Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 05 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Russian Flag

Putin's Direct Line appearance: After four hours, 81 questions, here are the top answers from his epic Q&A

Pres. Putin
© Sputnik/Alexey Nikolsky
Russian President Vladimir Putin answering questions during the 4-hour 'Direct Line' TV appearance, June 20, 2019.
Russian President Vladimir Putin took over four hours to answer 81 questions during "Direct Line," his regular annual Q&A session with the Russian people. Here are some of the most interesting ones:

MH17
Commenting on the Dutch-led investigators blaming Russia for the deaths of 298 people on board Malaysian Airlines jet shot down over Ukraine in 2014:
"Russia never avoids responsibility that is actually hers to bear. What we were presented as proof of Russia's guilt absolutely doesn't satisfy us. We believe it is no proof at all."
Ukraine's new president
Volodymyr Zelensky, the new president in Kiev, might be a former TV comedian, but his policies of continuing the war with residents of two eastern provinces are anything but humorous:
"He is a talented person. I remember his performances on the 'KVN' show. It was funny. But what we see now isn't funny. It's not a comedy. It's a tragedy."
Russian defense spending
Moscow's military expenditures are but a fraction of Washington's, and Putin is reducing them in favor of social programs even as other powers are ramping up theirs, but that does not mean the Russian military is weak:
"No other country has such state-of-the-art high-tech weaponry like ours. I'm talking primarily about our hypersonic missile technologies."

Comment: More comments from the 'Direct Line' Q&A session.

On defense spending:
Russia manages to remain a great military power despite decreasing its defense budget, while other countries keep pumping money into their armies, Vladimir Putin said, during his annual Direct Line Q&A session.

"We are probably the only great military power that is reducing its defense spending," the President pointed out. At around $48 billion, "Russia is just seventh in the world in absolute value" when it comes to the size of the military budget, he reminded his audience. "We are surpassed -sizably- by the US, which spends $720 billion dollars" and by other countries, including Saudi Arabia, UK, France and Japan, he said.

But despite all this, Russia not only manages to maintain military and nuclear parity, but also to "surpass our competitors by two or three steps," he said, adding that "it's something to be proud of. No other country has such state-of-the-art high-tech weaponry like ours. I'm talking primarily about our hypersonic missile technologies."

Russia's defense budget, which stands at 2.9 percent of GDP in 2019, will drop to 2.87 percent next year and to 2.8 percent in 2021, according to the head of state.
"The trend to reduce military spending is there," but defense remains an important expenditure for the state, he said, remembering a famous quote: "If you don't want to feed your army - get ready to feed someone else's."
On sanctions and EU losses:
Western economic restrictions have deprived the Russian economy of $50 billion, but the European Union has been hit harder, losing $240 billion since 2014, according Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Other countries also felt the impact of anti-Russian sanctions. The US, which does not have the biggest trade turnover with Russia, has lost $17 billion due to sanctions, while Japan lost $27 billion. "It affects the jobs in these countries, including the European Union. They lose our market," the Russian president stated.

Putin added that the West is unlikely to significantly change its attitude toward Russia anytime soon, so Russia must strengthen its economy to secure its "place under the sun."

Russia has managed to benefit from Western economic pressure, according to the president, as the country started phasing out imports and replacing them with domestically made products, even in sectors in which it did not have any experience. As an example, Putin said that prior to sanctions, Russia had never produced marine engines, but developed them out of necessity, with some even surpassing foreign analogues. The same applies to transport and power industry engineering, he added.
Putin's grand deal Syria:
Russia will not reach any agreement with the United States on the future of Syria at the cost of Syria itself or Moscow's interests and principles, President Vladimir Putin has said.

A journalist asked Putin if there would be a "grand deal" with the US on Syria as the country begins to recover from years of hostilities and destruction.

"What do you mean 'a grand deal'? Sounds like some commercial act. No. We don't sell out our allies, our interests or our principles," Putin said.

He said that Russia is willing to negotiate a political transition in Syria with various stakeholders. "Can it be done? I believe it can, provided there is goodwill of everyone involved in the conflict."

Putin highlighted Turkey and Iran as Russia's immediate partners in resolving the Syrian crisis, but said countries like the US, Israel, Egypt, and Jordan have legitimate interests in what happens in Syria as do the European nations, which were hurt by mass migration triggered by it. "We have to work together on it," he stressed.
On MH17 downing:
President Vladimir Putin has dismissed allegations by international investigators who have accused three Russians, one Ukrainian of using a surface-to-air missile, brought from Russia, to shoot down Malaysian Airlines flight MH17.

Asked whether he thought it was time for Russia to acknowledge responsibility for the shooting down of the plane, with the loss of almost 300 lives, Putin said there was nothing to acknowledge.

"Russia never avoids responsibility that is actually hers to bear. What we were presented as proof of Russia's guilt absolutely doesn't satisfy us. We believe it is no proof at all," he said.

"We have a version of our own, which we presented. But unfortunately nobody wants to listen to us. As long as we don't have real dialogue, we won't find the right answers to the questions about this tragedy and the deaths of people. We certainly mourn them and we believe such acts are intolerable."
US war on Iran could cause 'disaster' in Middle East:
It's hard to calculate Iran's response to a potential US invasion, Vladimir Putin has said, adding that assaulting the Gulf state could bring "disaster" to the entire Middle East region.

There are voices in the US calling for a military action against Iran, but hopefully, such a scenario will never come true, Putin admitted on Thursday. An all-out invasion of Iran could trigger "a disaster in the region" due to the spike in violence and, possibly, waves of refugees fleeing for safety. That aside, "anyone attempting to do this" would also pay a price, he cautioned. "It is hard to foresee what happens if military force is used."

Iran is a Shiite country and Iranians have a reputation as people that go to extremes if their country is attacked, according to Putin. "No one knows what those extremes will bring and it's hard to say who will be affected."



Arrow Up

How Ukraine will be coerced into making peace with Donbass

ladder in Ukraine
© the Nation
A way out?
Ukraine is important for the US only in the context of their relationship with Russia, and blocks the path to their improvement. The latest statement of the national security adviser to the US President John Bolton became yet more proof of this. On the eve of Putin and Trump's meeting in Osaka, Kiev ought to prepare for the US playing the Ukrainian card without paying attention to the interests of the Kiev authorities.

Washington tries to defreeze American-Russian relations - but in such a way that it does not look [like] a concession made by the US. Donald Trump is not constrained by the case of "Russian ties" any more, however the Ukrainian crisis remains the main problem for his dialogue with Putin.

It arose during Barack Obama's reign and is in many respects connected with the objective process of returning to Russia the status of a major world power. The events of 2014 became the most convenient reason for the US to transition to an active phase of "deterring Russia". The policy of sanctions and attempts to isolate Russia on the world scene not only failed - their results were opposite to American expectations.

Comment: See also:


Dollars

Shanahan out, Esper in: The revolving door of industry to defense keeps MIC profits churning

RaytheonGuyEsper
© Joe Gromelski/Stars and Stripes
Raytheon's Mark Esper appointed Acting Secretary of Defense
The replacement of one weapons industry lobbyist with another as the acting US defense secretary is just "business as usual" - and, in the US, appointing industry men to key government positions is nothing new, analysts tell RT.

Acting US defense secretary Patrick Shanahan, a former Boeing executive, stepped down earlier this week, to be replaced by Mark Esper, an ex-vice president of government relations at Raytheon.

The defense department is essentially a "procurement agency" for buying military equipment and weapons and is actually more a "money entity" than a "military entity," former US diplomat and political analyst Jim Jatras has told RT.

"This is a self-perpetuating system of enrichment for the companies that are involved," Jatras said, explaining that there was "nothing new going on" with Esper replacing Shanahan - except that it might just be a bit "more obvious" this time.

Jatras' view was echoed by retired US Air Force officer Karen Kwiatkowski, who told RT that spending massive amounts of money on weapons is essentially the Pentagon's most major role. "That's all the Pentagon is. The Pentagon is a way to spend taxpayer dollars on mainly American industries. It's almost a laundering operation in terms of spending money," Kwiatkowski said.

Comment: See also:


Question

Who really has Trump's ear - John Bolton or Tucker Carlson?

TrumpEar
© Reuters/Jonathan Ernst
President Donald Trump
As tensions with Iran threaten to spill over into war, the big question is who has sway over President Donald Trump, his hawkish advisers or a cautious Fox News host, and the answer might make all the difference.

According to the Washington Post, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is drawing his own "red lines" on Iran, while National Security Advisor John Bolton controls what Trump sees and hears, insulating the president from opinions different from his hard-line position when it comes to dealing with Tehran.


Meanwhile, the Daily Beast claims that it's Tucker Carlson who actually has Trump's ear when it comes to Iran. The prime-time Fox News host, who once supported George W. Bush's attack on Iraq, has renounced that position and become an outspoken critic of US military adventurism.


Comment: See also:


Footprints

Trump: Troops will leave Afghanistan 'soon', drop numbers to 8K as US-Taliban talks approach

Lt. Reicheiderfer
© CC by 2.0/The US Army
1st Lieutenant Chris Richeiderfer, Executive Officer of Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Squadron, 91st Cavalry Regiment (airborne) at Forward Operating Base Naray, Afghanistan.
The United States is "doing fine" in Afghanistan and will soon see its troops in the Islamic republic halved to 8,000 soldiers, President Donald Trump said in an interview with Time magazine amid nearing US-Taliban talks. Trump said in the Thursday interview:
"As you know in Afghanistan, when I got there, it was 16,000 people. It's now 9,000 people. And some good things are happening there frankly. No, I'd like to get out of the Middle East, we should have never been in the Middle East. We should have never been there, and I'd like to get out."
He reiterated that he was always against spending billions of dollars and losing an "unbelievable numbers of lives" on both sides.
"It was a terrible decision to go in. It's quicksand. Always has been, always will be. And we're doing just fine. We did ISIS [Islamic State terror organization, banned in Russia]. We're doing fine in terms of Afghanistan. We're down to half - we'll soon be down to about 8,000 soldiers."

Calendar

Remaining JCPOA signatories to meet in bid to save accord

Mogherini
© Azer News
EU Foreign Policy Chief Frederica Mogherini
The remaining signatories to the landmark 2015 Iran nuclear deal plan to meet next week in an effort to save the accord, the European Union says.

In a statement on June 20, the EU said senior officials from Iran, France, Germany, Britain, China, and Russia will meet on June 28 in Vienna to discuss the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

The officials will look at ways to "tackle challenges arising from the withdrawal and reimposition of sanctions by the United States on Iran," the EU said.

"The meeting has been called with the intention of ensuring the continued implementation of the JCPOA in all its aspects and discuss ways to tackle challenges arising from the withdrawal and reimposition of sanctions by the United States on Iran, as well as recent announcements by Iran regarding the implementation of its nuclear commitments," the EU said.

Attention

The real warmongers? Not who you think!

TrumpTroops
© KDRV.com
The real warmongers are the people who care less about human lives and more about clicks and sales of their reporting.

John Bolton. Mike Pompeo. The US warmongering senators of the past and now. The late John McCain. American colonialists or imperialists. All of these people are no doubt getting absolutely lambasted today and in coming days as warmongers, in the news surrounding the apparent downing of an American Navy RQ-4A Global Hawk in the area near the Strait of Hormuz early Thursday morning, local time. The only problem is that they are not the real warmongers. The real warmongers are far, far worse than any of the named people above.

President Trump's name is not on the list above, but that is not because he is a warmonger. In fact, anyone following his actions through his presidency knows that he is not at all interested in the continuation of pursuing foreign wars everywhere. And as we will see, he is in fact one of the most significant voices of reason in this current episode.

The biggest warmonger is the most selfish of all, because through that warmonger's actions, thousands, or even millions of people could be sent to their deaths.

Have you guessed who the biggest warmonger is?

Oil Well

Oil prices surge following Hormuz drone attack, could lead to global recession say experts

US Navy guys
© Reuters
US Navy in the Strait of Hormuz
Global crude prices have jumped on foot of the escalating tensions in the Middle East, where a US military drone was shot down by Iranian forces over the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for oil supplies.

RT's Boom Bust talked to David McAlvany of McAlvany Financial Group and to former Pentagon Official Michael Maloof, to discuss various aspects of the incident.

"It will be very disconcerting throughout the Gulf because not only oil and gas travel over there but a lot of commerce... for all those countries in the Persian Gulf. So, I think overnight we will all have a global recession set in," Maloof warned.

David McAlvany added that "It also raises the stakes for China. They are still bringing in quite a bit of the Iranian oil. Of course, it puts pressure on the rial, continues to put pressure on the Iranian people and the Iranian economy. So, these are all critical elements to a reduction of exports..."


Bullseye

Does the US have any real options vis a vis Iran?

Trump rouhani
Let's analyze, with the least aggressive options first:

Ending US Treasury Sanctions Waivers for Iran

Presently, Iraq purchases gas and electricity directly from Iran by waiver, and civilian nuclear products are likewise exported from Iran to Japan, Russia,

China and to some European countries. While all US waivers could be ended as a "measured response" to Iran's alleged 'misbehavior' it is more than likely that both China and Russia will continue to do business with Iran as per usual, or even accelerate their trade.

Since full sanctioning authority invested in the US Treasury has already been imposed versus Iran, there are few-to-none real options for imposing additional US sanctions on Iran. Other US Treasury options such as limiting Iran's access to the global financial system, gold market, and SWIFT system are already in effect

Vader

Understanding America's "regime change" strategy in Russia, and why it's failed so far

Putin
In what is a very timely admission taking into account the topic of my last article - 21st century international relations and decision-making, the head of Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (Служба внешней разведки Российской Федерации), Sergey Naryshkin, pointed to a low risk method of "hybrid" warfare and named a specific example where it is being implemented. RT reported the following on June 18th (emphasis my own):
"Western secret services are perfecting clandestine tools which are designed to weaken countries like viruses weaken bodies, the Russian foreign intelligence chief has said. This kind of warfare is currently used in Venezuela.

The criticism came from Sergey Naryshkin, who heads Russia's foreign intelligence agency SVR. He said spies are constantly improving the tool used to dispose of governments that the West does not like.

'We are talking about creating a universal algorithm for conducting clandestine influence operations in a continuous manner and on a global scale,' he said. According to the official, this clandestine work 'never stops and targets not only enemies, but also friends and neutral powers in the times of peace, crisis and war.'