Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 29 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Eagle

Trump's top intelligence and military personnel held unusual meeting at CIA on Iran

John Bolton
© Kevin Lamarque / Reuters
National security adviser John Bolton, outside the White House last week, has long advocated for regime change in Iran.

Comment: Keep in mind that the following article is from last May, but points to just how much the CIA is still a part of influencing foreign policy towards Iran.


In a highly unusual move, national security adviser John Bolton convened a meeting at CIA headquarters last week with the Trump administration's top intelligence, diplomatic and military advisers to discuss Iran, according to six current U.S. officials.

The meeting was held at 7 a.m. on Monday, April 29, and included CIA Director Gina Haspel, Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joe Dunford, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, five of the officials said.

National security meetings are typically held in the White House Situation Room. The six current officials, as well as multiple former officials, said it is extremely rare for senior White House officials or Cabinet members to attend a meeting at CIA headquarters.

The officials said the discussion was not about the intelligence that led to the decision in the following days to send a carrier strike group and bomber task force to the Middle East, but did not describe what the meeting covered.

Five former CIA operations officers and military officials said that in the past, such meetings have been held at CIA headquarters to brief top officials on highly sensitive covert actions, either the results of existing operations or options for new ones.

Bullseye

Huawei blasts US move to expand blacklist of its affiliates as 'politically motivated'

huawei
© Reuters / Aly Song
Chinese telecom giant Huawei has said the US decision to blacklist another 46 of the firm's affiliates is 'unjust.' The list now includes more than 100 entries.

The US Department of Commerce (DoC) initially blacklisted Huawei itself in May, forbidding US firms from selling technology or equipment to the Chinese tech giant, while also banning US state agencies from buying products and services from Huawei unless granted a waiver. Washington alleges that the Chinese company is involved in activities that pose a threat to US national security and foreign policy interests, suggesting, for example, that Huawei's smartphones could be used by China to spy on Americans, an allegation the firm has repeatedly denied.

The ban, however, was delayed by the DoC for the second time on Monday, allowing Huawei 90 more days to do business with US firms. However, it announced it would add 46 more Huawei subsidiaries and affiliates to its blacklist, which now puts the total number of companies prohibited from trade in the US at 115.

Russian Flag

Kremlin: Putin fully briefed on Arkhangelsk accident, rumors of 'radioactive cloud' absurd

putin
© Sputnik / Mikhail Klimentyev
Five Rosatom employees died in a blast that rocked a military site in the Arkhangelsk Region on 10 August during tests of a liquid-propellant rocket engine. They will receive posthumous government honours.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin is fully briefed on all details surrounding the accident in the Arkhangelsk region and dismissed rumours of a "radioactive cloud".

"I suggest you focus on the statements made by the president yesterday, who said that there is no danger and, all the authorities are working to prevent the slightest risk to the citizens of Russia in connection with that emergency," Peskov responded when asked why radiation monitoring stations in Kirov and Dubna stopped submitting reports after the 8 August explosion in the Arkhangelsk region.

Magnify

The purpose of Netanyahu's visit to Ukraine

netayahu zelensky

Ukrainian President Zelensky and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu arrived in Ukraine on an official visit. Most experts claim that the visit is motivated by two points: Israel noted that Ukraine is the only state in the world except Israel itself where the Prime Minister and the President are Jews; Netanyahu has elections on September 17th, and Israel is home to many people from Ukraine.

I think both said reasons for the visit are false. However, the goals named by Netanyahu himself can hardly be considered true either. He, apparently, was going to sign an agreement on a free trade zone, settle humanitarian problems (Banderists started to be denied entry to Israel on a massive basis, and Ukraine periodically sends Jews back, preventing them from entering) and, in addition, Zelensky invited him a couple of months ago.

Comment: See also:


Bad Guys

Political upheaval over Tlaib and Omar's denial of entry to Israel demonstrates the power of BDS

Representative Rashida Tlaib (L) and Representative Ilhan Omar

Representative Rashida Tlaib (L) and Representative Ilhan Omar (R)
We are in the middle of a political upheaval on Israel/Palestine in the United States, and Americans who are concerned with Palestinian human rights live for these moments. They are the moments of potential change: When more tarnish is added to Israel's image, and Americans get a clearer picture of what the Jewish state actually means for non-Jews under its sovereignty.

Since I've been covering the issue there have been several such moments. The Israeli assault on Gaza in 2008-09. The Israeli assault on Gaza in 2014. Netanyahu's showdowns with Obama over settlements, the Iran deal (2011, 2015). The move of the embassy last year with Israel's slaughter of some 60 nonviolent protesters at the Gaza fence.

Most of these moments have involved a lot of bloodshed. Palestine had to have a lot of martyrs for anyone over here to even start paying attention. 2200 Palestinians died five years ago over 500 of them children. Hundreds of brave Gazan protesters have died over the last year (with four NY Times columnists approving their killings).

This latest moment has been absolutely nonviolent. Two congresswomen tried to get into Palestine to meet with human rights groups and Palestinian leaders and see the occupation for themselves. They were barred by Israel because they support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign, or BDS.

Comment: And traditionally "pro-Israel" sites like The Hill are seeing this blunder by Israel in quite a similar way:
The decision to deny Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) entry into Israel may be one of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu worst strategic mistakes in recent times.

Whatever points he scored with President Trump, whatever damage he believes would be prevented by barring the lawmakers' visit, it pales in comparison to the damage this decision causes to Israel's campaign against its delegitmization. The decision to reverse the ban on Tlaib on "humanitarian grounds" does little to undo the damage, especially since Tlaib rejected the offer. Tlaib cited Israel's "oppressive conditions" of travel as her reasoning, which became the headline of the day. Israel played right into her hands.

Since the early 2000s, Israel has faced a concerted campaign of delegitimization against it, led by the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS). As part of Israel's response to the BDS, it amended its entry law to allow the government to refuse entry to BDS supporters. This law was invoked to bar Tlaib and Omar's visit. The congresswomen have openly supported BDS and Tlaib announced her intention of leading a delegation to the West Bank to counter the narrative produced by pro-Israel groups such as AIPAC. But even AIPAC criticized the decision to deny Tlaib and Omar's entry.

This was an extraordinary move on the part of the Israeli government, but it is not the first time it has fumbled the response to BDS. Just last summer, it detained liberal Jewish-American journalist Peter Beinart when he attempted to enter the country on a personal visit. Soon after, it refused entry to American student Lara Alqasem, despite her receiving a visa to study in Israel, on the claim that she had been a leader in her university's chapter of Students For Justice in Palestine (SJP).

The Alqasem case received wide coverage in Western media. Even conservative supporters of Israel, questioned the decision. What was not reported as widely was that in her 16 days of detainment, Alqasem was afforded access to three levels of the judicial system, all the way to the Israeli Supreme Court, which reversed the order and granted her entry. Alqasem is now a student at Jerusalem University. That part of the narrative was lost in the kerfuffle of Israel's overreaction.

Delegitimization is and should be treated as a threat to Israel. It presents a serious challenge to Israel's ability to maintain its Jewish character, which is increasingly viewed as incompatible with the modern values of the international society. Though the BDS movement has had little success in hurting Israel's economy or diplomatic relations with political elites, it has made considerable strides at the grassroots level, with civil society, on campuses, labor unions and churches.

As a 2016 Pew Research survey indicates, American millennials, including Jews, are far less sympathetic towards Israel than their older counterparts. In certain progressive, and some liberal spaces, Israel is becoming a pariah state.

If Israel hopes to successfully defeat the delegitimization campaign, it must avoid at all cost illiberal, largely ceremonial actions that serve little to enhance its security. Barring American students and lawmakers, even those most critical of Israel, represents a short-sighted and misguided approach to addressing the challenge. In many ways, Israel is contributing to the very threat it seeks to thwart.

Instead, Israel should have opened its doors to them. Demonstrating that it has nothing to hide. Perhaps Tlaib and Omar would have refused to meet with Israelis while on their trip, perhaps they would have met with Israeli groups that are strong critics of the government — and this would have highlighted Israel's openness to criticism. Perhaps they would have also met with Israeli and Palestinian victims of political violence. We will never know.

All that is left is the image of Israel as an oppressive state, one that does Trump's bidding, thereby alienating the very liberal audiences that Israel must win over if it hopes to defeat the delegitimziation campaign against it. With this decision, Netanyahu has done more to undermine Israeli security than the visit by Tlaib and Omar could have.

Ronnie Olesker is an associate professor of government at St. Lawrence University. Her upcoming article, "Delegitmization as a National Security Threat: Israel and BDS" will be featured in the fall issue of Israel Studies Review Journal.
But, alas, Israel does have a lot to hide.


Bullseye

Trump wants Google sued as tech company 'manipulated up to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 election'

Trump Clinton
© AFP 2019 / JEFF KOWALSKY JEWEL SAMAD
Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 presidential election in which she was running as a Democratic candidate.

US President Donald Trump has stated that Google should be sued based on a report about the alleged manipulation of millions of votes in favour of Hillary Clinton in 2016. Trump did not cite the report to support his accusation but referred to the watchdog group Judicial Watch in his tweet.


Comment: Doing evil Google isn't stopping with the 2016 US Presidential election either:


Snakes in Suits

Bojo rejects Corbyn's call to end MPs' holiday early to deal with looming No Deal Brexit

bojo
© Downing Street/PA
The chances of No Deal Brexit have been ramping up after Boris Johnson said he would leave "do or die" on October 31
Boris Johnson has slapped down Labour's call to cut short MPs' summer holiday in "the next few days" to sort out Brexit.

Jeremy Corbyn, and his Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell, backed more than 100 MPs' plea to recall Parliament after a leaked report showed the chaos of a No Deal Brexit .

The Operation Yellowhammer briefing said petrol and medical supplies could be disrupted and up to 85% of lorries using Channel ports may not be ready for French customs checks. It added 15,000 workers who cross daily from Spain to Gibraltar face delays of more than four hours "at least for a few months".

Comment: RT reports that while Tory remainers and those of the minority parties may be eager to avoid a no-deal Brexit, they're still not willing to back Labour's Corbyn as a temporary PM:
'Britain's Trump': Corbyn slams BoJo and 'reckless' govt, warns of 'disastrous' no-deal Brexit

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has attacked PM Boris Johnson for being a "phoney outsider" and cosying up to US President Donald Trump, in a speech that warned of a grim no-deal Brexit scenario.

Speaking at a children's centre in Corby, Northamptonshire on Monday, Corbyn reaffirmed his intention to table a vote of no-confidence in Johnson's government when MPs reconvene in parliament after the summer holiday period.

In what was ostensibly a pre-election pitch to voters, the socialist leader criticized Johnson's apparent cosying up to Trump ahead of a possible hard Brexit, accusing the Tory PM of siding with right-wing wealthy elites.

"Tories have lurched to the hard right under Boris Johnson, Britain's Trump, the fake populist and phoney outsider... committed to protecting vested interests of the richest and the elites, while posing as anti-establishment."

Corbyn also laid down the gauntlet to MPs in parliament who claim to want to avoid the UK leaving the EU without a deal on October 31. A number of pro-remain Tories, as well as Liberal Democrats led by Jo Swinson, have so far failed to back Corbyn as a temporary PM in order to prevent a no-deal exit.

"If MPs are serious about stopping a no-deal crash out, then they will vote down this reckless government," Corbyn told the audience, adding that, constitutionally, it falls on the biggest opposition party to form a minority administration in those circumstances.
See also: Coralling Trump and BoJo: US Senators threaten to block trade deal with Britain if Brexit imperils open Irish border


Light Sabers

Is Hong Kong's showdown with Beijing inevitable?

Hong Kong protest
© Treefong
Demonstration in Hong Kong against the extradition bill. (Hf9631, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons)
This reckoning with Beijing's authority was baked into the cake 22 years ago when the Union Jack came down over Government House.

It is impossible not to admire the bravery and commitment pro-democracy demonstrators display daily as they clog Hong Kong streets, shut down its airport, and disrupt the territory's beating heart in Central, the commercial and financial district. But neither can one deny the tragic fate that appears near as Beijing stiffens its resolve and signals the threat of military intervention.

The futility of all action, the necessity of any: Maybe those protestors building barricades and hurling Molotov cocktails at tear-gassing riot police are reading Camus in their off-hours.


Comment: Reading Camus in their off-hours in no way endears them to us. All we see are British-flag waving, US anthem-singing deluded rich kids.


There is no question of Chinese President Xi Jinping compromising Beijing's authority to mollify those now in their third month of protests across Hong Kong. He is too firm a believer in the primacy of the Chinese Communist Party to entertain any such risk. But there is too much at stake for the Chinese president to order mainland troops or police units into the territory short of a decisive challenge to the local administration's ability to govern. This accounts for Beijing's restraint over the past 10 weeks.


Comment: Or... Beijing's giving them all the rope they need to hang themselves. Western pundits have really poor grasp of Chinese leadership.


The best outcome in prospect now — and the chances of this appear slim at the moment — is that Xi will authorize influential political allies in Hong Kong to frame a set of reforms sufficient to isolate demonstrators by eliminating the broad public support they have to date enjoyed. In any other resolution of this crisis, the democracy advocates in the streets stand to lose everything. Even as they number in the hundreds of thousands, they are simply no match against a government intent on centralized control over a nation of 1.4 billion.

Comment: So, if HK is to fully become part of China by 2047 anyway, what the heck is the point of all this posturing about establishing a separate state there??

Obviously, it's not coincidental that protest movements have erupted in Russia and China at the same time: the Empire is pulling out all the stops to thwart their efforts to create an alternative system of world government.

If this is not up and running by the time the Western Order collapses, there's going to be a crisis unlike any the world has ever seen.


Pharoah

All along the watchtower and the follies of history

Bayon Temple
© Bruno Morandi, Robert Harding Heritage/AFP
Bayon temple, Angkor World Heritage site in Siem Reap, northern Cambodia.
The ultimate American imperial dream is to engineer a Chinese vassal state
There must be some kind of way outta here
Said the joker to the thief
There's too much confusion
I can't get no relief

Business men, they drink my wine
Plowmen dig my earth
None were level on the mind
Nobody up at his word

- Bob Dylan, All Along the Watchtower (immortalized by Jimi Hendrix)
Nothing beats the beguiling, stony smiles at the Bayon temple near Angkor Wat in Cambodia's Siem Reap to plunge us back into history's vortex, re-imagining how empires, in their endless pursuit of power, rise and fall, usually because they eventually get the very war they had sought to avoid.

Comment: See also:


Boat

Trump privately floats the possibility of a naval blockade against Venezuela

TrumpBattleships
© ABC7.com/marineartists.co.uk/KJN
US President Donald Trump • Battleships 1917
President Trump privately suggested stationing Navy ships around Venezuela to block goods from entering and exiting the country multiple times, Axios reported Sunday. Five current and former officials told the outlet they had either directly heard the president discuss the idea or been briefed on it.

Trump has reportedly raised the idea for at least a year and a half, and as recently as several weeks ago.

Earlier this month he answered "Yes, I am" when a reporter asked whether he was mulling a blockade, according to Reuters. However, he did not elaborate on the idea.

"He literally just said we should get the ships out there and do a naval embargo," one source who heard the president's comments in private told Axios. "Prevent anything going in." The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

A blockade would be a significant escalation of the Trump administration's efforts to force Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro out of office.

Comment: See also: