© AlamyGoogle says it complied with less than one-third of government removal requests.
Google revealed a sharp rise in requests from governments asking for political content to be removed from the web in its latest transparency report published on Thursday.
From January to June the search giant received 3,846 government requests to remove content from its services - a 68% increase over the second half of 2012.
"Over the past four years, one worrying trend has remained consistent: governments continue to ask us to remove political content. Judges have asked us to remove information that's critical of them, police departments want us to take down videos or blogs that shine a light on their conduct, and local institutions like town councils don't want people to be able to find information about their decision-making processes," Susan Infantino, legal director, said in a blogpost.
"These officials often cite defamation, privacy and even copyright laws in attempts to remove political speech from our services. In this particular reporting period, we received 93 requests to take down government criticism and removed content in response to less than one third of them. Four of the requests were submitted as copyright claims," she said.
Comment: "...the UN General Assembly resolution is not legally binding."
Do UN resolutions really even matter to the psychopathic elite? We see how ineffective they've been with regard to illegal occupations and human rights issues in other matters.
Does the UN actually believe a resolution that is not legally binding will accomplish something meaningful when it comes to international espionage?
Who's going to enforce the resolution? Who is the compelling authority?