Welcome to Sott.net
Tue, 02 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

X

Defense Secretary Esper point blank tells Syrian Kurds the US never promised them a state

Kurdish forces
© AFP
Kurdish forces
The US never promised Syria's Kurds that it would help them build an autonomous state, Defense Secretary Mark Esper has insisted, despite years of hints to the contrary. So much for the birth pangs of that New Middle East...

Esper told reporters on Friday:
"Nowhere, at no point in time did we tell the Kurds, we will assist you in establishing an autonomous Kurdish state in Syria, nor would we fight against the longstanding ally Turkey on your behalf.

"We live up to our obligations, and our obligation, our agreement, our understanding with the Kurds was this: that we would work together to fight in Syria to defeat ISIS."
But now that ISIS has been declared dead almost as many times as its late leader Baghdadi, is it game over for the US-Kurdish partnership?

Esper's words no doubt came as a shock to anyone expecting a continuation of the Assad-Must-Go policies of the Obama administration, in which it was understood that the Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces would be rewarded for doing their part to overthrow Syrian President Bashar Assad with their own semi-sovereign state à la Iraqi Kurdistan. US media have long sung the praises of 'Rojava' as some sort of feminist utopia, but this "brave social experiment" is now imperiled by the Trump administration's stubborn refusal to continue waging a war it has all but lost in Syria.

Comment: See also:


Attention

Hungarian FM Szijjarto: Pity that human rights are used as excuse to interfere in another state's domestic issues

Szijjarto
© Reuters/Adriano Machado
Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto
The EU's policy regarding sanctions and restrictive measures is sometimes marked with double standards, Hungarian FM Peter Szijjarto told RT, stressing that even an issue of human rights can be seen differently inside the bloc.

Budapest is committed to upholding human rights, the Hungarian foreign minister said, adding that unfortunately, sometimes a reference to this matter serves as a basis to persecute some political interest. Sometimes the reference to human rights serves as a basis to interfere into domestic issues of other countries on an ideological basis, on a political basis, without any good reason.

Szijjarto noted that even an understanding of what human rights means, raises a debate. Migration is a huge challenge, he states. Szijjarto doesn't agree with other European players that migration is a fundamental human right. He says that the fundamental human right is to have a "safe and secure" life at home, and if this right is violated, everybody is allowed to go to a safe country. Migration cannot be the reason to violate borders between safe countries.


Bizarro Earth

The Shakespearean tragedy of Jeremy Corbyn: Destroyed by appeasing his enemies

Corbyn
© Reuters/Tom Nicholson
Jeremy Corbyn
The Jeremy Corbyn project has ended in tears with an utterly demoralising general election defeat for Labour, but it could - and should - have been very different if only Corbyn had trusted his own instincts.

There is a distinctly Shakespearean air to the political demise of UK Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, which took place, appropriately enough, on Friday the 13th of December 2019 (or you could say 15 March would have been even more appropriate).

"There is a tide in the affairs of men, which taken at the flood, leads on to fortune. Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and miseries," the great bard wrote in Julius Caesar.

No Entry

DOJ won't release records on Imran Awan: Court docs cite 'technical difficulties' and a secret case

Imran Awan Wasserman Schultz
© Reuters
Imran Awan, the former IT aide to congressional Democrats including Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz
The Department of Justice is withholding documents about the Imran Awan cybersecurity scandal by saying there is an ongoing, secret case related to matter, according to court papers.

Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit Nov. 7, 2018, for 7,000 pages of Capitol Police records related to the cybersecurity investigation, and Aug. 2, the DOJ agreed to begin producing records by Nov. 5.

That deadline came and went with no records being produced; on a Nov. 13 phone call, the DOJ said "technical difficulties" had resulted in a delay, Judicial Watch stated in a court filing.

The DOJ later changed its story and said it was actually withholding documents "pursuant to an Order issued by the Honorable Tanya S. Chutkan who is presiding over a related sealed criminal matter," prosecutors said in a Dec. 5 filing.

Comment: Indeed, Imran Awan's activities is one of the real scandals that was lost in the fog of Russiagate. Kudos to Judicial Watch for staying on top of it.


Light Saber

Defense lawyers complain about lack of access to Assange in jail

julian Assange
© REUTERS / Peter Nicholls
Julian Assange has been is custody he was removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London in April.
Defence team say he is unaware of some evidence in his case because of blockage in visits

Julian Assange has been blocked from seeing evidence in his extradition case because his lawyers cannot get sufficient access to him, a court has heard.

The WikiLeaks founder, 48, appeared at Westminster magistrates court by video link on Friday for a hearing to extend his detention in Belmarsh prison, in south-east London.

Comment: Sputnik reports Judge Baraitser refused to intervene to give Assange the ability tp properly prepare his case:
A judge at Westminster Magistrates Court today dismissed an emergency application made by Julian Assange's lawyer asking her to instruct prison authorities to give Assange proper access to his case file, despite being provided with precedent of another judge doing exactly that.

District Judge Vanessa Baraitser was unmoved by Gareth Peirce's submissions that Assange is not able to properly prepare for his case. Peirce, a veteran human rights lawyer, provided the court with precedent of a judge from the Central Criminal Court of England and Wales (aka the 'Old Bailey') who recently intervened with prison authorities to ensure an imprisoned defendant had better access to his lawyers and case file.

At the last administrative hearing, on 18 November, Judge Baraitser dismissed concerns raised by Peirce over the unsuitability of the computer equipment which was provided to the WikiLeaks publisher, which he only received "after months of battle." At that hearing Baraitser said that she had, "no jurisdiction over the conditions over which he is held."
assange baraitser
© Elizabeth Cook/PA
A court artist’s sketch of Julian Assange facing the district judge Vanessa Baraitser, in his October 2019 hearing at Westminster magistrates court.
Despite hearing of this new precedent which Assange's lawyer said meant that Judge Baraitser could intervene with prison authorities, the Judge said the most she would do would be to state in open court that "it would be very helpful if" Assange was provided proper access to his lawyers and his case file.

Peirce contrasted what Judge Baraitser is prepared to do with the Old Bailey judge who "is on the phone to [Belmarsh] prison saying 'do it'".
"It could be done [with Belmarsh prison]" she told Sputnik, "that's the whole point, that's the whole point", she said.
Peirce: Assange is Being Denied the Ability to Properly Prepare for His Case

The case summary, which will be submitted by Assange's legal team to the Court on 19 December, is a "dense document" with "potentially 20 witnesses" and "recently acquired evidence", his lawyer said. "Mr Assange has not had the chance to review the summary let alone other evidence" Peirce told the court, noting that "to do it we would need proper time."

"The logistics are unfortunately not achievable, Mr Assange is not being given what he needed and we are doing our utmost," Peirce told Judge Baraitser.

But the Judge appeared to play down the significance of the case summary by asking Peirce whether she, "would agree that it is perhaps less important that that information is gone through in any detail [by Assange] because it is a preliminary summary which we wouldn't hold you to?" Peirce pushed back telling the court that the summary was "extremely detailed" and is the product of "intense consultation and conferences with counsel" and which is "predicated on underlying evidence which Mr Assange has not reviewed."

Peirce said that 18 December "is the only day Belmarsh [prison authorities] have given for a visit which puts in jeopardy the [case] timetable." She proceeded to emphasise that the document "isn't a standalone document, it's a document to inform the court so that it can carry out its objective on case management."

Baraitser repeated that she would only go as far as to note her "clear statement" that it would be "very helpful" if prison authorities ensured Assange had access to what he needed.



Eye 1

Assange lawyer discloses conditions for British justice to rethink his extradition

Assange protest
© REUTERS/Hannah McKay
A Spanish judge will question Julian Assange on a Spain-based security firm thought to have spied on him in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. His lawyer hopes it may help thwart the WikiLeaks founder's extradition to the US.

Set for next week, the questioning is part of a criminal inquiry the Spanish High Court is carrying out into UC Global, a private security company suspected of gathering surveillance on Assange and passing it further to US intelligence services.

"December 20 is an important day," Aitor Martinez, a lawyer in charge of defending Assange in Spain, told Russia's RIA Novosti news agency. The Spanish judge will go to Westminster Magistrates Court "to receive a video conference testimony from Mr Assange as a victim of the alleged spy plot," he revealed.

The firm's name surfaced this summer when El Pais newspaper reported that it was eavesdropping on Assange during his exile at the Ecuadorian diplomatic mission in London. Citing recordings it has had access to, the paper alleged that the firm - tasked to guard the embassy - specifically focused on Assange's legal matters discussions.

Newspaper

Turkey summons US envoy over resolution declaring Armenian killings as genocide

Armenia

Rights activists hold placards picturing Armenian intellectuals detained and deported in 1915, during a rally in Istanbul in April 2016.
Turkey has summoned the U.S. ambassador to Ankara over a resolution passed by U.S. lawmakers recognizing the mass killing of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire a century ago as genocide.

Turkish Deputy Foreign Minister Sedat Onal conveyed Turkey's dismay over the move to envoy David Satterfield, the Foreign Ministry said on December 13, the day after the U.S. Senate unanimously passed the resolution.

The House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a similar nonbinding measure in October.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian expressed his "gratitude" on behalf of the Armenian people for this "important and historic decision."

Comment: It's notable that recently Turkey has displeased the US what with it's purchase of Russia's S-400s and its veto's at NATO:


Bizarro Earth

Someone Meddled in the UK Election & It Wasn't Russia

UK news
Ladies and gentlemen I have here at my fingertips indisputable proof that egregious election meddling took place in the United Kingdom on Thursday.

Before you get all excited, no, it wasn't the Russians. It wasn't the Chinese, the Iranians, Cobra Command or the Legion of Doom. I'm not going to get any Rachel Maddow-sized paychecks for revealing this evidence to you, nor am I going to draw in millions of credulous viewers waiting with bated breath for a bombshell revelation of an international conspiracy that will invalidate the results of the election.

In fact, hardly anyone will even care.

Hardly anyone will care because this election interference has been happening right out in the open, and was perfectly legal. And nobody will suffer any consequences for it.

Comment: The evidence is damning, and yet, as the saying goes: "Every nation gets the government it deserves."

See also:


Newspaper

Russia retaliates by declaring 2 German Embassy diplomats personae non gratae over Berlin murder case

Russian Foreign Ministry
© Sputnik / Natalya Seliverstova
FILE PHOTO. The building of the Russian Foreign Ministry in Moscow.
Moscow has decided to expel two German diplomats working at the embassy in Russia, the Foreign Ministry announced on Thursday. The mirror action was anticipated after a similar move was made by Berlin last week.

Berlin declared two Russian diplomats serving in the Russian Embassy personae non gratae for "not sufficiently cooperating" with a German criminal investigation. The failure, Berlin believes, indicates that Moscow, or the authorities of Russia's Republic of Chechnya, may have had a hand in it.

A 40-year-old man was gunned down in Berlin in August. The German media identified the victim as Zelimkhan Khangoshvili, a former militant commander who fought on the side of terrorists in Russia's southern republic of Chechnya.

Comment: See also:


Rocket

How India's new ballistic missile sub changes regional power balance

Modi - INS Arihant
© Global Look Press
INS Arihant is seen on a screen behind India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
India is gearing up to test-fire its most potent home-made ballistic missile in the coming days. The missile is an upgrade to the country's nuclear deterrence arsenal, but the submarine that fires it is a game-changer.

The K-4 submarine-launched missile has a range of 3,500 km and is scheduled for testing in mid-December, according to sources cited by the Economic Times. Previous tests scheduled for November had been scuppered by a cyclone off India's eastern coast. A successful test would bring the nuclear-capable missile significantly closer to operational status.

However, the weapon would be useless without a platform to launch it from, and this is where India's first home-built ballistic missile submarine enters the picture.