Puppet Masters
Why it matters:
Iranian retrenchment in Syria is a huge concern for Israel, but the Russian position until now has been, at least publicly, that Iran's presence is legitimate because it came at the Assad regime's invitation. This is the first we're hearing that the Russians have floated an idea for Iran's withdrawal, and that they're linking it to U.S. sanctions.
Netanyahu's statements came during a hearing of the foreign affairs and security committee of the Knesset.
The president re-raises a question that has roiled the nation since Jimmy Carter: To what degree should we allow idealistic values trump vital interests in determining foreign policy?
On the matter of who ordered the killing of Khashoggi, Trump does not rule out the crown prince as prime suspect:
"King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman vigorously deny any knowledge of the planning or execution of the murder... (but) it could very well be that the Crown Prince had knowledge."Yet, whether MBS did or didn't do it, the Saudis have "agreed to spend and invest $450 billion in the United States." And a full fourth of that is for "military equipment from Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and other great U.S. defense contractors."
"Foolishly" cancel these contracts, warns Trump, and Russia or China will snap them up. Moreover, the Saudis have agreed to pump oil to keep prices down.
Trump is unabashedly putting U.S. economic and strategic interests first. He is not going to damage our relationship with Riyadh and its royal family, even if the future king ordered a cold-blooded killing of a U.S.-based Saudi journalist he regarded as an enemy.
Comment: Buchanan is right on both fronts: Trump is basically opting for a pragmatic foreign policy along the lines of that practiced by Russia. But at the same time, his justifications for this specific relationship are completely delusional. He accuses Iran of the very types of crimes which he excuses Saudi Arabia for, and then uses those crimes (which don't affect the Saudi relationship) as a reason for allying with Saudi Arabia (which actually commits those crimes). It is incoherent, because American foreign policy is incoherent - at least on the level of its public rationalization. Trump is honest about the Saudi relationship. He should be just as honest about Iran: the U.S. doesn't like Iran because Israel doesn't like them.
Like Buchanan, Glenn Greenwald is also clearsighted when it comes to Trump's statement:
This statement instantly and predictably produced pompous denunciations pretending that Trump's posture was a deviation from, a grievous violation of, long-standing U.S. values and foreign policy rather than what it actually and obviously is: a perfect example - perhaps stated a little more bluntly and candidly than usual - of how the U.S. has conducted itself in the world since at least the end of World War II.
The reaction was so intense because the fairy tale about the U.S. standing up for freedom and human rights in the world is one of the most pervasive and powerful prongs of western propaganda, the one relied upon by U.S. political and media elites to convince not just the U.S. population but also themselves of their own righteousness, even as they spend decades lavishing the world's worst tyrants and despots with weapons, money, intelligence and diplomatic protection to carry out atrocities of historic proportions.
After all, if you have worked in high-level foreign policy positions in Washington, or at the think thanks and academic institutions that support those policies, or in the corporate media outlets that venerate those who rise to the top of those precincts (and which increasingly hire those security state officials as news analysts), how do you justify to yourself that you're still a good person even though you arm, prop up, empower and enable the world's worst monsters, genocides, and tyrannies?
Simple: by pretending that you don't do any of that, that such acts are contrary to your system of values, that you actually work to oppose rather than protect such atrocities, that you're a warrior and crusader for democracy, freedom and human rights around the world.
That's the lie that you have to tell yourself: so that you can look in the mirror without instantly feeling revulsion, so that you can show your face in decent society without suffering the scorn and ostracization that your actions merit, so that you can convince the population over which you have ruled that the bombs you drop and the weapons with which you flood the world are actually designed to help and protect people rather than slaughter and oppress them.
That's why it was so necessary - to the point of being more like a physical reflex than a conscious choice - to react to Trump's Saudi statement with contrived anger and shock rather than admitting the truth that he was just candidly acknowledging the core tenets of U.S. foreign policy for decades. The people who lied to the public and to themselves by pretending that Trump did something aberrational rather than completely normal were engaged in an act of self-preservation as much as propagandistic deceit, though both motives were heavily at play.
...
If you want to denounce Trump's indifference to Saudi atrocities on moral, ethical or geo-political grounds - and I find them objectionable on all of those grounds - by all means do so. But pretending that he's done something that is at odds with U.S. values or the actions of prior leaders or prevailing foreign policy orthodoxies is not just deceitful but destructive.
It ensures that these very same policies will endure: by dishonestly pretending that they are unique to Trump, rather than the hallmarks of the same people now being applauded because they are denouncing Trump's actions in such a blatantly false voice, all to mask the fact that they did the same, and worse, when they commanded the levers of American power.
"I think Europe needs to get a handle on migration because that is what lit the flame," Clinton said in an interview with the Guardian published Thursday.
The former U.S. Democratic presidential candidate suggested that immigration concerns in part contributed to Britain's vote to leave the EU - which Clinton has previously described as the "greatest self-inflicted wound in modern history" - as well as her election loss to Donald Trump.
The world's biggest economies have been engaged in an escalating trade war that is starting to have a greater impact on financial markets and global growth. On Thursday, Trump told reporters that China wants to make a deal "very badly" after his administration placed tariffs on on about $200 billion worth of Chinese goods.
China "wants to make a deal and we're very happy with that," Trump said. "I'm very prepared, I've been preparing for it all my life."
Wish it was a joke folks: https://www.resistanceschool.com.
Indicative classes are:
"How to knock on doors""
"How to register voters
"The power of texting"
and, my personal fav, "How to hold a house meeting".
Imagine needing Pocahontas to tell you how to call friends over to your house.
There's something rotten in the Democratic Party and I'm not talking about Pocahonta's moccasins.
The plan is to launch a new cross-border system for direct payments in national currencies. Discussions are underway to allow the use of China's UnionPay credit card in Russia and Russia's Mir card in China, according to Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, who visited China this month.
"No one currency should dominate the market, because this makes all of us dependent on the economic situation in the country that issues this reserve currency, even when we are talking about a strong economy such as the United States,"Medvedev said.
Comment: See also:
- The Dollar's days as global reserve currency are numbered says world's largest asset manager
- Ditching the dollar, China seals currency swap deal with Indonesia
- Dumping the dollar: Iran & South Korea agree cross-currency trade
- Russia looks to eliminate US dollar from trade with African countries
- Bypassing the dollar: China and Japan seal bilateral currency swap deal worth up to $30B
To make matters worse, Khan made the remarks at a conference celebrating the birthday of none other than the Prophet Mohammed. Praising the greatness of the Muslim prophet, the politician suddenly delved deeper into religious history than anyone was expecting.
"Moses does find some mention but we don't find mention of Hasrat Isa [Jesus Christ] in human history," Khan said.
The video of the speech went viral, with many observers left baffled by Khan's sudden authority on Bible matters. Some mocked him, accusing him of ignorance.
Comment: These people's ignorance is embarrassing. Even Christian scholars admit that Jesus is not mentioned by any contemporary historians. Neither is he present in the archaeological record, unlike actual historical figures like Caesar, Augustus, or the Jewish historian Josephus. Christianity is mentioned in the generations after the Apostle Paul lived and wrote, but aside from the religious texts written at least a generation to two or three after Jesus was supposed to have lived, there is not mention of Jesus in other sources that isn't a later Christian forgery (as in Josephus). People criticizing Khan for making this basic point should get informed if they don't want to look like idiots: On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt
Commenters rushed to remind the PM that Jesus is even mentioned multiple times in the Quran.
The decree, with which Moreno effectively sacked Ecuador's London ambassador Abad Ortiz, was published by WikiLeaks on Wednesday. The document does not offer any explanation as to why Ortiz, who had been his country's ambassador to the UK since 2015, is now being permanently recalled. Nor does it name a successor for the outgoing diplomat. The decree is effective immediately.
He's exactly right.
Just ask California officials. Two months ago, the state legislature enacted a measure that would expedite the removal of dead trees and use "prescribed burns" to thin forests. In other words: the very same reforms that Trump is now being mocked for proposing. The September law followed a Gov. Jerry Brown executive order earlier this year that also called for "controlled fires" to improve forest health.
This scientific approach isn't easily conveyed in Trump's preferred mode of communication, the 280-character tweet. But University of California forest expert Yana Valachovic conceded in a Washington Post interview that Trump's "general sentiment is correct - that we need to manage fuels." That is, to get rid of dangerous buildups of dead and dying trees.
Comment: Try an experiment: ask the sufferer of Trump Derangement Syndrome closest to you to tell you all the things Trump is right about, then observe their response. Chances are they won't be able to think of a single thing. The disagree with him on principle, even if they would've agreed with several of his statements or policies just a few years ago, and even if one of their heroes says the same thing now. The cognitive dissonance will be palpable. That is the strength of 'Orange Man Bad.'
Former Israeli Defence Minister Moshe Yaalon met with Syrian operatives during the civil war in Syria, Haaretz newspaper quoted a retired Israel Defence Force (IDF) general as saying.
Speaking at an Israel Democracy Institute conference, Maj. Gen. Gershon Hacohen, a former IDF General Staff Corps commander, explained that he and Yaalon "sat with three Syrian activists from the other side, from Syria," when Yaalon was Israel's defence minister and Hacohen himself was "commanding a corps in the Golan [Heights]".
"They came and Bogie [Yaalon] wanted to understand who they were. He asked one of them, 'Tell me, are you a Salafist?' And he said, 'I really don't know what a Salafist is. If it means that I pray more, then yes. Once I would pray once a week, on Fridays, now I pray five times a day. On the other hand, a Salafist isn't meant to cooperate with the Zionists. I'm sitting with the defence minister of the Zionists. So I don't know'," Hacohen said.
Comment: For all their talk about terrorism, the Israeli government has no problem allying with al-Qaeda or ISIS, as long as it means they can be used to weaken or destroy the secular Arab governments they consider their enemies. That's realpolitik for you. But really, shouldn't there be a red line? You'd think ISIS would be beyond the pale. Not for Israel! The more dead Libyans, Iraqis, Syrians, the better.
- Former Israeli Minister Ya'alon brags about killing the most Palestinians
- Former Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon confirms Israel's collaboration with ISIS in Syria















Comment: Another example of Russia's pragmatic approach to geopolitics. Netanyahu gets some of what he wants, plus saving political face at home. Iran needs to give up a little overt influence in Syria, but it could provide some relief for its suffering citizenry. Russia shows the world once again, at least for those seeing objectively, that it is not an aggressor, but a peacemaker.