Welcome to Sott.net
Sat, 16 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Hammer

CJ Hopkins: The New Normal "Reality" Police

reality police
So, according to Facebook and the Atlantic Council, I am now a "dangerous individual," you know, like a "terrorist," or a "serial murderer," or "human trafficker," or some other kind of "criminal." Or I've been praising "dangerous individuals," or disseminating their symbols, or otherwise attempting to "sow dissension" and cause "offline harm."

Actually, I'm not really clear what I'm guilty of, but I'm definitely some sort of horrible person you want absolutely nothing to do with, whose columns you do not want to read, whose books you do not want to purchase, and the sharing of whose Facebook posts might get your account immediately suspended. Or, at the very least, you'll be issued this warning:

reality police2

Comment: See also:


Yoda

Cruz refuses to wear mask when asked by reporter at press event, citing immunization, press badgers him anyway

ted cruz no mask press conference
© CSPAN
Senator Ted Cruz (right) rebuffed a reporter's request that he wear a mask while giving a Senate presser on Wednesday
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Wednesday refused to wear a mask during a press conference on Capitol Hill after a reporter repeatedly asked him to put one on as a courtesy to others in the room.

"Would you mind putting a mask on for us?" a reporter asked Cruz as he stepped up to a bank of microphones.

"Uh, yeah, when I'm talking in front of the TV cameras I'm not going to wear a mask," Cruz responded. "And all of us have been immunized, so..."

Comment: Senator Cruz is in the right: Good on him for not being cowed by the yapping presstitutes. The twitterati has even awarded him a meme:




Evil Rays

Is Joe Biden enabling Russiagate 2?

Putin
The old expression that "lightning never strikes the same place twice" is frequently used in the aftermath of a truly awful experience, meaning that the odds are that something exactly like that will never occur again. Unfortunately, however, we Americans will now have to endure lightning striking twice due to the emergence of President Joe Biden and whoever is telling him what to say. I am referring specifically to Russiagate, which is possibly the single most discredited bit of politically motivated chicanery that this country has seen in the past twenty years. Joe is relying on the "evidence" provided by a conveniently timed new declassified "Intelligence Community Assessment" entitled "Foreign Threats to the 2020 US Federal Election." The document was dated March 10th but released by Director Avril Haines of the Office of National Intelligence (ONI) on March 16th.

The new report consists of eleven pages of text and charts. It specifically discounts any direct evidence to alter votes electronically, but asserts that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally directed his spies and proxies to turn the US election in favor of Donald Trump. Based in part on the report, Joe Biden subsequently labeled Putin a "killer" and vowed that both Russia and its president would "pay a price" which we will be "seeing shortly" for their claimed meddling in American politics. The Bidenesque grotesque overreach has led to the Kremlin recalling its ambassador in Washington home for "consultations" and will at a minimum put US forces in the Middle East at risk.

Comment: How pathetic that Biden and his intelligence agency handlers and cronies would still try and trot out the Russia Bogeyman after the Mueller Report - and so much other information that has come out effectively debunking it.


Pumpkin 2

Seriously? Psaki says she never heard claim Hunter Biden got $3.5M from wife of ex-Moscow mayor

Jen Psaki hunter press conference white house
© Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Jen Psaki speaks during a news conference in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Wednesday said that she's "not familiar" with a widely reported claim that a company associated with first son Hunter Biden received $3.5 million from the wife of Moscow's former mayor, after being asked by The Post what the payment was for.

"I'm not familiar with that claim. It doesn't sound like it's backed up by a lot of evidence. If you have evidence or specifics, I'm happy to discuss it further," Psaki said at her daily press briefing in response to a question from The Post.

Psaki said, referring to a report from the Senate Finance and Homeland Security committees that made the claim, "I'm not familiar with the report at all."

Comment: Psaki must have been living under a rock since her stint with the Obama admin, emerging into the light of day at the behest of Biden's "advisers".


Arrow Up

The US Intel community, flouting laws, is increasingly involving itself in Domestic Politics

Biden Panetta
© Alex Wong/Getty Images
VP Joe Biden with former CIA Dir. Leon Panetta
A report declassified last Wednesday by the Department of Homeland Security is raising serious concerns about the possibly illegal involvement by the intelligence community in U.S. domestic political affairs.

Entitled "Domestic Violent Extremism Poses Heightened Threat in 2021," the March 1 Report from the Director of National Intelligence states that it was prepared "in consultation with the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security — and was drafted by the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and Department of Homeland Security (DHS), with contributions from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)."

Its primary point is this:
"The IC [intelligence community] assesses that domestic violent extremists (DVEs) who are motivated by a range of ideologies and galvanized by recent political and societal events in the United States pose an elevated threat to the Homeland in 2021."
While asserting that "the most lethal" of these threats is posed by "racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists (RMVEs) and militia violent extremists (MVEs)," it makes clear that its target encompasses a wide range of groups from the left (Antifa, animal rights and environmental activists, pro-choice extremists and anarchists: "those who oppose capitalism and all forms of globalization") to the right (sovereign citizen movements, anti-abortion activists and those deemed motivated by racial or ethnic hatreds).

Snakes in Suits

Biden's new deal: Re-engineering America, quickly

Biden
© Stefani Reynolds/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images
US President Joe Biden
President Biden recently held an undisclosed East Room session with historians that included discussion of how big is too big — and how fast is too fast — to jam through once-in-a-lifetime historic changes to America.

Why it matters ... The historians' views were very much in sync with his own: It is time to go even bigger and faster than anyone expected. If that means chucking the filibuster and bipartisanship, so be it.

Four things are pushing Biden to jam through what could amount to a $5 trillion-plus overhaul of America, and vast changes to voting, immigration and inequality.
  1. He has full party control of Congress, and a short window to go big.
  2. He has party activists egging him on.
  3. He has strong gathering economic winds at his back.
  4. And he's popular in polls.

Comment: 5. He is completely manipulable.


Comment: An unholy train wreck's coming via the government to the people. The track is laid, the wheels are greased, the engine is revving and the Commander-in-Chief has left the platform.


Pistol

Kamala Harris calls for Congress to act on gun control: 'Slaughter have to stop'

Harris/Guns
© Reuters/Eduardo Munoz/Carlos Barria
US VP Kamala Harris and guns
Decrying two mass shootings in the United States in less than a week, Kamala Harris said on Wednesday that "these slaughters have to stop" but deflected a question about whether Joe Biden was prepared to take executive action to restrict access to guns, calling instead for action by Congress.

The US vice-president said on the CBS This Morning program.
"We should first expect the US Congress to act. I'm not willing to give up on what we must do to appeal to the hearts and minds and the reason of the members of the US Senate."
Two gun safety bills have been passed by the Democratic-controlled House, but under current rules unless Republicans in the Senate budge from their opposition to any such legislation - which they have shown no sign of doing - the bills cannot advance.

Comment: Lining up the horse with the cart? Shooting sprees always seem to predate the push for gun control:
As the Biden administration launches a new push for gun control, Vice President Kamala Harris insists that nobody's "coming after your guns." With Harris on record saying the exact opposite, will anyone believe her?

Speaking to CBS News on Wednesday, Harris urged Congress to pass a pair of bills that would strengthen background checks for weapon purchases. The bills were recently passed by the Democrat-controlled House, but need a 60-vote majority in the Senate. With control of the Senate split 50-50 between Democrats and Republicans, they are unlikely to pass, even after two high-profile mass shootings in the past two weeks.


Harris scolded Republicans who equate gun control with "getting rid of the Second Amendment," telling them to "stop pushing the false choice that this means everybody's trying to come after your guns, that is not what we're talking about."

Harris' appeal echoes President Biden's call for "common sense" gun laws, a call he made on Tuesday, one day after alleged gunman Ahmad Al Aliwi Al-Issa murdered 10 people in a grocery store in Boulder, Colorado.

However, gun owners and Second Amendment advocates are unlikely to be moved by her promise not to "come after" their guns. For one thing, Joe Biden explicitly vowed on the campaign trail to rid America of "assault weapons," a term ascribed by Democrats to hundreds of weapons, from certain shotguns to pistols to the ubiquitous AR-15 rifle. Asked in 2019 by CNN's Anderson Cooper if "a Biden administration... will come for my guns?" Biden answered: "Bingo, you're right if you have an assault weapon... they should be illegal, period."


His plan to "end our gun violence epidemic" includes promises to ban the sale of these weapons by reinstituting a Clinton-era law, to register all existing weapons on a federal database, to implement a mandatory buyback scheme, and to ban all online firearms sales. However, these actions are the purview of Congress, and Biden can push for them as much as he wants, but they ultimately won't pass without Republican votes in the Senate.

Both Biden and Harris are aware of this, hence their pleas to lawmakers. Biden can take executive action, and Press Secretary Jen Psaki said on Tuesday that he is "considering a range" of executive orders, but their scope is far more limited and temporary than any laws passed by Congress.

Yet before she was vice president, Harris announced during her own presidential campaign that she wouldn't wait for Congress to act. She asserted in 2019 that she would ban the importation of AR-15 style rifles, mandate "near universal background checks," implement mandatory buybacks, and make gun manufacturers criminally liable for mass shootings, all by executive order if necessary and within her first 100 days in office. When Biden stressed during a debate that she had "no constitutional authority" to do this, Harris responded: "Hey Joe, instead of saying 'No, we can't,' let's say 'Yes, we can.'"


Let's just take law into our own hands and the country will just have to deal with it - seems to be a Democratic thing:


Harris was gung-ho about depriving Americans of their beloved AR-15s, as was fellow candidate Beto O'Rourke, who said taking Americans' rifles is "exactly what we're going to do... Americans who own AR-15s, AK-47s, will have to sell them to the government."

Harris told reporters that compulsory buybacks were "a great idea," and promised to do the same if elected. However, campaign trail rhetoric is just that. Barack Obama tried and failed to reintroduce the Clinton-era assault weapons ban in 2013, but fell foul of Congress [...] and short of curbing the number of so-called 'assault weapons' sold in the US.

As such, Biden and Harris may have every intention of getting these weapons off the streets, but barring a shakeup of Congress in next year's midterm elections, gun owners and enthusiasts are safe, for now.



Doberman

Byte worse than its bark? Armed robot dogs don't belong in the US police; Black Mirror is not an instruction manual for officers

robot dog
© Reuters/Kim Kyung Hoon
"DigiDog"
Unleashing weaponized robotic dogs to supplant the US's metastasizing police forces is not just a bad idea - it's a disastrous move that will vastly compound the levels of human suffering for which cops are responsible.

"DigiDog," the nickname given to Boston Dynamics' robo-canine monster by the New York Police Department, has been tested over the last year by the agency for its ability to see in the dark, assess threats, and otherwise perform policing duties human officers cannot. Hailed for its usefulness by the NYPD's emergency service and bomb squad units, it was singled out last week by New York City Council member Ben Kallos, who called for a unilateral ban on the use of "robots armed with a weapon" in a manner "likely to cause death or serious physical injury."

Kallos unveiled the No Killer Robots Act in an effort to crack down on the use of secretive surveillance and technology tools, with New York one of three American states (along with Massachusetts and Hawai'i) that have made a not-so-subtle show of testing the quadruped attack dogs in public.

Rocket

Western media quick to accuse Syria of 'bombing hospitals' - but when TERRORISTS really destroy Syrian hospitals, they are silent

Aleppo hospital
© Reuters
A general view shows the damage at a Russian military field hospital after it was shelled by Syrian rebels in Aleppo
As legacy media again bleat the unsubstantiated "Syria is bombing hospitals" chorus of its war propaganda songbook, let's pause to review the relatively unknown (but verifiable) reality of terrorists bombing hospitals in Syria.

Following recent allegations of a hospital being targeted Al Atarib, western Aleppo, the US State Department repeated the claim, in spite of any clear evidence to back it up.

Instead, reports rely on highly questionable sources like the White Helmets, the USAID-funded Syrian American Medical Society and the usual unnamed "witnesses" and (clearly impartial!) "rebel sources," as per a Reuters' report on the recent claims.

In fact, Reuters even acknowledges being unable to verify the authenticity of videos purporting to show "a ward damaged and civil defence rescuers carrying bloodstained patients outside."

Let's recall that Idlib is occupied by Al-Qaeda in Syria - a fact emphasized (as I wrote) by the US' own former special envoy, Brett McGurk, who deemed the northwestern Syrian province the "largest Al-Qaeda safe-haven since 9/11."

Comment: See also:


NPC

The Deep State can't meme! Pentagon spent over 20 days creating crappy anti-Russia cartoon

Pentagon Russia meme
© Twitter / CNMF_CyberAlert
An uninspired cartoon commissioned by the Pentagon that attempted to throw shade at Moscow required weeks to complete, documents have revealed, shining a light on how the US military goes about its creative endeavors.

On October 29, 2020, the US Cyber Command's Cyber National Mission Force posted a "meme" to Twitter showing a bear wearing a Russian ushanka. Apparently in a nod to Halloween, the cartoon animal is seen tripping as he drops his trick-or-treat basket, spilling candies labeled with the names of malware programs allegedly used by Russia.

While the image itself is rather prosaic, the process used to create it was nothing short of a bureaucratic masterpiece.

A Freedom of Information Act request filed by Runa Sandvik, a senior adviser for Norway's Armed Force Cyber Defence, unearthed 23 pages of emails and other documents related to the cartoon.

In a heavily redacted message dated October 7, a proposal is put forward to make the public aware of several types of malware.