Welcome to Sott.net
Mon, 08 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Evil Rays

Eva Bartlett: How the MSM whitewashed al-Qaeda and White Helmets in Syria

White Helmets Netflix still
© Netflix
On December 18, 2017, the Guardian issued a shoddily-penned hatchet piece against British journalist Vanessa Beeley, Patrick Henningsen and his independent website 21st Century Wire, Australian professor and writer Tim Anderson, and myself.

Many insightful writers have since deconstructed the lies and omissions of the article, which I will link to at the bottom of my own.

Judging by the scathing comments on the Guardian's Facebook post, the general public didn't buy it either. The Guardian, like Channel 4 News and Snopes, whitewashes terrorism in Syria, employs non-sequitur arguments, promotes war propaganda, and simply gets the facts wrong.

As the purported theme of the The Guardian's story was the issue of rescuers in Syria, I'll begin by talking about actual rescuers I know and worked with, in hellish circumstances in Gaza.

Laptop

Clinton-Obama emails: Understanding why Hillary wasn't indicted

ObamaClinton
© YouTube
New FBI texts highlight a motive to conceal the president's involvement.

From the first, these columns have argued that the whitewash of the Hillary Clinton-emails caper was President Barack Obama's call - not the FBI's, and not the Justice Department's. (See, e.g., here, here, and here.) The decision was inevitable. Obama, using a pseudonymous email account, had repeatedly communicated with Secretary Clinton over her private, non-secure email account.

These emails must have involved some classified information, given the nature of consultations between presidents and secretaries of state, the broad outlines of Obama's own executive order defining classified intelligence (see EO 13526, section 1.4), and the fact that the Obama administration adamantly refused to disclose the Clinton-Obama emails. If classified information was mishandled, it was necessarily mishandled on both ends of these email exchanges.

If Clinton had been charged, Obama's culpable involvement would have been patent. In any prosecution of Clinton, the Clinton-Obama emails would have been in the spotlight. For the prosecution, they would be more proof of willful (or, if you prefer, grossly negligent) mishandling of intelligence. More significantly, for Clinton's defense, they would show that Obama was complicit in Clinton's conduct yet faced no criminal charges.

Comment: Bottom line: All involved are banking on the fact that Killary is essentially immune from prosecution. What happens when many of those who made this decision are, themselves, thrown under the justice bus? For surely this house of cards will come tumbling.


Biohazard

US spins another 'convenient' chemical attack yarn

Syria skullcross
© The Sleuth Journal
The latest spat between Washington and Moscow over how reports of chemical weapon attacks in Syria should be investigated seems to be just an episode in which US political necessities trump transparency in policy-making.

On Monday, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson blamed Russia for a suspected chlorine gas attack in a Damascus neighborhood. The incident was reported by anti-Damascus groups, which said the Syrian Army had attacked civilians. Tillerson used the reports to showcase Russia's supposed bad behavior in Syria, and said "whoever conducted the attacks, Russia ultimately bears responsibility for the victims."

The word "whoever" stands for "whichever actors in league with the President Bashar Assad regime," since, according to Washington's apparent reasoning, the only plausible scenario is that bad regime guys attacked innocent civilians, because why not? Alternatives, ranging from false flag operation to accidental release of the gas, which is not a chemical weapon in itself and is used in many civilian applications, were absent from Tillerson's rhetorical exercise. This was not surprising, considering that he was speaking at an event dedicated to circumventing Russia's veto at the UN Security Council in assigning blame for chemical attacks in Syria on Damascus.

Tillerson's message was quite clear: since Moscow supports Damascus, whatever happens in the territory that the Syrian government claims to control is Moscow's fault. Of course, by the same logic, US hands are covered in the blood of whoever was killed by the weapons, which the US supplied to rebels forces and which ended up in jihadist hands. But it is doubtful that Tillerson would ever publicly acknowledge responsibility for those deaths or many others that can be traced back to US foreign policy.

Comment: See also:


X

From flawed FBI probes to 'secret societies', the Russiagate scenario is imploding

beargate
© unknown/KJN
The anti-Russia narrative is collapsing under the growing weight of evidence pointing to a concerted internal effort on the part of the US establishment to sabotage the Trump presidency.

Russiagate - the ongoing American witch hunt that imagines the Kremlin behind everything, up to and including Donald Trump's presence in the Oval Office - is starting to resemble a Russian matryoshka stacking doll.

On the outer shell of this multilayered plaything, the media has painted for us an ominous image of Russia, which, they would have us believe, is the bogeyman responsible for hacking Hillary Clinton's computer, and hypnotizing US voters over their Facebook and Twitter accounts, thereby giving Trump a free ride into the White House.

Yet as we begin to pry open each layer of this extremely convoluted story we discover to our surprise that there is absolutely nothing inside even remotely connected to Russia. Nothing. A big nothing matryoska.


Comment: So far: No rest or arrest for the wicked. The FISA document, if uncontaminated, may be the impetus to end this government fiasco and, on the flip side, commence the prosecution of actual criminals.


Snakes in Suits

Biden: McConnell refused to sign the bipartisan statement on Russian interference

BidenatCFR
© Alex Brandon/AP
Former VP Joe Biden
Former Vice President Joe Biden says he and President Barack Obama decided not to speak out publicly on Russian interference during the 2016 campaign after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to sign a bipartisan statement condemning the Kremlin's role.

Speaking on Tuesday at the Council on Foreign Relations, Biden said the Obama administration sought a united front to dispel concerns that going public with such accusations would be seen as an effort to undermine the legitimacy of the election.

However, McConnell "wanted no part of having a bipartisan commitment saying, essentially, 'Russia's doing this. Stop,' " he said.


Comment: Oh this is rich. Mum was the word because B&O thought Hillary was going to win. Then blame it on McConnell.


At that point, Biden added, he felt that "the die had been cast" and that "this was all about the political play."

"Can you imagine if the president called a press conference in October, with this fella, Bannon, and company, and said, 'Tell you what: Russians are trying to interfere in our elections and we have to do something about it,' " he said. "Would things have gotten better, or would it further look like we were trying to de-legitimize the electoral process, because of our opponent? Had we known what we knew three weeks later, we may have done something more," Biden added.


Comment: Exactly what they tried to do.


Comment: The ex-VP Gaffinator resorts to a tactic known as CMA (cover my ass).


Snakes in Suits

The GOP escalates law enforcement probes while Russia inquiry heats up

Bob Goodlatte
© Jacquelyn Martin/AP Photo
Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R. VA
Amid new signs that special counsel Robert Mueller is pursuing an obstruction of justice case against President Donald Trump, Republicans in Congress have intensified their own investigations of the Justice Department's and FBI's handling of inquiries into Trump's ties to Russia.

Tuesday brought several dramatic developments in the Russia saga, including the news that Mueller recently interviewed Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the first Cabinet official known to be questioned in the investigation. The New York Times also reported that former FBI Director James Comey was interviewed by Mueller last year.

But even as Mueller showed apparent momentum, Republicans made new charges of political bias and even potential criminal misconduct in the nation's top law enforcement agencies.

On Fox News, Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), chairman of the House committee that oversees the Justice Department and FBI, alleged an anti-Trump "conspiracy" by FBI agents whose text message exchanges have been made public in selective bursts by GOP lawmakers.

"Some of these texts are very disturbing," Goodlatte said, adding, "They illustrate a conspiracy on the part of some people, and we want to know a lot more about that."

Comment: See also:


Mr. Potato

Cameron caught admitting Brexit isn't the disaster he said it would be

David Cameron
© Yves Herman / Reuters
David Cameron has been caught telling a steel tycoon that Brexit is not the "disaster" he expected. Unaware he was being filmed, the ex-PM also said that leaving the EU had "turned out less badly than we first thought."

The off-guard comments were captured on camera at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. In the footage, Cameron appears engrossed in conversation with Indian-British steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal, estimated to be the fourth-richest person in the UK.

In footage highlighted by Five News, Mittal observed that Brexit was the topic of the moment, and Cameron responded: "[Brexit] is frustrating. As I keep saying, it's a mistake not a disaster. It's turned out less badly than we first thought," the former PM said. "But it's still going to be difficult."

Cameron also told Mittal that in his post-political career he was keeping "busy" leading a billion-pound investment initiative agreed between the UK and China, as well as writing a book.

Attention

Justice Dept escalates sanctuary city crackdown threatening to issue subpoenas or cut off federal grant funds

jeff sessions
Returning to a favorite cause for President Trump and Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions, the Justice Department on Wednesday escalated a struggle with two dozen so-called sanctuary jurisdictions, demanding records proving they are cooperating with immigration enforcement agencies.

The department sent letters to 23 states, cities and counties, including California, Los Angeles and Chicago, demanding records showing whether law enforcement officers are sharing information with federal agents on the immigration status of people in their custody.

If the local jurisdictions don't comply, the department says it will issue subpoenas or possibly cut off certain federal grant funds.

A crackdown on sanctuary jurisdictions was one of the first measures ordered by Trump a year ago, and Sessions has repeatedly focused on the policies, which he says are a hazard to public safety.

But little concrete has happened.

Comment: See also:


Star of David

Review: 'Ten Myths about Israel', by Ilan Pappe

Ilan Pappe

Ilan Pappe
The Middle East remains a subject of increasing examination and debate. The prospects for peace between Israelis and Palestinians seem to be receding. Early in 2018, Israel's ruling Likud Party unanimously endorsed a resolution calling for the annexation of West Bank settlements. This decision marked the latest step by Likud to distance itself from the internationally backed idea of establishing an independent Palestinian state as part of a future peace agreement. Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan declared: "We are telling the world that it doesn't matter what the nations of the world say. The time has come to express our biblical right to the land."

Much of the world's understanding of the conflicting claims to historic Palestine is confused. We have heard over the years of "an Israeli narrative" and a "Palestinian narrative." There have been too few efforts to understand what really has happened in this region, and to arrive at some agreement about where myth ends and facts begin. In this book, written on the 50th anniversary of Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, Professor Ilan Pappe, an Israeli historian now teaching at the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom, examines the most contested ideas concerning the origins and identity of the contemporary state of Israel.

The "ten myths" that Pappe explores reinforce the regional status quo. He explores the claim that Palestine was an empty land at the time of the Balfour Declaration, as well as the formation of Zionism and its role in the early decades of nation building. He asks whether the Palestinians voluntarily left their homeland in 1948, and whether June 1967 was a war of "no choice." Turning to the myths surrounding the failures of the Camp David Accords and the official reasons for the attacks on Gaza, he explains why the two state solution, in his view, is no longer viable.

Snakes in Suits

'You should be happy to have a job': Bezos tells WaPo staffers fighting for wage increases to sit down and shut up

jeff bezos devil

Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon, richest man in the world
The narrative casting Jeff Bezos as a transformative media baron reached new heights in 2017. His Washington Post consistently set the political agenda while claiming two straight years of profitability. Bezos himself glowed on the red carpet as an improbable journalism hero when Steven Spielberg's The Post, a fictionalized account of the newspaper's publication of The Pentagon Papers, opened in December.

Bezos is worth $111 billion. He is the richest man in the world. But over the past eight months, his prized media outlet has repeatedly stymied requests for better pay and benefits from the employees who've driven its renaissance. The paper's union, the Washington-Baltimore NewsGuild, remains locked in a tense contract dispute, union reps told Splinter, with management ceding little ground in negotiations over annual raises, improved retirement plans, and other workplace protections. Hanging over the talks is the question of how to pressure an owner whose purchase of the newspaper is widely credited for pulling it back from the brink.

"Many of the employees see Jeff Bezos as a savior to the company," David DeJesus, a longtime advertising staffer who co-chairs the Post's bargaining unit of about 880 editorial and business-side employees, told Splinter. "People are a little bit hesitant to be openly critical of him because of it."

Comment: WaPo staffers who have been paying attention to what is going on at Amazon shouldn't be at all surprised: