Puppet Masters
You might think that when two honest men, with nothing to gain and much to lose, speak the truth about a major scandal in a body which might one day decide between world war and peace, that the world would immediately do the right thing.
You would be utterly wrong.
In the movies, the dissenters would quickly be recognised as the heroes of the story, their bosses would admit to doing wrong. The media would celebrate their courage. And the matter would be set right.
But the case of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) shows that it would be foolish to expect that to happen. The OPCW is an agency of the UN. It exists to ensure impartial and rigorous inspection of the alleged use of chemical weapons. But it is now charged with being neither impartial nor rigorous.
An important story has been widely ignored, to the lasting shame of Western journalism. The organisation involved has made no move to correct the wrong. The individuals involved have been unfairly attacked by their own former employer.
Politicians have continued to repeat claims based on documents which have been gravely challenged, as if nothing had happened.

Women loyal to the Houthi movement parade to show support to the movement in Sanaa, Yemen
Revolutionary Guard Aerospace Force Commander Brig. Gen. Amir-Ali Hajizadeh has called on Iran's partners in the unofficial 'Axis of Resistance' alliance to join together to defeat the US and Israel.
"All countries of the Axis of Resistance are united, and we must join hands to kick American troops out of the region and annihilate the Zionist regime," Hajizadeh said, speaking to Yemen's pro-Houthi al-Masirah television.
Comment: Is the Middle East's "axis of resistance" in a better or worse position post-Soleimani?
Short answer: Yes.

Mike Pompeo, Wang Yi and Mark Esper at the Munich Security Conference
"Huawei and other Chinese state-backed tech companies are Trojan horses for Chinese intelligence," Pompeo said in a speech at the Munich Security Conference on Saturday. The US secretary of state took on the Chinese tech giant while speaking about what he believes are the biggest threats to modern security.
Mirroring Pompeo's sentiments, US Secretary of Defense Mark Esper told the conference that Washington would like to see "allied and US tech companies" develop their own technologies in order to compete with Chinese firms.
Comment: China fires back:
Beijing has issued a scathing rebuke of Mike Pompeo's claim that China is involved in covert activities as part of its desire to obtain greater power, noting that the allegation might be true - if he were referring to Washington.It doesn't seem to matter how many times Huawei assures the Deep State neocons it has no intention of conducting intelligence activities or how many other cyber experts confirm those assertions. China bad is the message for the masses.
"All these accusations against China are lies, not based on facts," Foreign Minister Wang Yi told the Munich Security Conference on Saturday. "But if we replace the subject of the lie from China to America, maybe those lies become facts?"
Washington has repeatedly claimed that Huawei poses an existential security threat to its allies. However, these allegations have been largely dismissed by Europe. The UK has already decided to allow Huawei limited participation in its 5G network, and countries such as Germany, Portugal and Italy have been vocal critics of US pressure to cut all ties with the Chinese firm.
- Huawei ready to work with foreign nations to eliminate security concerns
- Belgian cybersecurity agency determines there are no security threats from Huawei tech
- No-brainer: German cyber watchdog BSI says no evidence that Huawei spies
- Huawei set to abate 'spying fears' by signing 'no-back-door' agreement with India
- All snooping is bad but some is worse: Why is Huawei a worry if it's WhatsApp & Israel who messed up?
- Huawei getting most of its 5G contracts from Europe
- List of countries resisting US pressure to ban Huawei's 5G equipment
Do as we say, not as we do!

People gather in Tehran to mourn during a forty-day memorial for Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani, who was killed in a US air strike in January.
Comment: You mean, they ... lied? Imagine our total lack of shock.
Now over a month removed from the targeted killing of Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani, the White House on Friday has offered yet another rationale for the operation, the latest in a series of alternating arguments offered by the president and Pentagon officials.
"The president directed this action in response to an escalating series of attacks in preceding months by Iran and Iran-backed militias on United States forces and interests in the Middle East," the memo said.
While the document notes that the assassination was meant to "protect" American troops and "deter Iran" from future attacks, US President Donald Trump previously maintained Soleimani was killed specifically "because they were looking to blow up our embassy" - later expanding the alleged Iranian plot to four American embassies.
Defense Secretary Mark Esper initially questioned that assertion, telling CBS "I didn't see [a threat] to four embassies," but eventually came around to "the president's view," all the while providing no evidence for any of the conflicting accounts.
Comment: The Iranians have a sane view of the situation:
"It's unfortunate that the United States, based on misinformation, based on ignorance and arrogance, combined on a course that has brought the region very close to the brink. [...] We were very close to a war", Zarif said, cited by NBC News.
[Regarding the retaliatory strike on the American base in Iraq:] "We wanted to show to the United States that they could not bully Iran. Actions against Iran will have repercussions, but the intention was not to kill anybody [...] The intention was to send a message, a very clear message to the United States, that if they kill Iranians, we will hit back", Zarif said, cited by NBC News.
...
Zarif detailed that US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had written an "extremely inappropriate letter to Iran" at the height of the crisis in January, adding that this message contained "threats", although the Tehran diplomat carefully declined to cite the content.
"Let him say what he put in that letter", Zarif offered, cited by NBC News.
...
"The United States hit at the wrong place, at the wrong time, and these are the consequences and we can't control the consequences, nor can the United States. I mean, people are responsible for the consequences of their actions and I think people who initiated this, need to walk back", Zarif said, cited by NBC News.
More than forty days ago a US drone assassinated Major General Qassem Soleimani, leader of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) - Quds Brigade and leader of the "Axis of the Resistance". He was killed after midnight at Baghdad airport between the second and the third of January along with his companions. Has the "Axis of Resistance" been weakened by this event, and what has it achieved since then?
On the Syrian front, in an outstanding gain, the Syrian Army along with its allies from the Zoul-fi-Qar brigade and other partners liberated the 432 km Damascus-Aleppo road for the first time since it was blocked in 2012. It enlarged the security perimeter on its western flank. The strategic cities of Saraqeb, Rashedeen, Khan al-Asal have been liberated along with El-Eiss hil, a location that Major General Soleimani always wanted to free. Hezbollah lost 23 officers buried at the hill and wants to recover them to bring them back home.
Comment: Is the U.S., in all its arrogant, decades-long meddling, finally to reap the whirlwind?
The Philippines are a poor troubled island nation that is starting to get its house in order thanks mostly to a powerful charismatic central figure, but if we look at the country through the lens of "Geopolitics 101" then we can see that this nation has more value than one would think due to its location.
IISS data shows that in 2019 the United States, China, Saudi Arabia, Russia and India retained their positions as the world's top defence spenders. Indeed, the only movement in the top 15 saw Italy and Australia swap places, with Italy taking the 12th position and Australia the 13th (Figure 1).
The lack of change in the top 15 reflects an interesting underlying trend, in that the US has if anything just restated its spending dominance. In 2019, global defence spending rose by 4.0% in real terms over 2018 figures, but spending in the US grew by 6.6%. China's spending also rose by 6.6% over 2018 data, but the trajectory of the two states' defence spending is diverging. The budget increase in the US was the largest in ten years, and spending has increased year-on-year since US President Donald Trump took office. While spending is still rising in China, the pace of growth is decelerating, in line with Beijing's relative economic slowdown. This divergence in trajectories means that the spending gap between the two countries, which had narrowed since 2010, has since 2018 increased once more (Figure 2). It remains to be seen, however, if this trend will continue given Washington's plans for a more limited defence-spending increase in FY2021.
Comment: Meanwhile the US' output is increasingly riddled with flaws, and its position on the world stage becomes ever weaker:
- US' F-35 jet's gun can't shoot straight plus 873 software 'issues'
- Last-ditch attempt to stop Nord Stream 2: US Senate passes $740 BILLION Pentagon budget that includes Russian pipeline sanctions
- The Saker: Political implications of Russia's new weapons
- "Astonishing fraud": Pentagon stashes billions, spends it later to avoid accountability
However, government officials said no "concrete commitments" had been made.
China's state railway company said it could build the line in just five years and at a much lower cost, according to a letter seen by Building magazine.
But Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat warned letting CRCC build HS2 would be "extremely questionable".
It comes after Boris Johnson this week approved the controversial HS2 scheme.
This was despite an official review warning costs could reach over £100bn, against a budget of £62bn.
Comment: The UK is going to need a lot more than merely a high speed rail line to turn around its current trajectory. But, as it is, it could do a lot worse than work together with China to improve it's infrastructure:
- UK economy faces weakest growth since second world war
- UK ignores US pressure, allows Huawei 'limited' role in shaping 5G network
- UK: G4S privatized prison taken back under gov control due to appalling conditions and riots
- I spy with my little eye: Threats to civil liberties in Johnson's Queen's speech
The incident happened during an election conference held by the Prime Minister in Netanya.
According to reports, the 25-year-old woman who tossed the apple may have been aiming for Netanya's mayor, Miriam Feirberg, who was also present at the campaign.

U.S. President Barack Obama (right) toasts with Czech counterpart Vaclav Klaus and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev (right) after signing the New START accord in Prague in 2010.
A senior administration official told reporters in a White House briefing on February 14 that Beijing's silence on the matter raises questions about its intentions and will force the United States to strengthen its military readiness to counter any potential threat.
The Trump administration has said it wants an extension of New START -- which is set to expire in February 2021 -- to include China. The United States and Russia are the two signatories of the treaty that went into effect in 2011.
China, the third-largest nuclear power, is on track to double its nuclear arsenal over the next decade. However, China's arsenal would still be less than half of that of the United States and Russia.
Beijing has not publicly expressed any interest in such talks.
"Continued silence from China creates uncertainty about their intentions and only brings about the need for a renewed focus on deterrence and military readiness for the United States," the U.S. administration official said.











Comment: See also: