Puppet Masters
Shah Mahmood Qureshi's comments came after tensions over a February standoff between the arch enemies had appeared to ease.
He said on Sunday that an attack could take place between April 16 and 20, adding that Pakistan had told the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council of its concerns.
"India rejects the irresponsible and preposterous statement by the foreign minister of Pakistan with a clear objective of whipping up war hysteria in the region," a spokesman for India's foreign office said in a statement.
"This public gimmick appears to be a call to Pakistan-based terrorists to undertake a terror attack in India."
The foreign office said India reserved the right to respond firmly and decisively to any cross border militant attack, accusing Pakistan of being complicit in such attacks on India.
Comment: Evil personified
- Psychopath Cheney: Nothing illegal in CIA interrogations!
- "If I would have to do it all over again, I would": Dick Cheney stands by his love of torture
- Remorseless psychopath Dick Cheney never apologized to man he shot
- Cheney admits that he lied about 9/11
- Darth Cheney: Pure Evil, or Just 99 Percent Evil?
- New book by Dick Cheney reveals his psychopathic vision for America - war, torture and mass surveillance
"Most of the information they have, they had read in the newspapers. And I got the impression that both the family of Dawn Sturgess and that of Charlie Rowley have not been adequately informed as to what happened to the pair in Amesbury and what happened in Salisbury before," Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko said after the meeting with Rowley.
They never received any official reports... [Charlie Rowley and his brother] had a lot of questions for us, and I was happy to answer all of them.Whatever small information Moscow has managed to gather about the incidents, with a total lack of cooperation from the UK side, was passed on to the brothers - and most of it was a "total revelation" for them, Yakovenko said. "They are ordinary people, reading British newspapers. What could they know - only what they are offered by the press. So it's good to have an alternative point of view and understand Russia's line of reasoning."
Comment: The Sunday Mirror has given a notably different take on the meeting:
Rowley said he went to the Russian Embassy "to ask them 'Why did your country kill my girlfriend?' but I didn't really get any answers," he told the Sunday Mirror newspaper, which arranged the meeting.If that's what the ambassador said, he's right, and that's the implication of what all the experts have said too, that 'novichok' is extremely deadly. And the fact that the traces found were high in purity makes it even stranger. By all accounts, the nerve agent should have killed everyone involved.
"I just got Russian propaganda," he said.
...
"I liked the ambassador, but I thought some of what he said trying to justify Russia not being responsible was ridiculous," said Rowley. "The ambassador kept saying the substance definitely wasn't the Novichok [the Russians] had made because if it was it would have killed everyone."
In a series of tweets after meeting with visiting Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi in Tehran on April 6, the Iranian leader questioned the motives of the United States, saying it opposes Iraq's "current democratic setting."
"U.S. military presence in Iraq is detrimental to countries and nations of the region. You should take actions to make the U.S. withdraw its troops from Iraq because wherever they have had enduring presence, forcing them out has become problematic," he said in the first of five tweets.
"The U.S. pursues goals beyond simply maintaining military presence in Iraq. They seek enduring presence and interests as well as forming a government like the military states that existed during the early years of occupying Iraq," he added.
The Iraqi prime minister is on a two-day visit to neighboring Iran as the countries seek to expand commercial ties.
Comment: The Iran-Iraq relationship has been yet another own goal for the U.S. Their invasion and occupation of Iraq only pushed Iraq closer to Iran, to the point where Iran has a lot of influence among the current Iraqi leadership. And there's very little the U.S. can do about it at this point, thankfully. See also:
- Iran upstages US in Iraq with Rouhani's three-day official visit
- Elijah Magnier: Sources say Iraqis may attack US forces, but only if they refuse to abide by future Parliamentary decision to leave Iraq
- Iraq's new PM Mahdi will balance US and Iranian interests

FILE PHOTO: A US Air Force F-35A Lightning II participates in a training mission near Kunsan Air Base in South Korea on December 1, 2017.
Pyongyang decried the deployment as an "unfriendly act" and warned that this step only "exacerbates tensions" while being "a direct challenge to the peace efforts." A piece published on the North Korean Uriminzokkiri news portal also called on Seoul to think about the potentially "catastrophic consequences" the deployment of the new jets could cause.
Comment: Would the Korean peninsula have already achieved peace without US intervention?
The full nature of this secret parallel state would only come to light a decade later when the Italian premier, Giulio Andreotti, under questioning from a special commission of inquiry, revealed the existence of arms caches stashed all around the country and which were at the disposal of an organization which later came to be identified as 'Gladio'.
The members of this group turned out to include not only hundreds of far-right figures in the intelligence, military, government, media, Church and corporate sectors, but a motley assortment of unreconstructed WW2 fascists, psychopaths and criminal underworld types to boot. And despite Andreotti's attempts to airbrush the group as 'patriots' it appeared evident to much of the rest of the Italian polity that these seemed rather more like pretty bad folk indeed. Little did they know. Follow-up research by the likes of Daniele Ganser, Claudio Celani, Jurgen Roth and Henrik Kruger traced connections to similar groups spread throughout Europe of which all were found to be deep state terrorist organizations, and all of which were found, ultimately, to be subservient unto the highest levels of the CIA and NATO command structures.
The moniker 'Gladio' (after the two-edged sword used in classical Rome) was eventually broadened to include a bewildering host of related deep state terrorist structures including: 'P2' In Italy, 'P26' in Switzerland, 'Sveaborg' in Sweden, 'Counter-Guerrilla' in Turkey and 'Sheepskin' in Greece. This (hardly definitive) European list was then found to have connections not only to virtually every US sponsored secret state terrorist organization the world over (including the likes of Operation Condor in Latin America), but also to many of the global drug cartels that provided the secretive wealth needed to fund and otherwise lubricate the whole rotting, corrupt shebang.
If all this sounds sinister enough, it pales in light of the detailed structure of the dazzlingly diabolical Gladio edifice. And it is to those details we now repair vis a vis an overview of the remarkable, if otherwise unheralded, 2015 work by journalist Paul L. Williams entitled, 'Operation Gladio: The Unholy Alliance Between the Vatican, the CIA and the Mafia'. Though there are other books on the subject worthy of honourable mention (including Daniele Ganser's seminal tome, 'NATO's Secret Armies', and Richard Cottrell's recent and stylishly written, 'Gladio: NATO's Dagger at the Heart of Europe'), it is to Williams that I believe we owe a particular debt of gratitude in having provided a more or less fully integrated portrait of the global machinations of Operation Gladio.
Before embarking on our grim, if yet fascinating, journey it is worth first noting that whilst 'Gladio' was officially acknowledged and condemned by the European Parliament (in Nov., 1990; Washington and NATO having ever after refused 'comment' on the matter), and its multifarious organs and factions ordered dismantled, it is hardly likely that the latter was ever fully enacted. The historical context of 'Gladio', then, is really the quintessential backdrop to understanding the trademark false flag events of the modern era.
The US Africa Command announced Sunday that it was pulling out a small contingent, which was deployed in Libya a few years ago to assist airstrikes against forces loyal to the terrorist group Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS). The move came in response to the latest escalation of violence in the country.
"Due to increased unrest in Libya, a contingent of US forces supporting US Africa Command temporarily relocated in response to security conditions on the ground," AFRICOM said in a statement.
"We will continue to monitor conditions on the ground and assess the feasibility for renewed US military presence, as appropriate," said Nate Herring, an AFRICOM spokesman.
After boasting that he was responsible for U.S. President Donald Trump's declaration recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, Netanyahu told the program Meet the Press:
"Will we move ahead to the next stage? Yes. I will extend sovereignty but I don't distinguish between the settlement blocs and the isolated ones, because each settlement is Israeli and I will not hand it over to Palestinian sovereignty.""I will not divide Jerusalem, I will not evacuate any community and I will make sure we control the territory west of Jordan," Netanyahu told the show's host, Rina Matzliah.
Comment: None of the candidates bode any good for the future.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange waves to supporters as he prepares to make a statement to the media and supporters at a balcony of the Ecuadorian Embassy in central London, Thursday, Dec. 20, 2012.
Due to recent claims made by WikiLeaks on Twitter that Julian Assange will be forcibly removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London in a matter of "hours or days," MintPress News has brings you this editorial first published last June by journalist Whitney Webb in order to again highlight the dangerous precedent for journalism, free speech and much more the end of Assange's asylum - and his likely extradition to the United States - would set.Today marks the sixth anniversary of Julian Assange's ascent to the position of the world's most well-known political refugee after daring to be the public face of the ground-breaking transparency organization WikiLeaks. Arbitrarily detained in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for more than half a decade, Assange's precarious situation - a product of the U.S. and U.K. governments' efforts to destroy and silence him forever - threatens to devolve into tragedy.
If Assange's asylum is suspended or he is extradited to the United States, however, it will be much more than a personal tragedy for Assange. It will also be a tragedy for the public's "right to know" and the free flow of information - the first major loss to an empire's battle to quash dissent and silence those who seek to use information to liberate rather than deceive.
Assange's case means much more than the severe mistreatment - torture, as some have said - of a single man whose commitment to bringing the dark deeds of government crimes to light has forced him to sacrifice seeing the outside world - even his own children - for the better part of a decade. Though his mistreatment has no place in any civilized "democracy," the outcome of Assange's case - if his extradition to the United States does come to pass - will have a powerful impact for journalism as a whole. Indeed, if the U.S.-led campaign to extradite and silence Assange is successful, it will invariably become the blueprint used by powerful governments like the U.S. to silence independent journalists the world over, and bludgeon them into submission.
Comment: Your hatred of Assange is irrelevant: His prosecution will strike a devastating blow to press freedom around the world
The facts are that prosecuting Julian Assange under the Espionage Act for exposing US war crimes, as the Trump administration is attempting to do, would strike a devastating blow to press freedoms around the world. This is because there are no legal distinctions in place separating an outlet like WikiLeaks from outlets like the New York Times, the Washington Post, or the Guardian, meaning that a precedent would be set allowing for the prosecution of those outlets on the same grounds, who also publish anonymous government leaks.See also:
- You don't have to love Assange to fear his prosecution
- The Assange case will define 'freedom of the press' in the 21st century
- Chris Hedges: The war on Assange is a war on press freedom
Beware Agenda 21 and its Green New Deal!
Seemingly overnight, the Green New Deal has arrived. Given the sorry state of our environment, what possible objections could there be? In this case, plenty - and they all trace back to the Green New Deal's deeply complex and surreptitious ties to UN Agenda 21.
Those who claim that Agenda 21 amounts to little more than a right-wing rant or is somehow anti-Semitic are at best seriously misinformed. Those who buy into the carefully crafted jargon of Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, Redevelopment and the Green New Deal are similarly misinformed and need to know that the environmental movement has in fact been highjacked by the Agenda 21 plan.
First, Some Background
Journalist Thomas L. Friedman is sometimes credited with being the original source for the term "Green New Deal" because in two 2007 articles, in the New York Times and The New York Times Magazine, Friedman connected FDR's "New Deal" to a new "green" economy, suggesting that this might provide an economic stimulus program that could address economic inequality and climate change at the same time. Almost prophetically, Friedman also argued in earlier writings that an "iron fist inside a velvet glove" would be needed to maintain the coming new world order.













Comment: See also: