Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 03 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Chess

Russian PM Medvedev: Russia's response to NATO build-up could be both political, military

Medvedev

Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev
Russia views with alarm NATO's expansion toward its western border and it will make not only a political response but a military one as well if need be, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev has said.

In an interview with the Serbian newspaper Vecernje Novosti, the Russian official said NATO's maneuver toward Russia's border is a threat to its "national security," Tass news agency reported on Saturday, Presstv Reported.

"We are a large country, we are a nuclear state, and the desire to place NATO bases in our immediate vicinity obviously cannot fill us with positive emotions," Medvedev said.
"We have always responded and will continue to respond to this, both politically and in a military sense."
The Russian prime minister further warned NATO to think twice before adding certain countries into the alliance. He said "all attempts to draw into NATO countries that have internal political tensions are very dangerous" and fraught with very "serious consequences."

Fire

Hong Kong officially kills controversial extradition bill while China 'plans to replace Carrie Lam'

HOng Kong protests
© Getty
Protesters set fire outside a Causeway Bay Mass Rapid Transit (MTR) station in Hong Kong.
Hong Kong authorities have formally withdrawn the unpopular extradition bill that sparked a months-long protest movement.

The semi-autonomous province's leader, Carrie Lam, had initially proposed the bill in February to resolve a case involving a man wanted for murder in Taiwan who could not be sent to face charges because there was no extradition agreement.

However the proposals sparked widespread fears that residents would be at risk of being sent to mainland China to face the state's Communist Party-controlled courts - prompting protests that have engulfed the territory between citizens and the police.

Now, after assurances from Ms Lam in September that the bill would be scrapped in the next meeting of the state's legislative council, it has been formally withdrawn by secretary for security John Lee.

Comment:


Eagle

US officials ignored Trump on Syria, now we're paying the price

turkish soldier flag
© Anadolu Agency / Arif Hüdaverdi Yaman
Republicans, Democrats, and European leaders are united in their outrage with President Donald Trump. This time, it is for his effective endorsement of a Turkish invasion of northeastern Syria to put a boot on the neck of Kurdish militants who fought with the United States to defeat the Islamic State.

But this anger is misplaced. Trump has been clear about his intentions in Syria. As he told the world in April 2018, after years of fighting foreign wars, in his view it was time for the United States to withdraw from Syria, passing responsibility for the mission to hold territory taken from the Islamic State to regional states. I was listening, and wrote in War on the Rocks that the longer the president's own staff continued to treat the world's most powerful man like an infant, the more likely it became that he would simply order a hasty withdrawal. This chaotic U.S. exit from Syria was obviously coming, for anyone paying attention to the opinion of the man who matters most in the United States: the president.

Vice President Mike Pence and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo reached a ceasefire agreement with Turkey, which grants its core demand of a 32-kilometer "safe zone" between the towns of Ras al Ayn and Tel Abyad. But it remains outrageous that senior U.S. officials found themselves in the position of having to travel to Turkey to negotiate under pressure while Turkish troops remained on the offensive in Syria. For over a year, it was obvious Trump wanted to leave Syria and, as I wrote in April 2018, Trump "has made his preferences for U.S. policy in the Middle East clear" and it was time "for his national security staff to listen to him and to devise a sequential drawdown policy that fits with the spirit of the president's demands, but takes deliberate and uncomfortable steps to protect U.S. interests." This did not happen.

Rather than plan and begin to implement a coordinated withdrawal, the president's appointed envoy for Syria and the Department of Defense worked to ensure Washington could stay, and ignored the reality that Trump would eventually order an American withdrawal. Such delusions have not served the United States and its friends well.

Bullseye

It's their JOB! MPs shouldn't complain about having no time to read Brexit bill

uk mps
© AFP / HO / PRU
MPs claim they haven't got time to read the Brexit Withdrawal Bill. As a former legislator myself, here's why I have little sympathy for their complaints.

The latest delaying tactic in the Brexit saga is MPs complaining that they don't have enough time to read the 115-page Withdrawal Agreement Bill. I've seen people jumping on the bandwagon, suggesting that we want MPs to be 'ordinary people', but then we expect them to scrutinize complex legislation in a short period of time, working overnight.

Anyone saying that is probably a little out of touch with everyday life. As a former teacher, I'm acutely aware of the stress felt by teachers when they know there's an Ofsted inspection coming the next day. Our police have had leave cancelled to deal with Extinction Rebellion protestors, having to work very long hours. At short notice, medical professionals will often have to work incredibly long hours at a high level of concentration. Students putting together dissertations for a degree, small business owners getting their tax returns sorted, salespeople meeting targets - we all have times when something goes wrong.

No Entry

Iraq turns to UN to kick out unauthorized US troops who came in from Syria

esper
© REUTERS / Erin Scott
The Iraqi government is seeking international help after US troops withdrawing from Syria entered western Iraq without authorization, with Baghdad now taking legal action against the uninvited presence.

Baghdad did not give permission for US forces to stay in Iraq, Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi reaffirmed on Wednesday.
We ask the international community and the United Nations to perform their roles in this matter.
US Defense Secretary Mark Esper said Tuesday that US troops transiting from Syria would use Iraq to make preparations to go home and assured that the aim is not to "stay in Iraq interminably." Esper did not specify how long the American troops would be staying.

Washington removed its troops from northern Syria on foot of a Turkish offensive against Kurdish militias in the region, who Ankara regard as terrorists.

Comment: Secretary of Defense Esper made an unannounced visit to Iraq, presumably to deal with the fallout of the unannounced arrival of US troops Iraq didn't ask for:
Pentagon Chief Mark Esper has been paying unofficial visits to Middle Eastern countries since 18 October. He will reportedly get updates on the current operations in the region and then will head to the NATO ministry in Brussels where he will meet with his Turkish counterparts and discuss the campaign to defeat the Daesh terrorist group.

Esper has arrived in Baghdad for meetings with his Iraqi counterpart and the prime minister Adel Abdul Mahdi to discuss matters of mutual concern in the region, Reuters reported.

The counterparts will also reportedly discuss the partial withdrawal of US troops from Syria and the role Iraq will play in it.

​Esper earlier stated that around 1,000 US soldiers, withdrawn from Syria after the beginning of Turkey's offensive there, would head for western Iraq.

"We're still in the early stages of withdrawal from northeast Syria. It will take weeks, not days, and we're... in many ways only days into the withdrawal. The aim is to pull our soldiers out and eventually get them back home", Esper said.

He added that the weeks needed for US forces to leave Syria left plenty of time for Washington and Baghdad to work out the details of a withdrawal from Iraq.



Map

Russian military police move to Syrian-Turkish border as first phase of Erdogan-Putin deal - UPDATES

manbij russian military police
© Pool footage / Ruptly
Russian military police patrol Manbij after withdrawal of US forces on October 16, 2019
A column of Russian military police has crossed the river Euphrates and started moving towards Syrian-Turkish border, Russian Defense Ministry has confirmed on Wednesday.

The transfer marks a start of the implementation of the deal presidents Putin and Erdogan agreed on following their Tuesday meeting.


"Units of Russian military police will assist in ensuring the safety of the population and maintain order, carry out patrols in the area and facilitate the withdrawal of YPG forces to beyond 30 kilometers from the Turkish border," says the ministry's statement.

Comment: Stalker Zone published this summary from Komsomolskaya Pravda correspondent Aleksandr Kots:
1. What Was Agreed

In fact, a section from Tell Abyad to Ras al-Ain remains under Turkey's control. It's 120 kilometers along the border and 30 kilometers inland. Erdogan will obviously withdraw his troops from the zone soon, leaving Ankara-controlled militant units there. Plus, a 10-kilometre security zone is formed throughout the border, which Ankara will have no control over. However, it will be patrolled jointly by Turks and Russians. In fact, this option allowed Erdogan to save face, but the most important thing is to stop the military operation. This, of course, is not the 480 desired kilometers with a width of 30, but allows to gain a foothold on the М-4 road from Aleppo to the border with Iraq.


2. What Turkey Got

In the occupied territories, Erdoğan will certainly try to resolve the issue of refugees flooding Turkey. According to the most modest signs, about 3 million people fled north-eastern Syria. Initially, Ankara planned to settle them in the buffer zone along the entire border. Now Erdoğan has only 120 kilometers. However, it is not yet a fact that most refugees will want to return. Some already live on Turkish territory, some won't want to give up their benefits and other "privileges". However, Ankara always has legitimate leverage over refugees - it is possible to simply not renew their status.

3. What Syria Got

Firstly, control over territories that seemed lost forever. Because few believed that the Americans, having set their zones of influence in Syria, would abandon them. So even a month ago, the thought of reaching the northeast borders seemed fantastic. Today, it can be said that Assad, thanks to Russian diplomacy, is stitching together a country tearing apart at the seams. Secondly, Damascus is returning the government-loyal Arab population, which has been ruled by the Kurdish minority in recent years. Thirdly, with a competent policy of reconciliation, it receives powerful fighting formations of Kurds, who, when working correctly with them, become allies of government forces.

The fate of the Euphrates oil fields remains unclear. Turkey did not reach them, so there is no word in the signed memorandum about hydrocarbons. Meanwhile, there are already ideas in Washington to leave a small contingent of US military personnel in the oil field area - "to help Kurds protect infrastructure". Obviously, Damascus believes that it will do so itself.

4. What the Kurds got

In fact, compared to the Syrian army, Kurdish formations look more focused. And during their operation against ISIS, they really completed the most difficult tasks, proving themselves to be fearless warriors. This quality is not to be taken away from them. But they chose the wrong ally. And instead of helping their country, they decided to separate themselves. Today, thanks to Russia, the Kurds will not receive the ethnogenocide that Turkey would certainly arrange for them. Whatever personal qualities SDF or PKK fighters possess, they would have nothing to counter the regular army with aviation.

5. What Russia got

Russia is shifting the Middle East's decision-making center to its own side, solving the worst military-political puzzle without the use of force. And thus overplaying the wretched US, which is used to "solving issues" through "humanitarian bombing", bribery, and promises that can not be kept. Together with peace and Syrian territories, Moscow is regaining its status as a leader in a complex region with which it cannot but be reckoned. And these are image things that have no dollar equivalent.
As Kourosh Shamlou told RT: "It is a successful meeting. More important for Vladimir Putin, because Russia is now filling up the gap left by the US. The US is now pulling out all its forces and Russia is coming in." After being informed of the deal last night by Putin via phone, President Assad reportedly thanked Putin and expressed his full support for the decision. After the meeting, the Turkish Defence Ministry announced that there was no longer any need to carry out a new military operation in Syria "at this stage."

The meeting came after the conclusion of the 5-day US-mediated ceasefire, after which the US told Turkey that all terrorists had withdrawn from the area in question - to which Cavusoglu responded: "However, it does not mean that there are no terrorists there. They could be hiding in tunnels or other places. We took the US guarantees into account and halted the operation, but that does not mean that it is over." It may not be over, but the Russian-Turkish deal provides a bit more breathing room. Erdogan says Turkey will resume the operation if the U.S. and Russia fail to keep their respective promises. Pompeo says Trump is "fully prepared" for military action against Turkey should misbehave - but Washington prefers diplomacy. As for Trump, he's naturally claiming all the credit, but will also remove sanctions against Turkey as a result of the new developments.

Sputnik shared a proposed map resulting from the deal, showing zones in question, plus the 15 observation posts to be manned by the Syrians (full size here):


The Syrian live map is showing the entire stretch of the M4 highway from Ayn Isa east under the control of the Syrians.

Moscow is demanding the US end its occupation of al-Tanf, which blocks a major border crossing with Iraq.


NPC

Revenge of the swamp creatures: Obama State Department careerists strike back

Marie Yovanovitch
© J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press
Former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch (center).
They've been derided as a "deep state," slurred as "Obama holdovers," threatened with draconian budget cuts and told President Donald Trump doesn't even need them.

Now, America's diplomats are taking their revenge.

In recent days, current and former foreign service officers have defied Trump administration orders and trudged to Capitol Hill to testify before House committees conducting an impeachment investigation against the president. Colleagues inside the State Department and their allies in the broader foreign policy community are quietly hailing them as heroes, with special praise for those testifying despite still being on the government payroll.

Bizarro Earth

Pepe Escobar: Watch neoliberalism burn

massive protest
Neoliberalism is - literally - burning. And from Ecuador to Chile, South America, once again, is showing the way. Against the vicious, one-size-fits-all IMF austerity prescription, which deploys weapons of mass economic destruction to smash national sovereignty and foster social inequality, South America finally seems poised to reclaim the power to forge its own history.

Three presidential elections are in play. Bolivia's seem to have been settled this past Sunday - even as the usual suspects are yelling "Fraud!" Argentina and Uruguay are on next Sunday.

Blowback against what David Harvey has splendidly conceptualized as accumulation by dispossession is, and will continue to be, a bitch. It will eventually reach Brazil - which as it stands continues to be torn to pieces by Pinochetist ghosts. Brazil, eventually, after immense pain, will rise up again. After all, the excluded and humiliated all across South America are finally discovering they carry a Joker inside themselves.

Chile privatizes everything

The question posed by the Chilean street is stark: "What's worse, to evade taxes or to invade the subway?" It's all a matter of doing the class struggle math. Chile's GDP grew 1,1% last year while the profits of the largest corporations grew ten times more. It's not hard to find from where the huge gap was extracted. The Chilean street stresses how water, electricity, gas, health, medicine, transportation, education, the salar (salt flats) in Atacama, even the glaciers were privatized.

That's classic accumulation by dispossession, as the cost of living has become unbearable for the overwhelming majority of 19 million Chileans, whose average monthly income does not exceed $500.

Comment: The list of economic and social destruction as a result of neoliberal policies - and its elitist proponents - goes on, and on, and on:


Eagle

A call for a coup in Washington and a week like no other for Tulsi Gabbard

Tulsi Gabbard

Tulsi Gabbard
There was what might be described as an extraordinary amount of nonsense being promoted by last week's media. Unfortunately, some of it was quite dangerous. Admiral William McRaven, who commanded the Navy Seals when Osama bin Laden was captured and killed and who has been riding that horse ever since, announced that if Donald Trump continues to fail to provide the type of leadership the country needs, he should be replaced by whatever means are necessary. The op-ed entitled "Our Republic is Under Attack by the President" with the subtitle "If President Trump doesn't demonstrate the leadership that America needs, then it is time for a new person in the Oval Office" was featured in the New York Times, suggesting that the Gray Lady was providing its newspaper of record seal of approval for what might well be regarded as a call for a military coup.

McRaven's exact words, after some ringing praise for the military and all its glorious deeds in past wars, were that the soldiers, sailors and marines now must respond because "The America that they believed in was under attack, not from without, but from within."

McRaven then elaborated that:
"These men and women, of all political persuasions, have seen the assaults on our institutions: on the intelligence and law enforcement community, the State Department and the press. They have seen our leaders stand beside despots and strongmen, preferring their government narrative to our own. They have seen us abandon our allies and have heard the shouts of betrayal from the battlefield. As I stood on the parade field at Fort Bragg, one retired four-star general, grabbed my arm, shook me and shouted, 'I don't like the Democrats, but Trump is destroying the Republic!'"

Comment: Clearly this is a lot of inflammatory rhetoric that is low on specifics so that it cannot be critiqued with any amount of rigor.


Pirates

Senior Iraqi MP: US redeployment of soldiers is meant to restore ISIS in Iraq

US soldier Iraq
The US transfer of troops from Syria to Iraq is a plan for re-stationing ISIS terrorists in the country's western province of Anbar, a senior Iraqi lawmaker said.

After withdrawing from Syria, the US troops will station at American military bases in Iraq, a senior member of the Iraqi parliament's Security and Defense Committee Karim al-Mahmadawi told the Arabic-language al-Ma'aloumeh news website, adding that the whole transfer of troops is a plan to re-organize the ISIS in Iraq's western desert province of Anbar.

He added that US forces will be stationed at bases in Anbar and Salah al-Din provinces and that the US government has given them a green light. Washington is trying to bring back ISIS to Iraq by moving its forces from Syria to Iraq, the legislator said. The Iraqi lawmaker insisted that Washington, through deploying its troops from Syria to Iraq, is after returning ISIS terrorist elements to Iraq to resettle them in the Anbar desert, west of Iraq.
"Washington has chosen the present time for its military withdrawal from Syria because the [Iraqi] government is grappling with a crisis of public demonstrations and popular anger," al-Mahmadawi continued.

Comment: See also: