© AP/Evan Vucci
The "Donald Trump likes Russia" and "Russia bad" strategy was propagated by the Clinton election campaign. It build on constant U.S. incitement against Russia after the U.S. coup in Ukraine partially failed and after the Russian intervention on the side of the government in Syria. Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State was the main force behind the original anti-Russian campaign.
When Clinton lost the election to Trump the theme connecting Trump and Russia was continued and fanned by parts of the U.S. intelligence community.The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the FBI published a propaganda report claiming nefarious Russian cyber activities during the election
without providing any evidence. The report came together with the
expulsion of 35 Russian diplomats by the Obama administration. The DHS then
planted a
false story of Russian cyber-intrusion into a Vermont utility with the
Washington Post.
The Director of National Intelligence Clapper followed up with a "report" of alleged Russian interference with the election.
Even the Putinphobe Masha Gessen found that to be a shoddy piece of implausible propaganda. The DNI then
helped to publish an
MI6 "report" of fakes asserting Russian influence on Trump. In an unprecedented threat escalation the Pentagon
sends a whole brigade and other assets to the Russian border.
Now the head of the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, warns the President elect to "
watch his tongue". Is there any precedence of some "intelligence" flunky threatening a soon to be President?
This has been, all together, a well though out propaganda campaign to reinforce the scheme Clinton and her overlords have been pushing for quite some time: Russia is bad and a danger. Trump is aligned with Russia. Something needs to be done against Trump but most importantly against Russia.Propaganda works. The campaign is having
some effects:
Comment: Drip, drip, drip... the US Deep State is being publicly exposed day-by-day...
The Primakov Policy - a great man's legacy to Russia