While President Trump is now accusing Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) of 'helping to write' a CIA whistleblower's complaint at the heart of an impeachment inquiry, the New York Times is out with a Wednesday article designed to put distance between the House Intelligence Committee Chairman and the accusation - suggesting Schiff had no more than a vague sneak peek.

As The Times reports, "The Democratic head of the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, learned about the outlines of a C.I.A. officer's concerns that President Trump had abused his power days before the officer filed a whistle-blower complaint," adding "the original accusation was vague," and "The aide did not share the whistle-blower's identity with Mr. Schiff or anyone else."

So - according to the Times, Schiff kinda sorta knew what the whistleblower said, and a House Intel Committee aide told him (or her) to get an attorney - Andrew Bakaj - who "interned for Schumer in the spring of 2001 and for Clinton in the fall of the same year," per The Federalist.

The Times goes to great lengths to explain that nothing was untoward.

"Like other whistle-blowers have done before and since under Republican and Democratic-controlled committees, the whistle-blower contacted the committee for guidance on how to report possible wrongdoing within the jurisdiction of the intelligence community," said Schiff spokesman Patrick Boland.

Trump, meanwhile, is gunning for Schiff.

On Wednesday, Mr. Trump said Mr. Schiff should be forced to resign for reading a parody of the Ukraine call at a hearing, an act Mr. Trump has called treasonous and criminal.

"We don't call him shifty Schiff for nothing," said Mr. Trump. "He's a shifty dishonest guy."

Mr. Schiff's aides followed procedures involving the C.I.A. officer's accusations, Mr. Boland said. They referred the C.I.A. officer to the inspector general for the intelligence community, Michael Atkinson, and advised him to seek legal counsel.

Mr. Schiff never saw the full complaint or knew precisely what the whistle-blower would deliver to Mr. Atkinson, Mr. Boland said. - NYT

GOP spokeswoman Elizabeth Harrington, meanwhile, responded to the Times' article - calling the whistleblower saga 'COLLUSION' and a 'CON JOB' in a Wednesday afternoon tweet.

Finally, if this process seems vaguely familiar, it's because it should be: as the Federalist's Sean Davis writes, this is a carbon copy of what happened with Christine Blasey Ford's accusations aimed at sabotaging Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation.

• Snake-oil alert: Encryption doesn't prevent mass-snooping
• U.S. may outlaw messaging encryption used by WhatsApp, iMessage and Others - Report
• 'Five Eyes' security alliance: Law enforcement must have backdoor access to encrypted material
• NSA caught illegally collecting Americans' phone data...yet again!
• Government surveillance of American citizens goes far beyond what you are being told

• Pepe Escobar: How Yemen's Houthis are bringing down a Goliath
• After Syria & Venezuela, Russian military prepares for Hybrid war
• Destabilizing Pakistan: Bookending Washington's China policy
• The economic entrails at the heart of the 'deal of the century'

• Putin, Xi & Abe: Greater Eurasia Coming Together in Russian Far East
• Hong Kong protests: Fading foreign tantrum, not genuine revolution
• WTO lowers global outlook again amid trade conflicts and volatility
• Washington's and NATO's criminal wars and government austerity policies at the heart of European & US migration turmoil

The slow-burning political crisis in Peru reached the boiling point after Vizcarra dissolved the opposition-controlled parliament on Monday and called for a new general election in January.

"May this exceptional measure allow citizens to finally express themselves and decide the country's future at the polls," he said in a televised address.

Vizcarra previously threatened to dissolve parliament if the opposition continues to block his anti-graft bills. The president finally decided to make the move after lawmakers voted to replace almost all Constitutional Court judges despite his objections.

While Vizcarra insists that his actions are completely legal, parliament declared them to be unconstitutional and "a threat to democracy." Lawmakers then voted to remove Vizcarra from office and swore in Vice President Mercedes Araoz as acting president of Peru.

Vizcarra has made it clear that he will not step down. Shortly after dissolving the parliament, he met with the chiefs of the army, navy, air force, and police, with all of them affirming their loyalty to him as president.

"Martin Vizcarra is the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and the National Police of Peru," the military later said in a statement.

At the same time, rallies were held in various cities in support of Vizcarra and his move to dissolve parliament.

Not everyone is cheering him on, though. Several prominent figures, like former Interior Minister Fernando Rospigliosi and veteran politician Lourdes Flores, blasted Vizcarra's actions as a "coup d'etat."

During his election campaign, Martin Vizcarra championed the fight against corruption, which has plagued the nation for decades. His predecessor, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, was forced to resign last year over allegations of graft and vote-buying.

Vizcarra's primary opponents come from the Popular Force (FP) party, whose leader, Keiko Fujimori, is currently being held as part of a corruption investigation. She is the daughter of former President Alberto Fujimori, who is serving jail time for corruption and embezzlement.

Unlike in Venezuela, where opposition leader Juan Guaido enjoys full backing from Washington, the US had previously refrained from taking a side in Peru's burgeoning struggle. Vizcarra's government ironically threw support behind Guaido in January, soon after he declared himself "interim president" of Venezuela.

Some online couldn't resist drawing comparisons between the two embattled countries. "It will be very fun to listen to Vizcarra, the Lima Group and the [Organization of American States] explaining why the interim president of Mercedes Araoz in Peŕu is not valid but that of Guaidó in Venezuela is," one user tweeted.

"The interim Vizcarra dissolves the Congress and the Congress suspends the interim Vizcarra. Guaido will have to take care of Peru," another commenter joked, while a third asked "Did Guaidó proclaim himself President of Peru yet?"

With Washington finally taking notice of Peru's crisis, however, some noted the country may soon find itself in bigger trouble, and become another victim of US-imposed "democracy" abroad. Previous initiatives yielded outcomes such as Iraq and Libya, where the floodgates of violence and extremism were smashed open by American bombing campaigns - or Syria, where US support for "moderate rebels" prolonged a bloody conflict by years and helped to tear the country apart - all in the name of "democratic institutions."

• Brussels becomes first major city to halt 5G rollout due to health concerns
• Huawei looks to Russian technology to replace Google's Android, testing under way