© Mandel Ngan / AFP
State Department Spokesperson Heather Nauert
Western public consensus on Syria appears to have shifted dramatically since Aleppo's liberation in December 2016, which drove a stake through the heart of corporate media misdirection and deception on the Syrian 'crisis.'
As Syrian civilians haltingly told their tales of misery, imprisonment, execution, rape and murder under terrorist occupation, the corporate media headed for the hills, unwilling to confront the suffering they had effectively prolonged for over four long years.
Now we have a repeat spin cycle in Eastern Ghouta and other eastern suburbs of Damascus that have been occupied by Al-Nusra Front and its affiliates since 2013.
Parallels to the distorted propaganda produced in relation to East Aleppo are unmistakable. The usual
UN inflation of civilian numbers, the cries of "chemical weapon attacks," the "starvation" of civilians by the Syrian "regime" and of course the "incessant bombing" of hospitals by Syria and Russia, "targeting exclusively civilians," are as rampant in Western media as they were during the Syrian-led military campaign against many of the same terrorist factions in East Aleppo.
READ MORE: 'Truth is the 1st casualty of war': Syria's East Ghouta battleground distorted by MSM propaganda
Western media "hysteria" has reached
unprecedented levels, all manner of analogy is being utilized to convey the message of civilians "driven to their knees" under a "brutal onslaught by Syrian armed forces and allies who are hell-bent on slaughtering the Syrian people" -
of course nothing could be further from the truth. As in East Aleppo, there is a high probability that many of the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) soldiers giving their lives to liberate Eastern Ghouta from the clutches of Al-Nusra Front affiliates have family in those areas. The SAA is the Syrian people, it is an army of conscripts from all walks of Syrian life.
It is not some disembodied Assad-loyalist entity, despite what that Western media would have you believe. It is from the people and it is for the people, it is most certainly not deliberately targeting the people who are being used as
human shields by the extremist factions.
Comment: Information gathering. Trump, again, sussed out the Dems' threshold of support by suggesting an outcome they might agree with (to which he is not obligated to follow through) and in turn, the level of Republican push back.
See also: 'Take the guns first', Trump parts with Republicans over gun-control plan