Welcome to Sott.net
Sat, 16 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Pirates

Poroshenko ducks questioning over Biden relations at Ukraine's State Bureau Of Investigations - AGAIN

poroshenko
© Serhly Dolzhenko/EPA- EFE
Former Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko (center)
Former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko has failed for the second time this week to show up at the State Bureau of Investigations (DBR) for questioning.

The DBR planned to question Poroshenko on May 29 as a witness in two cases -- the alleged illegal transfer of cultural objects across the border and in connection with audio recording of individuals with voices thought to possibly be of Poroshenko and former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden.

Last week, lawmaker Andriy Derkach said the audio records prove "high treason" by Poroshenko.

Comment:


Bad Guys

The female UK scholar who was falsely accused as Flynn's Russian spy recruiter

Svetlana Lokhova
© The Tennessee Star
Svetlana Lokhova
The Cambridge University academic portrayed in the mainstream media as retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn's Russian mistress and spy recruiter told the Star Newspapers about her ordeal — caught in the web of fake news and the Russian Collusion Hoax.

"In April 2016, the Obama administration renewed General Flynn's security clearance — it was a top secret/sci, sensitive compartmentalized information, it is the highest clearance there is — so all is fine but, then suddenly in August 2016, the FBI start secretly investigating him for being a Russian spy — that is why they needed me to be his recruiter,' said Svetlana Lokhova, a former By-Fellow of Cambridge's Churchill College.

Margot Cleveland wrote for The Federalist:
"This honey pot storyline originated with Lokhova's mentor at Cambridge, the official MI5 historian, Professor Christopher Andrew, when on February 19, 2017, Andrew penned an article for the London Sunday Times, "Impulsive General Misha Shoots Himself in the Foot."

Snakes in Suits

Who are the secret puppet-masters behind Washington's war on Iran?

target Iran
On May 6th, President Trump vetoed a war powers bill specifying that he must ask Congress for authorization to use military force against Iran. Trump's "maximum pressure" campaign of deadly sanctions and threats of war against Iran has seen no let-up, even as the U.S., Iran and the whole world desperately need to set aside our conflicts to face down the common danger of the Covid-19 pandemic.

So what is it about Iran that makes it such a target of hostility for Trump and the neocons? There are many repressive regimes in the world, and many of them are close U.S. allies, so this policy is clearly not based on an objective assessment that Iran is more repressive than Egypt, Saudi Arabia or other monarchies in the Persian Gulf.

The Trump administration claims that its "maximum pressure" sanctions and threats of war against Iran are based on the danger that Iran will develop nuclear weapons. But after decades of inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and despite the U.S.'s politicization of the IAEA, the Agency has repeatedly confirmed that Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program.

If Iran ever did any preliminary research on nuclear weapons, it was probably during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, when the U.S. and its allies helped Iraq to make and use chemical weapons that killed up to 100,000 Iranians. A 2007 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate, the IAEA's 2015 "Final Assessment on Past and Present Outstanding Issues" and decades of IAEA inspections have examined and resolved every scrap of false evidence of a nuclear weapons program presented or fabricated by the CIA and its allies.

Attention

Macron on the brink: Humiliation for French President as seven more MPs abandon his party

emmanuel macron
© GETTY
EMMANUEL MACRON is facing yet another leadership crisis after seven more French MPs abandoned his party to form a new political group.

Emmanuel Macron has now seen 24 MPs walk out of his party in recent weeks - shattering the French President's overall majority in parliament. On Tuesday seven members of Mr Macron's La République En Marche decided to quit - just eight days after 17 other members defected to form a new party.

Mr Macron now has just 281 members in the lower chamber - well short of the 289 needed for an absolute majority.

Comment: See also: Macron loses absolute majority in parliament


Propaganda

Twitter censors Trump tweet for 'glorifying violence'

Trump executive order social media
© Reuters / Jonathan Ernst
The president wrote "when the looting starts, the shooting starts" late Thursday following chaotic scenes in Minneapolis.

Twitter has hidden a tweet from President Trump which the social media site said broke its rules around "glorifying violence."

The tweet in question threatened demonstrators after a chaotic third day of protests against the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis. Demonstrators are demanding action over the death of the 46-year-old unarmed black man after shocking video footage showed a white police officer kneeling on his neck.

Comment: Censoring the President of the United States. A rather bold move from Twitter, to say the least.

Here's the offending tweet:

trump tweet censored
See also:


Bullseye

Donald Trump is completely right about mail-in ballots

The President's claim that postal votes are easily rigged is widely supported by historical precedent

mail voting
It's an artefact of the peculiar world in which we live that we are sometimes forced to agree with, fight alongside or even defend people with whom we would never wish to be associated.

Donald Trump is right at the top of that list. And his "feud" with twitter over tweets concerning postal votes is a perfect example.

To be clear, whatever the MAGA crowd and QAnons may wish to believe, Trump is NOT some kind of anti-establishment rebel.

Whatever small threat he posed to the status quo was stamped out shortly after the Deep State switched sides from Hillary to Trump sometime in October 2016.

From Syria to Russia to Wikileaks, most of the good parts of Trump's "America first" or "isolationist" approach have fallen completely by the wayside. Either opposed by the Deep State to the point of total paralysis or shown to be nothing but talk in the first place.

Comment: See also:


Info

The "Obstruction of Justice trap" - Former AAG Matt Whitaker confirms Mueller probe was used as weapon to cover coup effort against Trump

Mueller investigation
Within an interesting interview conducted by Jan Jekielek of Epoch Times, former AAG Matt Whitaker confirms what CTH long suspected. The Mueller investigation was used by corrupt interests within the special counsel's office to threaten any/all executive branch and congressional officials with "obstruction of justice" charges if they revealed any exculpatory or counter-narrative information during the Mueller probe.

Whitaker describes this as the "obstruction of justice trap."

Essentially, this approach confirms the second-prong purpose of the Mueller investigation itself. First, use the special counsel in 2017, 2018 and into the beginning of 2019, as a shield (hide information); and secondly a weapon (threats) against any entity who would reveal the background intelligence that undercut the Trump-Russia collusion narrative.

We know President Trump was threatened by Rod Rosenstein not to declassify any information in September of 2018 or the Mueller investigation would use that act as evidence of obstruction. Whitaker confirms that same approach was applied toward any executive branch officer who would reveal or release information to congress during the tenure of the special counsel; even within the DOJ and including the attorney general.

Comment: See also:


Light Saber

'If anybody needs to be fact-checked, it's the media': Kayleigh McEnany unloads on Jim Acosta

Kayleigh McEnany
White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany let loose on CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta during Thursday's press briefing.

Acosta, after asking more than once why it took President Donald Trump 13 hours to tweet about the fact that the United States surpassed 100,000 deaths due to the coronavirus pandemic, questioned whether or not Twitter's move to fact-check the president on another issue was warranted.

No Entry

Catherine Austin Fitts: The injection fraud - it's not a vaccine

injection fraud

What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." ~ William Shakespeare
I am not a scientist. I am not a doctor. I am not a biotech engineer. I am not an attorney. However, I read, listen, appreciate, and try to understand those who are.

I was an investment banker until politics made it impossible to continue to practice my art. I was trained as a portfolio strategist — so I map my world by watching the financial flows and allocation of resources. I was also trained as a conspiracy generator and foot soldier — conspiracies being the fundamental organizing principle of how things get done in our world. It was not until I left the establishment that I learned that those not in the club had been trained to disparage and avoid conspiracies — a clever trick that sabotages their efforts to gather power.

My response to living at war with agencies of the U.S. government for a time was to answer the questions of people who were sufficiently courageous and curious to solicit my opinion. Over many years, that response transformed into two businesses. One was The Solari Report, which continues to grow as a global intelligence network — we seek to help each other understand and navigate what is happening and contribute to positive outcomes. The other was serving as an investment advisor to individuals and families through Solari Investment Advisory Services. After ten years, I converted that business to doing an ESG screen. What those who use it want — that is not otherwise readily available in the retail market — is a screen that reflects knowledge of financial and political corruption. Tracking the metastasizing corruption is an art, not a science.

Propaganda

Twitter tags Trump's tweets as "misinformation" only following pressure does it do the same to a Chinese official

twitter banner NYSE
© Reuters / Lucas Jackson
Aside from a string of tweets from Jack Dorsey, Twitter's PR machine has been strangely quiet during the dust-up over the extremely controversial decision to tag several tweets from President Trump as "misinformation".

And now we know why. Among the reasons Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg cited for why social media companies shouldn't strive to be "arbiters of truth" is the Sisyphean task of filtering, screening and analyzing an endless stream of information. Given the massive user bases of these companies, consistency would be nearly impossible, opening the door to yet more accusations of bias. And for what?

Perhaps that's why Twitter has spent the last day or so retroactively tagging tweets from certain officials with the Chinese government that also contain "misinformation" - some of it claiming that the coronavirus originated in the US.

Comment: RT reports:
The decision of Twitter to mark some of Donald Trump's tweets about mail-in ballots with notices implying they contained misinformation, may have been welcomed by the many critics of the US president, but some say the move was short-sighted. After all, how does Trump differ from any other public figure whose tweets may need to be 'corrected' with a 'fact check'?

Apparently, in at least one case, Twitter couldn't come up with a good answer, and instead chose to issue more notices. It dug up some March tweets by Lijian Zhao, a spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, who infamously accused the US military of possibly starting the Covid-19 epidemic by bringing the coronavirus into his country.

Twitter has been labeling what it believes to be Covid-19 misinformation on its platform since mid-May, but those particular notices were issued on purpose. At least that's what the New York Post believes, saying it was done after they confronted Twitter about its apparent double standards in targeting Trump and not the Chinese official.

Quite a few commentators pointed out that Twitter is putting itself in a vulnerable position by getting involved in what is essentially a political quarrel - regardless of whether Trump delivers on his threat to "regulate or shut down" social media in retaliation.

Twitter's move against Trump's tweet is probably horrifying to fellow social media giant Facebook, whose CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, responded to it by reiterating in an interview with Fox News his long-held position that private companies shouldn't be "the arbiter of truth."

His counterpart at Twitter, Jack Dorsey, insists that his company is not taking on that role. "Our intention is to connect the dots of conflicting statements and show the information in dispute so people can judge for themselves," he tweeted.