Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 27 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Boat

Norwegian tanker 'attacked' in Gulf set to dock in Iran despite US blame-game

oil tanker
© AFP 2019 / HANDOUT / Emirati National Media Council
Four tankers in the Gulf of Oman, belonging to Norway, the UAE and Saudi Arabia, were left crippled as a result of several explosions that damaged their hulls in May 2019. While an investigation by the UAE has failed to determine the actor behind the "sabotage", the US has groundlessly accused Iran of it. Tehran has denied all the accusations.

Andrea Victory, a Norwegian tanker that suffered a significant blast on 12 May while sailing in the Gulf of Oman near a UAE port, is readying to dock at Iran's Bandar Imam Khomeini port, almost two months after the attack, the research company Refinitiv Energy reported on its Twitter.

According to Refinitiv, the tanker is completing its voyage, which was interrupted by the May incident, carrying a shipment of oil from Argentina to Iran. Following the blast, Andrea Victory reportedly unloaded its cargo onto another ship and was then moored at a dry dock for repairs needed to cover the hole in its hull. Recently, the tanker reclaimed its cargo and is now heading towards its destination, according to Refinitiv Energy.

Gold Bar

Poland is latest country to repatriate its gold from the Bank of England

gold
© Getty Images / Achmad Arphan / EyeEm
Poland is repatriating gold from overseas, after it more than doubled its bullion holdings in the past year. Central banks all over the world have been stocking up on gold in recent years, shifting away from the US dollar.

The National Bank of Poland (NBP) has bought 100 tons of the precious metal since the beginning of this year, nearly four times more than it added to its reserves in 2018.

Now Warsaw wants to bring a significant part the precious metal back home, repatriating it from the Bank of England. The NBP wants to transfer at least 100 tons and store the repatriated bullion in its vaults.

The Polish central bank noted that the repatriation comes on account of central banks' need to diversify the storage of their gold reserves "to limit geopolitical risk," which, it says, could result "in losing access to or restriction of the availability of gold resources held abroad."

In recent months, the Bank of England refused to return 14 tons of gold belonging to Venezuela. Caracas wanted to repatriate some of its bullion holdings to deal with the country's economic crisis, which is exacerbated by US sanctions.

Comment: The following may also have something to do with the desire of various nations to hold on to their own gold:

A revolution in world economies is underway thanks to the Bank for International Settlements' 'Basel III' policy


Clipboard

The top 10 indicators of 'liberal imperialism' - and the 'thinking' behind it

Liberal imperialists
© MIGUEL MEDINA/AFP/Getty Images
Are you a liberal imperialist? Liberal imperialists are like kinder, gentler neoconservatives: Like neocons, they believe it's America's responsibility to right political and humanitarian wrongs around the world, and they're comfortable with the idea of the United States deciding who will run countries such as Libya, Syria, or Afghanistan. Unlike neocons, liberal imperialists embrace and support international institutions (like the United Nations), and they are driven more by concern for human rights than they are by blind nationalism or protecting the U.S.-Israel special relationship. Still, like the neocons, liberal imperialists are eager proponents for using American hard power, even in situations where it might easily do more harm than good. The odd-bedfellow combination of their idealism with neocons' ideology has given us a lot of bad foreign policy over the past decade, especially the decisions to intervene militarily in Iraq or nation-build in Afghanistan, and today's drumbeat to do the same in Syria.

It's not that the United States should never intervene in other countries or that its military should not undertake humanitarian missions (as it did in Indonesia following the Asian tsunami and in Haiti after a damaging earthquake). It should do so, however, only when there are vital national interests at stake or when sending U.S. troops or American arms is overwhelmingly likely to make things better. In short, decisions to intervene need to clear a very high bar and survive hardheaded questioning about what the use of force will actually accomplish.

Comment: Another term for "liberal imperialism" would seem to be neoliberalism - and at the end of the day these folks sure have a lot in common with neoconservatives:


Briefcase

Rep. Peter King: 'Severe, serious abuses' by FBI and CIA in Russia probe are 'going to come out'

Rep. Peter King

Rep. Peter King
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., said he is "confident" that when Attorney General Bill Barr concludes his investigation of the origins of the investigation of President Trump's 2016 campaign, the American people will learn that the FBI and CIA under the Obama administration engaged in foul play.

President Trump and his supporters have questioned how the investigation started in the first place, accusing the FBI of carrying it out under false pretenses. King is among those leveling such allegations.

"There was no legal basis at all for them to begin the investigation of his campaign," King said in a Friday interview with New York radio host John Catsimatidis, "and the way they carried it forward and the way information was leaked, the improper applications they filed in the FISA court to get surveillance, all of this is going to come out."

King was referring to the FBI's application for a warrant under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. Republicans, including California Rep. Devin Nunes, claimed that federal authorities did not fully disclose their reliance on an unverified dossier compiled by Christopher Steele, which was part of opposition research for Hillary Clinton's campaign.

Comment: As the Democrats continue to try and make something of absolutely nothing they may find themselves, correctly, at the opposite end of the investigation - and may have some hell to pay for it:

See also:


Bullseye

Britain is run by a self-serving clique, that's why it's in crisis

britain food bank
© Illustration: Ben Jennings/The Guardian
Government and culture are dominated by the same narrow section of the population. It's no way to run a country
Last week Boris Johnson delivered a speech to a Royal Horticultural Society audience in Wisley, Surrey, before heading to the affluent village of Oxshott to buy some fennel and tarragon sausages and have a cup of tea in the Munch and Wiggles cafe. In a series of interviews later that day, he was unwilling to reveal the provenance of the staged photograph of him and his partner, Carrie Symonds. He was, however, able to insist that Britain would leave the European Union, "do or die", by the end of October.

On the same day, the Sutton Trust and the Social Mobility Commission issued a report into elitism in Britain that "paints a picture of a country whose power structures are dominated by a narrow section of the population [where] social mobility is low and not improving". Those who went to private school comprise 7% of the country's population but 39% of the elite; those who went to Oxford or Cambridge university comprise less than 1% of the population but 24% of the elite. Senior judges, junior ministers, permanent secretaries and diplomats are among the least representative professions. But the media, and particularly newspaper columnists, are right up there, too.

Comment: It's not just a case of elitism, and it's not just Britain, the system throughout the Western world is becoming ponerized and is collapsing under the weight of its own corruption: Political Ponerology: A Science on The Nature of Evil adjusted for Political Purposes Also check out SOTT radio's:


TV

UK bars RT & Sputnik from conference on media freedom for 'disinformation'

Simonyan
© (AFP Photo/EVGENIA NOVOZHENINA)
Britain has said it will bar Sputnik news and RT from a global conference on media freedom in London; in this image from May 23 2019, Russia's President Vladimir Putin presents flowers to editor-in-chief of Russian broadcaster RT Margarita Simonyan after awarding her with the "Order of Alexander Nevsky"
Britain said Monday it had barred Russia's RT and Sputnik news organisations from a global conference on media freedom in London because of their "active role in spreading disinformation".

Some 60 ministers and 1,000 journalists and members of civil society are expected to attend the meeting on Wednesday and Thursday co-hosted with Canada.

"We have not accredited RT or Sputnik because of their active role in spreading disinformation," a Foreign Office spokeswoman said.

Comment: When pressed for proof of Russian 'disinformation' the accusers in the West are forever unable to provide any. However the evidence incriminating the disinfo peddlers in the UK and it's propaganda outlets, like the BBC, is legion. While RT and Sputnik reveal the sordid truth about the systemic corruption that the plagues the country, the UK gov and it's outlets are busy trying to cover it up:


Broom

US will 'no longer deal with' British ambassador following leaks scandal - Trump

trump
© Global Look Press / White House
Washington will cut its ties with British ambassador Kim Darroch, President Donald Trump has announced. According to leaked cables, Darroch called the Trump administration "dysfunctional," "inept," and "incompetent."

In a rambling series of tweets critical of British Prime Minister Theresa May's handling of Brexit, Trump called out Darroch on Monday, saying the diplomat is "not liked or well thought of within the US."

In a series of diplomatic cables leaked to the Daily Mail and reported by the paper on Sunday, Darroch slammed the Trump administration's hardline Iran policies, saying they are unlikely "to become more coherent anytime soon." Darroch also panned "hawkish" hardliners within Trump's cabinet, likely National Security Advisor John Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.


Comment: Darroch can't be pleased with the UK's behavior towards Iran then: Iranian DM Hatami: UK's seisure of Iranian oil tanker is 'maritime robbery'


Comment: See also:


Red Flag

Arch hypocrisy: Washington creates commission on 'inalienable rights'; Pompeo & Amnesty disagree on who gets to weaponize them

human rights as lethal arrows
© https://cdni.rt.com/files/2019.07/article/5d23aea7fc7e93e40c8b4600.jpg
To establish the need for such a body, Pompeo quoted former Czech dissident – and later president – Vaclav Havel, who warned that human rights “can be rays of light in a realm of darkness … [but] they can also be lethal arrows.”
In setting up a new commission on 'unalienable rights,' Washington has admitted to using human rights as a weapon. Its critics don't disagree, but want that weapon to work both ways. Of actual human rights, there is not a trace.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced on Monday the establishment of the commission, made up of "human rights experts, philosophers, and activists" with the purpose of conducting an "informed review of the role of human rights in American foreign policy."

To establish the need for such a body, Pompeo quoted former Czech dissident - and later president - Vaclav Havel, who warned that human rights "can be rays of light in a realm of darkness ... [but] they can also be lethal arrows."

This stunning admission, however, went entirely unnoticed by professional human rights activists, who were too busy shrieking about President Donald Trump's "hateful policies."

Comment: Pot calling the kettle black? A little background on the 'human rights' records of Washington and Amnesty International:


Attention

'They are sanctioning us because of knowledge': IRGC chief says Iran's not pursuing nukes & the world knows it

Iran nuclear enrichment
© AP Photo / VAHID SALEMI
Earlier on Monday, Iran said it started to enrich uranium beyond the limit outlined in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The move came as a response to JCPOA signatories' failure to protect Iran's economic interests amid reimposed US sanctions on the Islamic republic.

"Why do they globally sanction us about the nuclear issue when the world knows that we are not pursuing a weapon? In reality they are sanctioning us because of knowledge," Major General Hossein Salami said. "Nuclear weapons have no place in Islam. Islam never approves of weapons of mass destruction."

Earlier in the week, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif confirmed that the country had surpassed its 300-kilogram (660-pound) low-enriched uranium stockpile limit, agreed on under the JCPOA. According to Araghchi, in 60 days, Tehran will announce the next nuclear obligations it is about to discontinue.

Comment: See also:


Bullseye

Is there something larger afoot with the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein?

Epstein Trump
"Bernie Birnbaum is a horse of a different color, ethics-wise that is....
... as in he ain't got none!"
— Johnny Caspar, "Miller's Crossing"
Serial pederast Jeffrey Epstein is going to be arrested again.


Comment: Epstein was just arrested.


The big questions are why? And why now?

I never doubted Donald Trump's sincerity in wanting Hillary in jail. But the reality is that Trump was not in any position to do so. Until a few months ago.

When Attorney General William Barr ended the Mueller investigation back in February that was a turning point. I talked about it back then in a piece called "The Old Political Order is Just Old."
Mueller, his staff of hatchetmen, the Obama administration and the rest of the corrupt old-guard in D.C. fully expected to be allowed free rein to convict Trump politically of Obstruction of Justice based on an interpretation of Federal Statutes that could only be justified in the world of Philip K. Dick's Minority Report.

When that didn't happen, they are now looking at potential blowback from a vain and vindictive man occupying the supposedly most powerful office in the world.

But is that really the case anymore? It seems John Bolton has been more president than Trump recently.