Puppet Masters
The Washington Post's screaming headline on Sunday is "Ukraine decries Russian 'invasion,'" treating the coup regime in Kiev as if it speaks for the entire country when it clearly speaks for only a subset of the population, mostly from western Ukraine. The regime's "legitimacy" comes not from a democratic election but from a coup that was quickly embraced by the U.S. government and the European Union.
For example:
March 1933:
German federal election brings Hitler to power as chancellor
March 1936:
Germany remilitarizes the Rhineland in contravention of the Treaty of Versailles
March 1937:
The Third Reich's Condor Legion bombs and attacks Durango, Spain and the next month bombs Guernica
March 1938:
Germany absorbs Austria
Over the past fifteen years a not dissimilar pattern has emerged.
That's what Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) of California charged Tuesday in an extraordinary Senate floor speech. The CIA has denied wrongdoing and has its own questions about how Intelligence Committee staffers turned up a sensitive internal report on the agency's past use of harsh interrogation techniques.
Here are nine questions and answers about a complex story that starts with waterboarding and ends in a secret CIA facility in northern Virginia.
1. What's the background?
The CIA began using so-called enhanced interrogation techniques on terror suspects at black sites around the world in 2002. These included use of waterboarding to simulate drowning, stress positions, and sleep deprivation.
Following a series of news reports detailing this activity, the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2009 authorized a comprehensive review of the program. While panel lawmakers had been informed of the program by agency briefers, a preliminary staff inquiry showed that the interrogations were harsher than they had been described, according to Senator Feinstein, the committee chairman. The panel was also concerned about the CIA's destruction of some videotapes of interrogations, seeing it as possible destruction of evidence.
The whistleblower Edward Snowden accused the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee of double standards on Tuesday, pointing out that her outrage at evidence her staff were spied on by the CIA was not matched by concern about widespread surveillance of ordinary citizens.
Snowden, the former contractor whose disclosures to journalists revealed widespread surveillance by the National Security Agency, was responding to an explosive statement by Senator Dianne Feinstein about the CIA's attempts to undermine a congressional investigation into interrogation and detention.
In a surprisingly combative statement on the Senate floor on Tuesday, Feinstein, who has been widely criticised by privacy experts for failing to hold the NSA to account, accused the CIA of conducting potentially unconstitutional and criminal searches on computers used by her staff.
The remarks put the Democratic senator on a collision course with the CIA's director, John Brennan, who strongly denied "hacking" the committee's computers. Feinstein described the controversy as "a defining moment for the oversight of our intelligence community".
He publicly talks about how rich people need to pay more in taxes, then turns around and pioneers new ways for his company Berkshire Hathaway to avoid hundreds of millions in taxes. He thinks that by going on television stuffing ice cream cones and hamburgers in his mouth and acting all grandfatherly that no one will notice who he is really is and the incredible hypocrisy of his actions.
I've pointed out "Uncle" Warren's hypocrisy previously on these pages, most recently in my post from last March titled: Crony Capitalist "Uncle" Warren Buffett Drives Company Profits Using Derivatives.
While that was pretty blatant hypocrisy, Buffett's latest elaborate scheme to avoid $400 million in capital gains taxes from the disposition of a large chunk of Berkshire Hataway's Washington Post stake (which was acquired in the 1970s for $11 million) absolutely takes the cake.
Never mind Obama's assurances on the campaign trail and the vow he made in 2009 about being "committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in government." Journalists at the Associated Press say that their research indicates that the US government has withheld more information from ever under the authority of Pres. Obama.
Journalists Jack Gillum and Ted Bridis have been investigating just how hard it is to successfully request documents from the White House through the US Freedom of Information Act, and in an article published by the AP on Sunday they wrote that the current administration "more often than ever censored government files or outright denied access to them."
"The administration cited more legal exceptions it said justified withholding materials and refused a record number of times to turn over files quickly that might be especially newsworthy," they wrote. "Most agencies also took longer to answer records requests, the analysis found."
According to the AP's research, the Obama administration has exhibited anything but what the president promised with regards to maintaining an open and transparent White House.
Author John Perkins explained last week on the David Pakman Show how American corporations extorted natural resources from developing nations in a process that sounds very similar to domestic privatization schemes.
Perkins, who wrote the 2004 book Confessions of an Economic Hitman about his experience working as a chief economist for the engineering company Chas. T. Main, said corporations would identify countries that had resources sought by the U.S. and arrange for them to obtain large loans from the World Bank and similar organizations.
"But the money never actually went to the country," Perkins said. "Instead, it went to our own corporations to build infrastructure projects in that country. They made a great deal of profit from that."
The countries would use those borrowed funds to build electrical systems, highways, industrial parks, and other infrastructure projects.
"Yet the country would be left holding a huge debt they couldn't repay, and so at some point we'd go back and say, 'Hey, you know, since you can't pay your debts, sell your resource - oil, whatever - very cheap to our companies without any environmental restrictions or social regulations or privatize your public sector businesses, sell them real cheap - your utility companies, your water and sewage system, your schools, your jails, off to our corporations," Perkins said. "And in that way we created the world's first truly global empire, primarily without the use of the military."
He said most economists agreed that developing countries needed better infrastructure to improve their economies, but he said statistics supporting this model were misleading.
The White House earlier Monday announced sanctions on Russian officials, and Obama said further restrictions would occur if Russia continues to interfere with Ukraine. The European Union also announced its own sanctions on Russia.
Vice President Joe Biden is traveling to Europe Monday to meet with leaders of Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Obama said he will travel to Europe next week.
"We'll continue to make clear to Russia that further provocation will achieve nothing except to further isolate Russia and diminish its place in the world," Obama said. "The international community will continue to stand together to oppose any violations of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity. And continued Russian military intervention in Ukraine will only deepen Russia's diplomatic isolation and exact a greater toll on the Russian economy."
The farm bill passed Jan. 29 cuts about $800 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), but officials in Connecticut, New York, and Pennsylvania have made changes to state programs to tie food-stamp eligibility to home-heating assistance to allow more low-income families to be eligible for aid.
"This completely negates, almost entirely negates the cuts that Congress imposed," Varney said Tuesday on "Fox & Friends." "It shows you, once you've got a program, you can never get rid of it and it's very difficult to cut. Now what's really going on here is the government's buying votes. They're keeping, churning out the food stamps in return for votes. That's what's happening."
"Fox & Friends" host Brian Kilmeade said the states had forced Republicans into "a tough situation politically."
"They know what's right, they know what's affordable, they know that food stamps are a never-ending cycle, but do you want to be the party that goes up to the poor and says, 'Take that back'?" Kilmeade said.

Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., talks with Senators during a meeting of the Senate Climate Action Task Force.
Sure, when only one party shows up.
Democrats have been plowing through a dusk-to-dawn talkathon during which more than two dozen speakers have agreed with each other about the need for action on climate change. Naysayers - Republicans - largely stayed away.
"Climate change is real, it is caused by humans, and it is solvable," said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii.
In Schatz's view, the debate, such as it was, showed that a growing number of senators are committed to working together on climate change, even if no Republicans were among them. "This is where intractable, longstanding issues get solved," he said of the Senate.
Despite that bravado, Democratic leaders made it clear they have no plans to bring a climate bill to the Senate floor this year. Indeed, the issue is so politically charged that a host of Democrats who face tough re-election fights in the fall opted to skip the session. Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Mark Begich of Alaska and Kay Hagan of North Carolina were among Democrats who stayed away.











