Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 05 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Question

Iran, Hamas come to funding arrangement to 'increase resistance' to Israel- but Syria is wary

hamas delegation Iran
© Associated Press / Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader
During a recent visit by a Hamas delegation to Tehran, leaders of the militant group secured a big funding increase, if they agree to open a second front against Israel if it attacks a northern neighbor. However, Hamas has made little headway in seeking Iranian help restoring severed relations with Syria.

Hamas, the Palestinian militant group that has governed the besieged Gaza Strip since 2006, secured a big funding increase from Iran last month when its leadership paid a visit to the Iranian capital.

According to a report by Israel's Channel 12 News, the Iranian government increased its funding for Hamas from $100 million per year to $30 million per month, or roughly $360 million per year. However, in exchange, Hamas must provide Tehran with intelligence on Israeli missile systems and agree to open a second front against Tel Aviv, should it attack one of its northern neighbors in an all-out offensive.

Attention

The totalitarian hand: State responses to the torture of Julian Assange, morally disengaging media, and the consequences for us all

Julian Assange
© Steve Rhodes / Flickr

While Julian Assange rots in prison for publishing journalism, clinical psychologist Dr Lissa Johnson explains some of the science behind how we got here, and also how we push back.


On Sunday June 28th 2019, Western democracy arrived at an historic crossroads. Moving forward from this day, citizens of Western nations will head down one of two paths.

The first path leads towards genuine democracies, wherein governments are accountable to the publics they govern, and publics have a right to know what leaders do in their name. It is a path along which a free press fosters an informed electorate, capable of making informed decisions at election time. Such principles are not only fundamental prerequisites for democracy, but essential protections against government abuses of all kinds.

The second path heads down totalitarian terrain, currently being blazed by the Trump administration, wherein governments decide who is free to speak and who is not, including who is a 'journalist' and who is not, by granting themselves the power to silence those who make them look bad. This pathway not only spells death to democracy and the public's right to know, it is a recipe for state-sanctioned abuse.

As the Science of Human Rights Coalition warns in a document titled Human Rights 101,
"Unless citizens want their governments to support human rights, government leaders rarely will do so... [Human rights principles] carry no weight unless the people know them, unless the people understand them, unless the people demand that they be lived."
People kept in the dark about their government's activities, however, are in no position to demand anything of their governments at all, as political philosopher Hannah Arendt reminds us. Down the pathway of governmental secrecy, citizens can kiss goodbye not only to respect for human rights, but to holding their leaders accountable over any issue in which the interests of the elites and the majority clash, whether fossil fuels, climate emergency, racial and economic inequality and injustice, endless wars, mass surveillance or any other public interest matter one might care to name.

Mr. Potato

Delusional: Peter Strzok suing FBI for reinstatement - claims 'unrelenting pressure' from Trump behind firing

strzok congress hearing
© YouTube / Latest World News
Recently fired FBI agent Peter Strzok testifies before congress prior to his sacking.
Embattled former FBI agent Peter Strzok, who was first removed from the Special Counsel's investigation into President Trump's campaign and later fired, is suing the FBI and Justice Department for reinstatement, claiming "unrelenting pressure" from Trump led to his dismissal, according to reports.

The lawsuit was filed Tuesday, and Strzok's counsel argued in the report that he was unlawfully fired. The counsel argued that his political speech was protected under the First Amendment and those rights were violated.

Comment: The Hill further reports:
In particular, they argued that he was fired for using his protected political speech under the First Amendment and that the FBI also "deprived" him of his due process under the Fifth Amendment by denying him the right to appeal the decision.

The lawsuit also alleges that unlawful leaks to the press violated the Privacy Act.

"The concerted public campaign to disparage and, ultimately, fire Special Agent Strzok was enabled by the defendants' deliberate and unlawful disclosure to the media of texts, intended to be private, from an FBI systems of records, in violation of the Privacy Act," according to the court documents.


Uh, no. Strzok's (and Page's) iPhones were DOJ issue. That makes any information on them government property. The phones were to be used for conducting DOJ business, not setting up trysts or plots. However, the brass at the DOJ at the time did them a big favor:



Strzok, who was fired in August 2018, argued that his firing was politically motivated because a top FBI executive originally recommended a different, less extreme disciplinary response to his conduct.

FBI Assistant Director Candice Will, who led the Office of Professional Responsibility, initially recommended against firing the agent, instead proposing that he "be demoted and suspended for sixty days without pay," the court documents read.

"Will's decision was based upon the facts underlying the charges in the proposed removal, the agency's schedule of disciplinary offenses, the agency's record of discipline in comparable circumstances, and upon Strzok's long and outstanding record of service to the FBI and the country," the court documents argue, noting that it also reflected a "last chance agreement" that Strzok had accepted.

Nevertheless, Strzok was still fired, and because his firing was "effective immediately," he was prevented him from appealing the decision to the FBI's Disciplinary Review Board or any other formal avenue to receive due process.

"The discharge decision was made by Deputy Director David Bowdich, and was the result of unrelenting pressure from President Trump and his political allies in Congress and the media," the court filing states.

Strzok described that text during public testimony before Congress last year as "written late at night off the cuff and it was in response to a series of events that included then-candidate Trump insulting the immigrant family of a fallen war hero."

Horowitz ultimately said his investigative team found no evidence that any decision made during the course of the investigation was a result of political bias or improper influence. Nonetheless, the report found that those actions cast a cloud over the department and was deeply critical of FBI and Justice Department leadership.

Strzok served both as the No. 2 official on the FBI Clinton probe as well as briefly on special counsel Robert Mueller's investigative team. But Mueller promptly removed Strzok from his team after Horowitz's internal review uncovered the critical Trump text messages.

Revelations of the text messages sparked a barrage of attacks from Trump and Republicans, who have alleged that the top brass at the FBI and Justice Department harbored an anti-Trump bias during the 2016 election.



Arrow Down

Zarif: 'Isolated' US fails to create Gulf coalition; allies too ashamed to join

Javad Zarif
© Press TV
Iranian FM Javad Zarif
The United States has repeatedly called for the creation of a maritime coalition in the Gulf to maintain "freedom of navigation" after Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps seized a British tanker in the area last month.

Speaking to reporters on Monday, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif stated that the US had failed to create an allied naval coalition in the Persian Gulf.

"Today, the United States is alone in the world and cannot create a coalition [in the Gulf]. Countries that are its friends are too ashamed of being in a coalition with them", he pointed out. Zarif said the US is accountable for Gulf tensions which caused "misery and stressed that Iran is responsible for the region's safety and security. He also blamed the UK for its involvement in US "economic terrorism" against Iran.

Zarif reiterated that last month's seizure of an Iranian tanker by UK marines was an act of piracy and that the vessel was not en route to Syria.

Regarding the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Zarif made it clear that Tehran would exit the agreement if necessary, and urged European signatories to the JCPOA to intensify efforts to save the deal. He went on to describe the US sanctions imposed on the top Iranian diplomat as a failure in diplomacy.

Comment: From Sputnik: Moscow condemns US sanctions on Iranian FM
Moscow condemns Washington for imposing sanctions on Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif as it sees this as unprecedented pressure which should not be a part of modern international relations," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said at a briefing.

The Treasury said on 31 July that all assets that Zarif might have in the United States would be blocked, threatening people and entities who engaged in transactions with the diplomat with penalties. Zarif denied having any property interests outside of Iran and voiced the belief that the United States had sanctioned him because of considering him a threat.
In addition, Sputnik reports: UK to join US-led anti-Iran mission in Gulf; Germany wants European coalition
UK Defence Minister Ben Wallace has announced that London would join a US-led maritime mission in the Persian Gulf to add to maintaining security in the area. "We look forward to working alongside the US and others to find an international solution to the problems in the Strait of Hormuz", he told reporters in London on Monday.

Reuters has, meanwhile, quoted an unnamed British security source as saying that the US-led mission would concentrate on ensuring security in the Gulf and that the UK doesn't plan to join US sanctions against Iran.

Wallace's statement comes shortly after German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas reaffirmed his country's unwillingness to join a US-led maritime mission in the Strait of Hormuz. ... We want a European mission." At the same time, he added that the matter remains on the table but that convincing the EU to conduct such a mission will take time.

Vice Admiral Michael Gilday, Director of the Joint Staff, and nominee to become the Navy's top admiral, for his part, insisted that says the US should let its allies do most of the work of the "international maritime security framework" that Washington is trying to set up in the Gulf.

"The coalition that we're building in the Arabian Gulf and specifically in the Strait of Hormuz is going to be 80 or 90 percent a coalition effort and a much smaller US effort," Gilday told members of the Senate Armed Services Committee last week.
See also:
US pawn Australia to consider 'request' to join coalition protecting oil shipments in Persian Gulf


Stop

US Ambassador to Russia, Jon Huntsman, resigns

LavrovHuntsmanPutin
© Global Look Press
Russian FM Lavrov • US Ambassador Jon Huntsman • Russian President Vladimir Putin
US Ambassador to Russia, Jon Huntsman, has resigned from his post effective October 3. Huntsman has been ambassador since 2017. The former governor of Utah is returning home, where he reportedly plans to attempt another gubernatorial run.

Huntsman said he was "honored by the trust [Trump] placed in me as the United States ambassador to Russia during this historically difficult period in bilateral relations."

His term in Moscow coincided with increased anti-Russian sentiment in the US political establishment and the media, due to the claims of "election meddling" in 2016. Huntsman found himself losing a significant portion of his staff following the tit-for-tat expulsions of diplomats and closures of consulates.

Hiliter

McCabe may have asked FBI agents to change their 302's

McCabe
© static.politico
Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe
Investigative journalist Sara Carter reported on Fox News last night that outgoing FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe may be in serious trouble if the information she had received from FBI sources proves to be true.

"I have been told tonight by a number of sources ... that McCabe may have asked FBI agents to actually change their 302s," Carter told host Sean Hannity.

The 302 form contains information from the notes an FBI agent takes during an interview of a subject. It is used by FBI agents to "report or summarize the interviews that they conduct." "So basically every time an FBI agent interviews a witness, they have to go back and file a report," Carter explained.

Hannity pointed out that, if true, it would constitute a case of obstruction of justice, and Carter agreed. She said the matter was being investigated by FBI Inspector General Michael Horowitz.


Comment: Check out the video with guests: Sara Carter, Judge Jeanine Pirro and Sebastian Gorka

See also:


Attention

Former engineer: Google plans to meddle in 2020 elections to derail Trump

Trump/G
© Global Look Press/Jaap Arriens
President Donald Trump and Google's transparency
Tech giant Google is plotting to meddle into the 2020 US presidential election to make sure President Donald Trump doesn't win, a former employee has claimed, accusing the company of persecuting conservatives within its ranks.

Former Google engineer Kevin Cernekee sounded the alarm over the tech giant's alleged plans to intervene into the upcoming presidential election. Trump's win back in 2016 made the corporate executives to throw a tantrum and vow to derail his potential re-election.

Cernekee told morning news show Fox & Friends Monday:
"When President Trump won in 2016, Google executives went on stage right away and cried - literal tears streaming down their faces. They vowed that it would never happen again and they want to use all the power and resources they have to control the flow of information to the public and make sure that Trump loses in 2020."
The meddling will rely upon "a huge amount of information on every voter in the US" the company has stashed, the engineer claimed. The data allows Google to "build psychological profiles" of voters to target their weak points in a bid to sway their opinion before the elections.

Comment: See also:


Dollars

US accused China of currency manipulation - something it does itself; here's what it means

money-china/us
© Frontera
On Monday, the United States government officially labeled China a 'currency manipulator.' But all countries manage their own national currencies. Here's a quick explainer of what this means.

How does a country control currency?

Government central banks control currency by regularly setting interest rates, through issuing new bank notes, and managing foreign currency reserves. National regulators also manage currencies on the open market to weaken or strengthen the exchange rate if the market price rises or falls too quickly.

Which countries manipulate their currency?

In effect, all countries manipulate their currencies in one way or another. Recent examples include Quantitative Easing programs by the US, the European Union, Japan, and others, in the years following the 2008 financial crisis. Hundreds of billions in new currencies have been issued to prop up local stock markets and buy government debt. Why is that currency manipulation? The answer is devaluation. The more money you print, the less it is worth.

Comment: And this from RT: US labeling China 'currency manipulator' will shake global financial markets warns China's central bank
The People's Bank of China warned on Tuesday that the US decision to designate Beijing a 'currency manipulator' harms international rules and will have tremendous consequences for global markets. "This will not only seriously undermine the international financial order, but also trigger financial market turmoil," the Chinese central bank said in a statement, as cited by Xinhua.

On Monday, Washington escalated the trade war with Beijing by accusing China of devaluating the yuan, after US stocks saw their biggest drop in a year.

The yuan to fell below its 7-to-1 ratio with the US dollar for the first time in a decade Monday, after the latest tariff threats from Washington. A weaker currency helps Chinese exporters deal with higher tariffs. [See above]

US President Donald Trump accused Beijing of deliberate manipulation of its currency. Shortly after Trump's furious tweets, the US Treasury officially labeled China a "currency manipulator." The move triggers a set of measures mandated under the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, including a complaint to the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

The People's Bank of China refuted Washington's accusations on Tuesday, calling the US' actions "unilateral" and "protectionist." It argued that Beijing has not and will not weaponize the yuan in the trade conflict with Washington.

The latest clash between Washington and Beijing triggered a selloff on the global stock markets. The Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted almost 2.9 percent, or 767.27 points, on Monday. The S&P 500 suffered similar losses, dropping 2.98 percent. The Nasdaq Composite closed down 3.5 percent, wiping out $162 billion in value of Big Tech stocks. It was the worst percentage drop for all three main US indices this year.

Asian markets extended losses on Tuesday. China's Shanghai composite declined 1.56 percent to finish at 2,777.56, while the Shenzhen composite tumbled 1.39 percent. Hong Kong's Hang Seng shed 0.67 percent to 25,976.24 points, while Japan's Nikkei declined 0.65 percent, closing at 20,585.31 points.



Attention

India strips Kashmir autonomy leaving Pakistan with limited options...call Trump?

Protesters/Trump
© REUTERS/Al Drago/Amit Dave/Mohsin Raza
Protesters • US President Donald Trump
India raised the stakes in its dispute with Pakistan over Kashmir by revoking the decades-old special status for its part of the region. This left Pakistan fuming, but there isn't much it can do in response, analysts told RT.

For decades, the Indian constitution gave the part of disputed Kashmir under India's administration special privileges, including having a constitution of its own, governing most of its affairs, and keeping people from other parts of the county at arm's length through restricting property rights and the ability to hold offices.

This arrangement was scrapped on Monday by the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as promised several years ago. It was made possible by the landslide victory of his BJP party earlier this year which gave it enough seats in parliament to push the change through.

Comment: In addition from RT: Pakistani army ready to support Kashmiris
Islamabad's military says it's ready to go to "any extent" to support the "struggle" of people in the disputed Kashmir region, after India's President Ram Nath Kovind signed a decree revoking Kashmiri autonomy.

Chief of Army Staff General Qamar Javed Bajwa said the military will never recognize the effort by India to "legalize its occupation" of Kashmir.
"Pakistan Army firmly stands by the Kashmiris in their just struggle to the very end. We are prepared and shall go to any extent to fulfill our obligations in this regard."
The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) says that stripping J&K of its special status will allow for it to be better integrated with the rest of India. Home Minister Amit Shah said that axing the autonomy will also help to weed out militants in the region.
"Article 370 was the root of terror in Jammu and Kashmir. It is time for it to go... If it doesn't go today, we can't remove terrorism from Jammu and Kashmir."
Amid fears of violence, travel restrictions and a ban on rallies were imposed in some parts of Indian-held Kashmir. There were reports of an increased presence of police and security forces.
See also:


Rocket

N. Korea missiles fired to protest US-SK 'hostile' drills

NK rocket launch
© Reuters/Kim Hong/File
North Korea has fired several 'unidentified projectiles' into the Sea of Japan as its foreign ministry slammed joint US-South Korean military drills as "hostile" move in breach of all peace initiatives in the peninsula.

South Korean troops have been put on high alert in case Pyongyang launched additional missiles as Seoul analyzes the type of the two projectiles it detected Tuesday morning.

The missile launch is the fourth such test in two weeks and coincides with the start of the joint US-South Korea military drills that will last until August 20. "We remain unchanged in our stand to resolve the issues through dialogue. But the dynamics of dialogue will be more invisible as long as the hostile military moves continue," a spokesperson for the North's foreign ministry said.

The US and South Korea tried to keep their upcoming exercises low-key, amid Pyongyang's vigorous protests. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump dismissed North Korea's short-range ballistic missile tests last week, saying that short-range rockets did not bother him much. "These missiles tests are not a violation of our signed Singapore agreement, nor was there discussion of short-range missiles when we shook hands," Trump tweeted Friday, downplaying Pyongyang's concerns and response.

Comment: See also: