Puppet Masters
The decision by Judge Liam O'Grady in U.S. District Court in Eastern Virginia did not detail how much Snowden should have to pay the U.S. government in connection with his book "Permanent Record."
That amount likely will be decided later by O'Grady.
The judge's ruling Tuesday came in response to a request by the government to grant summary judgment in a lawsuit against Snowden for violating the terms of secrecy agreements he signed while working at the Central Intelligence Agency as an employee and contractor, and at the National Security Agency as a contractor.
The Justice Department is seeking to recover "all proceeds earned by Snowden," it has previously said.
In a tweet on Thursday, Snowden wrote, "The government may steal a dollar, but it cannot erase the idea that earned it."
"I wrote this book, Permanent Record, for you, and I hope the government's ruthless desperation to prevent its publication only inspires you read it — and then gift it to another."

(L-R) Emmanuel Macron, Volodymyr Zelensky, Angela Merkel, Vladimir Putin
First, what just happened
First, here are the key excerpts from the Paris Conference and from statements made by "Ze" and his superior, Arsen Avakov right after their return to Kiev:

The Dome of the Rock Mosque at the Al Aqsa Mosque compound, know by the Jews as the Temple Mount, is seen from the Mount of Olives in east Jerusalem.
The draft allegedly contains a series of clauses describing a trilateral agreement between Israel, the PLO and Hamas, which would constitute a departure from the U.S.'s longstanding position of refusing to negotiate directly with Hamas, the Islamic group governing the Gaza Strip.
According to the report, the state of New Palestine will exist in the West Bank and Gaza, connected via a raised highway constructed 30 meters off the ground. All Israeli settlement blocs would be annexed to Israel, signaling consistency with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's statement last month that "The establishment of Israeli civilian settlements in the West Bank is not per se inconsistent with international law."
Now we can add impeachment to the list of stomach-turning sights to avoid.
The arcane rules, phony cordiality and debates over the second sentence in paragraph G of Point Six were bad enough, but the nausea meter hit the roof when Nancy Pelosi took the microphone. Wearing a funereal black dress, she stood next to a cardboard American flag and recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
I would have counted her more honest if she had pledged her allegiance to a Democratic donkey.
As the leader of a party that has marinated its mind in unadulterated hatred of President Trump, Pelosi bears unique responsibility for this calamity. She could have stopped it.
It seems hostilities towards an ideology that shunted the world backwards by decades, adopted to ensure a repeat will never occur, have not only thawed but melted into warm, fuzzy greetings.
Zelensky hailed Ukraine international footballer Zozulya "a patriot" after Spanish fans showered the Albacete midfielder with chants of "You f*cking Nazi!" during a Segunda Division match away to Rayo Vallecano at the weekend, which forced its abandonment.
After the unsavory event, Zelensky took to Facebook to voice his support of the 33-times Ukraine-capped Zozulya.
Defense lawyer Edward Fitzgerald said during a hearing held at London's Westminster Magistrates' Court that Mr. Assange's legal team will argue that a treaty in place between the U.K. and U.S. prohibits individuals from being extradited from one nation to the other for political offenses, multiple British media outlets reported.
"We say that there is in the treaty a ban on being extradited for a political offense and these offenses as framed and in substance are political offenses," Mr. Fitzgerald told the court, according to Reuters.
Comment:
- Power versus the Press: Contrasting the extradition cases of Pinochet & Assange
- US abuses justice systems to target its enemies, like it did with Huawei - Assange's father
- Don't railroad Assange to Virginia
- British hacker Lauri Love: Chances of Assange receiving a fair trial in America are 'effectively nil'

Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson speaking in the House of Commons during the first sitting of Parliament since the election on Tuesday.
This promise helped propel his Conservative Party last week to its most emphatic election victory in three decades.
It means Johnson looks certain to finally pass a Brexit deal in Parliament on Friday after years of political deadlock, a huge symbolic moment that will ensure Britain leaves the European Union next month.
So Brexit will be "done," right?
The most likely answer is no.
Comment: LOL!
No one knows what leaving the EU looks like much less feels like in tangible terms, yet it's the only thing Jack here 'knows' is going to happen!
The whole thing is one big nothing-burger.
See also: The story of the UK general election is not Brexit, it's the coming break up of Britain
The new leaks provide further evidence that the OPCW suppressed evidence and altered the reports of their investigators who were on the ground in Douma. The sheer number of documents and whistleblowers will make it hard for mainstream media outlets to continue to ignore this scandal.
One of the leaked documents is a memo addressed to OPCW Director-General Fernando Arias from an unknown OPCW inspector who was a member of the fact-finding mission (FFM) sent to Douma. The memo is dated March 14th 2019, two weeks after the OPCW released their final report on the alleged chemical attack.
Comment:
- The Evidence We Were Never Supposed to See About The Douma 'Gas' Attack
- The OPCW and Douma: Chemical weapons watchdog accused of evidence-tampering by its own inspectors
- OPCW whistleblower's Syrian gas attack hoax testimony casts doubts about similar incidents
- 'Pressured' chemical watchdog afraid to contradict US on Douma chemical incident - Russian envoy
- OPCW confirms leak of covered-up report, suggesting Douma incident 'false-flag' is genuine

Latvian army soldiers attend the NATO enhanced Forward Presence battle group military drill Integrated Capstone Exercise 2019/1 in Adazi, Latvia February 26, 2019.
NATO's ramping up of large-scale war games in the Baltics, Poland and the Black Sea region show that it is gearing up for a major confrontation, Gerasimov said on Thursday, briefing foreign military attaches in Moscow.
"The scenario [of the drills] point that NATO is purposefully training its troops to be engaged in a major military conflict."Gerasimov pointed out that in addition to flexing its military muscles around Russian borders, the US continues to deploy its anti-ballistic missile systems to Europe, which Moscow considers to be an acute threat to its national security.
Furthermore, there is an ongoing smear campaign about a "Russian military threat" aimed at vilifying Moscow, the general said. Any military build-up attempted by Russia, transparent and defensive in nature, is being spun by Western media outlets and governments as a "threat to peace," he added.
Comment: The Kremlin agrees with the assessment of its top military general:
The Kremlin has said that it trusts the opinion of a senior Russian general, who has said that NATO's intensified drills this year are an indication that the military bloc is preparing for a major conflict.
Valery Gerasimov, the chair of the Russian General Staff, shared the wary view that the Russian military have about NATO's maneuvers on Tuesday as he gave a year-end briefing to foreign military attaches in Moscow.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the opinion was based on analyses of data collected by the Russian military and should not be dismissed.
"In this case the professional opinion may be the only correct one, so the presidential administration is in no position to put forward its own military assessment," he said.
Gerasimov said the increased number and scale of military exercises conducted by NATO members this year indicates that the alliance "is purposefully training its troops to be engaged in a major military conflict."

Nancy 'goes right' to outflank Trump at yesterday's House vote on impeachment of the president. It won't work as its ostensibly designed to, but it might in a roundabout way...
Last night, the House voted along party lines to impeach Trump, a partisan move that enables Democrats to continually undermine and discredit Trump as the "impeached President."
However, with the effort virtually guaranteed to fall flat in the Senate, Democrats are planning to delay and drag the process in yet another underhanded stunt.
Following the impeachment vote, Pelosi said she would withhold the articles of impeachment until the Senate makes rules that she determines will be "fair" to the prosecution.
Comment: To be clear, they won't be 'gathering evidence' for the purpose of actually strengthening their chances of Trump being impeached (because they have nothing, and they know it). Instead, they will be pretending to 'gather evidence' so that as many headlines as possible with 'Trump impeachment' in them can be generated for as long as possible through 2020, an election year.
What they may also do, in parallel, is cook up something more 'sensational' than 'withholding military aid to Ukraine' as 'evidence' of Trump's 'malfeasance', but its purpose won't be to support the formal legal proceedings, but to convince the minds of the general public in 'trial by media' that Trump really is 'Orange Man Bad'.
This is all designed to influence voters to not vote for Trump next November. Their plan will likely fail, but you never know; populations do succumb to heavy, targeted infowar campaigns of repetitive media lies...










Comment: A state that cannot defend itself is not a state. Isn't that what Israel has trumpeted from the beginning. Yet Israel and the U.S. expect Palestine to kneel and gratefully accept the 'deal of the century'.