Puppet Masters
Actually, I'm not really clear what I'm guilty of, but I'm definitely some sort of horrible person you want absolutely nothing to do with, whose columns you do not want to read, whose books you do not want to purchase, and the sharing of whose Facebook posts might get your account immediately suspended. Or, at the very least, you'll be issued this warning:

Senator Ted Cruz (right) rebuffed a reporter's request that he wear a mask while giving a Senate presser on Wednesday
"Would you mind putting a mask on for us?" a reporter asked Cruz as he stepped up to a bank of microphones.
"Uh, yeah, when I'm talking in front of the TV cameras I'm not going to wear a mask," Cruz responded. "And all of us have been immunized, so..."
Comment: Senator Cruz is in the right:
- Masks are neither effective nor safe: A summary of the science
- Denis Rancourt: 'The Scientific Argument Against Wearing Facemasks'
- The Science is Conclusive: Masks and Respirators do NOT Prevent Transmission of Viruses
- Exercising with face masks on could be dangerous and here's why
- Corruption of science: Multiple journals reject major mask study amid hints that it shows masks don't stop COVID
- Is evidence masks don't work being purged from the internet?
The new report consists of eleven pages of text and charts. It specifically discounts any direct evidence to alter votes electronically, but asserts that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally directed his spies and proxies to turn the US election in favor of Donald Trump. Based in part on the report, Joe Biden subsequently labeled Putin a "killer" and vowed that both Russia and its president would "pay a price" which we will be "seeing shortly" for their claimed meddling in American politics. The Bidenesque grotesque overreach has led to the Kremlin recalling its ambassador in Washington home for "consultations" and will at a minimum put US forces in the Middle East at risk.
Comment: How pathetic that Biden and his intelligence agency handlers and cronies would still try and trot out the Russia Bogeyman after the Mueller Report - and so much other information that has come out effectively debunking it.

Jen Psaki speaks during a news conference in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House.
"I'm not familiar with that claim. It doesn't sound like it's backed up by a lot of evidence. If you have evidence or specifics, I'm happy to discuss it further," Psaki said at her daily press briefing in response to a question from The Post.
Psaki said, referring to a report from the Senate Finance and Homeland Security committees that made the claim, "I'm not familiar with the report at all."
Comment: Psaki must have been living under a rock since her stint with the Obama admin, emerging into the light of day at the behest of Biden's "advisers".
- The Hunter Biden criminal probe supports a Chinese scholar's claim about Beijing's influence with the Biden administration
- Hunter Biden lists Joe, Chinese business partner as 'office mates' in leaked email
- DOJ confirms FBI criminal investigation into "Hunter Biden and Associates" has money laundering focus - probe ongoing
- Ukrainian MP: $7.4B Obama-linked laundering, Biden group's take tallies at $16.5M
- "Smoking gun" email from laptop shows Burisma's goal was to buy influence via Hunter Biden and Devon Archer
- Hunter Biden laptop labeled 'national security nightmare'
- Facebook and Twitter censor NY Post's new story about Hunter Biden on their platforms
- The truth about Hunter Biden's laptop
Entitled "Domestic Violent Extremism Poses Heightened Threat in 2021," the March 1 Report from the Director of National Intelligence states that it was prepared "in consultation with the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security — and was drafted by the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and Department of Homeland Security (DHS), with contributions from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)."
Its primary point is this:
"The IC [intelligence community] assesses that domestic violent extremists (DVEs) who are motivated by a range of ideologies and galvanized by recent political and societal events in the United States pose an elevated threat to the Homeland in 2021."While asserting that "the most lethal" of these threats is posed by "racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists (RMVEs) and militia violent extremists (MVEs)," it makes clear that its target encompasses a wide range of groups from the left (Antifa, animal rights and environmental activists, pro-choice extremists and anarchists: "those who oppose capitalism and all forms of globalization") to the right (sovereign citizen movements, anti-abortion activists and those deemed motivated by racial or ethnic hatreds).
Why it matters ... The historians' views were very much in sync with his own: It is time to go even bigger and faster than anyone expected. If that means chucking the filibuster and bipartisanship, so be it.
Four things are pushing Biden to jam through what could amount to a $5 trillion-plus overhaul of America, and vast changes to voting, immigration and inequality.
- He has full party control of Congress, and a short window to go big.
- He has party activists egging him on.
- He has strong gathering economic winds at his back.
- And he's popular in polls.
Comment: 5. He is completely manipulable.
Comment: An unholy train wreck's coming via the government to the people. The track is laid, the wheels are greased, the engine is revving and the Commander-in-Chief has left the platform.
The US vice-president said on the CBS This Morning program.
"We should first expect the US Congress to act. I'm not willing to give up on what we must do to appeal to the hearts and minds and the reason of the members of the US Senate."Two gun safety bills have been passed by the Democratic-controlled House, but under current rules unless Republicans in the Senate budge from their opposition to any such legislation - which they have shown no sign of doing - the bills cannot advance.
Comment: Lining up the horse with the cart? Shooting sprees always seem to predate the push for gun control:
As the Biden administration launches a new push for gun control, Vice President Kamala Harris insists that nobody's "coming after your guns." With Harris on record saying the exact opposite, will anyone believe her?
Speaking to CBS News on Wednesday, Harris urged Congress to pass a pair of bills that would strengthen background checks for weapon purchases. The bills were recently passed by the Democrat-controlled House, but need a 60-vote majority in the Senate. With control of the Senate split 50-50 between Democrats and Republicans, they are unlikely to pass, even after two high-profile mass shootings in the past two weeks.
Harris scolded Republicans who equate gun control with "getting rid of the Second Amendment," telling them to "stop pushing the false choice that this means everybody's trying to come after your guns, that is not what we're talking about."
Harris' appeal echoes President Biden's call for "common sense" gun laws, a call he made on Tuesday, one day after alleged gunman Ahmad Al Aliwi Al-Issa murdered 10 people in a grocery store in Boulder, Colorado.
However, gun owners and Second Amendment advocates are unlikely to be moved by her promise not to "come after" their guns. For one thing, Joe Biden explicitly vowed on the campaign trail to rid America of "assault weapons," a term ascribed by Democrats to hundreds of weapons, from certain shotguns to pistols to the ubiquitous AR-15 rifle. Asked in 2019 by CNN's Anderson Cooper if "a Biden administration... will come for my guns?" Biden answered: "Bingo, you're right if you have an assault weapon... they should be illegal, period."
His plan to "end our gun violence epidemic" includes promises to ban the sale of these weapons by reinstituting a Clinton-era law, to register all existing weapons on a federal database, to implement a mandatory buyback scheme, and to ban all online firearms sales. However, these actions are the purview of Congress, and Biden can push for them as much as he wants, but they ultimately won't pass without Republican votes in the Senate.
Both Biden and Harris are aware of this, hence their pleas to lawmakers. Biden can take executive action, and Press Secretary Jen Psaki said on Tuesday that he is "considering a range" of executive orders, but their scope is far more limited and temporary than any laws passed by Congress.
Yet before she was vice president, Harris announced during her own presidential campaign that she wouldn't wait for Congress to act. She asserted in 2019 that she would ban the importation of AR-15 style rifles, mandate "near universal background checks," implement mandatory buybacks, and make gun manufacturers criminally liable for mass shootings, all by executive order if necessary and within her first 100 days in office. When Biden stressed during a debate that she had "no constitutional authority" to do this, Harris responded: "Hey Joe, instead of saying 'No, we can't,' let's say 'Yes, we can.'"
Let's just take law into our own hands and the country will just have to deal with it - seems to be a Democratic thing:
Harris was gung-ho about depriving Americans of their beloved AR-15s, as was fellow candidate Beto O'Rourke, who said taking Americans' rifles is "exactly what we're going to do... Americans who own AR-15s, AK-47s, will have to sell them to the government."
Harris told reporters that compulsory buybacks were "a great idea," and promised to do the same if elected. However, campaign trail rhetoric is just that. Barack Obama tried and failed to reintroduce the Clinton-era assault weapons ban in 2013, but fell foul of Congress [...] and short of curbing the number of so-called 'assault weapons' sold in the US.
As such, Biden and Harris may have every intention of getting these weapons off the streets, but barring a shakeup of Congress in next year's midterm elections, gun owners and enthusiasts are safe, for now.
"DigiDog," the nickname given to Boston Dynamics' robo-canine monster by the New York Police Department, has been tested over the last year by the agency for its ability to see in the dark, assess threats, and otherwise perform policing duties human officers cannot. Hailed for its usefulness by the NYPD's emergency service and bomb squad units, it was singled out last week by New York City Council member Ben Kallos, who called for a unilateral ban on the use of "robots armed with a weapon" in a manner "likely to cause death or serious physical injury."
Kallos unveiled the No Killer Robots Act in an effort to crack down on the use of secretive surveillance and technology tools, with New York one of three American states (along with Massachusetts and Hawai'i) that have made a not-so-subtle show of testing the quadruped attack dogs in public.

A general view shows the damage at a Russian military field hospital after it was shelled by Syrian rebels in Aleppo
Following recent allegations of a hospital being targeted Al Atarib, western Aleppo, the US State Department repeated the claim, in spite of any clear evidence to back it up.
Instead, reports rely on highly questionable sources like the White Helmets, the USAID-funded Syrian American Medical Society and the usual unnamed "witnesses" and (clearly impartial!) "rebel sources," as per a Reuters' report on the recent claims.
In fact, Reuters even acknowledges being unable to verify the authenticity of videos purporting to show "a ward damaged and civil defence rescuers carrying bloodstained patients outside."
Let's recall that Idlib is occupied by Al-Qaeda in Syria - a fact emphasized (as I wrote) by the US' own former special envoy, Brett McGurk, who deemed the northwestern Syrian province the "largest Al-Qaeda safe-haven since 9/11."
On October 29, 2020, the US Cyber Command's Cyber National Mission Force posted a "meme" to Twitter showing a bear wearing a Russian ushanka. Apparently in a nod to Halloween, the cartoon animal is seen tripping as he drops his trick-or-treat basket, spilling candies labeled with the names of malware programs allegedly used by Russia.
While the image itself is rather prosaic, the process used to create it was nothing short of a bureaucratic masterpiece.
A Freedom of Information Act request filed by Runa Sandvik, a senior adviser for Norway's Armed Force Cyber Defence, unearthed 23 pages of emails and other documents related to the cartoon.
In a heavily redacted message dated October 7, a proposal is put forward to make the public aware of several types of malware.













Comment: See also: