
U.S. Army Sgt. Kaylin Jones, 25, stands at a guard tower on the perimeter of a small coalition outpost on the western edge of Iraq on Jan. 26, 2018.
The letters detail the Trump administration's plan for an open-ended mission for U.S. forces, beyond the fight against the Islamic State group. The letters - first reported by The New York Times - were to Virginia Democrat Sen. Tim Kaine, an advocate for a replacement for the post-9/11 war authorizations for the use of military force.
The letters come amid various efforts from congressional Republicans and Democrats to have Congress approve a new authorization, or AUMF. Kaine and other critics argue the White House's use of authorizations from a decade and half ago is a legal stretch. He called on Trump to seek a new authorization.
Comment: The original AUMF was purposefully designed to be vague for exactly this purpose: endless war without congressional approval. Democrats and Republicans both like it that way, and you can bet Clinton would've continued and expanded the wars started by Obama. That's the way the bipartisan war party works.
"As I have long feared, we are moving from administrations exploiting the blurry authority between the president's and Congress's shared war powers to the alarming belief that Congress doesn't need to be involved at all," Kaine said in a statement, adding that Trump is "acting like a king by unilaterally starting a war."
Comment: "Starting"? These wars were started by Bush and Obama, Mr. Kaine.
In the letters to Kaine, not only is the end date of U.S. operations in Iraq and Syria vague - so is the number of U.S. troops working to defeat the remnants of ISIS. The Defense Department publicly says that number is 2,000, but has acknowledged that number omits troops on "sensitive missions."














Comment: Mr. Trump -- Is this your final answer? (and will it be left standing?)