Puppet Masters
"On our part, we are prepared to dialogue with our Western partners, once there is responsiveness and a real interest in solving the issues we have accumulated," Nikolai Patrushev said in an interview.
He added that at the moment there is virtually no progress in this regard. "The US suggested discussing the problems in 2018, but then they derailed a planned Russian-American interagency consultation by failing to send a delegation to Geneva."
Sputnik discussed the possible reasons Iran's top diplomat resigned, and how this could impact Tehran's internal and foreign policy, with Dr. Ali Bakeer, an Ankara-based political analyst specialising in Turkey's foreign policy, Iran and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries.
Sputnik: What's your impression of Zarif's sudden resignation announcement?
Ali Bakeer: Many observers anticipated that Zarif might have to resign at a certain point but no one expected that his resignation would be announced on Instagram during the official visit of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to Iran.
The direct reason for Zarif's resignation is widely attributed to not informing his ministry of the visit and not allowing him personally to attend any of the official meetings, during which Assad met with Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Hassan Rouhani.
However, I think the resignation came after a long period of frustration and as a result of the contention between the political/diplomatic approach of Rouhani's government towards regional issues on the one hand, and the security/IRGC approach which is usually endorsed by the Supreme Leader on the other.
Cohen will say that while Trump was "intoxicating" to be around, and "When you were in his presence, you felt like you were involved in something greater than yourself -- that you were somehow changing the world," that the president is actually a 'racist, conman and a cheat.'
Comment: As Cohen is trying desperately to cover his posterior, RT notes some glaring blanks in his testimony so far:
US President Donald Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen, giving testimony on Capitol Hill, has not been able to provide any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials during the 2016 election.
Cohen has been giving testimony described as "explosive" by mainstream media to the House Oversight Committee about his "suspicions" that Trump could have worked with Russia during the campaign - but when probed, was not able to provide any evidence to back up those suggestions.
CBS reporter Bo Erickson tweeted during the hearing that Cohen "cannot cite any real examples of Russian collusion" with the Trump campaign "even though he was one of [Trump's] closest allies."
"If [Cohen] doesn't know about any collusion, who does?" Erickson tweeted.
Republicans on the committee have castigated Democrats for inviting a "convicted perjurer," who they say cannot be trusted, to give testimony. Cohen pleaded guilty last November to making false statements to Congress about a potential deal to build a Trump Tower hotel in Moscow, later admitting that he lied to "protect" Trump.
During the hearing, Rep. Jim Jordan accused Cohen of being aggrieved with Trump because he didn't get a job at the White House - a claim which Cohen denied.
While Republicans immediately took an adversarial tone with Cohen, Democrats on the committee have been pushing him to produce information implicating Trump in a conspiracy to steal the election with help from Russia.
Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings said Democrats will continue to call Trump's associates before Congress to testify in their "search for the truth" for the foreseeable future, taking advantage of the fact that the party now holds majority powers in the House of Representatives.
Tweeting before the hearing, Trump himself accused Cohen of "lying in order to reduce his prison time."
"You've got people who will see that offer from the Democrats, from the progressive Democrats, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 'Here's the Green New Deal, here's the guarantee of a job,' and think, 'yeah, that's what I want, it's that simple.' What do you say to those people?" Hilton asked Ivanka Trump in the interview set to air in full on Sunday.
"I don't think most Americans, in their heart, want to be given something. I've spent a lot of time traveling around this country over the last 4 years. People want to work for what they get," Trump told Hilton. "So, I think that this idea of a guaranteed minimum is not something most people want. They want the ability to be able to secure a job. They want the ability to live in a country where's there's the potential for upward mobility."

People protest against U.S. foreign policy over Venezuela outside the Trump Building in New York City
Speaking at the United Nations, Arreaza said that $30 billion had been "confiscated" from Venezuela since November 2017 due to Washington's tightening economic measures against the country.
Arreaza suggested a meeting between Trump and Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro to "try to find common ground"and reach a diplomatic solution as tensions between the two countries continue to rise.
Mr. Trump is absolutely correct in the scale, scope and ramifications of the collaborative effort of Big Tech's weaponization based on political views.

Border Patrol officers keep watch before U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen inaugurates the first completed section of President Trumps 30-foot border wall in the El Centro Sector, at the U.S. Mexico border in Calexico, California on October 26, 2018.
The vote was 245-182. Thirteen Republicans voted with Democrats to pass the measure. The resolution will next be taken up by the Senate, where it will put Republican unity to the test, though Senate leaders have signaled they will not bring it to a vote immediately.
It is not yet clear how many Republicans will vote for the resolution in the Senate, but it looks likely to pass the upper chamber, despite the fact that Republicans hold a majority. That would be yet another blow to the President, who has said he will veto the resolution if it comes to his desk.
Language condemning anti-Semitism, tacked on as an amendment in the House before the Yemen War Powers bill was due to pass, is "not germane" to the content of the bill, the Senate parliamentarian ruled, stripping the bill of its "privileged" status and allowing McConnell to quash the scheduled vote.
Senators are planning to force a vote on a "clean" version of the bill, absent the anti-Semitism amendment, which House Republicans rammed through at the last minute in the wake of Rep. Ilhan Omar's controversial tweets about the Israeli lobby. The streamlined bill, written by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT), and Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), retains privileged status.
However, increasing frustration in Washington beckons more false flags.
Something shocking is "needed" in order to jolt world opinion into acquiescing to Washington's criminal agenda of "all options." In the fiendish mind of American imperialism, it is also prudent to consider "all options" as meaning more than military aggression. The foulest moves.
The torching of trucks purportedly ferrying US food and medicines across the border from Colombia was patently a planned provocation. Credible video footage and witnesses attested to the arson being carried out by supporters of the US-backed opposition figure Juan Guaido.
The vehicles never even made it to the crossing point where Venezuelan national guards were deployed.
Comment:
- 'Godfather' tactics: Bolton threatens 'serious consequences' if Venezuela arrests 'president' Guaido
- Italy vetoed EU recognition of US-backed Guaido in Venezuela - M5S source
- Kremlin: Recognition of Guaido by EU states is 'direct interference' in Venezuela's affairs
- Denouncing recognition of Guaido, MP Mélenchon posits: Can a Yellow Vest leader declare himself president?
- Mexico's president rejects Venezuela coup - takes stand against US imperialism
- Mourao: Brazil won't consider 'under any circumstances' even one US base for intervention in Venezuela
- Vultures of Caracas
France's elites have not felt such fear in half a century, and it's not the usual fear of losing an election, failing to 'reform' or seeing their shares slide on the stock market, but fear of insurrection, revolt, and loss of power. The street protests on 1 December 2018 caused some to feel a sudden chill. As BFM TV's star news anchor Ruth Elkrief shuddered: 'The most urgent thing is for people to go home.' The channel was showing footage of yellow vest protesters determined to claim a better life for themselves.
A few days later, a journalist from the pro-business daily L'Opinion revealed on TV that 'all the big industrial groups are going to give out bonuses, because they were really scared for a time that their heads would end up on stakes. So after that terrible Saturday when all the damage was done [1 December], the big firms called Geoffroy Roux de Bézieux, the head of Medef [France's largest employers' federation], and told him to "drop everything! Drop it all, or else..." They felt physically threatened.'
Comment:
- Social Contagion: 'Yellow Vest' protests spread among citizens fed up with corruption
- Gilets Jaunes: Is France ground zero for a global movement?
- Europe's authoritarian colors coming through: Thousands put into custody since start of Yellow Vest protests in France
- France's Yellow Vest movement maturing into broad-based citizens' coalition
- What do the protesters in France want? Check out the 'official' Yellow Vest manifesto
Gilets Jaunes' List of Demands
Economy/WorkPolitics
- A constitutional cap on taxes - at 25%
- Increase of 40% in the basic pension and social welfare
- Increase hiring in public sector to re-establish public services
- Massive construction projects to house 5 million homeless, and severe penalties for mayors/prefectures that leave people on the streets
- Break up the 'too-big-to-fail' banks, re-separate regular banking from investment banking
- Cancel debts accrued through usurious rates of interest
Health/Environment
- Constitutional amendments to protect the people's interests, including binding referenda
- The barring of lobby groups and vested interests from political decision-making
- Frexit: Leave the EU to regain our economic, monetary and political sovereignty (In other words, respect the 2005 referendum result, when France voted against the EU Constitution Treaty, which was then renamed the Lisbon Treaty, and the French people ignored)
- Clampdown on tax evasion by the ultra-rich
- The immediate cessation of privatization, and the re-nationalization of public goods like motorways, airports, rail, etc
- Remove all ideology from the ministry of education, ending all destructive education techniques
- Quadruple the budget for law and order and put time-limits on judicial procedures. Make access to the justice system available for all
- Break up media monopolies and end their interference in politics. Make media accessible to citizens and guarantee a plurality of opinions. End editorial propaganda
- Guarantee citizens' liberty by including in the constitution a complete prohibition on state interference in their decisions concerning education, health and family matters
Foreign Affairs
- No more 'planned obsolescence' - Mandate guarantee from producers that their products will last 10 years, and that spare parts will be available during that period
- Ban plastic bottles and other polluting packaging
- Weaken the influence of big pharma on health in general and hospitals in particular
- Ban on GMO crops, carcinogenic pesticides, endocrine disruptors and monocrops
- Reindustrialize France (thereby reducing imports and thus pollution)
- End France's participation in foreign wars of aggression, and exit from NATO
- Cease pillaging and interfering - politically and militarily - in 'Francafrique', which keeps Africa poor. Immediately repatriate all French soldiers. Establish relations with African states on an equal peer-to-peer basis
- Prevent migratory flows that cannot be accommodated or integrated, given the profound civilizational crisis we are experiencing
- Scrupulously respect international law and the treaties we have signed













Comment: There's a simple reason the U.S. won't cooperate with the Russians on cybersecurity: they're the biggest cyber-criminals on the planet, and any treaty on the subject would automatically put them in violation of whatever the terms would be. Just like with the INF, the Americans accuse the Russians of violations when they themselves are the ones acting in bad faith.