Welcome to Sott.net
Mon, 08 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Bullseye

Russian ambassador to UK on Skripal case: UK gov't cannot be trusted, other nations would be wise to demand proof

Alexander Yakovenko
© Simon Dawson / Reuters
Russia's ambassador to the UK, Alexander Yakovenko
When it comes to allegations against Russia, the UK government cannot be trusted, so other nations would be wise to demand proof, Russia's ambassador in London said, commenting on the Skripal poisoning saga.

"Don't take the words of the British for granted," Alexander Yakovenko told journalists during a press conference at the Russian Embassy when asked what his advice to European nations would be on the unfolding UK-Russian conflict. "I am quoting Ronald Reagan: trust but verify."

The ambassador spoke to the media on Thursday to denounce what he called a "hysterical anti-Russian campaign" conducted by the British government and media outlets over the poisoning of former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and two other people, his daughter Yulia and a police officer, in Salisbury. Prime Minister Theresa May accused the Kremlin of ordering a chemical weapon attack against the man and has been rallying Britain's allies against Moscow.

Sherlock

The money trail behind Trump, Bannon and Cambridge Analytica leads to Republican mega-donors Robert and Rebekah Mercer

Robert and Rebekah Mercer

Far-right Republican mega-donors Robert and Rebekah Mercer
Last evening, the Washington Post reported that Steve Bannon was the individual overseeing the earliest collection of Facebook data for Cambridge Analytica in 2014. The company is under investigation in both the U.S. and U.K. for data mining private information on more than 50 million Facebook users to target voters for the 2016 Trump presidential campaign.

Bannon, with funding from billionaire hedge fund manager, Robert Mercer, was involved in the launch of Cambridge Analytica in 2013. Both Bannon and Mercer served on the Cambridge Analytica Board after its founding.

Bannon is the former executive chairman of Breitbart News which also received funding from Mercer. Bannon also served as CEO of Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and as senior counselor to the 45th president for the first seven months of his term until a falling out last year. Robert Mercer was a large donor to the Trump campaign.

Essentially, whatever Bannon has been connected to since at least 2013, Mercer money has been involved in the effort. Take, for example, the Government Accountability Institute (GAI). It was founded in 2012 by Peter Schweizer and Steve Bannon. Schweitzer is currently listed on its website as its President and Rebekah Mercer, daughter of Robert, is listed as its Chair. Rebekah Mercer played a major role in the Trump campaign and served on the Trump Transition Team's Executive Committee, which played a major role in selecting cabinet appointees.

Read the rest of the article here...

Map

Pedophile Mueller witness flees country after past convictions made public

George Nader
© C-SPAN via AP
This 1998 frame from video provided by C-SPAN shows president and editor of Middle East Insight George Nader.
A key witness in the investigation into President Donald Trump's alleged collusion with Russia has fled the country, DailyMail.com can disclose.

Convicted pedophile George Nader was allegedly both a paid adviser for the United Arab Emirates and had close ties to the Trump administration.

He met Jared Kushner and Steve Bannon in Trump Tower just before the inauguration at a meeting they held with the de facto ruler of the United Arab Emirates.

Nader was thrust into the limelight after being interviewed twice by special counsel Robert Mueller as part of his probe into Russian meddling in the US election and collusion with the Trump campaign team.

Now DailyMail.com can reveal he has flown back to the UAE, according to two sources close to the country's de-facto ruler Mohammed bin Zayed, who is known by his initials 'MBZ.

The revelation comes just days after Nader was revealed to be a convicted pedophile.

Magnify

Iraq War: Fifteen-year anniversary of modern America's worst foreign policy disaster goes by largely unremarked

dubya
© Getty Images
The most tragic and infuriating piece of writing of the week came in Tuesday's New York Times. It carried a very plain and simple headline.

"Fifteen Years Ago, America Destroyed My Country"
My short visit only confirmed my conviction and fear that the invasion would spell disaster for Iraqis. Removing Saddam was just a byproduct of another objective: dismantling the Iraqi state and its institutions. That state was replaced with a dysfunctional and corrupt semi-state. We were still filming in Baghdad when L. Paul Bremer III, the head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, announced the formation of the so-called Governing Council in July 2003. The names of its members were each followed by their sect and ethnicity. Many of the Iraqis we spoke to on that day were upset with institutionalization of an ethno-sectarian quota system. Ethnic and sectarian tensions already existed, but their translation into political currency was toxic. Those unsavry characters on the governing council, most of whom were allies of the United States from the preceding decade, went on to loot the country, making it one of the most corrupt in the world.
Except for Sinan Antoon's richly deserved jeremiad, the 15th anniversary of the worst foreign policy disaster in modern American history went sailing by largely unremarked, at least in this country. After all, over here, everyone was too busy keeping track of the latest news involving the vulgar talking yam the country had installed as president, how he was still truckling to Russian oligarchs, how he was still being run to ground by Bob Mueller, and about how he was being outwitted and out-lawyered by a lady from the adult entertainment industry.

Stock Up

US-China trade war: Trump imposes $60bn in tariffs - China vows to retaliate - US says 'buy more American gas' to avoid more tariffs

aluminum china
© Aly Song
Workers ride on an motor rickshaw through an aluminium ingots depot in Wuxi, Jiangsu province.
China is readying itself for a trade war with the US as Washington reportedly plans to announce new measures against Beijing within days. Officials have been seeking support from other nations and world trade bodies.

US media reports have claimed the White House was preparing punitive measures, including tariffs on Chinese technology and telecoms commodity imports valued at $60 billion, to be a announced on Friday.

That was despite the much-vaunted rapport between US President Donald Trump and China's Xi Jinping, following the former's state visit to Beijing last year. A fortnight ago, Trump announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, hitting the EU, Japan and South Korea, as well as China.

"The Chinese side never wants to fight a trade war with anybody, but if we are forced to, we will not hide from it," Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying warned on Wednesday. Beijing will "definitely take firm and necessary countermeasures to defend its legal rights," she said, as quoted by China's Global Times.

Comment: Trump then announced the $60 billion tariff package, aimed at curbing "intellectual property theft":
Trump has signed a Section 301 trade action with China that could be about $60 billion in tariffs, he said adding that he asked China to reduce trade surplus immediately by $100 billion.

"We have right now an $800 billion dollar trade deficit with the world," he said before signing a memorandum. "It is the largest deficit of any country in the history of our world. It's out of control."

"We're gonna get it taken care of. Frankly it's going to make us a much stronger, much richer nation."

"Just use the reciprocal. If they charge us, we charge them the same thing."

Washington is targeting more than 100 types of Chinese goods, from clothing to electronics. The value of the tariffs is based on US estimates of economic damage caused by intellectual-property theft by China, an anonymous source familiar with the matter told Bloomberg.

The announcement comes after the Trump administration accused China of "state-led, market-distorting efforts to force, pressure, and steal US technologies and intellectual property," according to a statement by principal deputy press secretary Raj Shah on Wednesday.
China's response? A "fight to the end" using "all necessary measures":
In the statement, China's US Embassy said the country doesn't want a trade war, but "will not recoil from one" should it come to it. It also accused the US of "ignoring rational voices," and of disregarding "the mutually-beneficial nature of China-US trade relations and the consensus reached by the two countries of managing differences constructively through consultations."

"If a trade war were initiated by the US, China would fight to the end to defend its own legitimate interests with all necessary measures," it added. China strongly opposes what it described as a "typical unilateral trade protectionist action" taken by the Trump administration on Thursday. It said the US action will "directly harm the interests of US consumers, companies, and financial markets."

The embassy urged the US to "cease and desist, make conscious decisions and avoid placing China-US trade relations in danger," as it could "end up hurting itself."
...
"I have tremendous respect for President Xi," Trump said, after signing the new measures on Thursday. "We have a great relationship. They're helping us a lot in North Korea and that's China. But we have a trade deficit, depending on the way you calculate, of $504 billion."

"It is the largest deficit of any country in the history of our world. It's out of control," he added. "We're gonna get it taken care of. Frankly it's going to make us a much stronger, much richer nation."

US stocks dropped after Trump's announcement. The Dow Jones industrial average fell 722 points, almost 3 percent, and the Nasdaq fell 2.4 percent. Shares in US exporters, including Boeing, also dropped, on foot of the feared trade war with China.
But the Trump team has a counter-proposal: buy more American LNG, get fewer tariffs:
"China needs to import very, very large amounts of LNG and, from their point, it would be very logical to import more of it from us, if for no reason other than to diversify their sources of supply," said US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross in an interview with Bloomberg. "It would also have the side effect of reducing the deficit."
...
However, Washington's demand for China to buy more American gas is unlikely to cut the deficit, according to a Bloomberg-polled analyst Anastacia Dialynas. Beijing has commitments with other countries, and only 40 million tons of China's 2030 imports aren't already under contract, which accounts only for $13.5 billion at current prices.



Dominoes

The ghost of Col. Gaddafi reaches up from the grave to haunt 'King Sarko'

gaddafi sarkozy
© Reuters / Pascal Rossignol
Libya's then President Muammar Gaddafi (left) greets his then French counterpart Nicolas Sarkozy at Bab Azizia Palace in Tripoli, on July 25, 2007
NATO's 2011 war on Libya was unanimously sold across the West as a necessary humanitarian operation against the proverbial evil dictator (Hillary Clinton: "We came, we saw, he died."). Russia and China were firmly against it.

Now, in a stunning historical reversal, the ghost of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi seems to have come back to haunt former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, the self-described superstar of that R2P ("responsibility to protect") spectacular.

The "Colonel Sarko bombshell" exploded on Wednesday evening: he had been placed under formal investigation for passive corruption, illegal campaign financing, and misappropriation of Libyan state funds.

Sarkozy spent the whole of Tuesday, from 8am until midnight, answering questions in police custody from crack investigators specialized in corruption, tax evasion and money laundering. He was allowed to sleep at home but had to be back the next morning, up until the early evening. He was finally released on bail.

Cowboy Hat

Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline is good for Germany, good for Europe, and bad for globalists

Nord Stream 2 pipe
A recent article by Alan Riley titled "Nordstream 2: How Germany Lets Down Europe" appeared in the online news magazine The Globalist on 28 February 2018. The article claims that the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project is not in Germany's best interest as a sovereign country, a member of the EU, and an influential citizen of Europe as a whole.

Some further reflection is warranted on these matters, in directions other than those offered by the article's author. Riley is a Senior Fellow of the Institute for Statecraft (London) and a Senior Non-Resident of the Global Energy Center of the Atlantic Council (Washington, D.C.). At the end of the article he is listed as an adviser to Naftogaz of Ukraine and PGNIG (Polish Oil Mining and Gas Industry).

Germany's geopolitical position in Europe is a complex one. It shares borders with many countries, including Poland, with which it has had serious political disagreements in recent years. It has twenty-one U.S. military bases on its territory and its media is influenced by U.S. intelligence, raising the issue of whether or not it is genuinely a sovereign country. Landlocked on three sides, the country possesses maritime outlets in the north to the North Sea and Baltic Sea that are essential to its opportunities for trade and useful for its national security.

Smiley

Meet John Bolton, the hawkiest hawk of the Bush Administration and Trump's new NSC adviser

John Bolton
© Mike Segar / Reuters
John Bolton
John Bolton's new role as US national security adviser may spell trouble for security chiefs elsewhere. An apologist for the Iraq invasion on false pretexts, he is also well known for his hawkish effort to encourage war with Iran.

Bolton was Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security in the Bush administration from 2002-2004, during which time he promoted the weapons of mass destruction myth to bring about the Iraq invasion, and later said he had "no regrets," about doing so.

Bolton pushed the weapons of mass destruction narrative in the lead-up to the Iraq war. "We are confident that Saddam Hussein has hidden weapons of mass destruction and production facilities in Iraq," he said during a BBC debate in 2002, adding that "there is no doubt in our mind that Saddam Hussein has an active chemical and biological warfare effort."

Arrow Down

Brit MPs race to the bottom competing to condemn Kremlin in ever more undiplomatic and insulting ways

Theresa May Putin
© Reuters / Sputnik
Theresa May and Vladimir Putin
Theresa May arrived in Brussels with more doomsday warnings: Russia is not only a threat to the UK, but the whole of Europe. Her comments join a string of escalating accusations thrown at the Kremlin. Here are some of the others. Theresa May

The UK PM arrived in Brussels, where it is understood she will try to convince fellow European Union leaders that Russia poses a threat to not just the UK, but the entire bloc.

"Russia staged a brazen and reckless attack against the United Kingdom," May told reporters upon her arrival at the EU summit. "It's clear that the Russian threat does not respect borders and indeed the incident in Salisbury was a pattern of Russian aggression against Europe and its near neighbors."

Comment: Buffoonish Boris throws the 'nazi' word around rather freely. How did this idiot ever get into office, let alone the foreign policy post?


Quenelle

Britain's ultimatum to Russia backfires as NATO & EU allies reject demands

Theresa May Boris Johnson
Donald Trump's latest tweets saying that the US should aim for better relations with Russia underscores a crucial point about the Skripal case: the British are failing to win the support of their allies that they seem to have expected.

At this point it is necessary to say something about the British diplomatic strategy last week,

On Monday 12th March 2018 British Prime Minister Theresa May gave Russia a 36 hour ultimatum saying that unless it proved itself innocent the British government would deem it guilty of the attack on Sergey and Yulia Skripal

Comment: They can't beat Russia militarily, they can't beat them with propaganda, and their sanctions only make the Russian economy more competitive. It's a sad, sad day for Western imperialists.

Further reading: