• The 'Deal of the Century' only entrenches Israel's apartheid state
• The Saker: Debunking the Putin and Netanyahu/Israel work together canard
• Yemen's Houthi rebels say they attacked Saudi oil giant Aramco, airport & other 'sensitive' targets
• 'Take it or leave it': Trump & Netanyahu unveil US-Israel 'peace plan' that could bring war to Middle East

• Behind the Headlines: Kurdistan and Catalonia: The Politics of Self-Determination
• NewsReal #26: Globalization vs Nationalism - The Hidden Causes of The Yellow Vest Protests in France

• Even if Tulsi Gabbard wins lawsuit against Clinton over 'Russian asset' smear, establishment Dems will stand behind Hillary
• You GO girl! Tulsi Gabbard announces $50 million defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton
• Hillary's attacks on Tulsi Gabbard offer more Democratic division than Moscow could ever imagine
• Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection - Tulsi hits back ... hard!

• 'Ban things I don't like': Elizabeth Warren slams Twitter's new ban on political ads after urging Facebook to censor opponents
• Soros signals Elizabeth Warren is the Deep State's presidential pick
• Thick as thieves: Warren and Killary talk behind the scenes as 2020 race intensifies

"In going so far as decreeing Jerusalem's status, the Deal of the Century clearly has echoes of the 19th century's age of empires which created the current impasse in the Middle East that inspires recurring terrorism," said Afshin Rattansi, host of RT's Going Underground.

His guest, former ambassador UK to the Palestinian Authority Sir Richard Dalton, noted that Trump's unilateral decision on Jerusalem's status is nothing short of "de facto violation of 2017 emergency UN resolution" and could even be seen by the international body as a "flagrant violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention."

Yet the Trump administration apparently believes that it has "the right to unilaterally defy" all these international norms, since it openly endorses Israel's illegal annexations, the diplomat added.

The US proposal is extremely unlikely to bring even a hint of peace to the Middle East, since Washington was apparently more concerned about pleasing its allies in Tel Aviv rather than offering a genuinely feasible solution to the decades-old conflict.

Palestinians "are being presented with a deal that was made exclusively between the US and Israel" and hardly has any regard for their interests at all, said former US diplomat Jim Jatras, adding that the deal looks more like an ultimatum than an agreement.

"Like everything else in this so-called plan, it is 'take it or leave it'," Jatras said. "That is what the US and Israel will offer you and if you do not take it, they will take more. I think that is why Trump said it was Palestinians' last chance."

Either they will settle to the deal offered to them or they will get nothing.

That is precisely why this proposal has been a "non-starter" from the very beginning, believes former Pentagon official Michael Maloof.

"If you are going to have an agreement you will need both sides to go along with it. Right now I do not see Palestinians going along with it," he told RT.

Jatras believes that getting Palestinians to sign the deal might not be the goal of this proposal, which opens the way for Israel to further annex Palestinian territories in the West Bank like the Jordan Valley, with an approval from Washington.

"I expect that to happen fairly soon. Trump said that the US will then recognize these annexations as they recognized the annexation of the Golan Heights," he said.

The pompous unveiling of the peace plan was "the latest act of political theater" by Trump, who has honed his double-speak skills by confusing and manipulating the American people and now hopes to repeat the same trick with the Palestinians, American comedian Lee Camp told RT.

"For decades he has lied, reneged, and stolen - and his 'Two State Solution' is no different. He and Netanyahu were joined at the announcement by ultra-Zionist billionaire Sheldon Adelson and many others who have pushed for and celebrated an endless array of war crimes," Camp noted, adding that the Palestinians were nowhere to be seen.

The Palestinian people were not a part of this process. They are being asked to surrender what remains of their rights and sovereignty.

The consensus across the board is that this "deal of the century" could actually bring war to the Middle East, not peace. Palestinians already fiercely oppose this proposal and attempts to shove it down their throats would only be met with more resistance, potentially leading to a full-blown conflict.

"Palestinians are already threatening a new Intifada as a result," Maloof said. "It would create a whole new dimension of violence in the region."

Jerusalem, including Al-Aqsa Mosque and all other holy sites, would remain under Israeli control. The Muslim and Christian sites would, however, be administered jointly by the PA and Israel.

Between 30 and 40 percent of Area C in the occupied West Bank will be annexed by Israel. Fifteen Israeli Jewish settlements would remain isolated and 60 settlement posts with 3,000 settlers will be dismantled.

The deal reportedly stipulates that the Palestinian state would have no control over its air space, borders, crossings and would have no power to hold any agreement with foreign countries.

It allegedly proposes a tunnel to connect Gaza to the West Bank, however, Israel has yet to agree to this because it believes the tunnel can be used for weapons smuggling.

The deal would require Hamas and Islamic Jihad to relinquish their arms.

January 28, 2020 could very well go down as the most mind-boggling day in the history of Israel and its relations with the United States. Against the backdrop of a White House audience of enthusiastic cheerleaders, in a ceremony that seemed to fuse a Donald Trump rally with a religious Zionist gala, the president pronounced a dramatic, pro-Israel shift in U.S. foreign policy and laid down a lopsided peace plan that exceeds any rational Israeli's wildest dreams.

Netanyahu's unilateral acceptance of Trump's plan is a measure of his vanity, audacity, increasing disdain for accepted procedures and norms, and, of course, growing desperation to extract himself - one way or the other - from his legal morass.

For anyone not wedded to the concept that Israel must ultimately annex all of its biblical lands, Trump's plan is undoubtedly the most pro-Israel peace proposal ever made - and, despite the president's claims to the contrary, the worst offer ever made to the Palestinians. Even if it was more evenhanded, just a cursory look at the map attached to Trump's plan makes clear just how unworkable it is: It keeps Israelis and Palestinians at each other's throats to a degree that makes former Yugoslavia seems like an island of tranquility.

Nonetheless, Trump's cavalier, condescending and seemingly self-defeating approach to Palestinians - which is expressed in the tone and content of his "vision" - represents Netanyahu's greatest triumph. The plan marginalizes Palestinians, ignores their core demands and determines their borders as if by imperial edict, at a time when they are divided among themselves and abandoned by their one-time allies in the Gulf. If Tuesday marked a zenith for Netanyahu, it was a day of unprecedented degradation and humiliation for most Palestinians.

Netanyahu and Dermer have long argued that Palestinians must give up their unrealistic dreams in order to achieve peace; now Trump has shot down their aspirations without waiting for approval. Netanyahu has long argued that Palestinians must be motivated economically but beaten into submission as far as their political aspirations are concerned. His theory will now be put the test.

Netanyahu has the Palestinians right where he's always wanted them. If he was wrong, as many believe, then Netanyahu's mistake, born of hubris and desperation, will cost countless Israeli and Palestinian lives. It seems increasingly likely, however, that if and when the Trump scheme collapses and things go south, Netanyahu won't be around to take responsibility, not that he'd ever consider it.