Puppet Masters
A dilapidated warehouse in Malmi is being used by the US Embassy for unknown operations after a Wikileaks release revealed its location. The anonymous looking building on Takoraudantie is notable only for the new 427 meter perimeter fence that according to the Wikileaks' database was ordered by the US Embassy in April 2018.
Situated across the street from the main entrance of Malmi Airport, the warehouse with its 3 meter high security fence appears an unlikely location for official embassy business. Neighbouring companies include a car yard and a tyre warehouse.
Warsaw's moves confirm the suspicion that the high-profile arrest has the political purpose of catering to the US actions against Huawei.
Very few public espionage disputes have occurred between China and East Europe. Warsaw claims that the allegation was directed at personal behavior instead of the company, but how it handled the issue has already damaged Huawei's reputation. Although clearly aware of the affair's special resonance, Warsaw is wooing Washington while playing tricks on Beijing.
Poland fears China's retaliation, so it is calling for a joint position with the EU and NATO so as to share the pressure. Meanwhile such a call helps the US expand suppression of Huawei into the EU and NATO.
Huawei's equipment is widely applied in Europe's 4G networks and no evidence proves that Huawei's equipment has damaged European network security. Europe's 4G network is independent and free, but will the continent obey Washington's command in the communication industry starting from 5G? Warsaw is guiding Europe in the wrong direction.
Comment:
- Doing its master's bidding? Poland arrests Huawei employee over spying allegations
- US sets dangerous precedent after snatching Chinese executive Meng Wanzhou in Vancouver
- US makes lame attempt to smear China's Huawei for its business links to Iran and Syria
- US continues smear campaign against China by slapping export ban on US-based Huawei subsidiary

China's trade surplus with the US grew 17 percent year-on-year to $323.32 billion in 2018, the highest on record since 2006.
Although last year's overall trade surplus shrank, China's trade surplus with the US still grew 17 percent year-on-year to $323.32 billion in 2018, the highest on record since 2006 - a situation that goes against US President Donald Trump's vows to launch a trade war against China to reduce US trade deficit.
Specifically, China's exports to the US grew 11.3 percent year-on-year in 2018 to $478.4 billion in dollar-denominated terms, while imports from the US to China only rose 0.7 percent to $155 billion, according to data released by the General Administration of Customs.
Comment: Wow, those sanctions and tariffs were utterly useless then.
For the whole year, China's foreign trade volume hit $4.62 trillion in dollar-denominated terms, up 12.6 percent year-on-year, with exports and imports up 9.9 percent and 15.8 percent compared with 2017, respectively, customs data showed. The export growth was the highest since 2011.
Comment: RT adds that the simmering trade war is also negatively impacting Chinese investment in the US with levels falling to the lowest in seven years:
Chinese investments in North America and Europe fell by 73 percent last year as a result of tightened US scrutiny of foreign takeover deals and Beijing's restrictions on outbound investments.So China can withdraw three quarters of its investment in the West and still keep winning.
Data from law firm Baker & McKenzie showed that Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) flows into the United States have also turned negative, falling to the lowest in seven years. Chinese investments in the US fell by 83 percent, while growing by 80 percent in Canada.
Last year, Chinese companies completed just $4.8 billion in new business acquisitions and investments in the US, down 84 percent from $29 billion in 2017 and 90 percent from $46 billion in 2016.
With the $13 billion in US asset sales by Chinese companies, net Chinese investment in the United States dropped by $8 billion in 2018.
The dragon has awoken, but it hasn't even fully stretched out its limbs yet.
See also:
- Xi Jinping will give Donald Trump a victory on trade
- Beijing trade talks: China hints that talks were successful, Washington 'optimistic' over prospects for deal
Responding to an Instagram Live video posted by Warren two weeks ago, Trump suggested that the video would have been a "smash" if Warren "did this commercial from Bighorn or Wounded Knee instead of her kitchen, with her husband dressed in full Indian garb."
Nonetheless, Trump's decision on Syria, coupled with his order to reduce US forces in Afghanistan by half, has been "condemned," as The New York Times approvingly reported, "across the ideological spectrum," by "the left and right." Analyzing these condemnations, particularly in the opinion-shaping New York Times and Washington Post and on interminable (and substantially uninformed) MSNBC and CNN segments, again reveals the alarming thinking that is deeply embedded in the US bipartisan policy-media establishment.
"The more the US puts pressure on Europeans, the more there is a risk that Europeans try to detach themselves from the US and try to make a better deal with Russia," Thomann, who heads Eurocontinent geopolitical research, told RT.
"We cannot abandon the import of Russian gas, this will be economic suicide. So the Americans also have a limit of their pressure capacity," the analyst stressed.
The comment comes as the US Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell sent out warnings to German companies reminding them about significant sanctions they may face for participating in the building of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline with Russia.
Comment: See also:
- Majority of Germans support Nord Stream pipeline deal with Russia
- Nordstream 2 pipeline project reveals the extent of U.S. weakness
- 'Blatant & brazen': Russian lawmaker lambastes US "interference" in Nord Stream 2 deal
- Is Nord Stream 2 the bigger target of the Russian spy poison attack?
- Russia ready to build Nord Stream 3 & provide Europe with as much gas as it needs
Amal al-Taramsi, 44, died after she was shot in the head by live fire during Great March of Return protests east of Gaza City. She was 200 meters away from the boundary fence at the time of her injury, according to the Gaza-based human rights group Al Mezan.
Al-Taramsi is the third female to be killed during the protest series that was launched on 30 March last year. The other two female fatalities were medic Razan al-Najjar and 14-year-old Wesal al-Sheikh Khalil.
A defamation claim filed by General Zolotov in December didn't comply with the relevant articles of the Civil Procedure Code. He was given until January 9 to get it in order, but failed to do so, a Moscow court said, explaining the reasons why the lawsuit has been returned to the claimant.
The rift between Zolotov and the Kremlin critic began in September after a report by Navalny's NGO, the Foundation for Countering Corruption, alleged that tenders for food purchases by the National Guard were rigged in favor of a single supplier.
Comment: This demonstrates that just because someone is a 'critic of the Kremlin', increasingly, under Putin, the law is the law, whereas many countries in the west abuse the judicial process to target 'enemies of the state':
- Russia's State Duma implements law neutralizing Navalny's exploitation of children in protests
- Maria Zakharova calls US State Department's comments on Navalny rejection "meddling in the Russian elections"
- Yale University 'educated' Russian color revolution agitator tool Alexey Navalny
- Four Russian prison guards sentenced for beating an inmate to death
"After consultation with the relevant committee ranking members and my colleagues, I have concluded that the Treasury Department's proposal is flawed and fails to sufficiently limit Oleg Deripaska's control and influence of these companies, and the Senate should move to block this misguided effort by the Trump administration and keep these sanctions in place," the Democratic senator from New York said in a statement on January 13.
Comment:
- US Treasury to lift sanctions on multiple Russian companies
- Russian businessman sues Associated Press fake news for libel
- Coming Deripaska case versus AP may open worm can
- Oleg Deripaska op-ed: The Deep State's ever-changing 'Russia narrative' is false public manipulation
- Conflict of interest? Mueller and the Russian oligarch
A global powerful action against meat?
EAT is a global, non-profit startup dedicated to transforming our global food system through sound science, impatient disruption and novel partnerships. According to the website, "the EAT-Lancet Commission on Food, Planet, Health brings together more than 30 world-leading scientists from across the globe to reach a scientific consensus that defines a healthy and sustainable diet".
But the campaign, that will be launched in Oslo on January 17th, sounds like a powerful push to shift global diets by discouraging animal products. It is fuelled by large budgets and will be mediatised for a long time to come, scheduling more than 30 events around the world. But a closer look into its background reveals some perturbing elements. The danger is that the overstatement of certain concerns will result in an anti-livestock narrative, create a false impression of scientific consensus, and do more harm than good in a world in need of nutrient-rich meals and sustainable food systems.
EFA News has received this text which we gladly publish to encourage public debate. These crucial issues, in our humble opinion, should be the responsibility of public authorities, rather than private associations that inevitably act as pressure groups.
Comment: Make no mistake, the "enlightened" viewpoint circulating through media and society at large, proclaiming veganism as the ideal diet for health and the environment, is entirely socially engineered and nothing like the grass roots movement it's presented as. These are corporate interests being served, making the vegan diet a corporate-endorsed one. What better way to signal your fealty to our corporate overlords than to sacrifice your own health on a vegan diet?
See also:
- Plant-Based Profits: The Corporate Interests Behind the Push Towards Veganism
- Cows are getting a bad rap and it's time to set the record straight: Giving up meat won't save the planet
- Lab Meat: Big hype, bad investment
- Brace Yourselves: We could be seeing a 163% meat tax thanks to the know-nothing 'social engineers'
- Vegetarian propaganda working?: Americans consuming more fake meat & dairy than ever
- Making the Case for Sustainable Meat














Comment: Others have been following up on the Helsinki-Baghdad connection.
How America's global Deep State maintains its secret logistics