Puppet Masters
In the first few hours after the incident the fog of war was thick. But a day later much of it has cleared thanks to Iran's purposeful poke at U.S. leadership by coming clean with their intentions.
Iran chose to shoot down this drone versus hitting the manned P-8 aircraft and then chose not to lie about it in public, but rather come forward removing any deniability they could have had.
They did this after President Trump's comments yesterday during a news conference with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau where Trump described the attack as "a big mistake" and "not intentional."
But it was intentional.
Speaking at NBC News on Sunday, US President Donald Trump said that either a bilateral or a multilateral nuclear deal with Iran would do.
"I don't care what kind of a deal. It can be separate or it can be total. Anything that gets to the result - they cannot have a nuclear weapon," he replied to a question whether he wanted to get China or Russia involved in it.
Trump said he wanted to talk with Iran with no preconditions. He claimed that Iran's economy was "shattered" and the inflation was going "through the roof." "I'm not looking for war. And if there is, it will be obliteration like you've never seen before. But I'm not looking to do that. But you can't have a nuclear weapon. You want to talk? Good. No preconditions," he said.
The US president also said that he didn't send a message to Tehran warning the country of a US attack.
June 2019 may go down in the history books as the defining moment when the American IT giants - in cahoots with the limping 'legacy' media - removed their masks, as well as their gloves, revealing the real threat they have become to the institution of US democracy, fragile as it already is.
The New York Times got the ball rolling when it ran a front-page story ('The Making of a YouTube Radical') detailing the trials and tribulations of one tortured Caleb Cain, a college dropout who was "looking for direction" in life but instead tumbled headlong into a rabbit hole of "far-right politics on YouTube" where he eventually found himself "brainwashed" and "radicalized."
The article, quoting "critics and independent researchers," which I suppose could mean just about anyone, says the Google-owned platform has created "a dangerous on-ramp to extremism by combining ... a business model that rewards provocative videos with exposure and advertising dollars, and an algorithm that guides users down personalized paths meant to keep them glued to their screens."
Comment: See also:
- Google launches video-blocking tool for YouTube
- YouTube to start labeling propaganda videos posted by state-funded media
- YouTube to flag government propaganda videos
- FCC Chairman says internet giants control internet and prevent open web
- Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube team up to "fight spread of terrorist propaganda"
- New Rules: Coordination of internet censorship in the EU and US
The US president declared that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would start catching and deporting millions of illegal immigrants earlier this week. On Saturday, he tweeted that Democrats had asked him to put this process on hold, so he gave it two weeks to see if the parties "can get together and work out a solution to the Asylum and Loophole problems at the Southern Border."
Comment: More from the Gateway Pundit:
On Saturday morning former ICE Director Tom Homan went off on the government official who leaked the cities involved in the upcoming ICE raids. Homan outed acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan for resisting the upcoming ICE raids and for leaking the timing and location to the press.Kevin McAleenan served as deputy commissioner of Customs and Border Protection from 2014 to 2017.Tom Homan: As far as these mayors from sanctuary cities, I just wish they'd just shut their mouths. Because you want to talk about separation of families? Separation of families are the Angel moms and dads who've been separated from their children forever because illegal aliens walked out of your sanctuary jail. Every one of those mayors ought to be ashamed, San Francisco, New York, Chicago, I could go on and on... You've got the acting Secretary of Homeland Security resisting what ICE is trying to do.
In the Washington Post story, and numerous media outlets, he does not support this operation. And I tell you what, if that's his position then he's on the wrong side of this issue. You don't tell the men and women of ICE a day before they go out there to do this operation. When this story was leaked, they gave the location of the cities, the day this was supposed to start, how many targets. This leak, which I know where the leak came from, I think we all know where the leak came from. That story only benefits one person. Put these officers at greater risk of harm. I know the president said we're going to do an operation, one million people in a week. He didn't give the location... He didn't give the number of targets...
Via FOX and Friends Weekend:
- Mexico capitulates, signs migrant-control agreement - US tariffs 'indefinitely suspended'
- Mexico to deploy National Guard forces to southern border to stem flow of Central American migrants
Shamkhani told RT's Salam Musafir on a visit to Moscow that his country aims to ease tensions with all of its neighbors, including Arab and non-Arab countries, since they share a common history and culture. He said that this provides a basis for exploring a comprehensive non-aggression treaty that might also include Iraq.
"There is much evidence of brotherly relations between the regional powers. This might have paved the way for an agreement or a treaty [on non-aggression]," said the top official.
However, full-fledged reconciliation between Tehran and Baghdad is being impeded by the US, which deliberately drives a wedge between regional powers, many of which are US allies hosting its military installations. "Of course, external forces that have military bases in the countries of the region do not allow this. These forces won't allow these countries to act in accordance with their own will," said Shamkhani.

Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs Chrystia Freeland, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau,
Chinese Ambassador Lu Shaye
This has left the already beleaguered government of Justin Trudeau (and Chrystia Freeland... let's not kid ourselves here) in an embarrassing situation as Trudeau's requests to meet with Xi Jinping at the upcoming G20 have gone ignored for the past several days. Freeland has announced that her many requests to speak with China's Foreign Minister have similarly gone unheeded.
Since attaining power in 2015, the Liberal Government has demonstrated nothing but constant belligerence to China. Many then watching the Canadian political scene had hoped that Trudeau would continue the pro-China traditions which his father initiated in 1970 and which paved the way to China's opening up under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping a few years later. This did not occur.
Comment: See also:
- China's Ambassador to Canada highlights "white egotism" following US-initiated feud
- China's Ambassador to Canada Exposes The White Supremacist 'Five Eyes' Surveillance State
- Chinese Ambassador Sets The Record Straight: China is Not a Threat to Canada
- Trudeau fires envoy to China after he embarrassed him with truth on Huawei case
- Imperial puppet Trudeau warns China against 'arbitrary detention'... as Canada holds abducted Huawei CFO as bargaining chip in dirty trade war
During a luncheon on the second day of Xi's visit to Pyongyang, the leaders spoke of the "major internal and external policies" of their countries and exchanged views on domestic and international issues of mutual concern, Reuters reported, citing KCNA.
Moreover, Kim and Xi reached a consensus on "important issues", and agreed to build on their countries' friendly relations "whatever the international situation", Reuters reported, citing North Korean state media.
Xi's historic visit marks the first time in 14 years that a Chinese party and state leader has come to North Korea. The summit was organized to mark the 70th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the People's Republic of China and North Korea. Xi last traveled to the country as prime minister in 2008. Hu Jintao, the country's previous leader, visited Pyongyang in 2005.

Trident II D5 missile is test-launched from the Ohio-class US Navy ballistic missile submarine USS Nebraska.
Moscow's statement comes in response to the vice-chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Paul Selva, who vehemently promoted the modification of the warheads on Trident missiles, which are carried on Ohio-class submarines, in order for them to be able to carry low-yield nuclear weapons.
Selva argued that the US will be put in a difficult situation if Russia decides to hit an American city with a low-yield nuclear weapon. "The US doctrine says it will respond in kind, but without a low-yield nuclear weapon in its inventory, responding in kind means it will have to respond with a high-yield nuclear weapon," supposedly provoking and all-out nuclear war.
But the Russian Foreign Ministry on Saturday blasted the general's claims as "disingenuous" and pointed out that the use of low-yield nuclear weapons wasn't even a part of Russia's military doctrine. "An obvious deception is also the idea that it's possible to 'limit' the use of nuclear weapons in a clash between two nuclear powers."
The yield of an incoming enemy warhead can only be determined after it detonates and the Americans are well aware of that, the ministry said in a statement. "Therefore, any launch of a strategic nuclear carrier aimed at Russian territory... regardless of the capacity of its warhead, will be treated as an aggression with the use of nuclear weapons, and met with an appropriate response."

John Bolton sits behind Donald Trump during a White House event earlier this year.
In a sit-down Meet the Press interview broadcast Sunday, host Chuck Todd asked Trump if he was "being pushed into military action against Iran" by his advisers - presumably pointing to the aggressive pronouncements from National Security Advisor John Bolton.
"I have two groups of people. I have doves and I have hawks," replied Trump. "John Bolton is absolutely a hawk. If it was up to him he'd take on the whole world at one time, okay?"
Trump then brushed away concerns about the influence of Bolton, who also served in the White House during the Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush administrations.
Comment: This is how he said it:
I disagree very much with John Bolton. His attitude in the Middle East and Iraq - going into Iraq, I think that was a big mistake and I've been proven right but I've been against that forever. John Bolton is doing a very good job, but he takes a generally tough posture. I have other people that don't take that posture, but the only one that matters is me."These people want to push us into a war, and it's so disgusting. We don't need any more wars", Trump is alleged to have told one confidant about his advisers, per the WSJ.
"That doesn't matter because I want both sides," said Trump.
Comment: Here's what Bolton had to say, while in Israel:
Tehran should not "mistake US prudence and discretion for weakness," Bolton cautioned.
"Our military is rebuilt, new and ready to go," he added, days after Trump called off a planned attack on Iran, a chosen response to Tehran downing a US drone on Thursday.
Citing a planned strike against Iranian targets which US President Donald Trump called off, Bolton emphasized that Trump had only stopped the attack from "going forward at this time" - an indication that the decision may only be temporary.
Omar (D-MN) made the remarks after being asked by a reporter if she agreed with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's (D-NY) assertion that the White House is operating "concentration camps" on the border with Mexico.
"There are camps and people are being concentrated," Omar replied. "This is very simple. I don't even know why this is a controversial thing for her to say."











Comment: