Photograph published by the New York Times purportedly taken in Russia of Russian soldiers who later appeared in eastern Ukraine. However, the photographer has since stated that the photo was actually taken in Ukraine, and the U.S. State Department has acknowledged the error.
Two days after the
New York Times led its editions with a one-sided article about photos supposedly proving that Russian special forces were behind the popular uprisings in eastern Ukraine, the Times published what you might call a modified, limited retraction.
Buried deep inside the Wednesday editions (page 9 in my paper), the
article by Michael R. Gordon and Andrew E. Kramer - two of the three authors from
the earlier story - has this curious beginning: "A collection of photographs that Ukraine says shows the presence of Russian forces in the eastern part of the country, and which the United States cited as evidence of Russian involvement, has come under scrutiny."
In the old days of journalism, we used to apply the scrutiny before we published a story on the front page or on any other page, especially if it had implications toward war or peace, whether people would live or die. However, in this case - fitting with the anti-Russian bias that has pervaded the mainstream U.S. press corps - the scrutiny was set aside long enough for this powerful propaganda theme to be put in play and to sweep across the media landscape.
Only now do we belatedly learn what should have been obvious: the blurry photographs provided by the coup regime in Kiev and endorsed by the Obama administration don't really prove anything. There were obvious alternative explanations to the photos that were ignored by the
Times, such as the possibility that these were military veterans who are no longer associated with the Russian military. Or that some photos are not of the same person.
Comment: We can recognize this one from Ponerology:
Reversive blockade: Ponerological definition, and as used by psychopaths Some good insights on this from journalist Pepe Escobar:
This is not American propaganda versus Russian propaganda. There is only American propaganda (and compliant Western propaganda). It's the whole world sick of lies.