Welcome to Sott.net
Tue, 26 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Fire

IG Horowitz's report on FISA abuse will unleash Barr's investigation

William Barr
© Tom Williams/Getty Images
Attorney General William Barr
The forthcoming report from the Office of Inspector General on potential Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuse will finally unleash Attorney General William Barr, and when it does, watch out.

For the last month, conservative pundits have predicted the ever-imminent dropping of Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report on his investigation into the circumstances surrounding FISA surveillance of former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page. Horowitz's report will likely provide new and damaging details surrounding the FBI's use of the FISA court to spy on Page. More importantly, the conclusion of Horowitz's probe frees Barr to conduct a broader and more exacting investigation into all aspects of the Russia collusion hoax.

Barr revealed this during his interview last week with CBS This Morning's Jan Crawford. In his hour-long interview, Barr made several points clear. First, Barr confirmed that Horowitz's investigation focused on a discrete aspect of the Russia collusion investigation - the electronic surveillance of Page. (Barr had previously stated that he anticipated receiving Horowitz's conclusions concerning the propriety of the FISA process targeting Page in May or June, which makes the fevered predictions that Barr already had the IG report less impressive.)

Comment: What a show it will be.


Vader

The Gulf of (un)Credibility

attacked tanker buque petrolero Gulfo Oman
© Reuters
I really cannot begin to fathom how stupid you would have to be to believe that Iran would attack a Japanese oil tanker at the very moment that the Japanese Prime Minister was sitting down to friendly, US-disapproved talks in Tehran on economic cooperation that can help Iran survive the effects of US economic sanctions.

The Japanese-owned Kokuka Courageous was holed above the water line. That rules out a torpedo attack, which is the explanation being touted by the neo-cons.

Comment: Well said, Mr. Murray. Even the Brits are withholding unequivocal endorsement of the US' tall tale, and that is saying something.


Bad Guys

UK Royal Marines Reportedly Deployed to Gulf in Wake of Tanker Attacks Blamed on Iran

uk royal marines
© Wheelie A'barrow/MOD
The reported development comes amid heightened tensions in the Middle East as the United States and its regional allies have accused Iran of orchestrating an attack on two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman earlier this week. Tehran has strongly rejected the allegations as unfounded.

The Royal Marines are being deployed to the Gulf of Oman following an incident, in which two oil tankers were targeted near the Strait of Hormuz on 13 June, causing explosions and a fire on at least one of them, the Daily Star reported, citing unnamed sources.

The troops will purportedly be tasked with keeping British vessels safe, using equipment to search the open sea for "fast Iranian attack craft" and "terminate" them if deemed necessary.


Comment: Nothing can possibly go wrong with this plan.


"We have had marines in the region on anti-piracy and counter-terrorist operations for some time. If the current situation escalates I expect we will see more personnel deployed to bolster the operation", the source was quoted as saying.

According to the UK tabloid, the marines will be equipped with sniper rifles and light machine guns, but they have been instructed to use them only as a last resort.

Comment: The U.S. too is scrambling to promise to guarantee free movement through the Strait:
"We don't want war," Pompeo told Fox News, but he added that Washington would "take all the actions necessary, diplomatic and otherwise," to guarantee free navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, a major oil shipping route between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman.
See also:


Star of David

As Gaza protests refuse to abate, bloodthirsty IDF eagerly push for 'serious military campaign'

Israel tank near gaza strip
© Associated Press/Ariel Schalit
Israeli soldiers work next to their tanks near the Israel Gaza border, Israel, Tuesday, March 26, 2019.
TV report says IDF wants to end policy of warning Gaza residents before airstrikes after two days of rocket attacks, but analysts say unlikely ahead of elections

Top generals in the IDF are expected to push for a much stronger response to rocket fire and arson balloons from the Gaza Strip after fresh attacks in recent days, Channel 12 reported Friday.

Citing a senior military source, Channel 12's veteran military analyst Roni Daniel said Israel was "on the verge of a serious military campaign," and said the IDF was considering ending its policy of warning occupants of buildings ahead of airstrikes, even if it causes casualties.


"Everything is hanging by a very thin thread and the situation could change dramatically," the source said.

Arrow Up

Elijah Magnier: Expect more attacks in the Strait of Hormuz

strait hormuz
Japanese Prime Minister Abe Shinzo conveyed a message from US President Donald Trump to the Iranian leadership, asking the release of 5 US prisoners and inviting Iran to sit around a negotiation table, adding "he [Donald Trump] would be ready to suspend all sanctions only during the negotiations". No guarantee was offered to freeze or revoke the sanctions. Sayyed Ali Khamenei, the Leader of the revolution, rejected the message and any dialogue with the US President and told his guest that he considers Trump unworthy to "to exchange a message with".

Informed sources close to Iranian decision makers repeated the words of President Hassan Rouhani and the Iranian advisor to Sayyed Khamenei for international affairs, Ali Akbar Velayati, namely that "if Iran can't export oil through the Persian Gulf, no-one in the Middle East will be able do this". The source "expects further attacks in the future, given the US decision to stop the flow of oil by all means at all costs. Thus, oil will stop being delivered to the world if Iran can't export its two million barrels per day".

Two tankers - Kokuka Courageous and Font Altair - were attacked in the Gulf of Oman on Thursday, putting at risk the supply of oil to the West and making oil tanker navigation in the Middle East very unsafe. "One more attack and insurance companies are expected to increase their fees. More attacks and no insurance company will agree to cover any oil tanker navigating in Gulf waters, putting Iran and other oil-exporters at the same level. Moreover, let us see what justifications Trump and Europe will offer their people when the price of oil becomes unaffordable", said the source.

Comment: Also keep in mind the following, from Moon of Alabama:
What makes the situation confusing and the reasoning counterintuitive is that Iran and some of its enemies now have the very same tactical interests. Both sides now want to increase the heat in the region. That guarantees that more such attacks will happen. There are many, many potential targets for this campaign.

Iran's enemies hope that more attacks on tankers will goad Trump, and his British sidekicks, into a military conflict with Iran.

Iran calculates that Trump will see the danger and recognize that such a conflict would ruin his presidency. That he will accept that he has to revoke the sanctions and rejoin the nuclear deal to avoid to be blamed for unprecedented oil prices and catastrophic consequences for the global economy.

We can expect that the cat and mouse game will continue throughout the next twelve months. Trump will be under pressure from both sides. Next spring or summer is the latest point for him to decide either way. Until then we will see more casualties of this new tanker war.

Iran's enemies as well as Iran itself now have an interest that more attacks on tankers happen. But unless there is very convincing independent evidence we will never know who will have committed these. There are simply too many players who have motives and the capabilities to make such attacks happen. All of them have plausible reasons to damage more ships. All of them have plausible deniability. It is this what makes the current situation so dangerous. Luckily the problem can be easily solved.

The one who caused this conflict is Donald Trump. He is also the one who can immediately end it.
And this:
Iran will move against the interests of the U.S., Israel, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. It will do so in deniable form to give the U.S. and others no opening for taking military actions against it. Iran has friends in various countries in the Middle East who will support it with their own capabilities. The campaign Iran now launches will also create severe damage for other countries.
Consider this news, too. Perhaps it's relevant, perhaps it's not. But if Magnier and MoA are correct, that's just how things will be for the coming months:
Military Base Hosting US Troops Comes Under Mortar Attack in Iraq

News about the assault comes amid rising tensions in the region, as Washington accused Iran of attacking several tankers in the Gulf of Oman earlier this month.

Iraq's military said in a statement that militants attacked the Balad Air Base north of Baghdad on Saturday, firing three mortar shells. No casualties have been reported, however, the attack caused small fires, which were extinguished immediately.

According to AP, citing an anonymous security officer that American trainers are stationed at Balad air base.



Network

Cyber terrorism: NYT claims US planted 'cyber kill switch' in Russian power grid - Trump says 'fake news'

hydroelectric power station russia
© Reuters / Ilya Naymushin
The control room of a hydroelectric power station in Krasnoyarsk, Russia
The best defense is a good offense: the US seems to have taken this maxim to its logical conclusion, and has "aggressively" hacked Russia's power grid, according to a new report. God forbid the shoe were on the other foot.

An in-depth report in the New York Times on Saturday lays out an alleged ongoing US operation to penetrate and implant malware in Russia's power grid, partly as "a warning" to Moscow, and partly to stake out the high ground should competition between the two powers one day spill over into outright cyber warfare.

Due to the clandestine nature of the subject, the article is light on specifics. All we know is that the authority to carry out offensive cyber operation is enshrined in the National Defense Authorization Act since last summer, and that President Donald Trump delegated approval for such attacks to Cyber Command - set up by the Obama administration in 2008 to counter alleged similar efforts by Moscow - around the same time.


In the absence of details, the Times treated its readers to a carousel of security officials talking up their "aggressive" posture, including one faceless intelligence spook who bragged "We are doing things at a scale we never contemplated a few years ago." A chorus of these same officials also justified the cyberwar efforts, including one who dropped the wonderfully Washingtonian term "defend forward" to describe the incursions.


Comment: And no doubt he used that phrase without a trace of irony.


Comment: Trump took to Twitter after NYT published their story:

But Trump's denial rings hollow. After all, this is the kind of stuff the U.S. pulls, even on its allies:
How the NSA is preparing for cyberwar

A previously-unpublished citation from the 2013 Black Budget reveals the US aspiration to map and infiltrate critical infrastructure worldwide, "involving oil and gas pipelines and transportation systems ...the electrical power grid of targets". An extract from a 2009 NSA presentation shows the agency is monitoring botnets.

Source document:
CyberCOP

Related articles:
Exclusive: Edward Snowden on Cyber Warfare, by James Bamford and Tim De Chant, 8 January 2015, PBS Nova
Neues Snowden-Interview: Krieg im Internet, 13 January 2015, NDR.de (in German)
Cyberkrieg: Wie gefährdet ist Deutschland?, 12 January 2015, NDR.de (in German)
Battlefield Internet: Weaponizing Cyberspace, 10 January 2014, NDR.de
As shown in Oliver Stone's film on Snowden, the NSA apparently has such malware kill switches installed in the grids for Japan and Germany, among others. You know, just in case they step out of line.


Star of David

Facing the facts: Israel cannot escape the ICC's jurisdiction forever

General Maj. Gen. Sharon Afek IDF
© Israeli Defense Force
IDF Military Advocate General Maj. Gen. Sharon Afek
The Chief Military Advocate General of the Israeli army, Sharon Afek, and the US Department of Defense General Counsel, Paul Ney, shared a platform at the 'International Conference on the Law of Armed Conflict', which took place in Herzliya, Israel between May 28-30.

Their panel witnessed some of the most misconstrued interpretations of international law ever recorded. It was as if Afek and Ney were literally making up their own law on warfare and armed conflict, with no regard to what international law actually stipulates.

Comment: Unfortunately long as Israel is shielded by the US at the UN and elsewhere, without being challenged by the rest of the world, Israel will continue its criminal ways.


Dollar

India imposes retaliatory tariffs on 28 US products following Washington's withdrawal of trade privileges

Modi and Trump, India tariffs trade USA

India imposed retaliatory duties on 28 specified goods originating in or exported from USA while preserving the existing rate for these goods for all other countries. Higher Indian tariffs on U.S. goods could impact growing political and security ties between the two nations.
India will impose higher retaliatory tariffs on 28 U.S. products including almonds, apples and walnuts from Sunday, following Washington's withdrawal of key trade privileges for New Delhi.

The new duties take effect from Sunday, a government notification said, in the latest trade row since U.S. President Donald Trump took office in 2017 vowing to act against countries with which Washington has a large trade deficit.

From June 5, President Trump scrapped trade privileges under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) for India, the biggest beneficiary of a scheme that allowed duty-free exports of up to $5.6 billion.

India termed that "unfortunate" and vowed to uphold its national interests.

Reuters previously reported India was preparing to levy higher tariffs ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's first meeting with Trump on the sidelines of a G20 summit in Japan on June 28 and 29.

Comment: More on Trumps' disputes with India:


Quenelle - Golden

US backed color revolution fail in Moldova as Oligarch Plahotniuc and his Democratic Party supporters flee on jets

Plahotniuc
© Vadim Denisov/TASS
The leader of Moldova’s ruling-turned-opposition Democratic Party Vladimir Plahotniuc
Supporters of the Democratic Party of Moldova, together with their leader, oligarch Vladimir Plahotniuc, have just fled the country after the resignation of the government of Pavel Filip. Moldovan media outlets wrote about this, noting that businessmen and politicians flew off in private jets.

According to some reports, Ilan Shor , who is suspected of involvement in a scandal regarding the embezzlement of 1 billion euros from banks, also left the country with his family. And according to some information, Plahotniuc flew to Istanbul, and according to others, to Odessa.

In a statement delivered by the Democratic Party headquarters this morning and reported by TASS, the party confirmed the reports but attempted to distance his moves from the resignation of government, couching it as a 'family visit'.

"Due to media speculations about the alleged disappearance of the Moldova Democratic Party leader, we confirm that Vladimir Plahotniuc left the country for a couple of days to visit his family," the press service said in a statement.

Comment: It's probably a reflection of the health of a country if it can detect, resist and thwart US coup attempts: Also check out SOTT radio's: NewsReal: US Regime Change Operation in Venezuela - This Time It's Legit?


Megaphone

Iran can't be the only one to implement nuclear deal while others sit idle - Rouhani

Hassan Rouhani
© Iranian Presidency / AFP
FILE PHOTO: Iranian President Hassan Rouhani filmed on the "nuclear technology day" in Tehran, April 9, 2019
Tehran will continue to renege on some commitments under the 2015 nuclear deal because it can't become the only party to the milestone accord, the Iranian president has said.

Iran keeps sticking with the nuclear deal, even though the US pulled out of it and imposed "unlawful sanctions backed by other parties," Hassan Rouhani said at the Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia (CICA) in Tajikistan.

However, the Islamic Republic cannot become the only country still remaining in the deal, he warned. If other world powers sit idle and do nothing to save the nuclear accord, Iran will keep scaling back its commitments.

Comment: Putin explains the negative impact US withdrawal from the deal has had, Sputnik reports:
The US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) affects the nuclear nonproliferation regime, Russian President Vladimir Putin said Saturday.

"Everyone is concerned about the situation around the JCPOA on the Iranian nuclear programme. The US withdrawal from this agreement has significantly complicated its implementation and has a negative impact on the overall situation with regard to the nuclear nonproliferation regime", Putin said during the summit of the Conference on Interaction and Confidence-Building Measures in Asia (CICA).

He added that Russia sees the continuation of its obligations under the deal as the only reasonable solution in this situation.

In turn, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said that Tehran could not remain the only party fulfilling obligations under the nuclear deal, and urged other parties to make efforts to maintain the agreement.

"Despite the US withdrawal and the resumption of sanctions, as well as insignificant support of the parties to the deal, we remain convinced that the implementation of the obligations assumed by all related parties will play an important role in improving regional and international stability", he said.

Rouhani also reiterated that Tehran would take steps to reduce the fulfilment of obligations under the JCPOA if it did not see positive responses from other sides of the deal.

Shortly afterwards, the remaining signatories, which include Russia, France, China, the UK, Germany, and the EU swiftly reaffirmed their commitment to the deal.
So everybody but the US and Israel wants to go ahead with the deal; one might think their refusal to go ahead with it is because they benefit from increased regional and international instability, see: