
© The Postil Magazine
There are moments in the moral life of nations when
the language of restraint — so cherished by diplomats, so worshipped by Western editorial boards —
ceases to be a virtue and becomes instead an alibi for cowardice. Restraint, in the abstract, is a noble thing; it is the discipline of power, the modesty of the strong. But when restraint is demanded only of the weak, when it is invoked solely to pacify the victim while the aggressor is permitted to strike again and again without consequence, then it is no longer a moral principle. It is a weapon — a rhetorical cudgel wielded by the powerful to ensure that their own violence remains unchallenged and their own transgressions remain unpunished. When a nation suffers unprovoked assault, when its sovereignty is violated repeatedly, when its citizens are assassinated in foreign lands with the impunity that only empire can confer, it has not merely the right but the solemn duty to respond.
Iran's retaliation against the forces of the United States and Israel belongs to that category of rightful defiance — the kind of war that Augustine called just, the kind that Aquinas said restores peace not through submission but through the punishment of injustice.
To call this "escalation" is to reveal a fundamental dishonesty; it is to pretend that a chain of violence began with the party that finally, after years of provocation, decided to strike back.Let us be clear about what set this tragedy in motion, because the fog of diplomatic euphemism has already descended. Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu, two men united less by any coherent principle than by vanity, by fear, and by a shared genius for transforming political weakness into military aggression, built their respective powers on the foundation of perpetual crisis. For both, governance became indistinguishable from provocation; leadership was reduced to the art of manufacturing emergencies that only they were positioned to exploit. They discovered in aggression a convenient substitute for statesmanship, finding that nothing unites a fractured political base quite like the spectacle of foreign violence. Their reckless pursuit of what they called "deterrence" was in fact the systematic destruction of deterrence — a relentless campaign of open violations of sovereignty, of assassinations thinly disguised as "pre-emptive strikes," of covert acts of war conducted without even the pretense of lawful justification.
What they offered to their publics as defense was in reality provocation: extralegal, unprovoked, and profoundly immoral. And the world, for the most part, watched in silence, occasionally murmuring its disapproval but never acting to restrain the architects of this unfolding catastrophe.
Comment: Pretty damning, since the Levada Center is actually a western-funded polling company that is required to register in Russia as a foreign agent, per their own disclaimer: . The numbers appear to be beyond their ability to spin.