Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 05 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Document

Leaked Pentagon plan calls for sending 120,000 troops to the Middle East against Iran

iranian soldiers
As Michael Pompeo travels to Brussels to discuss the Iranian threat amid a flare-up in tensions that has brought the US to the brink of an armed conflict, the New York Times has published details from a confidential military plan presented to top national security officials that envisions sending as many as 120,000 troops to the Middle East should Iran attack American forces or start ramping up work on nuclear weapons (something it has promised to do if its European partners don't meet their commitments under the Iran deal).

Though the revised plan - it had been modified to incorporate suggestions from John Bolton - doesn't include plans for a land invasion, it does reflect "the influence of Mr. Bolton, one of the administration's most virulent Iran hawks, whose push for confrontation with Tehran was ignored more than a decade ago by President George W Bush."

It's unclear whether Trump himself has seen, or been briefed on, the plan. Asked about it, Trump said "we'll see what happens with Iran. If they do anything, it would be a very bad mistake."

Here are a few key details from the plan according to more than a half-dozen senior administration officials who spoke with the NYT:

Comment: See also:


Eye 1

Smearing Syria's Victory: The New York Times latest hit piece

syria
© REUTERS / Ammar Abdullah
The campaign is on for Syrian national forces to retake the last-remaining redoubt of militants in northwest Idlib. That might explain why the New York Times was prompted to publish a 5,000-word article based on flimsy anti-Syrian propaganda.

It is the Damascus government's sovereign right to recover all of its national territory, yet Western media are again trying to spin another "Aleppo-style" onslaught to discredit the Syrian army from its ultimate task.

This week Russia blocked a discussion at the UN Security Council on the grounds that Western powers were traducing the Idlib military operations as a criminal violation against innocent-sounding "rebels". Most of the militants holding out in Idlib province are foreign-backed mercenaries affiliated with internationally proscribed jihadist terror groups, such as Nusra Front or ISIS (Daesh in Arabic).

At this critical juncture along comes a suspicious New York Times' article published on May 11, headlined: 'Inside Syria's Secret Torture Prisons: How Assad Crushed Dissent'.

To be sure, the article is a re-run of a tired old story dating from 2014 when several Western media outlets had back then published sensational claims alleging a barbaric prison, torture and execution system overseen by President Bashar al-Assad.

Strangely, the NY Times seems to be only Western media outlet still pushing the story with its recent update, while other outlets have left it behind. The anomaly could be because the original "torture story" has since been convincingly debunked by several independent researchers. The main source for Western media claims was a mysterious, alleged Syrian military police defector nicknamed "Caesar". He was supposed to be a photographer working for Syrian military police who smuggled out tens of thousands images purporting to show how detainees were tortured, starved and beaten to death, among other horrors.

Comment: See also:


Bizarro Earth

What's behind the US embassy evacuations in Iraq?

army
© Reuters / Shannon Stapleton
Germany and the Netherlands halted training of Iraqi troops hours after the US said it will partially evacuate its Baghdad embassy. Amid growing tensions with Iran, analysts offered differing views on the reasons behind the moves.

Washington announced the partial evacuation of its embassy in Baghdad as well as a consulate in Erbil in Iraqi Kurdistan on Wednesday, citing heightened tension in the region. Hours later, Germany and the Netherlands suspended their missions to train Iraqi troops. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had earlier warned that "Iranian activities" endanger American sites and soldiers stationed in the country.

Are the latest moves a sign that the US is preparing for military action against Iran, are they just a precaution, or do they signal something about a shift in the security situation on the ground in Iraq?

'Preparing for instability'

Comment: And the US may have just found its excuse: "Likely": US accuses Iran of attack on Saudi tankers.

See also:


Bizarro Earth

US accuses Iran of sabotaging Saudi tankers

tanker
© AFP
Norwegian oil tanker Andrea Victory, one of the four tankers damaged in alleged "sabotage attacks." e
Update: Just as everyone with half a frontal lobe had expected, the WSJ reported late on Monday that according to an initial U.S. assessment, "Iran was likely behind the attack" on the two Saudi Arabian oil tankers and two other vessels damaged over the weekend near the Strait of Hormuz, a U.S. official said, a finding that, whether confirmed or not, will certainly inflame military tensions in the Gulf and likely result in a global proxy war that drags in the US, China and Russia. Oh, and that would be the Persian Gulf for those wondering, not the Gulf of Tonkin, which is where another famous False Flag naval incident occurred.

Furthermore, as we predicted would happen on Sunday, this "official assessment", was the first suggestion by any nation that Iran was responsible for the attack and follows a series of U.S. warnings against "aggression" by Iran or its allies and proxies against military or commercial vessels in the region. Some more details from the WSJ:

Comment: As noted in Iran squeezed between imperial psychos and European cowards while Iran knows the US may not be capable of all out war, or even the kind of economic warfare it has in mind, it does know that there are some in the US that are seriously unhinged:
Marandi, ominously, sees "further escalation" ahead: "Iranians have been preparing for war with the Unites States ever since the Iraq invasion in 2003. After what they've seen in Libya, in Syria, Yemen, Venezuela, they know that the Americans and Europeans are utterly brutal.
See also:


Target

Inside look at the secret plot to turn senior Venezuelan officials against Maduro

Maikel Moreno
© AFP/Getty Images
Maikel Moreno, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Venezuela
Late one night in April, a week before Venezuela's opposition launched its abortive uprising, four men sat on the terrace of the hillside compound in Caracas belonging to the chief justice of the country's Supreme Court. The dim lights of the capital twinkling below them, they sipped Fiji bottled water as they plotted the ouster of President Nicolás Maduro.

Maduro's spy chief, Gen. Christopher Figuera, and Cesar Omaña, a 39-year-old Venezuelan businessman based in Miami, were trying to seal a deal hashed out over weeks with Maikel Moreno, the chief justice, according to one of the participants in the meeting. Figuera and Omaña were part of the plan to force Maduro out, but they needed Moreno's help.

Moreno, sitting before an ashtray laden with the stubs of Cuban cigars, appeared to be having doubts. The 53-year-old jurist voiced concerns about Juan Guaidó, the U.S.-backed opposition leader who would become the nation's interim president if the plot succeeded.

Then, according to the participant, Moreno offered another candidate to "temporarily" lead the broken country - himself.

"In the end, he was trying to safeguard his own power play," one senior opposition figure said.
Christopher Figurea, Maduro
© whatsnew2day.com
Spy Chief Christopher Figuera • President Nicolas Maduro

Comment: See also:


Arrow Up

Putin to Pompeo: Time to restore US-Russia ties

PutinPompeo
© RIA NOVOSTI/ Sergey Gunieev
Russian President Vladimir Putin • US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
Russian President Vladimir Putin told US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo that he had the impression President Donald Trump wanted to restore relations between the US and Russia after the Mueller inquiry exonerated him.

"As you know, just a few days ago, I had the pleasure of talking with the US president on the phone," Putin told Pompeo on Tuesday, as the two met in Sochi.
"I got the impression that the [US] president was inclined to re-establish Russian-American relations and contacts to resolve together the issues that are of mutual interest to us. For our part, we have more than once said that we would also like to fully restore relations, and we hope that now the conditions for that have been met."
Pompeo agreed that there are matters of mutual interest between the US and Russia, where both countries can work together productively.

The Russian president listed security issues, preventing the spread of weapons of mass destruction, environmental issues and economic issues such as oil production as some of the areas of mutual interest.

Attention

All-out trade battle: Trump threatens tariffs on $300B of Chinese goods; Beijing calls for a 'people's war'

Chinese President Xi Jinping
© REUTERS/Fred Dufour
Chinese President Xi Jinping
The US-China trade war continues to heat up, with Beijing calling for a "people's war" against Washington and President Donald Trump threatening to impose tariffs on another $300 billion worth of Chinese goods.

In a series of editorials and op-ed articles published Monday, Chinese state media slammed what it labeled the Trump administration's "greed and arrogance" and called for a "people's war" against it. Beijing's state-run media effectively serves as a mouthpiece for the Communist Party.

The nationalistic Global Times tabloid wrote in a Chinese-language editorial carried by Xinhua News Agency:
"The most important thing is that in the China-US trade war, the US side fights for greed and arrogance ... and morale will break at any point. The Chinese side is fighting back to protect its legitimate interests.

"The trade war in the US is the creation of one person and one administration, but it affects that country's entire population. In China, the entire country and all its people are being threatened. For us, this is a real 'people's war.'"

Comment: See also:


Stop

'No one in Europe' wants second Iraq: Austrian president slams 'provocative' US Iran policy

Alexander van der Bellen, ruins of Saddam Hussein's palace
© (L) Reuters / Alexander Nemenov, (R) Reuters / Erik de Castro
(L) Austrian President Alexander van der Bellen; (R) Journalists look at the ruins of Saddam Hussein's palace in Iraq.
The US' reckless maximum pressure campaign against Tehran and nations dealing with it is deeply provocative and hurts international relations, Austrian President Alexander Van der Bellen said, warning against a major "crisis."

Speaking at a joint press conference with the Russian President Vladimir Putin in Sochi on Wednesday, Van der Bellen slammed the US sanctions against Iran by saying that such policies "do not help international relations" and only erode the system of global treaties.
"The fact that the US withdrew from the Iranian nuclear deal undermines trust in this agreement in general," he told journalists.
It is particularly provocative that the US reimposed its sanctions against Iran after pulling out of the deal and threatened the companies, which continued to work with Tehran, with punishment.
The Austrian leader also admitted that Europe has so far failed to "come up with a mechanism that would help companies effectively circumvent" the US restrictions. He also said that creating such an instrument is a "very laborious" task.

Nuke

Putin comments on Iranian nuclear deal: 'Russia is not a firefighting team, cannot save everything alone'

Trump pic burned
© REUTERS/Tasnim News Agency
Iranians burn the picture of President Donald Trump during a protest against Trump's decision to walk out of a 2015 nuclear deal, in Tehran.
Moscow cannot save the Iranian nuclear deal from falling apart all by itself, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said, adding that the destruction of the agreement was triggered by the US, while Europe has failed to react.

While Moscow believes the deal - officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) - should be preserved, it can be saved only through the efforts of all its signees, Putin said during a press conference Wednesday after meeting Austrian President Alexander Van der Bellen. "Russia is not a firefighting team, we cannot go around and save everything that does not fully depend on us," Russia's president stated.

He added that saying such an "undiplomatic thing might hurt the ears of our European friends." Putin squarely put the blame for the dismantling of the JCPOA on the US while blasting the EU's inability to actually do something about saving the deal.
"The Americans have withdrawn from the deal, the agreement is crumbling and European countries are unable to do anything to save it, unable to actually work with Iran and compensate for [its] economic losses."

Stock Down

China's nuclear option: Dump US bonds and cause absolute chaos in global markets

financialnuclearoption
© Getty Images/Rob Atkins/KJN
The ongoing tit-for-tat tariff exchange between China and the US could push Beijing to strike back with the so-called 'nuclear option' - dumping its vast holdings of US Treasury bonds.

While the move would be partly self-defeating for China, it would also have devastating consequences for global financial markets, Sourabh Gupta, a senior fellow at the Institute for China-America Studies in Washington told RT.

"In that case, there would be absolute chaos in global currency markets, and thereafter in global equity markets," he said, adding that with regards to interest rates "after significant initial volatility, the effects would be somewhat muted." The concern though is with financial market sentiment, not specifically interest rates, Gupta said.

China currently owns $1.13 trillion in US Treasuries. That's a fraction of the total $22 trillion in US debt outstanding but 17.7 percent of the various securities held by foreign governments, according to data from the Treasury and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. Beijing has been pulling back from its role in the US bond market, having cut holdings nearly four percent over the past 12 months, but it still takes the top spot among America's foreign creditors.