Welcome to Sott.net
Thu, 30 Sep 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Rocket

North Korea rejects offer of almost three million Covid-19 jabs

Kim Jong-un
© Reuters
North Korea has cast doubt over the efficacy of Chinese-made vaccines
North Korea has asked that almost three million Covid-19 jabs offered to it be redirected elsewhere, the UN says.

A spokesperson said the country had asked that the shots be relocated to harder hit nations in view of global vaccine shortages.

Chinese-made Sinovac shots were offered under the Covax programme which aims to help poorer nations obtain vaccines.

Comment: It looks like the Rocketman is smarter and braver than most of the "democratic" world leaders. He knows what is going on in the world, and he won't allow the PTB's Corona circus to have a show in his country.

See also:


Shoe

Russian foreign minister warns that US could try to kidnap athletes it deems a 'threat' under new anti-doping act opposed by WADA

lavrov olympic athletes
© Kirby Lee / USA Today Sports via Reuters | Pavel Golovkin / Reuters
Sergei Lavrov has voiced concerns over the treatment of athletes by the USA.
A new US law aimed at prosecuting doping offenders at international sporting events could be used to kidnap athletes and take them to the US illegally, Russia's foreign minister has warned.

Former US president Donald Trump signed the 'Rodchenkov Act' last December, allowing his country to impose criminal sanctions on athletes involved in doping at international events which involve American athletes, sponsors or broadcasters.

The law, which empowers officials to pursue fines of up to $1 million, jail terms of up to 10 years and restitution to victims, was described by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) as "unilaterally exerting US criminal jurisdiction over all global doping activity".

Comment: Once again, the US is attempting to install itself as the world police with planetary jurisdiction. How they think other countries will stand for this is mind boggling.

See also:


Syringe

Engdahl: Scandal behind the FDA fake approval of Pfizer jab

US Government regulator for drugs
The US Government regulator for drugs, the Food and Drug Administration, has just announced that it has voted full approval for the mRNA genetic vaccine of Pfizer and BioNTech, or did they? This supposed new status is being used by the Biden Administration and many states and companies to impose mandatory vaccinations. The notoriously conflicted Biden covid adviser, Tony Fauci of the NIAID, using that ruling, is calling for national mandatory vaccination for the country. What is not being revealed is the cesspool of corruption and conflicts of interest between the FDA and the major drug companies, including Pfizer, that stand behind the rushed approval. And it's not full approval for Pfizer's jab, only for BioNTech's legally different vaccine.

"...final stamp of approval"?

On August 23 as the FDA announced full approval for the Pfizer mRNA gene-edited substance. Or not quite, when the full papers of FDA are studied. Fauci, whose NIAID has financial interest in the vaccine, referred to the FDA decision as the "final stamp of approval." It is however anything but final or an impartial, scientific rigorous medical evaluation. Rather it is a politically-motivated decision by an FDA that is corrupt beyond the imagination of most people.

Backtracking on its statement in 2020 that it would hold normal FDA advisory committee hearings with independent experts to discuss the Pfizer application for full approval, now the FDA told the British Medical Journal that they did not believe a meeting was necessary ahead of granting full approval of what is the most controversial vaccine in modern history. The BMJ quotes Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on the FDA's Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, "These [FDA] public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorization."

Sherlock

China erases billionaire actress & businesswoman Zhao Wei from the internet

Zhao Wei
© Ian Gavan/Getty Images for Jaeger-LeCoultre
Zhao Wei at the Venice Film Festival on September 10, 2016.
One of China's most famous and richest actresses has been completely erased and the Chinese government is thought to be behind it.

She has millions of adoring fans. She's worth billions of dollars. But Beijing has all but erased actress Zhao Wei from history. And they won't say why.

Zhao's name won't be immortal. Her entire internet existence has been scrubbed.

All serials and chat shows featuring her have vanished from major Chinese online streaming sites. She no longer even appears in the online credits for the movies she appears in.

Comment: What exactly happened with billionaire businesswoman Zhao Wei remains to be seen, but erasing someone from the internet, on the face of it, appears to be a rather extreme, and not necessarily constructive, move.

However, with regards to the other issues highlighted, clearly China is taking a stand against demoralization and corruption in its society. Whether Westerners would agree with how it's set on achieving these goals is another issue. But, considering the state of the West these days, it can hardly claim to be a model that should be emulated.

See also:


Whistle

Evidence mounts that Biden manufactured weeks-long false narrative on Afghanistan

Biden
© AP
US President Joe Biden
The long saga of the Russia collusion scandal — during which law enforcement, media, political operatives and intelligence assets manufactured a two-year illusion of a Trump-Russia conspiracy that did not exist — raised questions about a new era of political warfare in which false realities could be foisted upon the American public.

The bungled, bloody U.S. exit from Afghanistan now has some fearing the Biden administration practiced deception by omission and commission to create a two-month false narrative that misled Congress and the American public by making the situation in and around Kabul look better than it was.

Two powerful pieces of evidence emerged this week that strongly suggest the Afghan exit wasn't just a case of incompetence but rather an intentional effort to use PR lipstick to disguise a Biden plan that was secretly willing to accept chaos and stranded Americans as a possible outcome to avoid further military casualties during the exit.

On Wednesday, Reuters published a leaked transcript of a call that quoted Biden asking the soon-to-flee Afghan president Ashraf Ghani to offer a narrative to change the "perception" of the Taliban's rapid advance in Afghanistan, "whether it is true or not." Biden is quoted as as telling the Afghan president:
"I need not tell you the perception around the world and in parts of Afghanistan, I believe, is that things are not going well in terms of the fight against the Taliban. And there is a need, whether it is true or not, there is a need to project a different picture."
The White House did not dispute the account of the July 23 call, even though it suggested that an American president asked a foreign leader to assist in creating a potentially fake story.

Propaganda

Jewish Chronicle's libel payouts were a small price to pay for smearing Corbyn and the left

News headline/Corbyn
© Pete Byrne/PA Wire/PA Images/The Jewish Chronicle/KJN
News Headlines • Jeremy Corbyn
The Jewish Chronicle, a weekly newspaper that was saved from liquidation last year by a consortium led by a former senior adviser to Theresa May, has been exposed as having a quite astonishing record of journalistic failings.

Over the past three years, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), the misnamed and feeble "press regulator" created by the billionaire-owned corporate media, has found the paper to have breached its code of practice on at least 28 occasions. The weekly has also lost, or been forced to settle, at least four libel cases over the same period.

According to Brian Cathcart, a professor of journalism at Kingston University in London, that means one in every four or five editions of the Chronicle has broken either the law or the IPSO code. He describes that, rather generously, as a "collapse of journalistic standards" at the paper.

IPSO, led by Lord Edward Faulks, a former Conservative minister, has repeatedly failed to launch any kind of formal investigation into this long-term pattern of rule and law-breaking by the Jewish Chronicle. He has also dragged his feet in responding to calls from a group of nine individuals maligned by the paper that IPSO urgently needs to carry out an inquiry into the paper's editorial standards.

Bad Guys

What Afghanistan's Saigon moment teaches us about America's 'humanitarian wars'

Chopper/Soldier
© Antonio Olmos/The Observer
US Army helicopter evacuates injured soldier of the 101st Airborne in Panjwai district, 2010.
What we've just witnessed in Afghanistan is a historical repeat of the 'Saigon moment'. But the final hours of the US occupation have been accompanied by a cacophony of neocons decrying the decision to end the war.

They cite women's rights, regional stability and anti-terrorism as reasons the US should have remained in Afghanistan. But those were the very reasons cited for starting the war in the first place, back in 2001. How many more decades do they expect the world to be held hostage to the narratives of 'the humanitarian war'? It's now, at the end of the US's longest war, that we must reflect on the past 20 years, and consider how it was that those false "humanitarian" narratives led us to this point.

Some of the most grave human rights violations occurred at the very onset of the war.

In the first months, the US dropped thousands of yellow cluster bombs around Afghan villages. They resembled aid packages - also yellow. Children would rush to collect what they believed to be food, only to end up dead after picking up and setting off an explosive device.

In an incident now known as 'the convoy of death', Taliban fighters who surrendered to the Afghan Northern Alliance were stuffed into sealed shipping containers and allowed to asphyxiate as they were driven across the desert - allegedly under the watchful eye of the CIA.

Syringe

Catherine Austin Fitts' approach for dealing with vaccine mandates

Catherine Austin Fitts
© Uvacall
Catherine Austin Fitts
"If I taught a college course, I'd take students through a year of tracking a descending trail of government documents, moving down into finer and finer detail as we go; and at the bottom of the trail, which is Hell, we would either find a vacuum, nothing at all, no meaning, a blank; or the clear evidence of intent to do great harm, and to evade discovery. That's where the details take you, when you break them down far enough."
-Richard Bell
My longtime friend and colleague, Catherine Austin Fitts, who founded and heads up a marvelous and essential organization, Solari (solari.com), has suggested an approach to dealing with vaccine mandates.

This is an individual strategy, and it's much more. It could open a wide legal and financial doorway for every person who wants to exercise free choice when it comes to COVID vaccination.

Comment: See also:


Airplane

'Righteous' drone strike in Kabul killed 'at least one' ISIS-K terrorist, Pentagon says amid reports of seven dead children

Milley
© Michael Reynolds/AP
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley
The US drone strike in Kabul that allegedly killed seven children was "righteous," followed proper procedures, and eliminated "at least one" person who was a "facilitator" for ISIS-K terrorists, the top US military officer said.

Sunday's strike had targeted a vehicle in Kabul, which the US Central Command said represented an "imminent" threat to the evacuation efforts ongoing at Hamid Karzai International Airport at the time.

Local media and the Taliban, however, said that 10 civilians were killed as a result - seven of them children.

Addressing reporters at the Pentagon on Wednesday, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley repeated the claim by CENTCOM that "secondary explosions" were evidence that the vehicle was intended to attack the airport. He told the reporters:

"At this point, we think that the procedures were correctly followed, and it was a righteous strike and that "at least one" person who was killed was a "facilitator" for the terrorist group Islamic State Khorasan (ISIS-K). It was ISIS-K that claimed responsibility for last Thursday's suicide bombing outside the airport, which killed an estimated 200 Afghans and 13 US troops.

"Were the others killed? Yes. Who are they? We don't know," Milley said, adding there would be an investigation.

Initially, CENTCOM said that there were "no indications" of civilian casualties from the "self-defense" strike.

Comment: The US general implies blowing up seven children was an acceptable tradeoff for one possible terrorist. No apology necessary. It's just standard procedure.


Family

Pro-Life Win: SCOTUS lets Texas six week abortion ban stand

abortion ruling
© Getty Images/AFP/M. Ngan
Supreme Court ruling on Texas law
In a pro-life victory, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 5-4 on Wednesday not to block the new Texas law banning most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy while legal challenges to that law proceed in lower courts.

A narrow majority of justices held that the abortion-provider plaintiffs had failed to meet the high standard required for the Supreme Court to issue an injunction blocking a law before it goes into effect.

Signed in May by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R), Senate Bill 8 effectively bans abortions in the Lone Star State the moment a fetal heartbeat is detected, which often occurs after six weeks of pregnancy. Since women do not often detect pregnancy prior to the sixth week, the law effectively bans abortions in the state. Multiple states have tried to implement similar measures only to be blocked by the courts.

The five-justice majority of Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, and Trump-appointed Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett did not issue a published opinion with their decision, so the precise reasoning of the Court remains unclear, including whether the Texas law would survive a constitutional challenge on the merits when that question is squarely before the Supreme Court.