. borders:

Fauci’s E-mails about Tedros.

Burwell, also the former Director of President Barack Obama's Office of Management and Budget, emailed the National Institue of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director on February 4th, 2020 inquiring about the necessity of wearing a mask for a forthcoming trip and advice on the direction of a donation to China from investor Ray Dalio.

Burwell E-mail

The following day, Fauci's response included a declaration that "I do not recommend that you wear a mask," adding that the "typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus."

In full, Fauci's response read:

Sylvia:

Masks are really for infected people to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection. The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through the material. It might, however, provide some slight benefit in keep out gross droplets if someone coughs or sneezes on you. I do not recommend that you wear a mask, particularly since you are going to a vey low risk location. Your instincts are correct, money is best spent on medical countermeasures such as diagnostics and vaccines.

Safe travels.

Best regards,

Tony

Fauci E-mail.