Puppet MastersS


Eye 2

Best of the Web: Were Syria gas attack victims actually kidnapped supporters of al-Assad government?

Image
One of the children kidnapped by al Qaeda, then murdered in the false-flag attack against Syria
Following the broadcasting of the images of the massacre in Ghouta, distributed by the Free Syrian Army and relayed by US and French services, Alawite families from Latakia have filed a complaint for murder.

Some of these videos were filmed and posted on Youtube before the events they picture.*

They show children suffocating from a chemical intoxication that can't possibly be sarin gas (the latter provokes yellow drool, not white drool).

The children do not correspond to a sample of the population: they are all almost of the same age and have light hair. They are not accompanied by their grieving families.

They are in fact children who were abducted by jihadists two weeks before in Alawite villages in the surroundings of Latakia, 200km away from Ghouta.

Contrary to the sayings of the Free Syrian Army and the Western services, the only identified victims of the Ghouta massacre are those belonging to families that support the Syrian government. In the videos, the individuals that show outrage against the ''crimes of Bashar el-Assad'' are in reality their killers.

Comment: Are folks starting to see a pattern emerging here?

Russian journalist exposes lies about Houla Massacre

Houla massacre carried out by Syrian 'rebels', says Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung

Children shot, knifed, axed to death in Free Syrian Army's Houla massacre

Not only did al-Assad not kill his own people, his own people were in fact kidnapped, gassed to death while being filmed, then presented as 'evidence' that "al-Assad kills his own people".

The truth is that al-Assad is defending his people from 'al Qaeda', that proxy army set up, funded and managed by the CIA, the Mossad, MI6 and DGSE.


Cult

Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the CIA's Saudi agent behind effort to topple Assad

Press TV has conducted an interview with author and political commentator Ralph Schoenman about Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia who is reportedly leading a secret Saudi-CIA effort to aid militants in Syria.


Comment: Syrian rebels and local residents testify that Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, supplied chemical weapons to 'al-Qaeda-linked group'

Saudi snake, Prince Bandar, tried first to bribe Russia to drop its support of Syria, then threatened to unleash Chechen terrorists at 2014 Winter Olympics


Chess

Deal or no deal: John Kerry's historic diplomatic "mistake" proves that Obama does not want peace

Image
When it comes to diplomacy, Russia is playing chess, Syria is playing checkers and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is playing tiddlywinks. On Monday, Kerry said that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad could avoid having his country bombed into oblivion by turning over "every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week." Of course Kerry just assumed that Assad would never do such a thing, but the Russians immediately pounced on his statement. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov quickly announced that Russia would encourage Syria to turn over their chemical weapons to international control in exchange for a guarantee that the U.S. will not attack, and subsequently Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Muallem stated that his government was prepared for "full cooperation with Russia to remove any pretext for aggression." Later on Monday, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon indicated that he is thinking about asking the UN Security Council to support such a deal.

Do you know what they call such a move in chess?

Checkmate.

We were originally told that the primary goal of a U.S. military strike on Syria would be to prevent them from using chemical weapons in the future, and then John Kerry said that Assad could avoid a conflict by giving up all of his chemical weapons.

Well, the Russians and the Syrians have called the bluff.

So does this mean that we will have peace?

Unfortunately, the Obama administration does not seem to want that. The State Department has already come out and announced that what John Kerry said was a mistake. They insist that it was a "rhetorical argument" instead of an actual peace proposal.

Light Saber

Russia's peace initiative: Syria encouraged to hand over its chemical weapons to avoid U.S. airstrikes, al-Assad's government agrees

Image
© AP/Ivan SekretarevRussian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, right, welcomes Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem, left, in Moscow, Monday, Feb. 25, 2013
Russia has urged Syria to put its chemical weapons under international control for subsequent destruction to avert a possible military strike.

"We are calling on the Syrian authorities not only agree on putting chemical weapons storages under international control, but also for its further destruction and then joining the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons," Lavrov said. "We have passed our offer to [Syrian Foreign Minister] Walid al-Muallem and hope to receive a fast and positive answer," he added.

It is unclear if Syria will support the offer, but if it helps to avoid a military strike, Russia is immediately prepared to work with Damascus, Lavrov said.

The Foreign Minister's statement comes shortly after US Secretary of State John Kerry's comment that the Syrian President "could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community" to avoid a military strike on the country.

"Sure, he could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week - turn it over, all of it without delay and allow the full and total accounting [of it[, but he isn't about to do it and it can't be done," Kerry said.

Comment: Syria has since accepted this Russian offer. So the ball is back in the Americans' court...

Syria welcomes Russia's offer to put its chemical weapons under intl control


Oscar

Obama Drama: The Hill to the rescue on Syria? - Don't hold your breath

Obama
© Reuters"Obama has implicitly opened the door for a Great Debate regarding the trajectory of US policy in the Middle East," writes Bacevich, a former US Army Colonel
Sometimes history happens at the moment when no one is looking. On weekends in late August, the president of the United States ought to be playing golf or loafing at Camp David, not making headlines. Yet Barack Obama chose Labour Day weekend to unveil arguably the most consequential foreign policy shift of his presidency.

In an announcement that surprised virtually everyone, the president told his countrymen and the world that he was putting on hold the much anticipated US attack against Syria. Obama hadn't, he assured us, changed his mind about the need and justification for punishing the Syrian government for its probable use of chemical weapons against its own citizens. In fact, only days before administration officials had been claiming that, if necessary, the US would "go it alone" in punishing Bashar al-Assad's regime for its bad behaviour. Now, however, Obama announced that, as the chief executive of "the world's oldest constitutional democracy," he had decided to seek Congressional authorisation before proceeding.

Red Flag

RT sources: Syrian rebels plan false flag chemical attack on Israel to blame Assad regime


Comment: Although any information that comes from unnamed sources is usually suspect to the journalistic eye, it is interesting that this one spells out a scenario that is normally foreseen only by the alternative media - in spite of the fact that books of history carry plenty of examples of false flag attacks used as excuses to trigger wars (9-11, anyone?).

The Russians, who are clearly opposed to letting the US start a regional or even global war, obviously know their history and understand that the possibility is real. They also know their enemy and how keen they are to 'make war by way of deception', and probably have real intelligence on what they might do next. By putting the possibility on a news outlet like RT, they may be making a clever attempt to spoil the plan for the CIA, Mossad, or anyone in control of the so-called 'Syrian rebels' to provide an indisputable casus belli for the US or Israel against Syria.

In other words, now that this scenario has been discussed publicly, it is less likely to happen. Perhaps that was the intention.


Bad Guys

Assad warns 'expect everything' if US attacks Syria

Image
© AFP 2013/ CBS News / 'This Morning'Syrian President Bashar Assad, right, during an interview with CBS news anchor Charlie Rose, which aired Monday
The United States and its allies should "expect everything" if military strikes are launched against Syria, as the Middle East teeters on "the brink of explosion," Syrian President Bashar Assad warned in excerpts of an interview with a veteran US journalist that aired Monday.

"You should expect everything, not necessarily through the government," Assad told CBS This Morning co-host Charlie Rose in what CBS said was the first television interview given by the embattled Syrian leader since President Barack Obama asked Congress to approve military action against Syria in retaliation for an alleged chemical weapons attack last month that Washington has blamed on the Assad regime.

"Everything is on the brink of explosion - you have to expect everything," Assad said, warning that his government is not in control of the volatile situation in Syria, where the United Nations says at least 100,000 people have been killed in a three-and-a-half-year civil war, because it is "not the only player in this region."

Bad Guys

The mysterious case of the royal Canadian Navy's "missing" equipment - spies, miscommunication and financial problems

The military contractor who allegedly disappeared with $1 million of Canadian government money and failed to build an acoustic monitoring system for the navy has a question for the Department of National Defence: When are you going to pick up your equipment?

Department officials say they have been trying since 2009 to get the equipment from Applied Radar and Sonar Technologies GmbH, a German firm.

But the company is no longer registered in Germany and "cannot be contacted," according to a December 2012 briefing note prepared for senior department staff. The company's contract has been terminated and DND is going to use an international collection agency to try to recover the $1 million it already paid to Applied Radar and Sonar Technologies.

But the Citizen has tracked the firm to Izmir, a city in Turkey, and interviewed its director, Klaus Kremer.

He says not only is the transportable acoustic range equipment ready to be picked up, but DND officials know very well where he is since they have visited him at least four times over the years.

Eye 1

Spiegel: NSA Can Spy on Smart Phone Data

SPIEGEL has learned from internal NSA documents that the US intelligence agency has the capability of tapping user data from the iPhone, devices using Android as well as BlackBerry, a system previously believed to be highly secure.

Angela Merkel
© Reuters
The United States' National Security Agency intelligence-gathering operation is capable of accessing user data from smart phones from all leading manufacturers. Top secret NSA documents that SPIEGEL has seen explicitly note that the NSA can tap into such information on Apple iPhones, BlackBerry devices and Google's Android mobile operating system.

The documents state that it is possible for the NSA to tap most sensitive data held on these smart phones, including contact lists, SMS traffic, notes and location information about where a user has been.

The documents also indicate that the NSA has set up specific working groups to deal with each operating system, with the goal of gaining secret access to the data held on the phones.

In the internal documents, experts boast about successful access to iPhone data in instances where the NSA is able to infiltrate the computer a person uses to sync their iPhone. Mini-programs, so-called "scripts," then enable additional access to at least 38 iPhone features.

Arrow Down

U.S. client regimes in Middle East outlaw online "dissemination of ideas that could affect public order or morality" under pretext of 'fighting terrorism'

Internet ban
© Agence France-PressePeople typing on their laptops.
Saudi Arabia said Monday it will outlaw the dissemination of information on the Internet for the benefit of "terrorist" groups, in line with a decision taken by Gulf Arab monarchies.

The official SPA news agency said the cabinet approved the "unified legislation against cybercrime," which the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) adopted in December.

The legislation targets those who "create sites and publish information on the Internet or a computer network for the benefit of a terrorist group to enable contacts among its leaders or its members, to promote its views or funding," said the agency.

It also prohibits "the dissemination of ideas that could affect public order or morality," said SPA, without providing further details.

Most members of the six-nation GCC - Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates - have tightened their laws against cybercrime in recent years.

Source: Agence France-Presse

Comment: That list of countries also happen to be U.S. client regimes and most repressive in the region. Coincidence?

You have to laugh in horror when you hear that Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, the biggest regional exporters of terrorism - culturally, materially, and financially - are doing all this under the pretext of 'fighting terrorism'.