Puppet Masters
Why it matters: Kaspersky Lab, the world's largest private cybersecurity company, has been accused of helping Moscow in their intelligence efforts, though they have repeatedly denied any such connection.
Details of the ban: In September, DHS ordered all government agencies to remove Kaspersky Lab software from their devices within 90 days. The ban officially went into effect last week when President Trump signed legislation codifying it.
Statement from Kaspersky Lab
"DHS failed to provide Kaspersky Lab with adequate due process and relied primarily on subjective, non-technical public sources like uncorroborated and often anonymously sourced media reports and rumors in issuing and finalizing the Directive," the company's CEO Eugene Kaspersky wrote in an open letter. "DHS has harmed Kaspersky Lab's reputation and its commercial operations without any evidence of wrongdoing by the company."
These 'warnings' typically come with claims that following the indictment of Michael Flynn Mueller is supposedly 'closing in' on Trump and that this explains why Trump and his supporters in Congress want to get rid of him.
On Tuesday, a Russian district court ruled that Frode Berg should continue to be remanded in custody after he was detained in Moscow two weeks ago. "The court satisfied the prosecutors' motion seeking to remand the defendant Berg in custody until February 5, 2018," Ekaterina Krasnova, the court's press secretary told journalists.
The Norwegian embassy in Moscow has not commented on the arrest so far.
Reagan National Security Strategy was 41 pages, Bush 2002 was 31, Obama 2015 was 29. Trump's is 55 pages: Buffet of priorities without much prioritization.The first "fundamental responsibility" the NSS sets out is:
... to protect the American people, the homeland, and the American way of life ...Micah Zenko points out that does not really do that:
[A]lmost nothing in the ... document deals with the actual domestic threats, risks, and systemic harms that Americans experience every day.While it touches lots of foreign policy issues, the emphasis of the new NSS is more realist than the - on paper - more idealistic version of Obama's imperial strategy. There is less schmoozing about "values" and a new emphasis on "rivals", most importantly China and Russia.
...
The Trump NSS ... mentions terrorists 58 times, and pledges to "defeat jihadist terrorists," just as all previous NSS documents have done since 9/11. Over the past 16-plus years, jihadis have killed 103 Americans within the United States, while right-wing terrorists have killed 68. During that same time period, drug-induced deaths have more than tripled, with over 59,000 Americans dying in 2016, while America's suicide rate has risen by 25 percent, resulting in 43,000 deaths annually.
...
The Trump administration's NSS fails to do what it claims - protect Americans - largely because it does not address the real threats and risks faced by Americans. It might be an "America First" foreign policy, as the president contends, but it does not put Americans themselves first.
Comment: The "four pillars" as defined by the document: protect the homeland, promote U.S. prosperity, peace through strength, advancing U.S. influence.
The White House has described the strategy as "principled realism" because it "acknowledges the central role of power in international politics, affirms that strong and sovereign states are the best hope for a peaceful world, and clearly defines our national interests," but also "grounded in advancing American principles, which spreads peace and prosperity around the globe."The biggest threats? Russia and China, who seek to "shape a world antithetical to our interests and values":
In the actual speech, Trump called China and Russia "rival powers" that "challenge American influence, values and wealth," but said that he was planning to work with them while putting American interests first.State Senator Richard Black is skeptical, believing Trump has reversed on his campaign promises and caved in to the war hawks. He told RT:
Next on the list are regional "dictators that spread terror, threaten their neighbors, and pursue weapons of mass destruction" followed by "jihadist terrorists" and transnational criminal organizations.
To protect the US, Trump will "target threats at their source" and "confront threats before they ever reach our borders."
"I believe the 'Deep State' actors rushed this National Security Review to completion in order to use it as a tool to dominate the foreign policy of President Trump," the senator told RT. "I believe that President Trump views Russia and China as economic competitors - not as enemies," he added.Russian MPs have responded with statements like these:
At the same time the document "drastically reverses Donald Trump's campaign promises to normalize relations with Russia, work with the Syrian government, limit US involvement to defeating ISIS [Islamic State, IS], and downplaying our relations with NATO."
"The US national security strategy is aimed exclusively at the restoration of American hegemony and the line for building a monopolar world" -- head of the lower house committee for international relations, MP Leonid Slutsky (LDPR)Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Hua Chunying responded:
"The tone of this document leaves no doubt about the fact that the United States is not content with the changes that have taken place in the world over the past years and that it intends to reverse these changes and restore the latest version of Pax Americana as a supposedly-just new world order. What the US means by stability is its control over the domestic and foreign policy of other nations" -- head of the upper house foreign affairs committee, Senator Konstantin Kosachev
"We urge the United States to stop deliberately distorting China's strategic intentions, and abandon outdated concepts such as a Cold War mentality and a zero-sum game, otherwise it will only harm everyone," Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told reporters on Tuesday.And the Kremlin:
Meanwhile, the Chinese embassy in the US said it is "completely selfish" for Washington to put its interest above others, warning that such an approach "will only lead to isolation." The Chinese mission also accused the US of "self-contradictory rhetoric" that diminishes the countries' cooperation.
"On the one hand, the US government claims that it is attempting to build a great partnership with China. On the other hand, it labels China as a rival. The self-contradictory rhetoric of the US betrays the truth that China and the US are becoming increasingly interdependent and have growing intertwined interests," the embassy said in a statement.
"For China and the United States, cooperation leads to win-win outcomes, while confrontation can only lead to a lose-lose situation," the diplomatic mission added, calling the US "to abandon its outdated zero-sum thinking" and "engage in win-win cooperation."
"Looking through [the strategy], particularly those parts concerning our country, one can see the imperial nature of the document, as well as persistent unwillingness to abandon the idea of a unipolar world and accept a multipolar world," he said. Peskov stressed that Moscow strongly disagrees with Washington's stance towards Russia expressed in the document, which designates the country as a threat to US security. And yet, there are some positive signs too.Overall, there are some slight shifts in the right direction here (seeing Russian and China as rivals, not simply enemy threats, with the camouflaged olive branch of cooperation in some spheres), wrapped in the clothes of "more of the same". American exceptionalism lite, perhaps? See also:
"[The strategy] has some positive moments, particularly those regarding cooperation with Russia in fields corresponding to the US interests. It is totally in line with our approach, voiced by [President Putin], because Moscow is also seeking cooperation with the United States in areas which are beneficial for us, and depending on how far our US counterparts are ready to go," President Vladimir Putin's press secretary said. When asked about "a perfect example of US-Russia cooperation," Peskov mentioned the recent exchange of information between the two countries' special services, which made it possible to thwart terrorist attacks in St. Petersburg and "helped save many lives."
The new US national security strategy is a long document with "rather impressive" wording "which needs to be thoroughly assessed" by relevant Russian agencies, the presidential spokesman said.
...
While China allegedly "seeks to displace the United States in the Indo-Pacific region, expand the reaches of its state-driven economic model, and reorder the region in its favor," Russia seeks to "restore its great power status and establish spheres of influence near its borders. The intentions of both nations are not necessarily fixed," the document added.

Palestinian mourners carry the body of 29-year-old activist Ibrahim Abu Thuraya who was shot and killed by Israeli troops Friday, in clashes on the Israeli border with Gaza, during his funeral in Gaza City, Saturday, Dec. 16, 2017. Abu Thuraya lost legs and an eye in Israeli bombing during the 2008 Israel and Gaza war.
Ibrahim Abu Thraya, 29, was shot while demonstrating along Gaza's border with Israel, Palestinian health officials said, during days of unrest sparked by President Donald Trump's recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital earlier this month. Abu Thraya is being hailed as a hero and his death has emerged as a rallying cry among Palestinians against Trump's dramatic declaration, which they largely saw as siding with Israel.
"We were telling him not to go (to the border), but he would not listen to us. He said 'this is Jerusalem; if I don't go to defend it, who will?'" said Raed al-Komi, Abu Thraya's half-brother.
Comment: Israel only opens a 'probe' when its actions are truly egregious.
IDF kills wheelchair-bound Palestinian with no legs during Gaza protest
If previous history is a guide, the soldier in question will get off with a slap on the wrist.
- IDF soldier who electrocuted blindfolded Palestinian for fun, laughed while filming gets light sentence, keeps job
- Video shows Israeli sniper callously murdering random Palestinian
- 'Extrajudicial execution': UN slams 1.5yr sentence for manslaughter of wounded Palestinian, "unacceptable" and "excessively lenient"
- Israeli police raid of Jerusalem hospital caught on film - Wounded Palestinian dead with doctors and nurses assaulted
An investigation by the Israeli military into the death of a paraplegic Palestinian man cleared Israeli troops of wrongdoing on Monday, saying it found "no moral or professional failures" in the incident.Israeli military shoots protester in the head. Israeli military investigates itself. Israeli military clears itself.
Palestinian health officials say Ibrahim Abu Thraya, 29, was shot in the head while demonstrating last week along Gaza's border with Israel, an area that has experienced repeated unrest since President Donald Trump recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital this month.
Abu Thraya's death has become a rallying cry among Palestinians against Trump's move, which upended decades of U.S. foreign policy and countered an international consensus that the fate of Jerusalem should be determined in negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.
The military said Friday's protest was "extremely violent," with protesters hurling stones, burning tires and explosive devices at troops. In its findings Monday, it said no live fire was aimed at Abu Thraya and it was impossible to determine the cause of death. The military said it has repeatedly requested details about Abu Thraya's injuries and will examine them if they are received. The military did not disclose from whom it had requested details.
Abu Thraya, who had previously worked as a fisherman, lost his legs in an Israeli airstrike during a 2008 war between Israel and Hamas. According to relatives, he was assisting in the evacuation of people after an earlier airstrike when he was struck. He had since used a wheelchair.
Itedal Abu Thraya, Ibrahim's mother, questioned the military's self-investigation and said her son posed no threat.
"He was only holding a flag, not an explosive belt or a bomb," she said. "I do not trust them or their investigations."
Israeli military investigations have drawn criticism from rights groups and Palestinians who charge that they are not independent or effective, citing a low indictment rate. The military insists the system works.
The UN Human Rights Chief, however, denounced the IDF's excessive force and is calling for an independent investigation:
"The lethal use of firearms should only be employed as the last resort, when strictly unavoidable, in order to protect life. However, as far as we can see, there is nothing whatsoever to suggest that Ibrahim Abu Thuraya was posing an imminent threat of death or serious injury when he was killed.
"Given his severe disability, which must have been clearly visible to those who shot him, his killing is incomprehensible - a truly shocking and wanton act."
...
The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) said in a statement: "No live fire was aimed at Abu Thuraya. It is impossible to determine whether Abu Thuraya was injured as a result of riot dispersal means or what caused his death."
Last week the Shanghai International Energy Exchange said the system has met all the listing requirements after rehearsals for futures trading denominated in the Chinese currency.
"An official launch during Christmas would be appropriate. The Western market would be quiet and allow the Shanghai exchange as well as Chinese investors to adjust in the early days," Chinese trader Yuan Quwei told Bloomberg.
"It's time to face the truth. We cannot and will never be able to stop migration," writes EU Commissioner for Migration Dimitris Avramopoulos, in a piece for POLITICO, published Monday entitled, "Europe's Migrants Are Here to Stay".
Comment: The "problem of migration" would not exist if Europe hadn't supported Washington's endless wars in Third World countries.
In it, the Eurocrat wrote "human mobility will increasingly define the 21st century", and that mass migration is an issue Brussels has committed Europe to "for the long haul", stating: "Migration is deeply intertwined with our policies on economics, trade, education and employment - to name just a few."
Comment: EU President Junker doubles down on the migration issue. Note the will if the people of Europe have no say in the matter.
Brussels is opening legal pathways for migrants "who want to come" says European Commission chief Jean-Claude Juncker, declaring that Europe has a "clear need" for mass migration from Africa.
Speaking ahead of the EU-Africa summit this week, where leaders of EU and African nations will meet to discuss migration, he told Deusche Well that "if we don't offer legal ways of emigrating to Europe, and immigrating within Europe, we will be lost.
"If those who come - who are, generally speaking, the poor and needy - are no longer able to enter the house of Europe through the front door, they'll keep making their way in through the back windows."
Claiming that the continent "will clearly need immigration in the coming decades", he said EU nations "have to provide [Africans] who want to come, and are able to come, and whose situation makes it possible for them to come, with legal paths to get to Europe".
Asked by the German public broadcaster why there is "so much resistance" in Europe to the question of open borders with the third world, and why the EU has not yet "succeeded" in foisting mass immigration on countries across the continent, Juncker said Brussels has "told the member-states of their responsibility".
State sovereignty is apparently dead in the EU.
"We will see what the member-states do about it," he said, proclaiming mass immigration to be a "great challenge of our age" and hinting that countries in Europe will come around to taking the same view as the European Commission.
The former prime minister of Luxembourg denied DW's suggestion that "fear is overcoming reason" with regards to mass migration, pointing to developments such as the EU Parliament's recent adoption of changes to the bloc's asylum system which would permanently force third world migrants upon unwilling nations.
"Now it's up to the member-states to follow the path of wisdom," said Juncker in the interview, where he cryptically hinted there are plans for Europe and Africa to become more interlinked.
"Africa is not a continent that will become part of our history tomorrow. Africa has always been a part of history," he told interviewer Max Hofmann. "Certain Europeans just didn't see it that way."
The Commission president also remarked that "populists" are "dangerous", but argued that it is "far more dangerous" when mainstream parties adopt "harmful proposals" to cut migration from outside Europe, and other conservative policies.
"If the traditional parties follow the populists, they become populist themselves, which is a phenomenon we are already seeing in some EU countries," he said.
"No, we should not be afraid of the populists; we should embrace those they are fighting."
In the interview, Juncker did not expand on why Europe has a "clear need" for mass migration from the world's poorest and most turbulent nations, but other EU figures have previously stated that the continent needs millions of third world migrants so as to combat an "ageing population".
In making this calculation, it is unclear as to whether the European Commission has thought about the fact that migrants also get older, or the effect of an ever-expanding population on the continent's emissions, or if it has considered the impact of automation - at a time when experts warn millions of jobs will be taken by robots in the coming years.
In addition, recent research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) found nothing to support the assertion that economies are harmed by ageing populations.
"There is no evidence of a negative relationship between ageing and GDP per capita," academics wrote in a paper entitled 'Secular Stagnation? The Effect of Aging on Economic Growth in the Age of Automation'.
"On the contrary, the relationship is significantly positive in many specifications," it adds.
The Senate has always been the heavier lift. The fact that Republicans aren't panicked over the absence of John McCain -- who is at home in Arizona as he battles an aggressive form of cancer -- suggests that Mitch McConnell has the votes, even without McCain. Let's look at the whip count: Only about five GOP Senators were potential 'nay' votes in the first place. Republicans hold a 52-48 edge in the upper chamber, meaning that leadership could lose up to two votes and still secure a successful outcome, with Vice President Pence poised to cast a decisive tie-breaking vote, if necessary. Two major pieces fell into place on Friday, as Marco Rubio won his battle to expand the refundable child tax credit in the final bill. He's now an "enthusiastic yes," with Mike Lee likely to follow. And Bob Corker, the outgoing Tennessee Senator who was the only Republican member to vote against the Senate-passed bill in early December, has announced his intention to get on board and help make tax reform the law of the land.
Comment:
- Poor Sen. John McCain will miss GOP tax bill vote
- Dem governors considering lawsuit to stop GOP tax bill
- Fake News outlet Washington Post misleads readers on GOP tax reform bill - then Brit Hume smacks them with facts
- Wall Street Journal says tax cuts will grow the economy more than expected
- Something, something ... Tax Cuts For The Rich
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, his wife Sophie Gregoire Trudeau and Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne were among the dignitaries who were marching in the procession. Trudeau was casually dressed in a blue blazer and pink shirt, with a temporary tattoo of a rainbow-coloured maple leaf on his left cheek. He waved at the thousands of people who lined both sides of the parade route down Yonge Street, frequently yelling out, "Happy Pride!"
"It's all about how we celebrate the multiple layers of identities that make Canada extraordinary and strong," Trudeau told reporters before the parade started.
Comment: This actually wasn't Trudeau's first participation at a 'pride' event: he broke the mold in 2016.














Comment: More background:
- Kaspersky Lab says it is not affiliated with any government
- Kaspersky Lab CEO acknowledges that company is 'under attack' by US gov't
- DHS orders removal of all Kaspersky Lab products - 'because Russian spies'
- CEO: US government knows Kaspersky Lab is not involved in cyber-espionage
The possible reason: Kaspersky CEO: U.S. attacks us because we found something U.S. doesn't like