Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 05 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Camera

Trump pardons submariner who took photos of classified sub and used 'Clinton emails' defense


RT
Sat, 10 Mar 2018 13:16 UTC
A narrow corridor of a nuclear-powered submarine
© Caro / Marc Meyerbroeker / Global Look Press
FILE PHOTO: A narrow corridor of a nuclear-powered submarine.
US president Donald Trump has pardoned a Navy sailor who was sentenced to prison for taking and "mishandling" photos of a classified military vessel. The submariner used Hillary Clinton's email scandal in his court defense.

Former Machinist's Mate 1st Class Kristian Saucier took six photos of the USS Alexandria's engine room with his cellphone at the Naval Submarine Base New London in Groton, Connecticut. The vehicle's propulsion system was deemed "confidential" by authorities.

Trump pardoned the Arlington, VT native on Friday. He had often referenced Saucier's case during his electoral campaign, comparing it with Hillary Clinton's illicit use of private email servers and classified information.
      Read More...
Light Saber

Tucker Carlson destroys neocon John Bolton for wanting to go to war with Iran

Alex Christoforou
The Duran
Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00 UTC
Bloton AIPAC lapdog
John Bolton floats the idea of "Iran WMDs"

Former UN Ambassador John Bolton may become Trump's new NSA director.

John Bolton was one of the key forces behind Bush's illegal invasion of Iraq.

John Bolton is a top neoconservative who believes that regime change is good for American foreign policy.

In the interview below with Tucker Carlson, Bolton goes so far as to conjure up the myth that Iran now has WMDs, and states that the Iraq regime change invasion under former POTUS George W. Bush was a good thing.
      Read More...
Eye 2

Gaza is kept on the brink of humanitarian catastrophe for the benefit of Israeli companies

Shir Hever
+972 Magazine
Fri, 02 Mar 2018 11:22 UTC
UNRWA Gaza Palesstine aid
© Abed Rahim Khatib/ Flash90
Palestinians in the southern Gaza city of Rafah receive monthly food rations from an UNRWA distribution center, January 23, 2017.
"The Gaza Strip is on the brink of a humanitarian crisis." Sound familiar? We've been hearing about the imminent collapse of Gaza's drinking water, sewage, health, and electricity systems since the outbreak of the Second Intifada 18 years ago.

In their book The One State Condition, Ariella Azoulay and Adi Ophir attempt to answer the question, what interest does Israel have in keeping Gaza on the verge of collapse? Their answer remains valid even after fifteen years: keeping the Palestinians perpetually on the brink is proof of Israel's conclusive victory. The Palestinians cannot take their lives as given, for Israel can take their lives at any time. This is the basis of Israel's relation of clear relation of dominance over the Palestinians.

But while this answer is true, it is not sufficient. There is also an economic answer. As long as Gaza remains on the brink of collapse, international donors keep the flow of humanitarian aid money going. If the crisis were ended and the siege lifted, it is safe to assume that that the international donors would change the type of aid they provide and return to focus on the development of the Gazan economy (as they did from 1994-2000, until the outbreak of the Second Intifada). This type of aid would likely compete with certain branches of Israeli companies and therefore threaten the Israeli economy. Keeping Gaza on the verge of collapse keeps international humanitarian aid money flowing exactly to where it benefits Israeli interests.

Comment: This is profiting from suffering, plain and simple. Not that different from torture.

      Read More...
2 + 2 = 4

Failure of intelligence: Why Russia's new strategic capabilities come as a shock to US intelligence community

Philip M. Giraldi
Strategic Culture Foundation
Thu, 08 Mar 2018 11:00 UTC
missile misil
The United States of America spends something like $80 billion annually on intelligence gathering and analysis. When the CIA was founded by the National Security Act in 1947 the intention was to create a mechanism that would warn about an imminent threat. The memory of Pearl Harbor in 1941, when Japan attacked the U.S. naval base was still fresh, and the legislation was popularized by the slogan "no more Pearl Harbors."

In spite of the dedication of considerable resources and manpower, there have been some major intelligence failures in the past seventy years, starting with the inability to anticipate the breakout of the Korean War and including the embrace of false intelligence on Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction. But the most recent failure is perhaps more consequential than either Korea or Iraq.

On March 1st, Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke before his country's Federal Assembly plus a large group of both local and foreign journalists, outlining his plans for the economy and also dealing with other domestic issues should he be reelected later this month. The final third of the presentation was on national defense and, in its substance, was clearly directed at a global audience, particularly the United States.

Comment: The biggest lesson for the the US establishment is that they cannot go around the world acting as if they can wage a hot war with Russia and 'win'.

Putin Delivers Landmark 'State of The Union' Speech: Puts The Smack Down on US, Shows Off Latest Russian Nuclear Weapons

At least some are listening:

We're listening! US senators call for dialogue after Russia's new nuclear arsenal unveiled

      Read More...
X

James Clapper dodges charges for 'clearly erroneous' surveillance testimony

Steven Nelson
Washington Examiner
Sat, 10 Mar 2018 11:01 UTC
JamesClapper
© AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais
Former intelligence chief James Clapper
Former intelligence chief James Clapper is poised to avoid charges for allegedly lying to Congress after five years of apparent inaction by the Justice Department.

Clapper, Director of National Intelligence from 2010 to 2017, admitted giving "clearly erroneous" testimony about mass surveillance in March 2013, and offered differing explanations for why.

Two criminal statutes that cover lying to Congress have five-year statutes of limitations, establishing a Monday deadline to charge Clapper, who in retirement has emerged as a leading critic of President Trump.

The under-oath untruth was exposed by National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, who sparked national debate on surveillance policy with leaks to the press.

Many members of Congress, mostly Republicans supportive of new limits on electronic surveillance, called for Clapper to be prosecuted as the deadline neared, saying unpunished perjury jeopardizes the ability of Congress to perform oversight.
"He admitted to lying to Congress and was unremorseful and flippant about it," Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., told the Washington Examiner. "The integrity of our federal government is at stake because his behavior sets the standard for the entire intelligence community."

"Political consideration should not affect the Department of Justice from pursuing this matter," Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., said ahead of the deadline. "Complete and truthful testimony is imperative for Congress to conduct effective oversight. It is clear from the evidence and Director Clapper's own admission that he lied."
      Read More...
Russian Flag

Putin vs Megyn Kelly round 2: Full text of NBC's extensive interview (with VIDEO)


kremlin.ru
Sat, 10 Mar 2018 10:26 UTC
putin
© Kremlin.ru
Vladimir Putin answered questions from NBC anchor Megyn Kelly. The interview was recorded in the Kremlin on March 1, 2018, and in Kaliningrad on March 2, 2018.

Part 1. The Kremlin, Moscow, March 1, 2018

Megyn Kelly: So, thank you very much for doing this, Mr President. I thought that we'd start with some of the news you made today at your State of the Nation Address, then we will move into some facts about you in preparation for our long piece that we are putting together, and then tomorrow when we will have a longer time together, we will talk about more substantive issues together, if that is ok with you.

Vladimir Putin: Fine.

Megyn Kelly: You announced today that Russia has developed new nuclear-capable weapons systems, including an intercontinental ballistic missile that you say renders defence systems useless. Several analysts in the West have said this is a declaration of a new Cold War. Are we in a new arms race right now?

Vladimir Putin: In my opinion, the people you have mentioned are not analysts. What they do is propaganda. Why? Because everything I spoke about today was done not on our initiative, it is a response to the US ballistic missile defence programme and Washington's unilateral withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002.

If we speak of the arms race, it began at that very moment, when the United States pulled out of the ABM Treaty. We wanted to prevent this. We called on our American partners to work together on these programmes.

      Read More...
Briefcase

Russian billionaire, Oleg Deripaska, claims Fusion GPS funded by Soros

Tyler Durden
Zero Hedge
Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:42 UTC
Daniel J. Jones

Daniel J. Jones
In a Daily Caller op-ed calling the Russian meddling narrative a "false public manipulation," Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska claims that Daniel Jones - a former FBI investigator, Feinstein staffer and now a Fusion GPS operative - told the Russian Oligarch's lawyer in March, 2017 that Fusion GPS was funded by "a group of Silicon Valley billionaires and George Soros."


Comment: See: Oleg Deripaska op-ed: The Deep State's ever-changing 'Russia narrative' is false public manipulation


Of note, Deripaska's lawyer, D.C. lobbyist Adam Waldman, recommended Jones to investigate and verify the claims from the Fusion GPS anti-Trump dossier assembled by former UK spy Christopher Steele. Waldman was also an intermediary between Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) and Steele in trying to arrange a meeting - which suggests that Waldman, Jones, Steele and Fusion GPS are all connected.


Comment: See: Yet more texts: Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact Christopher Steele


Comment: The Russia narrative continues to spin out of control, unable to withstand the slightest bit of scrutiny. It's way past absurdity at this point, yet despite this fact, it continues on, pathologically persistent, refusing to die.

See also:

      Read More...
TV

Independent evidence confirms that US-supported terrorists arrested with sarin gas and used it, Assad has not (PODCAST)


Sputnik
Fri, 09 Mar 2018 22:19 UTC
We Have Independent Evidence That al-Nusra Was Arrested With Sarin Gas - (PODCAST)
© AFP 2018/ Ammar SULEIMAN
Washington is looking into the possibility of launching new attacks against Syria, according to US Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, as the new strikes could come as a response to the Syrian government's alleged use of chemical weapons. Radio Sputnik spoke with senior lecturer at the University of Sydney, Dr. Tim Anderson.

Sputnik: In your view, how likely is it that a new US attack against Syria is going to happen?

Dr. Tim Anderson: Well it's unpredictable because the rationales keep changing and the US commitment to this war is uncertain at the moment because they have steadily been losing for the last couple of years, but these sorts of threats have become rather routine.

It might sound a little bit different because we have a new intelligence spokesperson here appointed by President Trump last year but he has been in their intelligence committee since the beginning of the conflict, so he is really part of the establishment of this war. But it's a repetition of what we have seen several times before.

Comment: The dying US empire in its insane attempts to prevent any peace in the Middle East region is creating chaos, but they're only slowing things down and they won't be able to keep it up forever:

      Read More...
Jet4

US Army Military Review admits Russia won in Syria

Tom Ricks
Business Insider
Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:12 UTC
Russian Su-25s take off at the Hmeimim base in Syria
© Dmitriy Vinogradov / Sputnik
I was interested to see in an article in the new issue of "Military Review," a publication of the U.S. Army, conclude that, "Russia appears to have won at least a partial victory in Syria, and done so with impressive efficiency, flexibility, and coordination between military and political action."

Looking at Putin, the article states that "the Russian campaign might be judged a qualified success from the standpoint of the Kremlin's own objective."

As for the United States, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, the authors (who are not Army employees - one is at the Center for Naval Analyses, and the other is at the Kennan Institute) conclude "it is certainly a defeat for those who opposed the Russian-led coalition."

On the other hand, I thought as I read this grim assessment, military victory does not guarantee political success - as the U.S. whole of government has demonstrated so well in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
      Read More...
TV

Rachel Maddow seethes over Trump leading possible peace talks with North Korea

Nicholas Fondacaro
MRC News Busters
Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:30 UTC
Rachel Maddow
President Trump shocked the world Thursday night when it was announced that he planned to sit down with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un in the coming months. The political world was so overwhelmed by the news that even the journalists at CNN were more or less optimistic. Yet over at MSNBC, host Rachel Maddow was anything but enthused by the idea as she spewed skepticism and threw shade at the commander-in-chief for accepting North Korea's offer.

Towards the beginning of her bitter rant, Maddow seemed to question the President's intelligence and/or knowledge of history for taking the meeting:
You might think another president in this circumstance, you can imagine a president asking himself or herself, "why has no other American president ever agreed to do this? Why has no sitting American president ever met with a leader from North Korea? Why has that never happened in all the decades North Korea existed as a nation? Should I take that to mean that this might be particularly risky or even an unwise move?"

Comment: Talk about your faulty logic. How could it be seen as a bad thing to have a sit-down with a nuclear power that holds animosity towards the United States? Maddow apparently would prefer an 'ignore the problem and it will go away' strategy. Clearly, Maddow's rabidly anti-Trump stance is clouding her reading of the situation (if it were Obama, she'd likely be gushing about his unorthodoxy). While risky, this situation requires diplomacy, and meeting face to face is a potential step towards de-escalation and amicable relations.

See also:

      Read More...
Amazon Smile
Revolt! T-shirts