Puppet Masters
CNN's Acosta began his line of questioning by saying that the journalists "deserved" a reassurance that their work was valued by the President, and it would be a "good thing" if she would refute a label Trump first gave the press in January 2017, and never backed down from.
But Sanders would not swallow the bait, stating that Trump has "made his position clear," but before she could get any further, Acosta began to ask another follow-up.

White House Natl. Security Advisor John Bolton, DNI Dan Coats, FBI Director Christopher Wray, DHS Secretary Kristjen Nielsen, NSA Director General Paul Nakasone
In a rare appearance before the White House press corps, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, FBI Director Christopher Wray, National Security Adviser John Bolton and NSA director General Paul Nakasone all spoke about the Trump administration's efforts to secure the 2018 midterm elections.
After painting a scary picture of Russia conducting a "pervasive messaging campaign... to try to weaken and divide the US," and "undermine our democratic values," Coats acknowledged that it's "not the kind of robust campaign that we assessed in the 2016 election."
Comment: They never assessed it; they created it from thin air...a 'foe' they conveniently self-fulfilled.
"Right now, we have not seen that," Coats told reporters. He did say that Russia has tried to hack some candidates and steal their information - presumably a reference to claims by Senator Claire McCaskill (D-Missouri) - but added that others have that capability as well. Meddling is "just a click away," Coats said.
Comment: Dan Coats, told a briefing at the White House that Russia is continuing to use "pervasive methods" to exploit and intensify differences in U.S. society and that the intelligence community remains concerned about U.S. election security. Coats said he would support any type of measure, including sanctions, to send a message to Russia to get them to change their behavior.
Comment: The agencies and suits 'are on it.' They have 'suppressed the enemy'. But just in case the Dems repeat the loss, Russiaphobia will continue to be fanned by Intel and those in collusion it preserves.
"The implementation date of the taxation measures will be subject to the actions of the US, and China reserves the right to continue to introduce other countermeasures," the Chinese government press release stated. "Any unilateral threat or blackmail will only lead to intensification of conflicts and damage to the interests of all parties."According to China's Ministry of Commerce, the measure will come into force immediately if Washington starts to impose taxes on Chinese imports.
The announcement comes after US President Donald Trump threatened to raise the proposed tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese exports from 10 percent to 25 percent. The step is reportedly being considered by the White House in order to narrow the trade deficit between the US and China.
In July, Washington fired the first salvo in the escalating trade war with Beijing by introducing 25 percent tariffs on Chinese imports worth $34 billion. China immediately retaliated by imposing levies on the same amount of US goods. The next round of tariffs on mutual imports worth $16 billion could come into force on Friday.
Comment: Belligerence may not be the best approach. China, on one level, is responding in-kind to illustrate a point of demeanor. Manners count - a skill of which the US has little awareness. The equalization of the marketplace is a civilized discussion and arrangement.
The former international cricketer used his first meeting with British officials since his election win, to tell the UK that he wants to secure the return his nation's laundered money, reports the Telegraph. In the meeting with Thomas Drew, the UK's High Commissioner to Pakistan, Khan said it was "our firm resolve to bring back to the country the money laundered to the UK."
Khan swept to power on a populist anti-corruption ticket and did not hold back in attacking Pakistan's establishment. He has been scathing of the political class for siphoning off money from key public sector institutions and contracts before whittling away their wealth overseas.
The issue of extracting wealth and sending it abroad has dominated Pakistan's politics since the infamous Panama Papers leak that linked former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's family to offshore companies and four high-end London flats. Sharif has subsequently been sentenced to 10 years in jail on corruption charges relating to the purchase of the London flats.
The pessimistic outlook on Washington's quarrel with Ankara over the Russian weapon system came from René Clarke Cooper, nominated to be the assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs. Cooper spoke to the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday to convince them he is the right man to assist Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
At one point, Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) asked about the Russian-Turkish deal and US move to bar supply of F-35 fighter jets in retaliation.
"A sale of something like the S-400 would be catastrophic for us," Cooper told Shaheen. "We do not want a NATO ally to be dependent upon the servicing and supply of equipment that is provided by Russia. That is for me an operational standpoint. The strategic standpoint is we don't want a NATO ally to have a weapon system supplied by Russia."He conceded that if the long-standing cooperation between Turkey and the US were to be broken apart, it would be catastrophic too.
Comment: So how would nominee Cooper resolve the military equipment snag, given Turkey does not follow the US script? Is he any brighter than Pompeo? (It wouldn't take much.)

On October 9, 2017, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov met in Sochi with President of the Central African Republic Faustin-Archange Touadera, who went to Russia on a private visit.
An extensive report by the UN Panel of Experts on the Central African Republic (CAR) was released at the end of last month and contains valuable information about the activities of the Russian military mission there. The author has been paying very close attention to this angle of the conflict for the past nine months and produced the following analyses about it that should be referenced by the reader if they're not already familiar with the basics:
15 December, 2017: "Why Does Russia Want To Sell Arms To The Central African Republic?"
18 January, 2018: "Russia Might 'Pivot To Africa' With 'Mercenaries'"
7 May, 2018: "Russia's Grand Strategy In Afro-Eurasia (And What Could Go Wrong)"
9 June, 2018: "Russia's Making Some Smart Moves In The Central African Republic"
21 July, 2018: "BRICS Summit: Russia's Return to Africa"
1 August, 2018: "Why'd A Former Russian Oligarch Send Journalists To An African War Zone?"
1 August, 2018: "Is The Central African Republic Turning Into Mali 2.0?"
Up until now, however, details about Russia's operation in this war-torn but mineral-rich landlocked state were scarce and mostly speculative, but the UN report finally sheds some light on what's happening there. This piece is broken down into one-sentence summaries that encapsulate the gist of each part where Russia is mentioned (identified through a simple CTRL+F keyword search), followed by the relevant passage and a description of where it was cited within the report.
Outline of a possible AngloZionist attack on Iran
The US and Israel will surely avoid a massive, costly land campaign against Iran, a vast, mountainous nation that was willing to suffer a million battle casualties in its eight-year war with Iraq that started in 1980. This gruesome war was instigated by the US, Britain, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia to overthrow Iran's new popular Islamic government.
The Pentagon has planned a high-intensity air war against Iran that Israel and the Saudis might very well join. The plan calls for over 2,300 air strikes against Iranian strategic targets: airfields and naval bases, arms and petroleum, oil and lubricant depots, telecommunication nodes, radar, factories, military headquarters, ports, waterworks, airports, missile bases and units of the Revolutionary Guards.
Iran's air defenses range from feeble to non-existent. Decades of US-led military and commercial embargos against Iran have left it as decrepit and enfeebled as was Iraq when the US invaded in 2003. The gun barrels of Iran's 70's vintage tanks are warped and can't shoot straight, its old British and Soviet AA missiles are mostly unusable, and its ancient MiG and Chinese fighters ready for the museum, notably its antique US-built F-14 Tomcats, Chinese copies of obsolete MiG-21's, and a handful of barely working F-4 Phantoms of Vietnam War vintage.
Air combat command is no better. Everything electronic that Iran has will be fried or blown up in the first hours of a US attack. Iran's little navy will be sunk in the opening attacks. Its oil industry may be destroyed or partially preserved depending on US post-war plans for Iran.
The only way Tehran can riposte is by staging isolated commando attacks on US installations in the Mideast of no decisive value, and, of course, blocking the narrow Strait of Hormuz that carries two-thirds of Mideast oil exports. The US Navy, based nearby in Bahrain, has been practicing for decades to combat this threat.There is a lot of interesting material in this description and I think that it is worth looking into it segment by segment.
Corn puckishly notes that this puts Trump at odds with many Republicans who have spent years criticizing President Obama for his alleged failure to speak out on behalf of American exceptionalism. And this is more or less true.
But more interesting, I think, is what Trump himself actually meant by this. His full quote shows that all he really meant is that America is losing big time, and that claiming to be "exceptional" in that context only makes us look like bigger losers, compounding the embarrassment. Needless to say, this is a rather comical oversimplification of what the "American exceptionalism" debate is all about.
At the same time, Iran is not closing all doors on the US. Following last week's exchange of threatening words between Iran and the US, Oman Foreign Minister Yusuf Bin Abdullah received the visit of Iran Foreign Minister Jawad Zareef. He travelled to Washington this week and met with US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Advisor John Bolton to discuss the Iranian crisis.
President Donald Trump has expressed his unconditional willingness to meet with his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani. Mahmoud Vaezi, Rouhani's chief of Staff, revealed that Trump asked eight times to speak with the Iranian President, who rejected Trump's requests.
Ryabkov, in an interview with the Russian news agency Interfax, and Paul's office announced the meeting on August 2. Russian news agencies said that Paul will be leading a U.S. delegation meeting with Russian lawmakers.
Paul was one of the only U.S. legislators to express support last month for President Donald Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki.
Comment: Some background on Senator Rand Paul.
- Rand Paul's emergence as a voice for sanity in Washington
- Rand Paul blocks Senate bill, slams 'Trump derangement syndrome'
- Rand Paul: From Trump dossier to DNC leaks, Dems are responsible for everything they have blamed on Republicans
- Rand Paul points out what Elites have known for years - "America has been illegally at war for a long time"
- Senator Rand Paul re-introduces legislation to audit the Federal Reserve
- Rand Paul says Dick Cheney pushed for Iraq war after 9/11 to benefit his former employer Halliburton













Comment: The media has a responsibility to report the news accurately and factually, without slant nor innuendo. The public, likewise, has a responsibility to discern truth from fiction. With few exceptions, this has not been the case for MSM, especially regarding this president and his administration. Sanders stood her ground.